| Literature DB >> 28036331 |
Lena Berchtold1,2, Belen Ponte2, Solange Moll3, Karine Hadaya2, Olivia Seyde3, Matthias Bachtler4, Jean-Paul Vallée5, Pierre-Yves Martin2, Andreas Pasch4, Sophie de Seigneux2.
Abstract
Renal interstitial fibrosis and arterial lesions predict loss of function in chronic kidney disease. Noninvasive estimation of interstitial fibrosis and vascular lesions is currently not available. The aim of the study was to determine whether phosphocalcic markers are associated with, and can predict, renal chronic histological changes. We included 129 kidney allograft recipients with an available transplant biopsy in a retrospective study. We analyzed the associations and predictive values of phosphocalcic markers and serum calcification propensity (T50) for chronic histological changes (interstitial fibrosis and vascular lesions). PTH, T50 and vitamin D levels were independently associated to interstitial fibrosis. PTH elevation was associated with increasing interstitial fibrosis severity (r = 0.29, p = 0.001), while T50 and vitamin D were protective (r = -0.20, p = 0.025 and r = -0.23, p = 0.009 respectively). On the contrary, fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) and Klotho correlated only modestly with interstitial fibrosis (p = 0.045) whereas calcium and phosphate did not. PTH, vitamin D and T50 were predictors of extensive fibrosis (AUC: 0.73, 0.72 and 0.68 respectively), but did not add to renal function prediction. PTH, FGF23 and T50 were modestly predictive of low fibrosis (AUC: 0.63, 0.63 and 0.61) but did not add to renal function prediction. T50 decreased with increasing arterial lesions (r = -0.21, p = 0.038). The discriminative performance of T50 in predicting significant vascular lesions was modest (AUC 0.61). In summary, we demonstrated that PTH, vitamin D and T50 are associated to interstitial fibrosis and vascular lesions in kidney allograft recipients independently of renal function. Despite these associations, mineral metabolism indices do not show superiority or additive value to fibrosis prediction by eGFR and proteinuria in kidney allograft recipients, except for vascular lesions where T50 could be of relevance.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28036331 PMCID: PMC5201285 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167929
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Baseline characteristics of the study population (n = 129): clinical parameters, medication and laboratory measurements.
| Characteristics | Value |
|---|---|
| Age, years | 57.0 (46.0–69.1) |
| Male, n (%) | 78 (60) |
| Body mass index, kg/m2 | 25.3 ± 4.6 |
| Caucasian, n (%) | 123 (95) |
| Deceased donor transplant, n (%) | 80 (62) |
| History of acute rejection, n (%) | 49 (38) |
| Graft vintage, years | 5.0 (2.0–12.0) |
| Systolic BP, mmHg | 132 ± 17 |
| Diastolic BP, mmHg | 79 ± 12 |
| Current smoker, n (%) | 12 (9.3) |
| Diabetes | 8 (6.2) |
| Hypertension | 27 (20.9) |
| Glomerulonephritis | 29 (22.5) |
| Polycystic kidney disease | 24 (18.6) |
| Others (tubulointerstitial nephritis, reflux, …) | 68 (52.7) |
| ACEi/ARB | 66 (51.2) |
| Calcium channel blockers | 57 (44.2) |
| Diuretics | 14 (10.9) |
| Beta-blockers | 72 (55.8) |
| Statins | 85 (66.9) |
| Calcium supplementation | 91 (70.5) |
| 1.25OH-vitamin D supplementation | 15 (11.6) |
| 25OH-vitamin D supplementation | 113 (87.6) |
| Creatinine, micromol/l | 128 ± 47 |
| eGFR ml/min per 1.73m2
| 55 ± 20 |
| Albumin, g/l | 37.2 ± 3.5 |
| Corrected calcium, mmol/l | 2.4 ± 0.14 |
| Phosphate, mmol/l | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
| Magnesium, mmol/l | 0.72 ± 0.1 |
| 25-hydroxyvitamin D, nmol/l (n = 125) | 68 ± 22 |
| Parathyroid hormone, pmol/l(n = 126) | 8.5 (6.0–10.8) |
| Hemoglobin, g/l | 129 ± 15 |
| FGF23, RU/ml | 39.3 (27.7–54.6) |
| Klotho, pg/ml | 744 ± 246 |
| T50, min | 285 ± 61 |
| Spot urine protein/creatinine ratios, g/24h (n = 119) | 0.12 (0.07–0.25) |
| Albuminuria, n (%) | |
| • <30 mg/g | 55 (42.6) |
| • 30-300mg/g | 51 (39.5) |
| • >300mg/g | 23 (17.8) |
Values reported as numbers and %, mean±SD, or median (interquartile ranges) as appropriate.
*One patient may have more than one etiology to their kidney disease.
**eGFR (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate) was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.
ACEi/ARB, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin II receptor blocker.BP: Blood Pressure; FGF23: Fibroblast growth factor 23; T50: Calcification propensity.
Baseline characteristics of the study population (n = 129): biopsy indication, biopsy diagnosis and chronic histological lesions.
| Characteristic | Value |
|---|---|
| Protocol biopsies | 115 (89.1) |
| Creatinine increase | 6 (4.7) |
| De Novo Proteinuria | 4 (3.1) |
| Increase in creatinine and proteinuria | 3 (2.3) |
| De Novo Donnor Specific Antibodies | 1 (0.8) |
| Rejection | 13 (10.1) |
| Tubulo-interstitial lesions | 10 (7.8) |
| Immunological glomerulonephritis | 22 (17.1) |
| Diabetic nephropathy | 7 (5.4) |
| Hypertensive nephropathy | 6 (4.7) |
| Anticalcineurin toxicity | 36 (27.9) |
| Chronic allograft nephropathy | 4 (3.1) |
| Others (vascular lesions, …) | 31 (24) |
| Fibrosis in % | 24.3 ± 15.7 |
| BANFF score | |
| • IF/TA | 2 (2–4) |
| • Vascular lesions (cv + ah + aah), min 0 –max 9 | 3 (1–4) |
| Von Kossa (%) | |
| • Positive, n (%) | 8 (9) |
Values reported as number and %, mean±SD, or median (interquartile ranges) as appropriate.
* One biopsy may have more than one diagnosis.
aInterstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy.
ah: arteriolar hyaline thickening; aah: circumferential hyaline arteriolar thickening; cv: vascular fibrous intimal thickening.
Fig 1Correlations between phosphocalcic biomarkers, T50 and interstitial fibrosis in renal allograft recipients (n = 129).
Scatter plot graphs of (A) calcium, (B) phosphate, (C) vitamin D, (D) ln PTH, (E) ln FGF23, (F) Klotho, (G) T50, (H) eGFR versus interstitial fibrosis. Each symbol represents one patient. The continuous line indicates least-square linear regression. eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; FGF23: Fibroblast growth factor 23; PTH: parathyroid hormone; T50: Calcification propensity; Ln: log-transformed.
Associations of serum biomarkers with interstitial fibrosis in kidney allograft recipients (n = 129).
Univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis.
| Biomarkers | Coefficient | 95% CI | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | 9.40 | -10.0 to 28.8 | 0.34 |
| Model 1 | 9.61 | -9.72 to 28.9 | 0.33 |
| Model 2 | 9.03 | -10.5 to 28.6 | 0.36 |
| Model 3 | 9.55 | -9.15 to 28.3 | 0.31 |
| Model 4 | 10.1 | -10.1 to 30.2 | 0.32 |
| Unadjusted | 8.96 | -2.71 to 20.6 | 0.131 |
| Model 1 | 19.0 | 6.75 to 31.3 | 0.003 |
| Model 2 | 16.0 | 3.26 to 28.7 | 0.014 |
| Model 3 | 11.1 | -1.28 to 23.5 | 0.078 |
| Model 4 | 12.4 | -1.11 to 25.9 | 0.072 |
| Unadjusted | 9.36 | 3.81 to 14.9 | 0.001 |
| Model 1 | 10.8 | 4.79 to 16.7 | 0.001 |
| Model 2 | 9.14 | 2.87 to 15.4 | 0.005 |
| Model 3 | 7.68 | 1.58 to 13.8 | 0.014 |
| Model 4 | 7.59 | 0.98 to 14.2 | 0.025 |
| Unadjusted | -0.16 | -0.29 to -0.04 | 0.009 |
| Model 1 | -0.12 | -0.24 to 0.002 | 0.054 |
| Model 2 | -0.14 | -0.26 to -0.02 | 0.024 |
| Model 3 | -0.15 | -0.27 to -0.03 | 0.012 |
| Model 4 | -0.15 | -0.27 to -0.02 | 0.022 |
| Unadjusted | -0.01 | -0.02 to 0.0002 | 0.045 |
| Model 1 | -0.01 | -0.02 to 0.002 | 0.129 |
| Model 2 | -0.01 | -0.02 to 0.003 | 0.161 |
| Model 3 | -0.005 | -0.02 to 0.006 | 0.374 |
| Model 4 | -0.005 | -0.02 to 0.007 | 0.426 |
| Unadjusted | 4.69 | 0.10 to 9.28 | 0.045 |
| Model 1 | 2.73 | -1.99 to 7.45 | 0.255 |
| Model 2 | 2.36 | -2.38 to 7.09 | 0.327 |
| Model 3 | -0.51 | -5.31 to 4.29 | 0.834 |
| Model 4 | -0.51 | -5.54 to 4.52 | 0.841 |
| Unadjusted | -0.05 | -0.10 to -0.01 | 0.025 |
| Model 1 | -0.06 | -0.11 to -0.02 | 0.005 |
| Model 3 | -0.04 | -0.09 to -0.003 | 0.036 |
| Model 4 | -0.04 | -0.09 to 0.0005 | 0.053 |
Model 1: adjusted for calcium, phosphate, log PTH, vitamin D; Model 2: adjusted for model 1 and Klotho and FGF23; Model 3: adjusted for model 2 and diabetes, HTA, graft vintage and eGRF; Model 4: adjusted for model 3 and proteinuria (n = 119)
a not adjusted for calcium
b not adjusted for phosphate
c not adjusted for PTH
d not adjusted for vitamin D
e not adjusted for Klotho
fnot adjusted for FGF23
gnot adjusted for calcium and phosphate
hnot adjusted for Klotho and FGF23.
CI: confidence interval; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate.
FGF23: Fibroblast growth factor 23; HTA: hypertension; PTH: parathyroid hormone; T50: Calcification propensity.
Ln: logarithmic transformation.
Fig 2ROC curves of ln FGF23, ln PTH, T50, proteinuria and eGFR in predicting fibrosis ≤20%.
ROC curve analysis of ln FGF23 (Fig 2A), ln PTH (Fig 2B), T50 (Fig 2C), proteinuria (Fig 2D), eGFR (Fig 2E) for the prediction of fibrosis ≤20%. (2F): ROC cuvre analysis of ln FGF23, ln PTH and T50 combined for the prediction of fibrosis ≤20%. As T50 and eGFR are markers that are negatively associated with fibrosis, we used the opposite values of those markers. AUC: Area Under the Curve; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; FGF23: Fibroblast growth factor 23; Ln: log-transformed; PTH: parathyroid hormone; ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic; T50: Calcification propensity.
Fig 3ROC curves of T50, 25D, PTH, proteinuria and eGFR in predicting Fibrosis >40%.
As T50, vitamin D and eGFR are markers that are negatively associated with fibrosis, we used the opposite values of those markers. (3A-B-C-D-E) Separate ROC curves for ln PTH, T50, 25D, proteinuria and eGFR (3F) ROC curve for ln PTH, 25D and T50 combined. 25D: 25-hydroxyvitamin D; AUC: Area Under the Curve; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; Ln: log-transformed; PTH: parathyroid hormone; ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic; T50: Calcification propensity.
Fig 4Phosphocalcic biomarkers and T50 associate with chronic vascular lesions as assessed by banff (ah+aah+cv) in renal allograft recipients.
Scatter plot graphs of (A) calcium, (B) phosphate, (C) vitamin D, (D) ln PTH, (E) ln FGF23, (F) Klotho, (G) T50, (H) eGFR versus vascular lesions. Each symbol represents one patient. The continuous line indicates least-square linear regression. Ah: arteriolar hyaline thickening; aah: circumferential hyaline arteriolar thickening; cv: vascular fibrous intimal thickening; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate; Ln: log-transformed; PTH: parathyroid hormone; T50: Calcification propensity.
Associations of T50 with vascular lesions in kidney allograft recipients (n = 129), univariate and multivariate linear regression analysis.
| Biomarkers | Coefficient | 95% CI | p Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Unadjusted | -0.007 | -0.014 to 0.0004 | 0.038 |
| Model 1 | -0.007 | -0.014 to 0.00003 | 0.051 |
| Model 3 | -0.006 | -0.012 to -0.00004 | 0.048 |
| Model 4 | -0.006 | -0.012 to 0.0003 | 0.062 |
Model 1: adjusted for ln PTH and vitamin D; Model 3: adjusted for model 1 and diabetes, HTA, graft vintage, eGFR; Model 4: adjusted for model 3 and proteinuria (n = 119); CI: confidence interval; eGFR: estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate was calculated according to the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation.
HTA: hypertension; PTH: parathyroid hormone; T50: Calcification propensity.
Fig 5Vascular lesions estimated by BANFF: ROC curve of (5A) T50 and (5B) proteinuria in predicting significant vascular lesions (BANFF cv+ah+aah >5).
(5C) ROC curve of T50 and proteinuria combined. Ah: arteriolar hyaline thickening; aah: circumferential hyaline arteriolar thickening; AUC: Area Under the Curve; cv: vascular fibrous intimal thickening; ROC: Receiver Operating Characteristic; T50: Calcification propensity.