Chan Shen1, Kenneth L Kehl2, Bo Zhao3, George R Simon4, Shouhao Zhou5, Sharon H Giordano3. 1. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX; Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. Electronic address: cshen@mdanderson.org. 2. Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 3. Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 4. Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX. 5. Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy significantly improves outcomes among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbor sensitizing mutations. Patterns of EGFR testing have not been well-documented. The objective of this population-based study is to assess the testing pattern on a national scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using MarketScan 2012 to 2014 data, we identified 5842 patients newly diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer from January 2013 to June 2014 and assessed their EGFR mutation testing pattern in the 6 months after diagnosis. We further examined the testing rate among patients who received the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Because histology information is not available in this database, we also conducted a subgroup analysis of EGFR testing among patients who were treated with bevacizumab or pemetrexed, who are likely to have non-squamous NSCLC. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to ascertain factors associated with EGFR testing. RESULTS: Of 5842 patients with metastatic lung cancer, 1039 (18%) had claims for EGFR testing within 6 months of diagnosis, and 283 (5%) received erlotinib. The testing rate among patients who received erlotinib was 42%. Within a subgroup of 1685 patients treated with bevacizumab or pemetrexed, 616 (37%) underwent EGFR testing. Multivariable logistic regression showed that younger patients, female patients, patients with fewer comorbidities, and patients living in the West region were more likely to receive EGFR testing. CONCLUSION: This population-based study demonstrates low EGFR testing rates among advanced lung cancer patients in 2013 and 2014.
INTRODUCTION:Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy significantly improves outcomes among patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumors harbor sensitizing mutations. Patterns of EGFR testing have not been well-documented. The objective of this population-based study is to assess the testing pattern on a national scale. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Using MarketScan 2012 to 2014 data, we identified 5842 patients newly diagnosed with metastatic lung cancer from January 2013 to June 2014 and assessed their EGFR mutation testing pattern in the 6 months after diagnosis. We further examined the testing rate among patients who received the EGFR inhibitor erlotinib. Because histology information is not available in this database, we also conducted a subgroup analysis of EGFR testing among patients who were treated with bevacizumab or pemetrexed, who are likely to have non-squamous NSCLC. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to ascertain factors associated with EGFR testing. RESULTS: Of 5842 patients with metastatic lung cancer, 1039 (18%) had claims for EGFR testing within 6 months of diagnosis, and 283 (5%) received erlotinib. The testing rate among patients who received erlotinib was 42%. Within a subgroup of 1685 patients treated with bevacizumab or pemetrexed, 616 (37%) underwent EGFR testing. Multivariable logistic regression showed that younger patients, female patients, patients with fewer comorbidities, and patients living in the West region were more likely to receive EGFR testing. CONCLUSION: This population-based study demonstrates low EGFR testing rates among advanced lung cancerpatients in 2013 and 2014.
Authors: David S Ettinger; Wallace Akerley; Gerold Bepler; Matthew G Blum; Andrew Chang; Richard T Cheney; Lucian R Chirieac; Thomas A D'Amico; Todd L Demmy; Apar Kishor P Ganti; Ramaswamy Govindan; Frederic W Grannis; Thierry Jahan; Mohammad Jahanzeb; David H Johnson; Anne Kessinger; Ritsuko Komaki; Feng-Ming Kong; Mark G Kris; Lee M Krug; Quynh-Thu Le; Inga T Lennes; Renato Martins; Janis O'Malley; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Gregory A Otterson; Jyoti D Patel; Katherine M Pisters; Karen Reckamp; Gregory J Riely; Eric Rohren; George R Simon; Scott J Swanson; Douglas E Wood; Stephen C Yang Journal: J Natl Compr Canc Netw Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 11.908
Authors: Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Ryohei Katayama; Christine M Lovly; Nerina T McDonald; Pierre P Massion; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Adriana Gonzalez; Rong Fang; Eugene J Mark; Julie M Batten; Haiquan Chen; Keith D Wilner; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Carbone; Hongbin Ji; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mari Mino-Kenudson; William Pao; A John Iafrate Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Marissa N Balak; Yixuan Gong; Gregory J Riely; Romel Somwar; Allan R Li; Maureen F Zakowski; Anne Chiang; Guangli Yang; Ouathek Ouerfelli; Mark G Kris; Marc Ladanyi; Vincent A Miller; William Pao Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Michael J Hassett; Debra P Ritzwoller; Nathan Taback; Nikki Carroll; Angel M Cronin; Gladys V Ting; Deb Schrag; Joan L Warren; Mark C Hornbrook; Jane C Weeks Journal: Med Care Date: 2014-10 Impact factor: 2.983
Authors: Caroline Mariano; Ian Bosdet; Aly Karsan; Diana Ionescu; Nevin Murray; Janessa J Laskin; Yongliang Zhai; Barbara Melosky; Sophie Sun; Cheryl Ho Journal: Lung Cancer Date: 2013-10-19 Impact factor: 5.705
Authors: John H Stewart; Alain G Bertoni; Jennifer L Staten; Edward A Levine; Cary P Gross Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2007-08-08 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Lauren L Palazzo; Deirdre F Sheehan; Angela C Tramontano; Chung Yin Kong Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-02-20 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Kelsey S Lau-Min; Yimei Li; Jennifer R Eads; Xiaoliang Wang; Neal J Meropol; Ronac Mamtani; Kelly D Getz Journal: Cancer Date: 2021-03-17 Impact factor: 6.921
Authors: Maria E Arcila; Soo-Ryum Yang; Amir Momeni; Douglas A Mata; Paulo Salazar; Roger Chan; Daniela Elezovic; Ryma Benayed; Ahmet Zehir; Darren J Buonocore; Natasha Rekhtman; Oscar Lin; Marc Ladanyi; Khedoudja Nafa Journal: JTO Clin Res Rep Date: 2020-07-18
Authors: Chan Shen; Rolfy A Perez Holguin; Eric Schaefer; Shouhao Zhou; Chandra P Belani; Patrick C Ma; Michael F Reed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2022-04-09 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Adam H Fox; James R Jett; Upal Basu Roy; Bruce E Johnson; Jennifer C King; Nikki Martin; Raymond U Osarogiagbon; M Patricia Rivera; Lauren S Rosenthal; Robert A Smith; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Chest Date: 2021-06-26 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Kara L Larson; Bin Huang; Quan Chen; Thomas Tucker; Marissa Schuh; Susanne M Arnold; Jill M Kolesar Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 3.240