Literature DB >> 28018884

Trends in prostate biopsy in Ontario, 1992-2014: a cohort study.

Luke T Lavallée1, Rodney H Breau1, Dean Fergusson1, Carl van Walraven1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Prostate cancer is a substantial public health concern; however, in recent years, national guidelines have recommended against prostate cancer screening. We sought to determine if prostate biopsy incidence has changed over time in Ontario. We hypothesized that there has been a decrease in the incidence of prostate biopsy in recent years.
METHODS: This cohort study used population-based administrative databases from Ontario, Canada. We used a diagnostic code to identify if a patient received his first prostate biopsy between 1992 and 2012 (the last year for which records in the Ontario Cancer Registry were complete). Age-stratified and overall age-standardized incidences of prostate biopsy were determined. Changes over time in prostate biopsy incidence and the proportion of prostate biopsies that showed malignant disease were examined using negative binomial regression adjusting for patient age.
RESULTS: We identified 231 266 Ontario men aged 40 years and older who received their first prostate biopsy between 1992 and 2014. Up to 2007, biopsy incidence increased in younger men, but decreased in older men. After 2007, biopsy incidence decreased in all age groups, with the age-standardized overall biopsy incidence dropping from 480 per 100 000 in 2007 to 250 per 100 000 in 2014. A total of 84 149 (39%) incident biopsies showed malignant disease. The proportion of biopsies classified as showing malignant disease increased during the study period, from 25.6% in 1992 to 49.2% in 2010, and then decreased in all age groups.
INTERPRETATION: Previously increasing biopsy rates decreased significantly in recent years, suggesting that prostate cancer screening in Ontario may be changing.

Entities:  

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018884      PMCID: PMC5173466          DOI: 10.9778/cmajo.20160079

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  CMAJ Open        ISSN: 2291-0026


  18 in total

1.  Implications of stage-specific survival rates in assessing recent declines in prostate cancer mortality rates.

Authors:  R E Tarone; K C Chu; O W Brawley
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2008-08-05       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Survival of men with prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy in Ontario.

Authors:  Luke T Lavallée; Douglas C Manuel; Carl van Walraven
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-04-21       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Recommendations on screening for prostate cancer with the prostate-specific antigen test.

Authors:  Neil Bell; Sarah Connor Gorber; Amanda Shane; Michel Joffres; Harminder Singh; James Dickinson; Elizabeth Shaw; Lesley Dunfield; Marcello Tonelli
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-10-27       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Screening for prostate cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement.

Authors:  Virginia A Moyer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2012-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

6.  Prostate-cancer mortality at 11 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Stefano Ciatto; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Hans Lilja; Marco Zappa; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Páez; Liisa Määttänen; Chris H Bangma; Gunnar Aus; Sigrid Carlsson; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Theodorus van der Kwast; Paula M Kujala; Bert G Blijenberg; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Andreas Huber; Kimmo Taari; Matti Hakama; Sue M Moss; Harry J de Koning; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Impact of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendations against prostate specific antigen screening on prostate biopsy and cancer detection rates.

Authors:  Bimal Bhindi; Muhammad Mamdani; Girish S Kulkarni; Antonio Finelli; Robert J Hamilton; John Trachtenberg; Alexandre R Zlotta; Andrew Evans; Theodorus H van der Kwast; Ants Toi; Neil E Fleshner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2014-12-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Prostate cancer screening in men ages 75 and older fell by 8 percentage points after Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  David H Howard; Florence K Tangka; Gery P Guy; Donatus U Ekwueme; Joseph Lipscomb
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Primary care physician PSA screening practices before and after the final U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation.

Authors:  Joshua A Cohn; Chihsiung E Wang; Justin C Lakeman; Jonathan C Silverstein; Charles B Brendler; Kristian R Novakovic; Michael S McGuire; Brian T Helfand
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 3.498

10.  Annual Report to the Nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2010, featuring prevalence of comorbidity and impact on survival among persons with lung, colorectal, breast, or prostate cancer.

Authors:  Brenda K Edwards; Anne-Michelle Noone; Angela B Mariotto; Edgar P Simard; Francis P Boscoe; S Jane Henley; Ahmedin Jemal; Hyunsoon Cho; Robert N Anderson; Betsy A Kohler; Christie R Eheman; Elizabeth M Ward
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2013-12-16       Impact factor: 6.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  2018 CUA Abstracts.

Authors: 
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2018-06       Impact factor: 1.862

2.  Time trends in prostate cancer screening in Swiss primary care (2010 to 2017) - A retrospective study.

Authors:  Stefan Zechmann; Stefania Di Gangi; Vladimir Kaplan; Rahel Meier; Thomas Rosemann; Fabio Valeri; Oliver Senn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.