Louis-David Beaulieu1, Véronique H Flamand2, Hugo Massé-Alarie3, Cyril Schneider3. 1. Clinical Neuroscience and Neurostimulation Laboratory, CHU de Québec Research Center - Neuroscience Division, Quebec City, Qc, Canada; Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Qc, Canada. Electronic address: louis-david.beaulieu.1@ulaval.ca. 2. Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Qc, Canada; Center for Interdisciplinary Research in Rehabilitation and Social Integration, Quebec City, Qc, Canada. 3. Clinical Neuroscience and Neurostimulation Laboratory, CHU de Québec Research Center - Neuroscience Division, Quebec City, Qc, Canada; Department of Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec City, Qc, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used worldwide for noninvasively testing human motor systems but its psychometric properties remain unclear. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This work systematically reviewed studies on the reliability of TMS outcome measures of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability in healthy humans, with an emphasis on retrieving minimal detectable changes (MDC). METHODS: The literature search was performed in three databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase) up to June 2016 and additional studies were identified through hand-searching. French and English-written studies had to report the reliability of at least one TMS outcome of M1 in healthy humans. Two independent raters assessed the eligibility of potential studies, and eligible articles were reviewed using a structured data extraction form and two critical appraisal scales. RESULTS: A total of 34 articles met the selection criteria, which tested the intra- and inter-rater reliability (relative and absolute subtypes) of several TMS outcomes. However, our critical appraisal of studies raised concerns on the applicability and generalization of results because of methodological and statistical pitfalls. Importantly, MDC were generally large and likely affected by various factors, especially time elapsed between sessions and number of stimuli delivered. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review underlined that the evidence about the reliability of TMS outcomes is scarce and affected by several methodological and statistical problems. Data and knowledge of the review provided however relevant insights on the ability of TMS outcomes to track plastic changes within an individual or within a group, and recommendations were made to level up the quality of future work in the field. Copyright Â
BACKGROUND: Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is used worldwide for noninvasively testing human motor systems but its psychometric properties remain unclear. OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: This work systematically reviewed studies on the reliability of TMS outcome measures of primary motor cortex (M1) excitability in healthy humans, with an emphasis on retrieving minimal detectable changes (MDC). METHODS: The literature search was performed in three databases (Pubmed, CINAHL, Embase) up to June 2016 and additional studies were identified through hand-searching. French and English-written studies had to report the reliability of at least one TMS outcome of M1 in healthy humans. Two independent raters assessed the eligibility of potential studies, and eligible articles were reviewed using a structured data extraction form and two critical appraisal scales. RESULTS: A total of 34 articles met the selection criteria, which tested the intra- and inter-rater reliability (relative and absolute subtypes) of several TMS outcomes. However, our critical appraisal of studies raised concerns on the applicability and generalization of results because of methodological and statistical pitfalls. Importantly, MDC were generally large and likely affected by various factors, especially time elapsed between sessions and number of stimuli delivered. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review underlined that the evidence about the reliability of TMS outcomes is scarce and affected by several methodological and statistical problems. Data and knowledge of the review provided however relevant insights on the ability of TMS outcomes to track plastic changes within an individual or within a group, and recommendations were made to level up the quality of future work in the field. Copyright Â
Authors: Hugo Massé-Alarie; Michael J G Bergin; Cyril Schneider; Siobhan Schabrun; Paul W Hodges Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2017-09-17 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Charalambos C Charalambous; Jesse C Dean; DeAnna L Adkins; Colleen A Hanlon; Mark G Bowden Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2018-04-24 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Elisabetta Peri; Emilia Ambrosini; Vera Maria Colombo; Mark van de Ruit; Michael J Grey; Marco Monticone; Giorgio Ferriero; Alessandra Pedrocchi; Giancarlo Ferrigno; Simona Ferrante Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-09-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Mohamed Abdelhafid Kadri; Marianne Violette; Mathieu Dallaire; Fábio Carlos Lucas de Oliveira; Martin Lavallière; Suzy Ngomo; Louis-David Beaulieu; Christian Larivière; Rubens A da Silva Journal: J Man Manip Ther Date: 2021-01-01