Literature DB >> 28035770

Validation of Body Condition Indices and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance in Estimating Body Composition in a Small Lizard.

Daniel A Warner1,2, Maria S Johnson3, Tim R Nagy3.   

Abstract

Measurements of body condition are typically used to assess an individual's quality, health, or energetic state. Most indices of body condition are based on linear relationships between body length and mass. Although these indices are simple to obtain, nonlethal, and useful indications of energetic state, their accuracy at predicting constituents of body condition (e.g., fat and lean mass) are often unknown. The objectives of this research were to (1) validate the accuracy of another simple and noninvasive method, quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR), at estimating body composition in a small-bodied lizard, Anolis sagrei, and (2) evaluate the accuracy of two indices of body condition (based on length-mass relationships) at predicting body fat, lean, and water mass. Comparisons of results from QMR scans to those from chemical carcass analysis reveal that QMR measures body fat, lean, and water mass with excellent accuracy in male and female lizards. With minor calibration from regression equations, QMR will be a reliable method of estimating body composition of A. sagrei. Body condition indices were positively related to absolute estimates of each constituent of body composition, but these relationships showed considerable variation around regression lines. In addition, condition indices did not predict fat, lean, or water mass when adjusted for body mass. Thus, our results emphasize the need for caution when interpreting body condition based upon linear measurements of animals. Overall, QMR provides an alternative noninvasive method for accurately measuring fat, lean, and water mass in these small-bodied animals.
© 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28035770      PMCID: PMC5349178          DOI: 10.1002/jez.2053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol        ISSN: 1932-5223


  19 in total

1.  Non-invasive measure of body composition of snakes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Stephen M Secor; Tim R Nagy
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Resistance to nutritional stress in ants: when being fat is advantageous.

Authors:  Audrey Dussutour; Laure-Anne Poissonnier; Jerome Buhl; Stephen J Simpson
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 3.312

3.  Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) for determination of body composition in rats.

Authors:  M S Johnson; D L Smith; T R Nagy
Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res       Date:  2009-09

4.  Second-hand eating? Maternal perception of the food environment affects reproductive investment in mice.

Authors:  Tonia S Schwartz; Renee Gainer; Erik D Dohm; Maria S Johnson; J Michael Wyss; David B Allison
Journal:  Obesity (Silver Spring)       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.002

5.  Physical performance and Darwinian fitness in lizards.

Authors:  Jean-François Le Galliard; Jean Clobert; Régis Ferrière
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-11-25       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Developmental stress has sex-specific effects on nestling growth and adult metabolic rates but no effect on adult body size or body composition in song sparrows.

Authors:  Kim L Schmidt; Elizabeth A Macdougall-Shackleton; Scott A Macdougall-Shackleton
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2012-06-12       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Variation in body condition during the post-moult foraging trip of southern elephant seals and its consequences on diving behaviour.

Authors:  Gaëtan Richard; Jade Vacquié-Garcia; Joffrey Jouma'a; Baptiste Picard; Alexandre Génin; John P Y Arnould; Frédéric Bailleul; Christophe Guinet
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.312

8.  Quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) method for bone and whole-body-composition analysis.

Authors:  Gersh Z Taicher; Frank C Tinsley; Arcady Reiderman; Mark L Heiman
Journal:  Anal Bioanal Chem       Date:  2003-09-16       Impact factor: 4.142

9.  Evaluating indices of body condition in two cricket species.

Authors:  Clint D Kelly; Brittany R Tawes; Amy M Worthington
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2014-11-11       Impact factor: 2.912

10.  Body Condition Indices Predict Reproductive Success but Not Survival in a Sedentary, Tropical Bird.

Authors:  Olga Milenkaya; Daniel H Catlin; Sarah Legge; Jeffrey R Walters
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  5 in total

1.  Artificial light at night increases growth and reproductive output in Anolis lizards.

Authors:  Christopher J Thawley; Jason J Kolbe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  University of Alabama at Birmingham Nathan Shock Center: comparative energetics of aging.

Authors:  Steven N Austad; Thomas W Buford; David B Allison; Scott W Ballinger; Andrew W Brown; Christy S Carter; Victor M Darley-Usmar; John L Hartman; Timothy R Nagy; Daniel L Smith; Liou Sun; Jianhua Zhang
Journal:  Geroscience       Date:  2021-07-25       Impact factor: 7.713

3.  Fire reduces parasite load in a Mediterranean lizard.

Authors:  Lola Álvarez-Ruiz; Josabel Belliure; Xavier Santos; Juli G Pausas
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.530

4.  Protein metabolism and physical fitness are physiological determinants of body condition in Southern European carnivores.

Authors:  Nuno Santos; Mónia Nakamura; Helena Rio-Maior; Francisco Álvares; Jose Ángel Barasona; Luís Miguel Rosalino; Maria João Santos; Margarida Santos-Reis; Pablo Ferreras; Francisco Díaz-Ruiz; Pedro Monterroso
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Heterothermy as a mechanism to offset energetic costs of environmental and homeostatic perturbations.

Authors:  Javier Omar Morales; Nikki Walker; Robin W Warne; Justin G Boyles
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-24       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.