Literature DB >> 28029717

Time course of gamma-band oscillation associated with face processing in the inferior occipital gyrus and fusiform gyrus: A combined fMRI and MEG study.

Shota Uono1, Wataru Sato1, Takanori Kochiyama2, Yasutaka Kubota3, Reiko Sawada1,4, Sayaka Yoshimura1, Motomi Toichi1,4.   

Abstract

Debate continues over whether the inferior occipital gyrus (IOG) or the fusiform gyrus (FG) represents the first stage of face processing and what role these brain regions play. We investigated this issue by combining functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) in normal adults. Participants passively observed upright and inverted faces and houses. First, we identified the IOG and FG as face-specific regions using fMRI. We applied beamforming source reconstruction and time-frequency analysis to MEG source signals to reveal the time course of gamma-band activations in these regions. The results revealed that the right IOG showed higher gamma-band activation in response to upright faces than to upright houses at 100 ms from the stimulus onset. Subsequently, the right FG showed greater gamma-band response to upright faces versus upright houses at around 170 ms. The gamma-band activation in the right IOG and right FG was larger in response to inverted faces than to upright faces at the later time window. These results suggest that (1) the gamma-band activities occurs rapidly first in the IOG and next in the FG and (2) the gamma-band activity in the right IOG at later time stages is involved in configuration processing for faces. Hum Brain Mapp 38:2067-2079, 2017.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  face processing; fusiform gyrus; gamma-band oscillation; inferior occipital gyrus; magnetoencephalography (MEG)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28029717      PMCID: PMC6867163          DOI: 10.1002/hbm.23505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp        ISSN: 1065-9471            Impact factor:   5.038


  59 in total

1.  The entry point of face recognition: evidence for face expertise.

Authors:  J W Tanaka
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  2001-09

2.  A new look at gamma? High- (>60 Hz) γ-band activity in cortical networks: function, mechanisms and impairment.

Authors:  Peter J Uhlhaas; Gordon Pipa; Sergio Neuenschwander; Michael Wibral; Wolf Singer
Journal:  Prog Biophys Mol Biol       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.667

Review 3.  Does physical interstimulus variance account for early electrophysiological face sensitive responses in the human brain? Ten lessons on the N170.

Authors:  Bruno Rossion; Corentin Jacques
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-22       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  TMS evidence for the involvement of the right occipital face area in early face processing.

Authors:  David Pitcher; Vincent Walsh; Galit Yovel; Bradley Duchaine
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 10.834

5.  Analysis of fMRI time-series revisited.

Authors:  K J Friston; A P Holmes; J B Poline; P J Grasby; S C Williams; R S Frackowiak; R Turner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Rapid, high-frequency, and theta-coupled gamma oscillations in the inferior occipital gyrus during face processing.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Kazumi Matsuda; Keiko Usui; Yushi Inoue; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 4.027

7.  The relationship of γ oscillations and face-specific ERPs recorded subdurally from occipitotemporal cortex.

Authors:  Andrew D Engell; Gregory McCarthy
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2010-10-20       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 8.  Human gamma-band activity: a review on cognitive and behavioral correlates and network models.

Authors:  Christoph S Herrmann; Ingo Fründ; Daniel Lenz
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-09-08       Impact factor: 8.989

9.  Perception of face parts and face configurations: an FMRI study.

Authors:  Jia Liu; Alison Harris; Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  The BOLD response and the gamma oscillations respond differently than evoked potentials: an interleaved EEG-fMRI study.

Authors:  Jack R Foucher; Hélène Otzenberger; Daniel Gounot
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2003-09-19       Impact factor: 3.288

View more
  7 in total

1.  Bidirectional electric communication between the inferior occipital gyrus and the amygdala during face processing.

Authors:  Wataru Sato; Takanori Kochiyama; Shota Uono; Kazumi Matsuda; Keiko Usui; Naotaka Usui; Yushi Inoue; Motomi Toichi
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  PAGANI Toolkit: Parallel graph-theoretical analysis package for brain network big data.

Authors:  Haixiao Du; Mingrui Xia; Kang Zhao; Xuhong Liao; Huazhong Yang; Yu Wang; Yong He
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Frequency-Dependent Changes of the Resting BOLD Signals Predicts Cognitive Deficits in Asymptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Authors:  Feng Xiao; Tao Wang; Lei Gao; Jian Fang; Zhenmeng Sun; Haibo Xu; Junjian Zhang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Apperceptive Prosopagnosia Secondary to an Ischemic Infarct of the Lingual Gyrus: A Case Report and an Update on the Neuroanatomy, Neurophysiology, and Phenomenology of Prosopagnosia.

Authors:  Hassan Kesserwani; Adam Kesserwani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-10-31

5.  Special Patterns of Dynamic Brain Networks Discriminate Between Face and Non-face Processing: A Single-Trial EEG Study.

Authors:  Zhongliang Yin; Yue Wang; Minghao Dong; Shenghan Ren; Haihong Hu; Kuiying Yin; Jimin Liang
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Prestimulus feedback connectivity biases the content of visual experiences.

Authors:  Elie Rassi; Andreas Wutz; Nadia Müller-Voggel; Nathan Weisz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2019-07-22       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Theta- and Gamma-Band Activity Discriminates Face, Body and Object Perception.

Authors:  Francesco Bossi; Isabella Premoli; Sara Pizzamiglio; Sema Balaban; Paola Ricciardelli; Davide Rivolta
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2020-03-12       Impact factor: 3.169

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.