Literature DB >> 28025364

"Managing" the Placebo Effect: The Single-Blind Placebo Lead-in Response in Two Pain Models.

R Norman Harden1, Meryem Saracoglu2,3,4, Sara Connolly2,3, Amy Kirsling2,3, Kelly Comstock2,3, Katherine Khazey2,3, Trevor Gerson2,3, John Burns5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: "Placebo effects" in analgesic medication trials for chronic pain are pervasive; however, little is known regarding mechanisms or factors that may influence the presence or magnitude of these effects. Our objective is to consider elements of the placebo response in the context of two pain models using a "single-blind placebo lead-in" design (SBPLI).
METHODS: As part of two pilot drug trials using knee osteoarthritis (KOA) and non-radicular low back pain (LBP) subjects, SBPLI protocols were conducted. We examined whether gender and/or diagnosis affected placebo responses as observed in changes in patient self-reported pain, depressive and pain anxiety symptoms. We also evaluated the placebo response on performance-based tests (stair climbing, range of motion (ROM), sit to stand repetitions, and 6-minute treadmill distance).
RESULTS: VAS Pain Intensity (Now) values decreased significantly during the SBPLI for the sample as a whole, but the effects appeared stronger among LBP subjects. CES-D short form values (depressive symptoms) did not decrease significantly during the SBPLI for the sample as a whole, but some placebo effects appeared to emerge for women in the KOA group. PASS values (pain anxiety symptoms) decreased significantly, albeit mildly, during the SBPLI for the sample as a whole.Stair Climb (time) revealed no significant SBPLI effects. Bend Forward to Floor (ROM) increased significantly at the end of the SBPLI period for the sample as a whole, but the effects appeared stronger among KOA subjects. Sit to Stand Repetitions increased during the SBPLI for the sample as a whole. Treadmill Distance did not change significantly from Visit 1 to Visit 2; however, a significant Sex difference for the KOA group was found such that women showed greater Treadmill Distance at Visit 2.
CONCLUSION: Placebo effects emerged across psychometric and performance-based measures, indicating the pervasiveness of this phenomenon. In this design, diagnostic and (to a lesser extent) gender categories differentials were observed during the placebo period. The SBPLI design may prove not only a robust method in studying the placebo phenomena, but also as a design element to mitigate some aspects of the placebo response in clinical trials.
© 2016 American Academy of Pain Medicine. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronic Low Back Pain; Osteoarthritis Pain; Pain Modules; Placebo; Single-Blind Placebo Lead-In

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28025364     DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnv109

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pain Med        ISSN: 1526-2375            Impact factor:   3.750


  5 in total

Review 1.  Cell therapy for intervertebral disc herniation and degenerative disc disease: clinical trials.

Authors:  Jordy Schol; Daisuke Sakai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Stem cell therapy in discogenic back pain.

Authors:  Ahmed H Barakat; Vivian A Elwell; Khai S Lam
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-12

Review 3.  Advancing cell therapies for intervertebral disc regeneration from the lab to the clinic: Recommendations of the ORS spine section.

Authors:  Lachlan J Smith; Lara Silverman; Daisuke Sakai; Christine L Le Maitre; Robert L Mauck; Neil R Malhotra; Jeffrey C Lotz; Conor T Buckley
Journal:  JOR Spine       Date:  2018-10-08

4.  Designing and conducting proof-of-concept chronic pain analgesic clinical trials.

Authors:  Claudia M Campbell; Ian Gilron; Tina Doshi; Srinivasa Raja
Journal:  Pain Rep       Date:  2019-02-26

Review 5.  Molecular Mechanisms of Sex-Related Differences in Arthritis and Associated Pain.

Authors:  Ju-Ryoung Kim; Hyun Ah Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-26       Impact factor: 5.923

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.