Esteban Emiliani1, Olivier Traxer. 1. aFundacion Puigvert, Department of Urology, Universidad Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain and Hôpital Tenon, Department of Urology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, France bHôpital Tenon, Department of Urology, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI, France.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Flexible ureteroscopy has been widely developed in the last decade been nowadays one of the first line treatment options for urolithiasis and conservative management for upper tract urothelial tumors. Even though some unfavorable features of the reusable flexible scopes can limit the surgical procedure such as their availability, lack of sterilization or costly repairs. Disposable scopes have been developed with the intention of improving such problems. RECENT FINDINGS: To our knowledge, seven devices have been developed. Of the scopes features, size, deflection, image quality and ergonomic handling have to be at least as good as reusable ones as they are expected to be noninferior. Three devices match all the features of reusable scopes, although only one has been properly studied. SUMMARY: Not all the available disposable devices have been properly studied or compared with standard scopes. Although some devices are promising more studies are needed to proof their benefits.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Flexible ureteroscopy has been widely developed in the last decade been nowadays one of the first line treatment options for urolithiasis and conservative management for upper tract urothelial tumors. Even though some unfavorable features of the reusable flexible scopes can limit the surgical procedure such as their availability, lack of sterilization or costly repairs. Disposable scopes have been developed with the intention of improving such problems. RECENT FINDINGS: To our knowledge, seven devices have been developed. Of the scopes features, size, deflection, image quality and ergonomic handling have to be at least as good as reusable ones as they are expected to be noninferior. Three devices match all the features of reusable scopes, although only one has been properly studied. SUMMARY: Not all the available disposable devices have been properly studied or compared with standard scopes. Although some devices are promising more studies are needed to proof their benefits.
Authors: N F Davis; M R Quinlan; C Browne; N R Bhatt; R P Manecksha; F T D'Arcy; N Lawrentschuk; D M Bolton Journal: World J Urol Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: Ahmed I Ali; Amr Eldakhakhny; Abdelsalam Abdelfadel; Mahmoud F Rohiem; Mohamed Elbadry; Ali Hassan Journal: World J Urol Date: 2022-07-27 Impact factor: 3.661
Authors: Giovanni S Marchini; Fábio C Torricelli; Carlos A Batagello; Manoj Monga; Fábio C Vicentini; Alexandre Danilovic; Miguel Srougi; William C Nahas; Eduardo Mazzucchi Journal: Int Braz J Urol Date: 2019 Jul-Aug Impact factor: 1.541
Authors: Thomas James Johnston; Joyce Baard; Jean de la Rosette; Steeve Doizi; Guido Giusti; Thomas Knoll; Silvia Proietti; Marianne Brehmer; Esteban Emiliani; Daniel Pérez-Fentes; Palle Jorn Sloth Osther; Christian Seitz; Naomi Neal; Ben Turney; Mudhar Hasan; Olivier Traxer; Oliver Wiseman Journal: Cent European J Urol Date: 2018-10-02