BACKGROUND: Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) can resist conventional mapping strategies. Studies regarding optimal mapping and ablation methods for patients with noninducible RVOT-PVCs are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel mapping strategy for these cases: voltage mapping combined with pace mapping. HYPOTHESIS: METHODS: We retrospectively included symptomatic patients (n = 148; 76 males; age, 44.5 ± 1.4 years) with drug-refractory PVCs originating from the RVOT, who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), and stratified them as Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 patients had noninducible RVOT-PVCs, determined after programmed stimulation, burst pacing, and isoproterenol infusion (n = 21; 12 males; age, 39.5 ± 10.8 years). Group 2 patients had inducible PVCs. Group 1 patients were subjected to voltage mapping combined with pace mapping; Group 2 underwent conventional mapping. In all patients prior to RFCA, detailed 3-dimensional electroanatomic voltage maps of the RVOT were obtained during sinus rhythm using the CARTO system. RESULTS: Patients from both groups had similar success and complication rates associated with the RFCA. In Group 2, 89% (113/127) experienced the earliest and the successful ablation points in the voltage transitional zone. During the follow-up (36 ± 8 months), patients from both groups suffered similar rates of PVC relapse (2/21 and 7/127, respectively; P = 0.826). CONCLUSIONS: Voltage mapping combined with pace mapping is effective and safe for patients with noninducible RVOT-PVCs determined by conventional methods.
BACKGROUND:Premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) can resist conventional mapping strategies. Studies regarding optimal mapping and ablation methods for patients with noninducible RVOT-PVCs are limited. We retrospectively evaluated the efficacy and safety of a novel mapping strategy for these cases: voltage mapping combined with pace mapping. HYPOTHESIS: METHODS: We retrospectively included symptomatic patients (n = 148; 76 males; age, 44.5 ± 1.4 years) with drug-refractory PVCs originating from the RVOT, who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA), and stratified them as Group 1 and Group 2. Group 1 patients had noninducible RVOT-PVCs, determined after programmed stimulation, burst pacing, and isoproterenol infusion (n = 21; 12 males; age, 39.5 ± 10.8 years). Group 2 patients had inducible PVCs. Group 1 patients were subjected to voltage mapping combined with pace mapping; Group 2 underwent conventional mapping. In all patients prior to RFCA, detailed 3-dimensional electroanatomic voltage maps of the RVOT were obtained during sinus rhythm using the CARTO system. RESULTS:Patients from both groups had similar success and complication rates associated with the RFCA. In Group 2, 89% (113/127) experienced the earliest and the successful ablation points in the voltage transitional zone. During the follow-up (36 ± 8 months), patients from both groups suffered similar rates of PVC relapse (2/21 and 7/127, respectively; P = 0.826). CONCLUSIONS: Voltage mapping combined with pace mapping is effective and safe for patients with noninducible RVOT-PVCs determined by conventional methods.
Authors: M A Flemming; H Oral; M H Kim; H F Tse; F Pelosi; G F Michaud; B P Knight; S A Strickberger; F Morady Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 1999-11-15 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: F Morady; A H Kadish; L DiCarlo; W H Kou; S Winston; M deBuitlier; H Calkins; S Rosenheck; J Sousa Journal: Circulation Date: 1990-12 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Christopher F Liu; Jim W Cheung; George Thomas; James E Ip; Steven M Markowitz; Bruce B Lerman Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2014-06-10
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Saenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2020-10 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: J Fedida; T Strisciuglio; M Sohal; M Wolf; K Van Beeumen; A Neyrinck; P Taghji; C Lepiece; A Almorad; Y Vandekerckhove; R Tavernier; M Duytschaever; S Knecht Journal: J Interv Card Electrophysiol Date: 2018-02-24 Impact factor: 1.900
Authors: Edmond M Cronin; Frank M Bogun; Philippe Maury; Petr Peichl; Minglong Chen; Narayanan Namboodiri; Luis Aguinaga; Luiz Roberto Leite; Sana M Al-Khatib; Elad Anter; Antonio Berruezo; David J Callans; Mina K Chung; Phillip Cuculich; Andre d'Avila; Barbara J Deal; Paolo Della Bella; Thomas Deneke; Timm-Michael Dickfeld; Claudio Hadid; Haris M Haqqani; G Neal Kay; Rakesh Latchamsetty; Francis Marchlinski; John M Miller; Akihiko Nogami; Akash R Patel; Rajeev Kumar Pathak; Luis C Sáenz Morales; Pasquale Santangeli; John L Sapp; Andrea Sarkozy; Kyoko Soejima; William G Stevenson; Usha B Tedrow; Wendy S Tzou; Niraj Varma; Katja Zeppenfeld Journal: Europace Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 5.214
Authors: Leonor Parreira; Pedro Carmo; Rita Marinheiro; Dinis Mesquita; José Farinha; Ana Esteves; Pedro Amador; António Ferreira; Marta Fonseca; Rui Caria; Pedro Adragao Journal: Front Physiol Date: 2021-07-02 Impact factor: 4.566