Literature DB >> 20686636

Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) for determination of body composition in rats.

M S Johnson1, D L Smith, T R Nagy.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of quantitative magnetic resonance (QMR) to measure fat and lean mass in conscious rats.
METHODS: Fifty Osborne-Mendel rats (249-770 g) were scanned using the Echo Medical 2 MHz body composition analyzer. Each rat was scanned under six settings (three acquisition times, with and without determination of total water). Precision was determined by the calculated coefficient of variation (CV) of three consecutive scans. Accuracy was determined by comparing the first scan to chemical carcass analysis and analyzed by paired t-tests and least-squares regression analyses. Twenty-five rats were used in the validation study, and 25 in the cross-validation study.
RESULTS: The precision for fat, lean and water at all settings was <1%. QMR significantly overestimated fat (~5%; P<0.0001), and underestimated both lean (~12.5%; P<0.0001) and total water (~5.5%; P<0.0001). All QMR measures were significantly correlated with carcass measures (r(2)>0.99; P<0.0001). Using prediction equations from the validation study with the cross-validation rats, there were no significant differences between QMR fat and carcass fat at any setting (P>0.400). For four of the six QMR settings, there were no significant differences between QMR and carcass lean (P>0.05). For total water, all QMR settings were significantly different than carcass (P<0.05), but only by ~1%.
CONCLUSIONS: QMR showed excellent precision for the determination of fat, lean and water. Despite overestimating fat and underestimating lean and water, all were highly related to carcass values. When tested in the cross-validation group, QMR fat could be accurately predicted at all settings; however, lean mass (two settings) and water were still slightly different (less than 1%).

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20686636      PMCID: PMC2914623     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Body Compos Res        ISSN: 1479-456X


  17 in total

Review 1.  Rodent obesity models: an overview.

Authors:  M Tschöp; M L Heiman
Journal:  Exp Clin Endocrinol Diabetes       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.949

2.  Non-invasive measure of body composition of snakes using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Stephen M Secor; Tim R Nagy
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.320

3.  Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for the measurement of gross body composition in rats.

Authors:  S A Jebb; S W Garland; G Jennings; M Elia
Journal:  Br J Nutr       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 3.718

4.  Whole body composition of rats determined by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry is correlated with chemical analysis.

Authors:  B S Rose; W P Flatt; R J Martin; R D Lewis
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  An evaluation of the use of total body electrical conductivity for the estimation of body composition in adult rats: effect of dietary obesity and adrenalectomy.

Authors:  O Trocki; D J Baer; T W Castonguay
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1995-04

6.  Precision and accuracy of total body bone mass and body composition measurements in the rat using x-ray-based dual photon absorptiometry.

Authors:  S Makan; H S Bayley; C E Webber
Journal:  Can J Physiol Pharmacol       Date:  1997 Oct-Nov       Impact factor: 2.273

7.  Precision and accuracy of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry for determining in vivo body composition of mice.

Authors:  T R Nagy; A L Clair
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2000-08

8.  Recovery of body weight from below "set point" in mature female rats.

Authors:  R B Harris; R J Martin
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 4.798

9.  Comparison of TOBEC-derived total body fat with fat pad weights.

Authors:  J Stenger; C Bielajew
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  1995-02

10.  Evaluation of a quantitative magnetic resonance method for mouse whole body composition analysis.

Authors:  Frank C Tinsley; Gersh Z Taicher; Mark L Heiman
Journal:  Obes Res       Date:  2004-01
View more
  9 in total

1.  Validation of Body Condition Indices and Quantitative Magnetic Resonance in Estimating Body Composition in a Small Lizard.

Authors:  Daniel A Warner; Maria S Johnson; Tim R Nagy
Journal:  J Exp Zool A Ecol Genet Physiol       Date:  2016-12-30

Review 2.  The translation of age-related body composition findings from rodents to humans.

Authors:  Lindsay E Pappas; Tim R Nagy
Journal:  Eur J Clin Nutr       Date:  2018-10-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  In Vivo Determination of Body Composition in Zebrafish (Danio rerio) by Quantitative Magnetic Resonance.

Authors:  L Adele Fowler; Lacey N Dennis; R Jeff Barry; Mickie L Powell; Stephen A Watts; Daniel L Smith
Journal:  Zebrafish       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  Maternal Western diet increases adiposity even in male offspring of obesity-resistant rat dams: early endocrine risk markers.

Authors:  Jennifer B Frihauf; Éva M Fekete; Tim R Nagy; Barry E Levin; Eric P Zorrilla
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.619

5.  Quantitative trait loci affecting liver fat content in mice.

Authors:  Olga Minkina; James M Cheverud; Gloria Fawcett; Clay F Semenkovich; Jane P Kenney-Hunt
Journal:  G3 (Bethesda)       Date:  2012-09-01       Impact factor: 3.154

6.  Characterization of the 5-HT2C receptor agonist lorcaserin on efficacy and safety measures in a rat model of diet-induced obesity.

Authors:  Guy A Higgins; Jill Desnoyer; Annalise Van Niekerk; Leo B Silenieks; Winnie Lau; Sandy Thevarkunnel; Julia Izhakova; Ines Am DeLannoy; Paul J Fletcher; Josepha DeLay; Howard Dobson
Journal:  Pharmacol Res Perspect       Date:  2014-11-07

7.  Carnitine Palmitoyltransferase 1b Deficient Mice Develop Severe Insulin Resistance After Prolonged High Fat Diet Feeding.

Authors:  Teayoun Kim; John F Moore; Jon D Sharer; Kevin Yang; Philip A Wood; Qinglin Yang
Journal:  J Diabetes Metab       Date:  2014

8.  Morphometric parameters predict body fat proportions in common hamsters.

Authors:  Carina Siutz; Thomas Ruf; Stefanie Monecke; Eva Millesi
Journal:  J Mammal       Date:  2021-11-25       Impact factor: 2.416

9.  Acclimation to a High-Salt Diet Is Sex Dependent.

Authors:  Eman Y Gohar; Carmen De Miguel; Ijeoma E Obi; Elizabeth M Daugherty; Kelly A Hyndman; Bryan K Becker; Chunhua Jin; Randee Sedaka; Jermaine G Johnston; Pengyuan Liu; Joshua S Speed; Tanecia Mitchell; Alison J Kriegel; Jennifer S Pollock; David M Pollock
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 6.106

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.