| Literature DB >> 28030619 |
Linh Do Ngoc Nguyen1, Pieter Deschaght2, Sophie Merlin3,4, Alexandre Loywick3,4, Christophe Audebert3,4, Sabine Van Daele5, Eric Viscogliosi1, Mario Vaneechoutte2, Laurence Delhaes1,6.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION ANDEntities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28030619 PMCID: PMC5193350 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168860
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Comparison of the enumeration of P. aeruginosa cells between cultures and qPCRs of PMA-treated and untreated sputum samples.
Fig 2Venn diagram representing number of shared and specific bacterial (A) and fungal (B) genera between PMA-treated and untreated samples.
In each case, the first 5 most prevalent genera are listed.
Fig 3Global distribution of bacterial (A) and fungal (B) genera between PMA-treated (inner ring) and untreated groups (outer ring).
All genera are ordered in descending relative abundance.
Fig 4Effect of PMA on the composition of bacteriome of each sample.
(A): Relative abundance of bacterial genera of each sample (“yes” or “no” indicates the samples with or without PMA-pretreatment). (B): PCA plot of the first two components of bacteriome of samples with and without PMA-pretreatment. Each marker represents treatment conditions (filled triangle symbols PMA-treated samples, filled square symbols untreated samples). Each color represents a given sputum sample (G040.I: light blue; G040.II: aqua; G040.III: dark blue; G088.I: yellow green; G088.II: chartreuse; G088.III: dark green; G172.II: orange; G172.III: dark orange; G014.I: grey; G014.II: dark grey; G014.III: black; G176.I: red; G176.II: firebrick; G176.III: dark red).
Fig 5Effect of PMA on the composition of mycobiome of each sample.
(A): Relative abundance of fungal genera of each sample (“yes” or “no” indicates the samples with or without PMA-pretreatment). (B): PCA plot of the first two components of mycobiome of samples with and without PMA-pretreatment. Each marker represents treatment conditions (filled triangle symbols PMA-treated samples, filled square symbols untreated samples). Each color represents a given sputum sample (G040.III: dark blue; G088.II: chartreuse; G088.III: dark green; G172.I: yellow; G172.II: orange; G172.III: dark orange; G014.II: dark grey; G014.III: black; G176.II: firebrick; G176.III: dark red).
Abundance and α-diversity comparison of bacteriome and mycobiome between PMA-pretreated and untreated samples.
| Paired sputum samples | All populations | Abundant population (≥ 1%) | Intermediate population (<1%) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Un-treated | PMA-treated | Un-treated | PMA-treated | Un-treated | |||||
| 28280 ±14356 | 26278 ±11194 | 27617 ±13955 | 25591 ±10873 | 663 ±538 | 686 ±490 | ||||
| 20 ±8 | 22 ±11 | 6 ±3 | 6 ±3 | 13 ±7 | 16 ±9 | ||||
| 1.2 ±0.6 | 1.2 ±0.6 | 1.1 ±0.6 | 1.1 ±0.6 | 1.8 ±0.6 | 2.0 ±0.6 | ||||
| 0.5 ±0.3 | 0.5 ±0.2 | 0.5 ±0.3 | 0.5 ±0.3 | 0.8 ±0.2 | 0.8 ±0.1 | ||||
| 36618 ±44508 | 28910 ±36879 | 36286 ±43812 | 28637 ±36386 | 332 ±763 | 273 ±741 | ||||
| 9 ±6 | 12 ±7 | 6 ±4 | 8 ±4 | 3 ±3 | 4 ±5 | ||||
| 0.7 ±0.5 | 0.7 ±0.5 | 0.6 ±0.5 | 0.6 ±0.5 | 0.6 ±0.6 | 0.4 ±0.3 | ||||
| 0.3 ±0.3 | 0.3 ±0.2 | 0.3 ±0.3 | 0.3 ±0.2 | 0.9 | 0.3 ±0.3 | 0.4 ±0.3 | |||
*PMA, propidium monoazide;
μ: p value (significant p value is bolded);
**Total number of reads and all diversity index expressed as mean and standard deviation.
p-values and r-values of similarity analysis (one-way ANOSIM) of the bacterial and fungal OTU data.
| OTU data | Population and sub-populations | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Global population | 0.52 | -0.011 | |
| Abundant population | 0.52 | -0.010 | |
| Intermediate population | 0.97 | -0.066 | |
| Global population | 0.84 | -0.062 | |
| Abundant population | 0.84 | -0.062 | |
| Intermediate population | 0.56 | -0.009 |
a p- values indicate the significant differences between PMA-treated and untreated groups;
b r-values indicate dissimilarity between groups as follow: the higher the r-value is, the more dissimilar the compared groups are.