| Literature DB >> 28032019 |
Curt J Bougher1, Mahdi M Abu-Omar2.
Abstract
The kinetics of formation of the valence tautomers (tpfc⋅)MnIV(O-LA)] n+ [where LA=ZnII, CaII, ScIII, YbIII, B(C6F5)3, and trifluoroacetic acid (TFA); tpfc=5,10,15-tris(pentafluorophenyl) corrole] from (tpfc)MnV(O) were followed by UV/Vis spectroscopy, giving second-order rate constants ranging over five orders of magnitude from 10-2 for Ca to 103 m -1 s-1 for Sc. Hydrogen atom transfer (HAT) rates from 2,4-di-tert-butyl phenol (2,4-DTBP) to the various Lewis acid valence tautomers of manganese oxo corrole complexes were evaluated and compared. For LA=TFA, ScIII, or YbIII, the rate constants of HAT were comparable to unactivated (tpfc)MnV(O). However, with LA=B(C6F5)3, ZnII, and CaII, 6-, 21-, and 31-fold rate enhancements were observed, respectively. Remarkably, [(tpfc⋅)MnIV(OCa)]2+ gave the most enhancement despite its rate of formation being the slowest. Comparisons of HAT rate constants among the various Lewis acid tautomers revealed that both size and charge are important. This study underscores how valence may affect the reactivity of high-valent manganese-oxo compounds and sheds light on nature's choice of Ca in the activation of Mn-oxo in the oxygen-evolving complex.Entities:
Keywords: hydrogen atom transfer; manganese; metal-oxo compounds; porphyrinoids; valence tautomers
Year: 2016 PMID: 28032019 PMCID: PMC5167333 DOI: 10.1002/open.201600117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ChemistryOpen ISSN: 2191-1363 Impact factor: 2.911
Scheme 1Valence tautomerization of manganese(V)‐oxo corrole induced by various Lewis acids.
Figure 1Reaction of 223 μm Zn(OTf)2 and 22.3 μm (tpfc)MnV(O). a) Time‐resolved UV/Vis spectral changes, measured every 60 s. Inset: changes in absorbance at 345 nm versus time for the disappearance of (tpfc)MnV(O) (points are data and the dashed line best fit was obtained by using first‐order rate law). b) Plot of the observed pseudo‐first‐order rate constants (k obs) versus [Zn(OTf)2]. Slope=k 1 Zn=4.2±0.1 m −1 s−1.
Rate constants for the various Lewis acid valence tautomers.
| Species[a] | Tautomer formation | HAT | Ionic radius [Å][c] |
|---|---|---|---|
| (tpfc)MnV(O) ( | na | 45±0.3 | |
| [(tpfc⋅)MnIV(OH)]+ ( | 2300±70 | 32.6±0.5 | |
| [(tpfc⋅)MnIV(O−Zn)]2+ ( | 4.2±0.1 | 943±26 | 0.74 |
| [(tpfc⋅)MnIV(O−Sc)]3+ ( | 3400±100 | 27.3±0.7 | 0.75 |
| [(tpfc⋅)MnIV(O−Yb)]3+ ( | 1064±14 | 42±2 | 0.87 |
| [(tpfc⋅)MnIV(O−Ca)]2+ ( | (3.56±0.02)×10−2 | 1386±5 | 1.00 |
| (tpfc⋅)MnIV(O−B(C6F5)3 ( | 650±10 | 271±6 |
[a] Species 2–7 were made from the reaction of 1 with the corresponding Lewis acid. [b] Rate of formation represents the rate of the reaction for 1+Lewis acid, corresponding to the species being made. [c] Coordination number (CN)=6.
Figure 2Plots corresponding to a HAT of 23.9 μm [(tpfc⋅)MnIV(O−Zn)]2+ with 956 μm 2,4‐DTBP. a) Time‐resolved UV/Vis spectra of the reaction at 25 °C, measured every 19 s. Inset: Change in absorbance at 496 nm versus time, corresponding to the formation of (tpfc)MnIII (point) and the best fit refers to the first‐order rate law equation (dashed line). c) Plot of k obs versus [2,4‐DTBP]. Slope=k 2 Zn=943±26 m −1 s−1.