Literature DB >> 28018505

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy between Pulse Volume Recording Parameters and Exercise-Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index in Patients with Ankle-Brachial Pressure Index above 0.9.

Kazuo Tsuyuki1, Kenji Kohno1, Miho Asaoka1, Kunio Ebine2, Susumu Tamura2, Yasuhiro Ohzeki2, Toshifumi Murase2, Kaoru Sugi3, Kenta Kumagai3, Itaru Yokouchi3, Kenji Yamazaki3, Satoru Tohi3, Mutsumi Sorimachi4, Shinichi Watanabe5.   

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to clarify whether or not pulse volume recoding (PVR) parameters have screening capability equivalent to ankle-brachial pressure index after walking (Ex-ABI) for patients with 0.91 or higher ABI. Patients and
Methods: The subjects were 87 patients (147 limbs) with symptoms of lower extremities with 0.91 or higher ABI. In all patients, upstroke time (UT), percentage of mean artery pressure (%MAP) of PVR and Ex-ABI were measured, and computed tomographic angiography (CTA) was concomitantly performed.
Results: Area under the curve (AUC) of receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curves of Ex-ABI, %MAP, and UT were 0.90, 0.70, and 0.81, respectively. A significant difference was noted in AUC between Ex-ABI and %MAP (p <0.001). When the cut-off values were set at %MAP ≥45% and UT ≥180 msec, the accuracies of %MAP and UT were markedly lower than that of Ex-ABI. When the cut-off values were corrected to the values determined from the ROC curves (%MAP ≥41, UT ≥164 msec), the diagnostic accuracy of UT increased markedly.
Conclusion: In patients with 0.91 or higher ABI, screening capability of PVR parameters was markedly lower than that of Ex-ABI, but UT has screening capability close to that of Ex-ABI when the cut-off value is corrected downward.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ankle-brachial pressure index; peripheral arterial disease; pulse volume recording

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018505      PMCID: PMC5174993          DOI: 10.3400/avd.oa.16-00098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis        ISSN: 1881-641X


  5 in total

1.  Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II).

Authors:  L Norgren; W R Hiatt; J A Dormandy; M R Nehler; K A Harris; F G R Fowkes
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.268

2.  Combination of pulse volume recording (PVR) parameters and ankle-brachial index (ABI) improves diagnostic accuracy for peripheral arterial disease compared with ABI alone.

Authors:  Tomoko Hashimoto; Shigeo Ichihashi; Shinichi Iwakoshi; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Hypertens Res       Date:  2016-02-25       Impact factor: 3.872

Review 3.  Assessment of peripheral vascular disease in diabetes. Report and recommendations of an international workshop sponsored by the American Diabetes Association and the American Heart Association September 18-20, 1992 New Orleans, Louisiana.

Authors:  T J Orchard; D E Strandness
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Association of borderline ankle-brachial index with mortality and the incidence of peripheral artery disease in diabetic patients.

Authors:  Chiharu Natsuaki; Toyoshi Inoguchi; Yasutaka Maeda; Tomomi Yamada; Shuji Sasaki; Noriyuki Sonoda; Michio Shimabukuro; Hajime Nawata; Ryoichi Takayanagi
Journal:  Atherosclerosis       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 5.162

5.  Exercise-ankle brachial pressure index with one-minute treadmill walking in patients on maintenance hemodialysis.

Authors:  Kazuo Tsuyuki; Kenji Kohno; Kunio Ebine; Takehiro Obara; Toshiyuki Aoki; Atsuhiko Muto; Kenji Ninomiya; Kenta Kumagai; Itaru Yokouchi; Yoshiyuki Yazaki; Shinichi Watanabe
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2012-12-26
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.