Literature DB >> 28027692

Comparison of 3D-Printed Poly-ɛ-Caprolactone Scaffolds Functionalized with Tricalcium Phosphate, Hydroxyapatite, Bio-Oss, or Decellularized Bone Matrix<sup/>.

Ethan Nyberg1,2, Alexandra Rindone1,2, Amir Dorafshar3, Warren L Grayson1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D)-printing facilitates rapid, custom manufacturing of bone scaffolds with a wide range of material choices. Recent studies have demonstrated the potential for 3D-printing bioactive (i.e., osteo-inductive) scaffolds for use in bone regeneration applications. In this study, we 3D-printed porous poly-ɛ-caprolactone (PCL) scaffolds using a fused deposition modeling (FDM) process and functionalized them with mineral additives that have been widely used commercially and clinically: tricalcium phosphate (TCP), hydroxyapatite (HA), Bio-Oss (BO), or decellularized bone matrix (DCB). We assessed the "print quality" of the composite scaffolds and found that the print quality of PCL-TCP, PCL-BO, and PCL-DCB measured ∼0.7 and was statistically lower than PCL and PCL-HA scaffolds (∼0.8). We found that the incorporation of mineral particles did not significantly decrease the compressive modulus of the graft, which was on the order of 260 MPa for solid blocks and ranged from 32 to 83 MPa for porous scaffolds. Raman spectroscopy revealed the surfaces of the scaffolds maintained the chemical profile of their dopants following the printing process. We evaluated the osteo-inductive properties of each scaffold composite by culturing adipose-derived stromal/stem cells in vitro and assessing their differentiation into osteoblasts. The calcium content (normalized to DNA) increased significantly in PCL-TCP (p < 0.05), PCL-BO (p < 0.001), and PCL-DCB (p < 0.0001) groups relative to PCL only. The calcium content also increased in PCL-HA but was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Collagen 1 expression was 10-fold greater than PCL in PCL-BO and PCL-DCB (p < 0.05) and osteocalcin expression was 10-fold greater in PCL-BO and PCL-DCB (p < 0.05) as measured by quantitative-real time-polymerase chain reaction. This study suggests that PCL-BO and PCL-DCB hybrid material may be advantageous for bone healing applications over PCL-HA or PCL-TCP blends.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BioOss; additive manufacturing; adipose-derived stem cells; bone tissue engineering; decellularized bone matrix; hydroxyapatite; tricalcium phosphate

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28027692     DOI: 10.1089/ten.TEA.2016.0418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A        ISSN: 1937-3341            Impact factor:   3.845


  33 in total

Review 1.  Recent Advances in Tissue Engineering Strategies for the Treatment of Joint Damage.

Authors:  Makeda K Stephenson; Ashley L Farris; Warren L Grayson
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Multimaterial Segmented Fiber Printing for Gradient Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Luis Diaz-Gomez; Brandon T Smith; Panayiotis D Kontoyiannis; Sean M Bittner; Anthony J Melchiorri; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part C Methods       Date:  2018-12-28       Impact factor: 3.056

Review 3.  Tuning the biomimetic behavior of scaffolds for regenerative medicine through surface modifications.

Authors:  Nathan R Richbourg; Nicholas A Peppas; Vassilios I Sikavitsas
Journal:  J Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.963

4.  Process-Structure-Quality Relationships of Three-Dimensional Printed Poly(Caprolactone)-Hydroxyapatite Scaffolds.

Authors:  Sam Gerdes; Azadeh Mostafavi; Srikanthan Ramesh; Adnan Memic; Iris V Rivero; Prahalada Rao; Ali Tamayol
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  3D printing and intraoperative neuronavigation tailoring for skull base reconstruction after extended endoscopic endonasal surgery: proof of concept.

Authors:  Walid I Essayed; Prashin Unadkat; Ahmed Hosny; Sarah Frisken; Marcio S Rassi; Srinivasan Mukundan; James C Weaver; Ossama Al-Mefty; Alexandra J Golby; Ian F Dunn
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2018-03-02       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 6.  Recent Advances in Extrusion-Based 3D Printing for Biomedical Applications.

Authors:  Jesse K Placone; Adam J Engler
Journal:  Adv Healthc Mater       Date:  2017-12-28       Impact factor: 9.933

7.  Fabrication and mechanical characterization of 3D printed vertical uniform and gradient scaffolds for bone and osteochondral tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sean M Bittner; Brandon T Smith; Luis Diaz-Gomez; Carrigan D Hudgins; Anthony J Melchiorri; David W Scott; John P Fisher; Antonios G Mikos
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 8.  Mesenchymal Stem/Progenitor Cells: The Prospect of Human Clinical Translation.

Authors:  Dina Rady; Marwa M S Abbass; Aiah A El-Rashidy; Sara El Moshy; Israa Ahmed Radwan; Christof E Dörfer; Karim M Fawzy El-Sayed
Journal:  Stem Cells Int       Date:  2020-08-11       Impact factor: 5.443

Review 9.  3D Printing for Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Amit Bandyopadhyay; Indranath Mitra; Susmita Bose
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 5.096

10.  Next Generation Tissue Engineering of Orthopedic Soft Tissue-to-Bone Interfaces.

Authors:  Alexander J Boys; Mary Clare McCorry; Scott Rodeo; Lawrence J Bonassar; Lara A Estroff
Journal:  MRS Commun       Date:  2017-10-03       Impact factor: 2.566

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.