Literature DB >> 28028242

Lanthanide-dependent cross-feeding of methane-derived carbon is linked by microbial community interactions.

Sascha M B Krause1,2, Timothy Johnson2, Yasodara Samadhi Karunaratne2, Yanfen Fu1, David A C Beck1,3, Ludmila Chistoserdova1, Mary E Lidstrom4,2.   

Abstract

The utilization of methane, a potent greenhouse gas, is an important component of local and global carbon cycles that is characterized by tight linkages between methane-utilizing (methanotrophic) and nonmethanotrophic bacteria. It has been suggested that the methanotroph sustains these nonmethanotrophs by cross-feeding, because subsequent products of the methane oxidation pathway, such as methanol, represent alternative carbon sources. We established cocultures in a microcosm model system to determine the mechanism and substrate that underlay the observed cross-feeding in the environment. Lanthanum, a rare earth element, was applied because of its increasing importance in methylotrophy. We used co-occurring strains isolated from Lake Washington sediment that are involved in methane utilization: a methanotroph and two nonmethanotrophic methylotrophs. Gene-expression profiles and mutant analyses suggest that methanol is the dominant carbon and energy source the methanotroph provides to support growth of the nonmethanotrophs. However, in the presence of the nonmethanotroph, gene expression of the dominant methanol dehydrogenase (MDH) shifts from the lanthanide-dependent MDH (XoxF)-type, to the calcium-dependent MDH (MxaF)-type. Correspondingly, methanol is released into the medium only when the methanotroph expresses the MxaF-type MDH. These results suggest a cross-feeding mechanism in which the nonmethanotrophic partner induces a change in expression of methanotroph MDHs, resulting in release of methanol for its growth. This partner-induced change in gene expression that benefits the partner is a paradigm for microbial interactions that cannot be observed in studies of pure cultures, underscoring the importance of synthetic microbial community approaches to understand environmental microbiomes.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Methylobacter; eco-physiology; flow cytometry; metabolic transformation; synthetic ecology

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28028242      PMCID: PMC5240692          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1619871114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  50 in total

Review 1.  The generation and maintenance of diversity in microbial communities.

Authors:  Noah Fierer; Jay T Lennon
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 2.  Microbial interactions: from networks to models.

Authors:  Karoline Faust; Jeroen Raes
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-07-16       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Methane-fed microbial microcosms show differential community dynamics and pinpoint taxa involved in communal response.

Authors:  Igor Y Oshkin; David A C Beck; Andrew E Lamb; Veronika Tchesnokova; Gabrielle Benuska; Tami L McTaggart; Marina G Kalyuzhnaya; Svetlana N Dedysh; Mary E Lidstrom; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2014-10-21       Impact factor: 10.302

4.  XoxF Acts as the Predominant Methanol Dehydrogenase in the Type I Methanotroph Methylomicrobium buryatense.

Authors:  Frances Chu; Mary E Lidstrom
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.490

5.  Nutrient amendments in soil DNA stable isotope probing experiments reduce the observed methanotroph diversity.

Authors:  Aurélie Cébron; Levente Bodrossy; Nancy Stralis-Pavese; Andrew C Singer; Ian P Thompson; James I Prosser; J Colin Murrell
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2006-11-22       Impact factor: 4.792

6.  Methane assimilation and trophic interactions with marine Methylomicrobium in deep-water coral reef sediment off the coast of Norway.

Authors:  Sigmund Jensen; Josh D Neufeld; Nils-Kåre Birkeland; Martin Hovland; John Colin Murrell
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2008-09-22       Impact factor: 4.194

7.  Insights into the fate of a 13C labelled phenol pulse for stable isotope probing (SIP) experiments.

Authors:  Mike Manefield; Rob Griffiths; Niall P McNamara; Darren Sleep; Nick Ostle; Andrew Whiteley
Journal:  J Microbiol Methods       Date:  2007-02-21       Impact factor: 2.363

Review 8.  Synthetic microbial communities.

Authors:  Tobias Grosskopf; Orkun S Soyer
Journal:  Curr Opin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 7.934

9.  HTSeq--a Python framework to work with high-throughput sequencing data.

Authors:  Simon Anders; Paul Theodor Pyl; Wolfgang Huber
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  Draft genome sequences of gammaproteobacterial methanotrophs isolated from lake washington sediment.

Authors:  Marina G Kalyuzhnaya; Andrew E Lamb; Tami L McTaggart; Igor Y Oshkin; Nicole Shapiro; Tanja Woyke; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  Genome Announc       Date:  2015-03-12
View more
  42 in total

1.  Communal metabolism of methane and the rare Earth element switch.

Authors:  Zheng Yu; Ludmila Chistoserdova
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2017-06-19       Impact factor: 3.490

2.  Two forms of phosphomannomutase in gammaproteobacteria: The overlooked membrane-bound form of AlgC is required for twitching motility of Lysobacter enzymogenes.

Authors:  Guoliang Qian; Shifang Fei; Michael Y Galperin
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 5.491

Review 3.  Metals and Methanotrophy.

Authors:  Jeremy D Semrau; Alan A DiSpirito; Wenyu Gu; Sukhwan Yoon
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Recovery in methanotrophic activity does not reflect on the methane-driven interaction network after peat mining.

Authors:  Thomas Kaupper; Lucas W Mendes; Monica Harnisz; Sascha M B Krause; Marcus A Horn; Adrian Ho
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-18       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Methylococcaceae are the dominant active aerobic methanotrophs in a Chinese tidal marsh.

Authors:  Yongcui Deng; Qian Gui; Marc Dumont; Cheng Han; Huan Deng; Juanli Yun; Wenhui Zhong
Journal:  Environ Sci Pollut Res Int       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 4.223

6.  Adaptive laboratory evolution of methylotrophic Escherichia coli enables synthesis of all amino acids from methanol-derived carbon.

Authors:  Jie Ren Gerald Har; Alec Agee; R Kyle Bennett; Eleftherios T Papoutsakis; Maciek R Antoniewicz
Journal:  Appl Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 4.813

7.  Living apart together-bacterial volatiles influence methanotrophic growth and activity.

Authors:  A J Veraart; P Garbeva; F van Beersum; A Ho; C A Hordijk; M Meima-Franke; A J Zweers; P L E Bodelier
Journal:  ISME J       Date:  2018-01-30       Impact factor: 10.302

Review 8.  Bioinorganic insights of the PQQ-dependent alcohol dehydrogenases.

Authors:  Pedro D Sarmiento-Pavía; Martha E Sosa-Torres
Journal:  J Biol Inorg Chem       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.358

9.  Interspecies Chemical Signaling in a Methane-Oxidizing Bacterial Community.

Authors:  Aaron W Puri; Darren Liu; Amy L Schaefer; Zheng Yu; Mitchell W Pesesky; E Peter Greenberg; Mary E Lidstrom
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-03-22       Impact factor: 4.792

Review 10.  Specialized Metabolites from Methylotrophic Proteobacteria.

Authors:  Aaron W Puri
Journal:  Curr Issues Mol Biol       Date:  2019-06-05       Impact factor: 2.081

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.