| Literature DB >> 28018379 |
Qin Qiao1, Li Xue2, Qia Wang3, Hang Sun3, Yang Zhong4, Jinling Huang5, Jiajun Lei2, Ticao Zhang3.
Abstract
Multiple closely related species with genomic sequences provide an ideal system for studies on comparative and evolutionary genomics, as well as the mechanism of speciation. The whole genome sequences of six strawberry species (Fragaria spp.) have been released, which provide one of the richest genomic resources of any plant genus. In this study, we first generated seven transcriptome sequences of Fragaria species de novo, with a total of 48,557-82,537 unigenes per species. Combined with 13 other species genomes in Rosales, we reconstructed a phylogenetic tree at the genomic level. The phylogenic tree shows that Fragaria closed grouped with Rubus and the Fragaria clade is divided into three subclades. East Asian species appeared in every subclade, suggesting that the genus originated in this area at ∼7.99 Mya. Four species found in mountains of Southwest China originated at ∼3.98 Mya, suggesting that rapid speciation occurred to adapt to changing environments following the uplift of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau. Moreover, we identified 510 very significantly positively selected genes in the cultivated species F. × ananassa genome. This set of genes was enriched in functions related to specific agronomic traits, such as carbon metabolism and plant hormone signal transduction processes, which are directly related to fruit quality and flavor. These findings illustrate comprehensive evolutionary patterns in Fragaria and the genetic basis of fruit domestication of cultivated strawberry at the genomic/transcriptomic level.Entities:
Keywords: Fragaria; comparative genomics; evolutionary pattern; positive selection; transcriptome
Year: 2016 PMID: 28018379 PMCID: PMC5156730 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2016.01839
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
Statistics of study materials and gene numbers in Fragaria.
| Species | Abbreviation | Ploidy | Mating system | Genome size (Mb) | Number of genes | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FVE | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SC | 220.2 | 34809 | ||
| FNI | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SI | 206.4 | 87803 | ||
| FII | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SC | 199.6 | 76760 | ||
| FNU | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SI | 203.7 | 85062 | ||
| FNG | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SC | 274 ± 3.8∗ | 82537 | This study | |
| FPE | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SI | 268 ± 3.7∗ | 53748 | This study | |
| FMA | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SI | 241 ± 4.3∗ | 55911 | This study | |
| FVI | 2 | Hermaphrodite, SI | 230 ± 2.8∗ | 48557 | This study | |
| FOR | 4 | Dioecious | 214.2 | 99674 | ||
| FCO | 4 | Dioecious | NA | 62587 | This study | |
| FMO | 4 | Dioecious | 245 ± 3.3∗ | 52413 | This study | |
| FTI | 4 | Dioecious | NA | 54022 | This study | |
| – | 8 | Subdioecious | 697.8 | 230838 | ||
| FANhybrid | FAN | 2 | 173.2 | 45377 | ||
Statistics of clean data and unigenes in this study.
| Species | Statistics of clean data | Frequency distribution of unigenes’ lengths | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clean reads | Clean bases | Error (%) | Q20 (%) | Q30 (%) | GC (%) | Total number | Minimum Length | Median Length | Maximum Length | N50 | |
| FNG | 107941470 | 13.48G | 0.04 | 94.27 | 89.13 | 45.49 | 82537 | 201 | 412 | 16895 | 1405 |
| FPE | 68356166 | 10.25G | 0.02 | 96.82 | 91.66 | 46.04 | 53748 | 201 | 443 | 16152 | 1655 |
| FMA | 80770294 | 12.12G | 0.02 | 96.93 | 91.87 | 45.98 | 55911 | 201 | 435 | 16993 | 1672 |
| FVI | 59286810 | 8.89G | 0.02 | 96.67 | 91.31 | 46.27 | 48557 | 201 | 456 | 15622 | 1678 |
| FCO | 83949596 | 12.59G | 0.02 | 96.71 | 91.35 | 45.95 | 62587 | 201 | 399 | 16490 | 1563 |
| FMO | 71829414 | 10.77G | 0.02 | 96.46 | 90.85 | 46.03 | 52413 | 201 | 459 | 15581 | 1655 |
| FTI | 86674308 | 13.0G | 0.02 | 96.83 | 91.61 | 46.15 | 54022 | 201 | 449 | 15585 | 1638 |