Literature DB >> 28018834

Detailed Measurement of Wall Strain with 3D Speckle Tracking in the Aortic Root: A Case of Bionic Support for Clinical Decision Making.

Sebastian Vogt1, Konstantinos Karatolios2, Andreas Wittek3, Christopher Blasé3, Anette Ramaswamy4, Nikolas Mirow5, Rainer Moosdorf5.   

Abstract

Three-dimensional (3D) wall motion tracking (WMT) based on ultrasound imaging enables estimation of aortic wall motion and deformation. It provides insights into changes in vascular compliance and vessel wall properties essential for understanding the pathogenesis and progression of aortic diseases. In this report, we employed the novel 3D WMT analysis on the ascending aorta aneurysm (AA) to estimate local aortic wall motion and strain in case of a patient scheduled for replacement of the aortic root. Although progression of the diameter indicates surgical therapy, at present we addressed the question for optimal surgical time point. According to the data, AA in our case has enlarged diameter and subsequent reduced circumferential wall strain, but area tracking data reveals almost normal elastic properties. Virtual remodeling of the aortic root opens a play list for different loading conditions to determine optimal surgical intervention in time.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aneurysm; aortic disease; biomechanics; echocardiography

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018834      PMCID: PMC5177445          DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1571815

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Rep        ISSN: 2194-7635


Introduction

The lethal risk for patients by formation of aortic aneurysms is still high. Although atherosclerotic process proceeds, first minor symptoms are silent and suggest both patient and practitioner an “apparent security.” Quite often, an “enlarged aortic diameter” is measured as benchmark for cardiosurgical repair. In case of the ascending aorta, an increase in diameter up to 5.5 cm and for the descending aorta an increase in diameter up to 6 cm are considered as limits, respectively.1 However, a marked heterogeneity in the rigidity of the wall of aortic segments can require earlier resection. In case of enlarged aortic roots, the question remains on one hand the earlier the better or surgery just in time of appearing syndromes, although first sign of pain could mean a sudden significant bleeding and urgent emergency. We developed an algorithm on the basis of finite element analysis for evaluation of ultrasonic three-dimensional (3D) speckle tracking data.2 With the help of this special investigation, we have established a method for further risk stratification regarding aortic root rupture. In this report, we give an example for further bionic analysis of the aortic root to give a help for clinical decision making and optimal schedule of operation. This application was approved by the ethics committee (registration: AZ 131/12; MR 01.2013) and have therefore been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. The person gave his informed consent prior to his inclusion in the study. The authors obtained consent to publish the data from the patient.

Case Report

A 70-year-old patient was admitted to hospital with a suspected diagnosis of coronary heart disease. In coronary angiography, high-grade coronary narrowing was excluded. Evidence of an aneurysm of the ascending aorta was found by computed tomographic (CT) scan, whose inner diameter was 52 mm (Fig. 1). Aortic elongation led to a shift of the great vessel to the paravertebral left. The aortic valve was bicuspid (BAV), highly sclerotic and there was aortic regurgitation of higher degree. It had two cusps and one raphe and was potentially tricuspid. Two underdeveloped and one fully developed cusps were of non-equal size with one under- and two fully developed commissures (classical type 1 BAV with the subcategory R – N, B (I + S) according to Sievers and Schmidtke).3 Corresponding to these findings, we found an aneurysm of the ascending aortic vessel. The aortic root was not affected. By modified 3D echocardiography of the ascending aorta, specific investigations of the elastic properties of the aortic wall were performed. Aortic imaging was achieved with a commercial real-time 3D-echocardiography system (Artida, Toshiba Medical Systems, Tokyo, Japan) by means of a 3D transthoracic probe (PST-25SX, 1–4 MHz phased array matrix transducer). Aortic wall motion analysis with speckle tracking was performed on the stored 3D raw data by a modified wall motion tracking algorithm with advance cardiac package (Toshiba, UltraExtend, Toshiba Medical Systems GmbH, Neuss, Germany) and circumferential strain (CS) and area strain (AS) were calculated. These data were also further analyzed and processed with a custom-written software and the Abaqus/Viewer 6.10–1 (Simulia, Providence, Rhode Island, United States) to visualize local strains and displacements on 3D models of the aorta.2 A grid was placed along each of the intra- and extraluminal interfaces of the aortic segment and those points were tracked. Displacements of the points in the grids allow the documentation of the field vectors which are to be regarded as a measure of the time-dependent deformation of the aortic wall. These deformations can draw far more accurate color-coded images in the modeled aortic segment (Fig. 2a, e). Because of these deformations, longitudinal stain (LS) and CS for the segment were calculated to be 13.6 and 18.1%, respectively (Fig. 2). LS values were not different in concern of normal values (LSN between 15.2 and 17.1%4), but, of course, CSS were increased (CSN between 9.2 and 10.0%2). With the higher diameter of the aortic root (see Fig. 1), the index of strain heterogeneity ( ) in this case was lower (0.76 vs. 1.5%2) and also the systolic dyssynchrony index ( ) was reduced (14.3 vs. 30.7%2), indicating reduced movement of the aortic wall but almost normal rigidity.
Fig. 1

3D reconstruction of the patients' CT scan. The enlarged aortic root is obvious. Different diameters as typical decision-making tools for surgical intervention at present are seen.

Fig. 2

Results after infinite element analysis of 3D speckle tracking recording of the aortic part of interest. (A) Colored feature of the longitudinal and (B) distribution along the aortic root is shown. (E) Same feature and (F) distribution are seen for the circumferential strain. Final overall resulting displacement time related (C, G) and its distribution (D, H) between normal (C and D) and enlarged (G and H) aortic roots.

3D reconstruction of the patients' CT scan. The enlarged aortic root is obvious. Different diameters as typical decision-making tools for surgical intervention at present are seen. Results after infinite element analysis of 3D speckle tracking recording of the aortic part of interest. (A) Colored feature of the longitudinal and (B) distribution along the aortic root is shown. (E) Same feature and (F) distribution are seen for the circumferential strain. Final overall resulting displacement time related (C, G) and its distribution (D, H) between normal (C and D) and enlarged (G and H) aortic roots. AS is a deformation measure that combines LS and CS in one value, thus being a more appropriate deformation measure than CS alone. AS analysis shows no difference to normal data (30.9 vs. 29.9%). Distensibility relates the observed deformation (strain) to pulse pressure and describes the elastic properties of the aortic wall. Circumferential distensibility (CD = 2.51 × 10−3 mm Hg) and area distensibility (AD = 4.29 × 10−3 mm Hg) were determined. CD is in the range of the values that were observed in healthy volunteers (CDN between 2.00 and 2.63 × 10−3 mm Hg). AD is reduced (ADN between 5.98 and 7.86 mm Hg) indicating increased stiffness of the aortic wall. All the data result in a feature of an enlarged aortic root and subsequent deformations and displacements but rather normal elastic material behavior (Fig. 2).

Discussion

The formation of an aortic aneurysm is undoubtedly a dangerous threat. Currently, we expect an age- and gender-related rupture rate of 3.5 per 100,000 persons.5 However, at present in patients older than 65 years, incidence and mortality of ruptured aortic aneurysms was found in less than 2%. This reduction is apparently due to screening programs, which indicates a potential hazard in time. An increase in aortic size beyond a diameter of 5 cm is associated with increased mortality.6 Often the experience of the surgeon determines whether aortic root replacement is indicated or not, “even” at 5 cm. With increased diameters, increased aortic wall stiffness was observed.1 Beyond such population-averaged information, an exact description of the mechanical properties of the aortic wall would give a much more accurate tool to identify rupture-endangered aortic segments. Our group uses the high-resolution ultrasound sequences to determine anisotropic elastic properties of the aorta using an iterative finite element updating algorithm.2 4 By creating a virtual computer model in silico, a general technical principle will be implemented in a particular medical case. It seems possible in the near future to study biological objects in silico by means of ultrasound and to determine specific characteristics (e.g., elasticity, rigidity, and material coefficients).2 In this case according to common indications, the ascending aorta was replaced by prosthesis. According to biomechanics, it remains questionable weather aortic roots in this case have to be replaced. Although the histology represents mucoid degenerations of the aortic wall and lipidosis of the intima (Fig. 3), the indication remains unclear if in case of severe concomitant diseases (chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diabetes, progredient arteriosclerosis, stroke, etc.) and higher age, surgical procedure cannot be avoided by successful medical therapy of blood pressure. Therefore, risk stratification appears necessary and nowadays possible of impending aortic rupture. Without any doubt, BAV morphology has an impact on the shape and progression of an aortic type A aneurysm.3 The vertical blood flow in the thoracic aorta is changed.7 The flow pattern is a major contributor in the pathogenesis of aortic dilation8 because of its association with altered wall shear stress.9 10 The current speckle tracking imaging method in echocardiography has proven to be a valuable diagnostic tool for the segment-wise analysis of rotation and deformation, increasingly used in clinical diagnosis.11 Modeling and calculations regarding the aortic wall properties represent a “snapshot” of a current status. Although material parameters and wall motion characteristics give an improved indication for the likelihood of aortic rupture, they remain to be further worked out. We know about a progression of aortic dilation in case of aneurysms of approximately 0.10 cm/year on average in the ascending aorta.1 When the detailed current speckle tracking analysis could be supplemented with additional flow data, the progression analysis will be improved. Although the present operative risk of elective replacement of the ascending aorta is low, we should be attended for the right indication at the right time. Especially, in terms of a more conservative management of aortic dissections considered for long-term survival, computer-assisted wall motion strain measurement with 3D ultrasound speckle tracking and fitted finite element analysis could be helpful.12
Fig. 3

Histological examination of the patients' aortic wall (EvG staining, 100-fold magnification (A) and HE staining 200-fold magnification (B), respectively). pathological findings results in mucoid degeneration of the aorta (A) with lipidosis of the intimal layer (B).

Histological examination of the patients' aortic wall (EvG staining, 100-fold magnification (A) and HE staining 200-fold magnification (B), respectively). pathological findings results in mucoid degeneration of the aorta (A) with lipidosis of the intimal layer (B).

Conclusion

3D echocardiographic analysis together with speckle tracking evaluation of wall movement and subsequent finite element analysis opens the way to describe the mechanical behavior of the aortic root and supports clinical decision for intervention or conservative therapy.
  12 in total

1.  Method for aortic wall strain measurement with three-dimensional ultrasound speckle tracking and fitted finite element analysis.

Authors:  Konstantinos Karatolios; Andreas Wittek; Thet Htar Nwe; Peter Bihari; Amit Shelke; Dennis Josef; Thomas Schmitz-Rixen; Josef Geks; Bernhard Maisch; Christopher Blase; Rainer Moosdorf; Sebastian Vogt
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 4.330

Review 2.  Indications for aortic replacement.

Authors:  John A Elefteriades
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 5.209

3.  A classification system for the bicuspid aortic valve from 304 surgical specimens.

Authors:  Hans-H Sievers; Claudia Schmidtke
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 5.209

4.  Myocardial mechanics: understanding and applying three-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography in clinical practice.

Authors:  Khawaja Afzal Ammar; Timothy E Paterick; Bijoy K Khandheria; M Fuad Jan; Christopher Kramer; Matt M Umland; Alix J Tercius; Lisa Baratta; A Jamil Tajik
Journal:  Echocardiography       Date:  2012-05-17       Impact factor: 1.724

5.  Total Arch Replacement Versus More Conservative Management in Type A Acute Aortic Dissection.

Authors:  Marco Di Eusanio; Paolo Berretta; Mariano Cefarelli; Alfonsi Jacopo; Giacomo Murana; Sebastiano Castrovinci; Roberto Di Bartolomeo
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.330

6.  Yearly rupture or dissection rates for thoracic aortic aneurysms: simple prediction based on size.

Authors:  Ryan R Davies; Lee J Goldstein; Michael A Coady; Shawn L Tittle; John A Rizzo; Gary S Kopf; John A Elefteriades
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.330

7.  Bicuspid aortic cusp fusion morphology alters aortic three-dimensional outflow patterns, wall shear stress, and expression of aortopathy.

Authors:  Riti Mahadevia; Alex J Barker; Susanne Schnell; Pegah Entezari; Preeti Kansal; Paul W M Fedak; S Chris Malaisrie; Patrick McCarthy; Jeremy Collins; James Carr; Michael Markl
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Acute aortic dissection: population-based incidence compared with degenerative aortic aneurysm rupture.

Authors:  W Darrin Clouse; John W Hallett; Hartzell V Schaff; Peter C Spittell; Charles M Rowland; Duane M Ilstrup; L Joseph Melton
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 7.616

9.  Aortic dilation in bicuspid aortic valve disease: flow pattern is a major contributor and differs with valve fusion type.

Authors:  Malenka M Bissell; Aaron T Hess; Luca Biasiolli; Steffan J Glaze; Margaret Loudon; Alex Pitcher; Anne Davis; Bernard Prendergast; Michael Markl; Alex J Barker; Stefan Neubauer; Saul G Myerson
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 7.792

10.  Quantitative Analysis of Vortical Blood Flow in the Thoracic Aorta Using 4D Phase Contrast MRI.

Authors:  Jochen von Spiczak; Gerard Crelier; Daniel Giese; Sebastian Kozerke; David Maintz; Alexander Christian Bunck
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Evaluation of aortic stiffness by a new simplified 2D speckle tracking analysis.

Authors:  Luca Sabia; Eleonora Avenatti; Marco Cesareo; Dario Leone; Francesco Tosello; Franco Veglio; Alberto Milan
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 2.357

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.