Literature DB >> 28921724

"Discrete peaks" of excitability and map overlap reveal task-specific organization of primary motor cortex for control of human forearm muscles.

Hugo Massé-Alarie1,2, Michael J G Bergin1,3, Cyril Schneider2, Siobhan Schabrun1,4, Paul W Hodges1.   

Abstract

The primary motor cortex (M1) presents a somatotopic organization of body parts, but with overlap between muscle/movement representations. This distinct but overlapping M1 organization is believed to be important for individuated control and movement coordination, respectively. Discrete peaks of greater excitability observed within M1 might underpin organization of cortical motor control. This study aimed to examine interactions between M1 representations of synergist and antagonist forearm muscles, compare regions of greater excitability during different functional tasks, and compare characteristics of M1 representation recorded using surface and fine-wire (fw ) electrodes. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) was applied over M1 for mapping the representation of 4 forearm muscles (extensor carpi radialis brevis [ECRB], extensor digitorum communis, flexor carpi radialis, and flexor digitorum superficialis) during three tasks: rest, grip, and wrist extension in 14 participants. There are three main findings. First, discrete areas of peak excitability within the M1 representation of ECRBfw were identified during grip and wrist extension suggesting that different M1 areas are involved in different motor functions. Second, M1 representations of synergist muscles presented with greater overlap of M1 representations than muscles with mainly antagonist actions, which suggests a role in muscle coordination. Third, as larger normalized map volume and overlap were observed using surface than fine-wire electrodes, data suggest that cross-talk from adjacent muscles compromised interpretation of recordings made with surface electrodes in response to TMS. These results provide a novel understanding of the spatial organization of M1 with evidence of "functional somatotopy." This has important implications for cortical control of movement. Hum Brain Mapp 38:6118-6132, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dynamic plasticity; functional organization; grip; mapping; motor cortex; somatotopy; wrist extension

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28921724      PMCID: PMC6866955          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23816

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  50 in total

1.  Consistent features in the forelimb representation of primary motor cortex in rhesus macaques.

Authors:  M C Park; A Belhaj-Saïf; M Gordon; P D Cheney
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-04-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Negative blood oxygenation level dependent homunculus and somatotopic information in primary motor cortex and supplementary motor area.

Authors:  Noa Zeharia; Uri Hertz; Tamar Flash; Amir Amedi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Task dependence of responses in first dorsal interosseous muscle to magnetic brain stimulation in man.

Authors:  D Flament; P Goldsmith; C J Buckley; R N Lemon
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Use-dependent alterations of movement representations in primary motor cortex of adult squirrel monkeys.

Authors:  R J Nudo; G W Milliken; W M Jenkins; M M Merzenich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1996-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  ISSLS prize winner: Smudging the motor brain in young adults with recurrent low back pain.

Authors:  Henry Tsao; Lieven A Danneels; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Targeting chronic recurrent low back pain from the top-down and the bottom-up: a combined transcranial direct current stimulation and peripheral electrical stimulation intervention.

Authors:  Siobhan M Schabrun; Emma Jones; Edith L Elgueta Cancino; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 8.955

7.  Normalizing motor cortex representations in focal hand dystonia.

Authors:  Siobhan M Schabrun; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow; Michael C Ridding
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research.

Authors:  Simone Rossi; Mark Hallett; Paolo M Rossini; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 3.708

9.  Changes in excitability of motor cortical circuitry in patients with Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  M C Ridding; R Inzelberg; J C Rothwell
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 10.422

10.  Muscles in "concert": study of primary motor cortex upper limb functional topography.

Authors:  Jean-Marc Melgari; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Flavia Pauri; Paolo Maria Rossini
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-08-27       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  10 in total

1.  Reply to the comment on: "Reporting matters: Brain mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation".

Authors:  Hugo Massé-Alarie; Michael Bergin; Cyril Schneider; Siobhan Schabrun; Paul Hodges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-11-17       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Reporting matters: Brain mapping with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Martin E Héroux
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Motor cortex representation of deep and superficial neck flexor muscles in individuals with and without neck pain.

Authors:  Edith Elgueta-Cancino; Welber Marinovic; Gwendolen Jull; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.038

4.  Similarity of hand muscle synergies elicited by transcranial magnetic stimulation and those found during voluntary movement.

Authors:  Mathew Yarossi; Dana H Brooks; Deniz Erdoğmuş; Eugene Tunik
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 2.974

5.  Accounting for Stimulations That Do Not Elicit Motor-Evoked Potentials When Mapping Cortical Representations of Multiple Muscles.

Authors:  Fang Jin; Sjoerd M Bruijn; Andreas Daffertshofer
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.473

6.  Simultaneous Recording of Motor Evoked Potentials in Hand, Wrist and Arm Muscles to Assess Corticospinal Divergence.

Authors:  Stacey L DeJong; Jayden A Bisson; Warren G Darling; Richard K Shields
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 4.275

7.  Forearm and Hand Muscles Exhibit High Coactivation and Overlapping of Cortical Motor Representations.

Authors:  Gabriela P Tardelli; Victor H Souza; Renan H Matsuda; Marco A C Garcia; Pavel A Novikov; Maria A Nazarova; Oswaldo Baffa
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2022-03-09       Impact factor: 4.275

8.  Robotic transcranial magnetic stimulation motor maps and hand function in adolescents.

Authors:  Adrianna Giuffre; Ephrem Zewdie; Helen L Carlson; James G Wrightson; Hsing-Ching Kuo; Lauran Cole; Adam Kirton
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-04

9.  TMSmap - Software for Quantitative Analysis of TMS Mapping Results.

Authors:  Pavel A Novikov; Maria A Nazarova; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2018-07-09       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Mapping of multiple muscles with transcranial magnetic stimulation: absolute and relative test-retest reliability.

Authors:  Maria Nazarova; Pavel Novikov; Ekaterina Ivanina; Ksenia Kozlova; Larisa Dobrynina; Vadim V Nikulin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2021-03-08       Impact factor: 5.038

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.