Yun Jiang1, Dan Ma2, Kathryn E Keenan3, Karl F Stupic3, Vikas Gulani1,2, Mark A Griswold1,2. 1. Department of Biomedical Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 2. Department of Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA. 3. Physical Measurement Laboratory, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate accuracy and repeatability of T1 and T2 estimates of a MR fingerprinting (MRF) method using the ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom. METHODS: The ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom contains multiple compartments with standardized T1 , T2 , and proton density values. Conventional inversion-recovery spin echo and spin echo methods were used to characterize the T1 and T2 values in the phantom. The phantom was scanned using the MRF-FISP method over 34 consecutive days. The mean T1 and T2 values were compared with the values from the spin echo methods. The repeatability was characterized as the coefficient of variation of the measurements over 34 days. RESULTS: T1 and T2 values from MRF-FISP over 34 days showed a strong linear correlation with the measurements from the spin echo methods (R2 = 0.999 for T1 ; R2 = 0.996 for T2 ). The MRF estimates over the wide ranges of T1 and T2 values have less than 5% variation, except for the shortest T2 relaxation times where the method still maintains less than 8% variation. CONCLUSION: MRF measurements of T1 and T2 are highly repeatable over time and across wide ranges of T1 and T2 values. Magn Reson Med 78:1452-1457, 2017.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate accuracy and repeatability of T1 and T2 estimates of a MR fingerprinting (MRF) method using the ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom. METHODS: The ISMRM/NIST MRI system phantom contains multiple compartments with standardized T1 , T2 , and proton density values. Conventional inversion-recovery spin echo and spin echo methods were used to characterize the T1 and T2 values in the phantom. The phantom was scanned using the MRF-FISP method over 34 consecutive days. The mean T1 and T2 values were compared with the values from the spin echo methods. The repeatability was characterized as the coefficient of variation of the measurements over 34 days. RESULTS:T1 and T2 values from MRF-FISP over 34 days showed a strong linear correlation with the measurements from the spin echo methods (R2 = 0.999 for T1 ; R2 = 0.996 for T2 ). The MRF estimates over the wide ranges of T1 and T2 values have less than 5% variation, except for the shortest T2 relaxation times where the method still maintains less than 8% variation. CONCLUSION: MRF measurements of T1 and T2 are highly repeatable over time and across wide ranges of T1 and T2 values. Magn Reson Med 78:1452-1457, 2017.
Authors: Philipp Ehses; Nicole Seiberlich; Dan Ma; Felix A Breuer; Peter M Jakob; Mark A Griswold; Vikas Gulani Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-02-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Paul M J McSheehy; Claudia Weidensteiner; Catherine Cannet; Stephane Ferretti; Didier Laurent; Stephan Ruetz; Michael Stumm; Peter R Allegrini Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-12-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephen F Cauley; Kawin Setsompop; Dan Ma; Yun Jiang; Huihui Ye; Elfar Adalsteinsson; Mark A Griswold; Lawrence L Wald Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-08-28 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Dan Ma; Vikas Gulani; Nicole Seiberlich; Kecheng Liu; Jeffrey L Sunshine; Jeffrey L Duerk; Mark A Griswold Journal: Nature Date: 2013-03-14 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Claudia Weidensteiner; Peter R Allegrini; Melanie Sticker-Jantscheff; Vincent Romanet; Stephane Ferretti; Paul M J McSheehy Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2014-02-14 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Sen Ma; Christopher T Nguyen; Fei Han; Nan Wang; Zixin Deng; Nader Binesh; Franklin G Moser; Anthony G Christodoulou; Debiao Li Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2019-11-25 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Yun Jiang; Dan Ma; Himanshu Bhat; Huihui Ye; Stephen F Cauley; Lawrence L Wald; Kawin Setsompop; Mark A Griswold Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2016-12-26 Impact factor: 4.668