Literature DB >> 28033418

Characterisation of Species and Diversity of Anopheles gambiae Keele Colony.

Lisa C Ranford-Cartwright1, Sion McGeechan1, Donald Inch1, Graeme Smart1, Lenka Richterová1, Jonathan M Mwangi1.   

Abstract

Anopheles gambiae sensu stricto was recently reclassified as two species, An. coluzzii and An. gambiae s.s., in wild-caught mosquitoes, on the basis of the molecular form, denoted M or S, of a marker on the X chromosome. The An. gambiae Keele line is an outbred laboratory colony strain that was developed around 12 years ago by crosses between mosquitoes from 4 existing An. gambiae colonies. Laboratory colonies of mosquitoes often have limited genetic diversity because of small starting populations (founder effect) and subsequent fluctuations in colony size. Here we describe the characterisation of the chromosomal form(s) present in the Keele line, and investigate the diversity present in the colony using microsatellite markers on chromosome 3. We also characterise the large 2La inversion on chromosome 2. The results indicate that only the M-form of the chromosome X marker is present in the Keele colony, which was unexpected given that 3 of the 4 parent colonies were probably S-form. Levels of diversity were relatively high, as indicated by a mean number of microsatellite alleles of 6.25 across 4 microsatellites, in at least 25 mosquitoes. Both karyotypes of the inversion on chromosome 2 (2La/2L+a) were found to be present at approximately equal proportions. The Keele colony has a mixed M- and S-form origin, and in common with the PEST strain, we propose continuing to denote it as an An. gambiae s.s. line.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28033418      PMCID: PMC5199079          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Anopheles gambiae sensu lato is the major vector of malaria in sub-saharan Africa, consisting of eight morphologically indistinguishable species. An. gambiae sensu stricto exists in two molecular forms, denoted M and S, which can be distinguished by differences in a 4Mb region located centromerically on the X chromosome, including fixed SNPs within 2.3kb intergenic spacer region in the multicopy rDNA located on the X chromosome [1,2], or an M-specific insertion of a short interspersed transposable element (SINE200) [3]. Recently it was proposed that the M- and S-forms are named as separate species [4], with the M-form taking the name Anopheles coluzzii and the S-form retaining the name An. gambiae s.s. The two molecular forms differ in their geographical distribution and ecological niches, as well as in important phenotypic traits such as resistance to insecticides and to desiccation (reviewed in Lehmann and Diabate (2008) [5]). S-form An. gambiae are distributed across most of sub-saharan Africa, usually breeding in temporary aquatic habitats, and are associated with rainy seasons. M-form An. gambiae have a similar distribution to S-form in West and Central Africa, but are apparently absent east of the Great Rift Valley; they are able to exploit permanent breeding sites such as those associated with human activity, and breed year round [5-8]. The mechanisms driving divergence and speciation of the two molecular forms do not appear to be based on post-zygotic isolation, since laboratory crosses of M- and S-forms produce fully fertile male and female offspring [4,9]. Instead, spatial segregation of the two forms in mating swarms [10-12], or assortative mating behaviour [13] probably contributes to the usually very low rates of hybridisation seen in natural An. gambiae populations where the two forms are sympatric [12,14], although hybridisation can reach up to 20% in some sympatric populations [15-17], particularly at the extremes of the geographical distribution of sympatry [18]. Genetic divergence between the two forms in nature has been extensively studied, and was found to be widely distributed across the M- and S-form genomes, supporting the separation of the two forms into species [19-23]. The Keele mosquito strain was developed approximately 12 years ago as an outbred An. gambiae s.s. strain for use in experimental selection of malaria-resistant and -susceptible lines [24], and was established in Glasgow in 2002 directly from Keele University, where the line was generated. The chromosomal form has not previously been investigated, and it is usually referred to as an An. gambiae s.s. line. Its status now that An. gambiae s.s. has been divided into two species is uncertain. The line was developed by balanced interbreeding of 4 existing laboratory colonies: ZAN U, Ifakara, KIL and G3 [24]. The first three of these colonies originated in East Africa (Zanzibar in 1984; Ifakara (Tanzania) in 1996; Marangu (Tanzania) in 1975 respectively); only the G3 line is from West Africa (MacCarthy Island, The Gambia, in 1975). Therefore, 3 of the 4 strains are expected to have been S-form at their original isolation, because of their East African origin. The G3 line could originally have been M, S or even a mixture, since hybrid M/S forms have been observed in The Gambia [16,18]. The generation of the Keele line involved initial crosses of 50 individuals of each sex between the strains KIL and Ifakara, and ZANU and G3, and the offspring of these two crosses were then mated to produce the Keele strain[24]. Keele mosquitoes are therefore likely to have a mixed origin from M- and S- form parents. Laboratory colonies of mosquitoes usually exhibit considerable loss of diversity because of small starting populations (founder effect) and subsequent fluctuations in colony size [25,26]. Although the Keele strain was originally developed as an outbred line, the level of diversity of the strain has not previously been characterised. Microsatellites, especially those on chromosome 3 where there seems to be little restriction on gene flow [27], have been used previously to examine diversity in laboratory colonies, including the G3 line [26]. These analyses revealed reduced microsatellite diversity in two laboratory colonies relative to wild-caught mosquitoes from Mali, with an eightfold reduction in mean number of alleles found in eight microsatellite loci on chromosome 3 [26]. Wild-caught mosquitoes also had an abundance of rare alleles (frequency ≤ 0.05) which are less likely to be sampled in the relatively small starting populations for laboratory colonies. Chromosomal inversions contribute to the substructuring of An. gambiae subpopulations and their adaptation to different environments [28-31]. A much-studied large inversion polymorphism on chromosome 2L (2La or 2L+a) has been associated with adaptation to aridity: An. coluzzii larvae homozygous for 2La have been shown to have enhanced thermal tolerance [32], and An. gambiae s.s. adults have enhanced resistance to desiccation [33,34]. Allele frequencies of the 2La/2L+a vary spatially and temporally with respect to the degree of humidity in East and West Africa [35]. Both the 2La and the 2L+a karyotypes are found in An. gambiae s.s. and An. coluzzii, but with spatial variations in the frequency; the chromosomal arrangements assort independently of molecular form in the field, and probably predate the speciation process [8]. The 2La/2L+a karyotypes present in the Keele line have not previously been established.

Materials and Methods

DNA extraction from mosquitoes

The Keele colony held at Glasgow University is usually maintained at many thousands of individuals, with an average daily pupal collection of between 200 and 500 individuals, and 2000–3000 adults per large mating cage. Mosquitoes are allowed to mate naturally within each cage. Pupae for the study were selected randomly from different pupal trays over several days. 60 pupae were collected initially over 2–3 days for analysis of colony diversity, and an additional 90 pupae were collected for the evaluation of M and S forms at a later time point. DNA was extracted from individual pupae from the Keele line of An. gambiae s.s. using the DNeasy spin column protocol (Qiagen). The sex of each pupa was first determined by examination of the terminalia [36]. Pupae were frozen at -20°C overnight and then processed to extract DNA according to the manufacturer’s protocol. Each pupa generated 200μl of genomic DNA.

Determination of M- and S-forms

Fixed single nucleotide differences in the rDNA intergenic spacer region on the X chromosome are used to define the M- and S- chromosomal forms [1,2,37]. We used a published PCR-RFLP method which amplifies a 390bp product including the polymorphic site at position 581 of the IGS rDNA region [38]; M-forms have a T in this position whereas S-forms have a C. The PCR product was then digested with HhaI (recognition site GCG^C), resulting in fragments of 257bp, 110bp and 23bp from S form, and 367bp and 23bp from M form. 3μl of DNA from each pupa was amplified in a final volume of 28μl containing 1x PCR Buffer, 1mM MgCl2, 0.2mM dNTPs, 12.5ng primer UN (5’-GTGTGCCCCTTCCTCGATGT-3’), 6.25ng primer GA (5’-CTGGTTTGGTCGGCACGTTT-3’), and 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase, using the reaction conditions of an initial denaturation step 94°C for 3 minutes, and then 30 cycles of 94°C for 30s, 50°C for 45s, 72°C for 60s, with a final extension step of 7 minutes at 72°C. 12μl of the PCR product was digested at 37°C overnight with 1U of HhaI enzyme in 1 x NE Buffer 4 and 1 x BSA in a 15μl reaction volume. 7μl of the digested PCR product was run on a 2% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualised by UV transillumination. Undigested PCR product (5μl) was included for comparison to check for digestion; the digested product is clearly smaller than the undigested product for the M-form, and two bands are visible for the S-form (in both cases the 23bp band is not visible on a gel).

Microsatellite analysis of chromosome 3

Four published microsatellite loci (all dinucleotide repeats) on chromosome 3 [39,40] were chosen for analysis of diversity in the Keele colony. The markers were chosen to be spread along the chromosome; their published locations are shown in Table 1. 2μl of mosquito DNA from each pupa was amplified in a final volume of 20μl containing 1x PCR Buffer, 1mM MgCl2, 0.2mM dNTPs, 10nM of each primer and 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase, using the reaction conditions in Table 1. 7μl of PCR product was run for 4–6 hours on high resolution gels consisting of a 4% MetaPhor agarose gel (Lonza UK), containing ethidium bromide, and visualised by UV transillumination. PCR product sizes were estimated by comparison with a 25bp ladder using band size estimation software (Labworks, UVP, UK). Sizes were pooled into bins spanning 4 bp for each locus, taking into account the repeat size of 2 bp in these microsatellites and the estimated resolution for Metaphor Agarose of 3 bp (Lonza, UK).
Table 1

Microsatellite markers on chromosome 3.

Distance represents the cumulative genetic distances from the most distal markers, and is taken from [39].

Marker nameDistance (cM)Forward PrimerReverse PrimerAmplification conditions
Ag3H93a0TCCCCAGCTCACCCTTCAAGGGTTGCATGTTTGGATAGCG

95°C for 5min

30 cycles of [95°C for 20s/55°C for 30s/72°C for 30s]

72°C for 10min

Ag3H119b29.1GGTTGATGCTGAAGAGTGGGATGCCAGCGGATACGATTCG

95°C for 5min

30 cycles of [95°C for 30s/53°C for 30s/72°C f°C 30s]

72°C for 10min

Ag3H88b61.8TGCGGCGGTAAAGCATCAACCCGGTAACACTGCGCCGACas for Ag3H93
Ag3H817b93.7ACTGGTCCGTTGCTGCGCGATGAGTGAATGGTGCGCTGG

95°C for 5min

30 cycles of [95°C for 30s/53°C for 30s/65°C for 30s]

65°C for 10min

Primer sequences taken from Lanzaro et al., 1995.

Primer sequences taken from Zheng et al., 1996

Microsatellite markers on chromosome 3.

Distance represents the cumulative genetic distances from the most distal markers, and is taken from [39]. 95°C for 5min 30 cycles of [95°C for 20s/55°C for 30s/72°C for 30s] 72°C for 10min 95°C for 5min 30 cycles of [95°C for 30s/53°C for 30s/72°C f°C 30s] 72°C for 10min 95°C for 5min 30 cycles of [95°C for 30s/53°C for 30s/65°C for 30s] 65°C for 10min Primer sequences taken from Lanzaro et al., 1995. Primer sequences taken from Zheng et al., 1996

Analysis of inversions on chromosome 2

The inversion on the left arm of chromosome 2 known as 2La / 2L+a was analysed using a published PCR strategy [41]. 2μl of mosquito DNA from each pupa was amplified in a final volume of 20μl containing 1x PCR Buffer (1.5mM MgCl2), 0.2mM dNTPs, 10nM of each primer (Table 2) and 1 unit Taq DNA polymerase, using the reaction conditions of an initial denaturation step 94°C for 2 minutes, and then 30 cycles of 94°C for 30s, 55°C for 30s, 70°C for 45s, with a final extension step of 10 minutes at 70°C. 10μl of each PCR product was run on a 1.5% agarose gel containing ethidium bromide and visualised by UV transillumination.
Table 2

PCR primers used to type the chromosome 2 inversion 2La/2L+a [41].

Chromosome 2 ArrangementForward PrimerReverse PrimerExpected PCR product size (bp)
2La23A2: CTCGAAGGGACAGCGAATTA27A2: ACACATGCTCCTTGTGAACG492
2L+a23A2: CTCGAAGGGACAGCGAATTADPCross5: GGTATTTCTGGTCACTCTGTTGG207

Results

150 An. gambiae Keele mosquito pupae were analysed of which 63% were female. A PCR product of 390bp for the IGS rDNA region was amplified and digested from all 150 DNA samples. All digested PCR products were 367bp, indicating that only the M-form of this locus (T at position 581) was present in the colony (M frequency: 100% (95% confidence interval 97.5–100%)). No hybrid individuals were seen. The number of alleles seen at each of the 4 microsatellite markers in shown in Table 3. Some alleles were seen in only one mosquito, giving a low allele frequency of <0.05, but no allele predominated in the Keele colony for any of the 4 microsatellite loci.
Table 3

Allele frequencies (freq.) for least and most common alleles at each locus for the Keele colony.

Locusnano. allelesFreq most common alleleFreq least common allele
Ag3H882590.160.04
Ag3H933170.2580.032
Ag3H8174140.4630.073
Ag3H1193950.4870.077
mean346.250.3420.056
se3.6971.1090.0800.011

an = number of mosquitoes analysed

an = number of mosquitoes analysed Both the 2La and 2L+a chromosomal arrangements were found to be present in the Keele colony, with similar allele frequencies (Table 4). The numbers of homozygotes and heterozygotes was not significantly different to those expected under Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium (χ2 = 0.446, P = 0.800).
Table 4

Frequency of 2La/2l+a genotypes in the Keele colony (n = 161).

NumberProportion
GenotypeHeterozygous840.522
Homozygous 2La/2La460.286
Homozygous 2L+a/2L+a310.193
Allele frequency2La1760.547
2L+a1460.453

Discussion

Analysis of the Keele colony unexpectedly revealed only the M-form of the rDNA marker on the X chromosome used to distinguish the two forms. Three of the four laboratory strains from which the Keele strain was established originated in East Africa, and therefore were expected to be S-form, although contamination of any of the lines with the opposite rDNA form prior to the development of the Keele strain cannot be discounted. It is unclear when or why the S-form marker on the X chromosome was lost in the Keele line; the initial crosses to generate the line [24] involved progeny of two probable S-form lines mating with the offspring of a cross between a probable M and a probable S-form line: early generations of the Keele line must have had S-form individuals or hybrids. Hybrids of M- and S-forms occur readily in the laboratory, as do as back-crosses to either M- or S- form parents, and the hybrids and their backcrosses were found to be fully fertile, with similar egg batch size, hatching rate, and larval development success under laboratory conditions [9]. Observed fitness differences of M- and S-forms under laboratory conditions include minor differences in the time to hatching of eggs, with S eggs hatching slightly earlier than M [42], higher longevity of virgin female M-forms [5], and a larger body size of M-form females, which correlated in that study with larger egg batches in M-form than S-form [43]. The latter two factors could, over time, lead to increases in the frequency of M-form mosquitoes in a mixed colony. However in the face of repeated inter-form mating, it is difficult to imagine how the rDNA marker used to discriminate the M- and S-forms would remain linked to the fitness differences unless the genes responsible for these traits were strongly linked to the X-chromosome locus. Under natural conditions in most of sub-saharan Africa, males form swarms of only one chromosomal form, and mating is generally assortative [10-13]. The mechanism for premating isolation is not fully understood, but differences in wing widths in populations where M- and S-forms mate assortatively lend support to the hypothesis that mosquitoes choose a mate based on wing-beat frequencies [44,45]. However direct measurements from M- and S-form mosquitoes failed to show significant differences in their fundamental harmonic (wing beat) frequencies [46]. Mating of Anopheles in the laboratory does not appear to involve typical swarm formation, and adaptation/colonisation involves selecting for mating in the restricted space of a cage (stenogamy) [47,48]. The Keele line within the Glasgow insectaries does form small swarms, and females enter the swarms to mate (unpublished observations), but the majority of mating in a colony probably occurs outside of swarms. The Keele colony undoubtedly had a mixed M- and S-form origin, and the colony existing today is expected to have a hybrid genome with contributions from the four parent lines. It is similar in this respect to the An. gambiae PEST strain, chosen as the first Anopheles genome project [49]; the strain was generated in a series of crossing steps between different colonies from Kenya (S-form) and Nigeria (M-form) [https://www.vectorbase.org/organisms/anopheles-gambiae/pest]. Since this strain is commonly referred to as An. gambiae s.s., despite having M- and S-form heritage, we propose that the Keele strain should also continue to be referred to as An. gambiae s.s.; the hybrid name An. coluzzii × An. gambiae s.s. may be more correct, if the rules applied to the nomenclature for inter-species hybrid plants (including the F1, subsequent generations, back-crosses and combinations of these) were to be followed [50], but is excessively long. Microsatellite locus analysis of the Keele colony revealed an unexpectedly high level of allelic diversity at 4 microsatellite loci, with an average of 6.25 alleles (range 4–9) seen in the 4 microsatellite loci we examined on chromosome 3. Previous analyses of laboratory colonies e.g. Norris et al., 2001 [26], had shown reduced diversity compared to wild-caught mosquitoes, with an average number of alleles of 2.33 (G3 colony, range 1–6) and 3.67 (Mopti colony, range 2–6), using 9 microsatellites on chromosome 3. Two of the microsatellites used in their study, Ag3H88 and Ag3H119, were also used in our analysis of the Keele strain. For Ag3H88 both the Mopti and G3 colonies (n = 32 for each) had only 2 alleles present in the published study [26], whereas in our study, 9 alleles were observed in 25 mosquitoes of the Keele line. Analysis of Ag3H88 diversity in wild-caught mosquitoes revealed an average of 8 alleles in populations from 12 African countries (n = 967 mosquitoes), including a population (n = 23) from McCarthy Island (the origin of the G3 line) with 9 alleles at this locus [51]. For Ag3H119, previous characterisation of the Mopti and G3 colonies revealed 1 and 6 alleles respectively [26], compared to 5 alleles seen in the Keele colony. A previous study of wild-caught An. gambiae diversity in 9 Tanzanian locations found 10 alleles in total for this microsatellite in 638 individuals, with an average of 6.22 alleles per sample site (mosquito numbers sampled per location ranged from 30–106) [52]. Microsatellite diversity in the Keele line therefore appears to be higher than in previously-analysed laboratory colonies, although it does not reach the diversity observed in wild-caught mosquitoes, where large numbers of alleles, many at low frequencies (<0.05) are frequently observed [26,40]. This increased diversity may reflect the generation of the Keele colony by balanced interbreeding of 4 laboratory colonies, with offspring from 50 matings for each of the pairs (KIL x Ifakara and ZAN U x G3) then mated to produce the Keele line [24]. Finally the two karyotypes of the large inversion on chromosome 2 (2La/2L+a) are both present in the Keele colony at approximately equal frequencies, and mosquitoes appear to mate randomly with respect to this marker.
  46 in total

1.  Molecular characterization of ribosomal DNA polymorphisms discriminating among chromosomal forms of Anopheles gambiae s.s.

Authors:  G Favia; A Lanfrancotti; L Spanos; I Sidén-Kiamos; C Louis
Journal:  Insect Mol Biol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.585

2.  Mixed swarms of the molecular M and S forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae) in sympatric area from Burkina Faso.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Diabaté; Roch K Dabire; Pierre Kengne; Cecile Brengues; Thierry Baldet; Ali Ouari; Frederic Simard; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.278

3.  Reproductive output of female Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae): comparison of molecular forms.

Authors:  A S Yaro; A Dao; A Adamou; J E Crawford; S F Traoré; A M Touré; R Gwadz; T Lehmann
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.278

4.  Anopheles coluzzii and Anopheles amharicus, new members of the Anopheles gambiae complex.

Authors:  Maureen Coetzee; Richard H Hunt; Richard Wilkerson; Alessandra Della Torre; Mamadou B Coulibaly; Nora J Besansky
Journal:  Zootaxa       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.091

5.  Evaluating the effect of postmating isolation between molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae (Diptera: Culicidae).

Authors:  Abdoulaye Diabaté; Roch K Dabire; Niama Millogo; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 2.278

6.  High levels of hybridization between molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae from Guinea Bissau.

Authors:  E Oliveira; P Salgueiro; K Palsson; J L Vicente; A P Arez; T G Jaenson; A Caccone; J Pinto
Journal:  J Med Entomol       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.278

7.  Simultaneous identification of species and molecular forms of the Anopheles gambiae complex by PCR-RFLP.

Authors:  C Fanello; F Santolamazza; A della Torre
Journal:  Med Vet Entomol       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 2.739

8.  A polytene chromosome analysis of the Anopheles gambiae species complex.

Authors:  Mario Coluzzi; Adriana Sabatini; Alessandra della Torre; Maria Angela Di Deco; Vincenzo Petrarca
Journal:  Science       Date:  2002-10-03       Impact factor: 47.728

9.  Spatial swarm segregation and reproductive isolation between the molecular forms of Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Abdoulaye Diabaté; Adama Dao; Alpha S Yaro; Abdoulaye Adamou; Rodrigo Gonzalez; Nicholas C Manoukis; Sékou F Traoré; Robert W Gwadz; Tovi Lehmann
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2009-09-04       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Ecological niche partitioning between Anopheles gambiae molecular forms in Cameroon: the ecological side of speciation.

Authors:  Frédéric Simard; Diego Ayala; Guy Colince Kamdem; Marco Pombi; Joachim Etouna; Kenji Ose; Jean-Marie Fotsing; Didier Fontenille; Nora J Besansky; Carlo Costantini
Journal:  BMC Ecol       Date:  2009-05-21       Impact factor: 2.964

View more
  6 in total

1.  Chemical depletion of phagocytic immune cells in Anopheles gambiae reveals dual roles of mosquito hemocytes in anti-Plasmodium immunity.

Authors:  Hyeogsun Kwon; Ryan C Smith
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Immune Regulation of Plasmodium Is Anopheles Species Specific and Infection Intensity Dependent.

Authors:  Maria L Simões; Godfree Mlambo; Abhai Tripathi; Yuemei Dong; George Dimopoulos
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 7.867

3.  Detection of Plasmodium falciparum infected Anopheles gambiae using near-infrared spectroscopy.

Authors:  Marta F Maia; Melissa Kapulu; Michelle Muthui; Martin G Wagah; Heather M Ferguson; Floyd E Dowell; Francesco Baldini; Lisa Ranford-Cartwright
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 2.979

4.  Transcriptome profiles of Anopheles gambiae harboring natural low-level Plasmodium infection reveal adaptive advantages for the mosquito.

Authors:  Ann L Carr; David C Rinker; Yuemei Dong; George Dimopoulos; Laurence J Zwiebel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-11-19       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  The Transcription Factor PfAP2-O Influences Virulence Gene Transcription and Sexual Development in Plasmodium falciparum.

Authors:  Eliana F G Cubillos; Isadora Oliveira Prata; Wesley Luzetti Fotoran; Lisa Ranford-Cartwright; Gerhard Wunderlich
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-28       Impact factor: 5.293

6.  Late-phase immune responses limiting oocyst survival are independent of TEP1 function yet display strain specific differences in Anopheles gambiae.

Authors:  Hyeogsun Kwon; Benjamin R Arends; Ryan C Smith
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2017-08-01       Impact factor: 3.876

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.