Literature DB >> 28018350

Ménage-à-Trois: The Ratio of Bicarbonate to CO2 and the pH Regulate the Capacity of Neutrophils to Form NETs.

Christian Maueröder1, Aparna Mahajan1, Susanne Paulus2, Stefanie Gößwein2, Jonas Hahn1, Deborah Kienhöfer1, Mona H Biermann1, Philipp Tripal3, Ralf P Friedrich4, Luis E Munoz1, Markus F Neurath2, Christoph Becker2, Georg Andreas Schett1, Martin Herrmann1, Moritz Leppkes2.   

Abstract

In this study, we identified and characterized the potential of a high ratio of bicarbonate to CO2 and a moderately alkaline pH to render neutrophils prone to undergo neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. Both experimental settings increased the rate of spontaneous NET release and potentiated the NET-inducing capacity of phorbol esters (phorbol-2-myristate-13-acetate), ionomycin, monosodium urate, and LPS. In contrast, an acidic environment impaired NET formation both spontaneous and induced. Our findings indicate that intracellular alkalinization of neutrophils in response to an alkaline environment leads to an increase of intracellular calcium and neutrophil activation. We further found that the anion channel blocker DIDS strongly reduced NET formation induced by bicarbonate. This finding suggests that the effects observed are due to a molecular program that renders neutrophils susceptible to NET formation. Inflammatory foci may be characterized by an acidic environment. Our data indicate that NET formation is favored by the higher pH at the border regions of inflamed areas. Moreover, our findings highlight the necessity for strict pH control during assays of NET formation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CO2; NET; bicarbonate; calcium; inflammation; neutrophil extracellular traps; neutrophils; pH

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018350      PMCID: PMC5145884          DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2016.00583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Immunol        ISSN: 1664-3224            Impact factor:   7.561


Introduction

Neutrophils are the most abundant leukocyte subset in the human blood and constitute the first line of defense during infection (1, 2). A central effector function of neutrophils involves the release of decondensed chromatin decorated with cytoplasmic and granular proteins (3, 4). Since these structures may trap and degrade pathogens extracellularly inside their meshwork, they are referred to as neutrophil extracellular traps (NETs) and the accompanying process is termed NET formation (3). A variety of stimuli have been reported to induce formation of NETs, among them are bacteria, fungi, and microbial products (3, 5, 6). Other physiological stimuli include monosodium urate, immune complexes, apoptotic cells, or integrin-mediated signals at high cellular density (7–10). In experimental settings, chemicals with defined mechanisms of action such as phorbol-2-myristate-13-acetate (PMA) or ionomycin also induce NET formation (4). We have recently reported that occlusion of the pancreatic ducts by aggregated NETs is a driving factor of pancreatitis (11). In this study, we identified bicarbonate present in the pancreatic juice as a potent inducer of NET formation. In this manuscript, we aim to characterize more closely the influence of the triangular relationship of bicarbonate, CO2, and pH on NET formation. We observed that both a low pH and a high CO2 to bicarbonate ratio decrease the capacity of neutrophils to release NETs. Inflammatory foci may be characterized by an acidic microenvironment. Our data indicate that NET formation is favored at the border regions of inflamed areas and the beginning of inflammation. Furthermore, NET release may be favored by the restitution of physiological pH in ischemia–reperfusion situations. These observations will impact the understanding of multiple inflammatory diseases.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

4,4′-Diisothiocyanatostilbene-2,2′-disulfonic acid disodium salt hydrate (DIDS) and PI were from Sigma (Crailsheim, Germany). Hoechst 33342 was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (Frankfurt, Germany).

Isolation of Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes

All analyses of human material were performed in accordance to the institutional guidelines and with the approval of the ethical committee of the University Hospital Erlangen (permit # 193 13B). Written informed consent was given by each donor. Twenty milliliter of heparinized blood (20 U/ml) were taken from each normal healthy donor. Fifteen milliliter of PBS without calcium and magnesium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) were added and the suspension was gently applied on top of 15 ml of Ficoll (Bio-Rad, Dreieich, Germany). Cells were centrifuged at 1,400 rpm for 30 min at room temperature with lowest acceleration. Centrifuge was allowed to spin out without break. Suspension above the buffy coat was removed, and the white layer containing the PMNs on the top of the red blood cells was collected. To remove contaminating erythrocytes, PMNs were subjected to short cycles of hypotonic lysis with deionized water. Normal osmolality was restituted after 30 s with 10× PBS. PMNs with purity higher than 95% were adjusted to a concentration of 2 × 106 cells/ml in PBS without calcium and magnesium (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and stored at room temperature until further use.

Buffers and Culture Conditions

Isolated neutrophils were adjusted to a concentration of 6 × 106 cells/ml in Ringer’s solution (Deltaselect, Pfullingen, Germany). Twenty-five microliter of these solutions were added to 175 μl of indicated medium containing 2.5 μM Sytox Green (Thermo Fisher Scientific) with or without 10 ng/ml PMA (Sigma, Darmstadt, Germany), 1 μg/ml ionomycin (Sigma), 300 pg/cell monosodium urate crystals, or 2.5 μg/ml LPS from Klebsiella pneumoniae (L4268, Sigma) or Salmonella enterica serotype enteritidis (L6143, Sigma), respectively. Assays were performed either in 96-well cell plates (Greiner Bio-One, Frickenhausen, Germany) or 8-well Nunc chamber slides (VWR, Darmstadt, Germany). Plates and chamber slides were preincubated at 37°C and respective concentrations of CO2 at least 30 min prior to addition of 25 μl of cells in Ringer.

Platereader-Based Quantification of NET Formation

Plates containing PMN cultures were analyzed under the conditions described above for 4 h on an infinite® 200 pro plate reader (TECAN, Crailsheim, Germany). Excitation was performed at 485 nm and emission was detected at 535 nm. Relative fluorescence units were calculated as the 100-fold ratio of the fluorescence at the indicated time point and time point t = 0 min.

Immunohistochemistry

After addition of the cells, the chamber slides were incubated under these conditions for 3 h. Subsequently, 1% paraformaldehyde (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) in PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was added to each well and the preparations were incubated for 18 h at 4°C. Samples were blocked with 10% FCS (Biochrome, Berlin, Germany) in PBS (Thermo Fisher Scientific) for 1 h at room temperature. Cells were permeabilized with 0.1% Triton X-100 in water for 10 min. Primary antibody for neutrophil elastase (NE) (Abcam, United Kingdom, ab21595) 1:200 or citrullinated histone H3 (citH3) (Abcam, ab5103) 1:200 were added in 10% FCS in PBS for 18 h at 4°C. Slides were washed three times with PBS, and secondary anti-rabbit IgG antibody conjugated with Cy®5 (Jackson ImmunoResearch, Suffolk, United Kingdom, 111-175-144) 1:400 was added for 1.5 h at room temperature in the dark. Slides were washed with PBS. Staining solution containing 2.5 μM Sytox Green in PBS was added for 15 min at room temperature. Slides were washed with H2O and samples were embedded in DAKO fluorescent mounting medium (BIOZOL, Eching, Germany). Slides were analyzed on a BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence, Neu-Isenburg, Germany). Maximum intensity projection of Z-stacks and gamma correction were performed to increase depth of field and to allow proper display of NETs and nuclei on these images. Post-processing of pictures was performed with Photoshop CS5 (Adobe, München, Germany). Images were not used for quantification.

Live Cell Imaging

Chamber slides containing PMN cultures under the conditions described above were analyzed on a BZ-X710 microscope (Keyence, Neu-Isenburg, Germany) or an Axio Observer.Z1 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany) using a time-lapsed shooting sequence. Maximum intensity projection of Z-stacks and gamma correction were performed to increase depth of field and to allow proper display of NETs and nuclei on the same image, respectively. Post-processing of pictures was performed with Photoshop CS5 (Adobe, München, Germany) and ZEN pro 2012 (Zeiss).

Intracellular Calcium Measurement

Isolated neutrophils were suspended at a concentration of 10 × 106 cells/ml in PBS without calcium and magnesium and loaded with 3 μM Fluo-3 AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and 6 μM Fura-red AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Cells were incubated for 20 min at room temperature and followed by incubation at 37°C for 10 min. Cells were washed twice with PBS without calcium and magnesium and suspended in same medium at final concentration of 10 × 106 cells/ml. Fifty microliter of cell suspension was added to 450 μl of PBS with 0.4 mM CaCl2 and measured for 1 min by flow cytometry. Then, 2.5 ml of respective medium with calcium was added, which was preincubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 and fluorescence was measured for 15 min. To study the effect of extracellular acidification/alkalinization on calcium mobilization, PMN loaded with Fluo-3 AM and Fura-red AM was measured by flow cytometry in respective preincubated medium for 1 min. Then predetermined amount of HCl or NaOH was added to achieve respective extracellular pH followed by measurement for 15 min. Beckman Coulter’s Epics XL-MCL™ and software Kaluza 1.5 (Beckmann Coulter) were used for measurement and analysis, respectively. Original data file of cell events was divided in time-based gates and ratiometric fluorescence FL1–FL3 was used to determine intracellular calcium levels. The radiometric calcium levels were normalized to first time point level.

Measurement of Intracellular pH

Isolated neutrophils (10 × 106 cells/ml in PBS without calcium and magnesium) were loaded with 10 μM carboxy-SNARF-1-AM (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and incubated at room temperature for 20 min followed by incubation at 37°C for 10 min. Cells were washed twice with PBS without calcium and magnesium and suspended in same buffer at 10 × 106 cells/ml. Intracellular pH of neutrophils with different concentrations of bicarbonate in RPMI was recorded using Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA). To determine the change in intracellular pH in response to extracellular pH of the medium, 100 μl of the cell suspension was added to 2.9 ml of respective medium preincubated at 37°C and 5% CO2 and fluorescence was recorded for 1 min using Gallios Flow Cytometer (Beckman Coulter, USA) and respective extracellular pH was attained using predetermined volume of HCl and NaOH followed by flow cytometry measurement for 15 min. The change in intracellular pH was determined by ratio of FL6–FL2 in Beckman Coulter analysis software Kaluza 1.5.

Data Presentation and Statistical Analysis

Results are displayed as means ± SEM of the indicated number of biological replicates. If not indicated otherwise, an analysis of variance was used for statistical analysis. In case of multiple comparisons, Tukey’s correction was performed. Statistical significance is indicated with *, **, *** and ****. The respective confidential intervals are p < 0.05, p < 0.01, p < 0.001, and p < 0.0001. Statistical analysis was performed with the software GraphPad Prism 6.0 (GraphPad Software, USA).

Results

Freshly isolated PMNs were cultured in HBSS containing various amounts of bicarbonate. Quantification of DNA release in a fluorescence-based assay revealed that bicarbonate time- and dose-dependently induces an increase in Sytox Green signal (Figure 1A). Immunocytochemistry revealed that increasing amounts of bicarbonate induced the formation of thread-like DNA structures positive for NE (Figure 1B; Figure S1 in Supplementary Material). Live cell imaging further revealed that excessive bicarbonate induces chromatin externalization from neutrophils (Video S1 in Supplementary Material). Together, these data indicate that bicarbonate is a potent determinant of whether culture media induce NET formation. Since the ratio of bicarbonate to CO2 influences the pH of the medium, we analyzed the impact of the extracellular pH on formation of NETs. Therefore, the medium was supplemented with 5% CO2. Indeed, we observed an ameliorative effect of CO2 supplementation, indicating an important role of the pH in bicarbonate-induced NET release (Figure 1C; Figure S2 in Supplementary Material).
Figure 1

Bicarbonate induces formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in HBSS. HBSS was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate either in the absence (−) or presence (+) of 5% CO2. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right). n = 3–5. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase (NE) is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for NE is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm.

Bicarbonate induces formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in HBSS. HBSS was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate either in the absence (−) or presence (+) of 5% CO2. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right). n = 3–5. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase (NE) is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for NE is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. Many processes during NET formation, such as citrullination of histone H3, are dependent on calcium. Elevated levels of calcium are likely to render neutrophils more prone to release NETs. Intracellular alkalinization of neutrophils is reportedly accompanied by intracellular calcium increase. We observed that bicarbonate dose-dependently induces intracellular alkalinization and intracellular increase of calcium (Figure 2A). These effects were reduced when HBSS was supplemented with CO2, further highlighting the importance of the pH in bicarbonate-induced formation of NETs (Figure 2B).
Figure 2

A high ratio of bicarbonate to CO. HBSS was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate either in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 5% CO2. (A) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at various concentrations of bicarbonate. n = 3. (B) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at various concentrations of bicarbonate. n = 3.

A high ratio of bicarbonate to CO. HBSS was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate either in the absence (A) or presence (B) of 5% CO2. (A) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at various concentrations of bicarbonate. n = 3. (B) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at various concentrations of bicarbonate. n = 3. We next analyzed whether pH-dependent effects are also observed independently of the bicarbonate/CO2 axis. Therefore, we deployed RPMI medium buffered with 20 mM HEPES. We tested a variety of pH values ranging from pH 6.6 to 7.8 and observed that with increasing alkalinity of the medium, more NET formation was observed as identified by immunocytochemistry and live cell imaging displaying the typical morphological characteristics of NETs (Figures 3A,B; Figure S3 in Supplementary Material; Video S2 in Supplementary Material). Importantly, Sytox Green binding to DNA was not influenced by the pH (Figure S4 in Supplementary Material). We further tested whether intracellular alkalinization and increase in Ca2+ concentration occur in the absence of bicarbonate and CO2. Via addition of hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide, the extracellular pH was adjusted to 6 and 7.8, respectively. Strikingly, such a manipulation was ineffective in influencing the intracellular pH (Figure 3C). In line with this, also the intracellular calcium concentration remained stable after acidification or alkalinization (Figure 3C).
Figure 3

High extracellular pH values induce formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in the absence of bicarbonate/CO. RPMI was supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, and the pH was adjusted to values reaching from 6.6 to 7.8 with hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide, respectively. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various extracellular pH values after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right). (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated at a medium pH of 6.6, 7.2, and 7.8, respectively. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at pH values of 6.6 and 7.8. n = 3–4.

High extracellular pH values induce formation of neutrophil extracellular traps in the absence of bicarbonate/CO. RPMI was supplemented with 20 mM HEPES, and the pH was adjusted to values reaching from 6.6 to 7.8 with hydrochloric acid and sodium hydroxide, respectively. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various extracellular pH values after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right). (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated at a medium pH of 6.6, 7.2, and 7.8, respectively. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at pH values of 6.6 and 7.8. n = 3–4. So far, we had identified the bicarbonate/CO2 axis and the extracellular proton concentration as an important determinant of neutrophil behavior. These data highlight the necessity of strict CO2 control in media containing bicarbonate (i.e., HBSS and RPMI). Per example, cultivation of neutrophils in regular RPMI containing 24 mM bicarbonate for 30 min in the absence of proper CO2 control, induces robust formation of NET-like structures, which are not present if 5% CO2 is supplied (Figure S5 in Supplementary Material). We wondered whether the extracellular pH was also able to modify the response of neutrophils toward known inducers of NET release such as PMA and ionomycin. In order to study the modulation of the intracellular pH by the bicarbonate/CO2 axis under more physiologic conditions, we deployed RPMI buffered with various concentrations of bicarbonate under 5% CO2 atmosphere. NET release in the absence of added inducers was increased at higher concentrations of bicarbonate (Figures 4A,B; Figure S6 in Supplementary Material; Video S3 in Supplementary Material) and we observed dose-dependent alkalinization and intracellular calcium increase (Figure 4C). Importantly, sustained elevation of intracellular calcium was only observed after intracellular alkalinization, whereas a mild and transient increase was also observed in response to acidification (Figure 4C).
Figure 4

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right). n = 5–11. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at various concentrations of bicarbonate. n = 3.

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right). n = 5–11. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Flow cytometric determination of intracellular pH (left) and cytosolic Ca2+ concentration (right) of neutrophils at various concentrations of bicarbonate. n = 3. The bicarbonate/CO2 axis and the pH were also able to modify the effect of PMA or ionomycin on neutrophils. At low concentrations of bicarbonate, NET formation induced by PMA (Figure 5A; Video S4 in Supplementary Material) or ionomycin (Figure 6A) was significantly reduced compared to 24 and 48 mM bicarbonate, respectively. Immunocytochemistry for NE and citH3 demonstrated increased amounts of NETs positive for NE and/or citH3 in the presence of bicarbonate. Using live cell imaging, we analyzed the morphological changes in neutrophils under these stimulatory conditions and observed the markedly increased chromatin externalization and decondensation in the presence of bicarbonate. Overall, these observations were in line with the results of the quantitative fluorescence-based assay (Figures 5B and 6B; Figures S7–S10 in Supplementary Material).
Figure 5

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. PMA was used at a concentration of 10 ng/ml. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of PMA. n = 5–11. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of PMA. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of PMA. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for citrullinated histone H3 is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm.

Figure 6

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. Ionomycin was used at a concentration of 1 μM. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of ionomycin. n = 5–11. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of ionomycin. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of ionomycin. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for citrullinated histone H3 is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm.

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. PMA was used at a concentration of 10 ng/ml. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of PMA. n = 5–11. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of PMA. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of PMA. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for citrullinated histone H3 is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. Ionomycin was used at a concentration of 1 μM. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of ionomycin. n = 5–11. (B) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of ionomycin. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for neutrophil elastase is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. (C) Immunocytochemical analysis of neutrophils incubated in the presence of various concentrations of bicarbonate in the copresence of ionomycin. Signal for DNA is depicted in green, and signal for citrullinated histone H3 is displayed in red. The scale bar represents 20 μm. In order to further analyze the influence of bicarbonate in the media in response to potential physiological inducers of NET formation, we deployed lipopolysaccharides from K. pneumoniae and S. enterica, respectively (Figures 7A,B). LPS-stimulated NET formation was reduced under conditions of relative hypercapnia as highlighted by fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization (Figure 7) and immunocytochemistry (Figures S11 and S12 in Supplementary Material). As reported by Pieterse and colleagues, LPS from S. enterica is a poor inducer of NET formation in the absence of platelets (12). Confirming this data, we observed only a twofold increase as compared to baseline NET formation at 24 mM bicarbonate/5% CO2. Similarly, NET formation was also not pronounced at relative hypocapnia, further highlighting the necessity of platelets for the induction of NET formation by this particular subtype of LPS (12). In addition, we tested the influence of the bicarbonate to CO2 ration on the NET-inducing potential of monosodium urate crystals (MSU). NET release in response to monosodium urate was decreased at a low bicarbonate to CO2 ratio (Figures 8A,B; Video S6 in Supplementary Material). Taken together, our findings indicate an important role of the extracellular pH and the bicarbonate/CO2 axis in the signal integration of NET formation.
Figure 7

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. LPS was used at a concentration of 2.5 μg/ml. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of LPS from Salmonella enterica. n = 9 (B). (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of LPS from Klebsiella pneumoniae. n = 9.

Figure 8

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. MSU was used at a concentration of 300 pg/cell. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of MSU. n = 8–10. (B) Still movie of PMNs coincubated with MSU either under relative hypercapnia (0 mM bicarbonate/5% CO2) or 24 mM bicarbonate/5% CO2. Signal for DNA of cells with intact plasma membrane integrity is depicted in red (Hoechst 33342), and signal for extracellular DNA and inside of necrotic cells is depicted in green. The numbers indicate the time in min after addition of MSU, the scale bar represents 20 μm.

The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. LPS was used at a concentration of 2.5 μg/ml. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of LPS from Salmonella enterica. n = 9 (B). (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of LPS from Klebsiella pneumoniae. n = 9. The bicarbonate to CO. RPMI was supplemented with various concentrations of bicarbonate in the presence of 5% CO2. MSU was used at a concentration of 300 pg/cell. (A) Fluorescence-based quantification of DNA externalization in response to various concentrations of bicarbonate after 120 min (left) and 240 min (right) in the presence of MSU. n = 8–10. (B) Still movie of PMNs coincubated with MSU either under relative hypercapnia (0 mM bicarbonate/5% CO2) or 24 mM bicarbonate/5% CO2. Signal for DNA of cells with intact plasma membrane integrity is depicted in red (Hoechst 33342), and signal for extracellular DNA and inside of necrotic cells is depicted in green. The numbers indicate the time in min after addition of MSU, the scale bar represents 20 μm. We considered direct effects of the change in pH on phospholipid membrane integrity in neutrophils. Strikingly, the anion channel inhibitor 4,4′-diisothiocyano-2,2′-stilbenedisulfonic (DIDS) drastically reduced DNA externalization (Figure 7A). Microscopic analysis revealed that NET formation was strongly reduced/delayed by DIDS (Figure 7B; Video S5 in Supplementary Material). DIDS was also able to inhibit NET formation in response to PMA, ionomycin, and MSU at 24 mM bicarbonate/5% CO2 (Figure 9; Figure S13 in Supplementary Material). Since DIDS specifically inhibits anion channels, a protein-dependent mechanism is likely to be causative in pH control of NET formation. It is likely that alterations of the pH trigger a molecular program that increases the susceptibility of neutrophils to release NETs.
Figure 9

DIDS reduces neutrophil extracellular trap formation observed at high concentrations of bicarbonate. HBSS was supplemented with 37.5 mM bicarbonate at ambient CO2. (A) Kinetic of DNA externalization quantified in a fluorescence-based assay. DIDS was supplied at the indicated concentrations, DMSO served as vehicle control. n = 3. (B) Neutrophils were incubated in HBSS with 4.68 or 37.5 mM bicarbonate for 2 h. The media were supplemented with 0.1 mM DIDS or DMSO vehicle control. Subsequently, cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and DNA was stained with 5 μM Sytox Green (green). Images were taken using a BZ-X710 microscope.

DIDS reduces neutrophil extracellular trap formation observed at high concentrations of bicarbonate. HBSS was supplemented with 37.5 mM bicarbonate at ambient CO2. (A) Kinetic of DNA externalization quantified in a fluorescence-based assay. DIDS was supplied at the indicated concentrations, DMSO served as vehicle control. n = 3. (B) Neutrophils were incubated in HBSS with 4.68 or 37.5 mM bicarbonate for 2 h. The media were supplemented with 0.1 mM DIDS or DMSO vehicle control. Subsequently, cells were fixed with 1% paraformaldehyde and DNA was stained with 5 μM Sytox Green (green). Images were taken using a BZ-X710 microscope.

Discussion

Our data indicate that the triangular relationship of CO2, bicarbonate and pH strongly influences the capacity of neutrophils to form NETs. We observed that NET formation is decreased in conditions with a high ratio of CO2 to bicarbonate even in the presence of biochemical NET-inducers. A low ratio resulted in NET formation in the absence of added inducers and augmented the NET-inducing potential of multiple triggers including PMA, ionomycin, monosodium urate, and lipopolysaccharides. This effect was observed both in HBSS and RPMI, yet markedly enhanced in the absence of extracellular amino acids as in HBSS. In the absence of CO2 and bicarbonate in HEPES-buffered media, the independent contribution of the pH was assessed. These studies indicate that the extracellular pH has an important influence on the capacity of neutrophils to release NETs but can only partially account for the drastic NET formation in the presence of bicarbonate/CO2. Our data is in line with findings from other groups that observed that neutrophil function is depending on extracellular pH. Trevani and colleagues reported that extracellular acidification enhances specific functions of human neutrophils (13). They observed that extracellular acidosis transiently increases intracellular calcium and results in upregulation of the adhesion-mediating surface marker CD18. The stimulatory effects of conventional agonists were markedly increased by a low pH and the neutrophils responded with more production of H2O2 and increased release of myeloperoxidase (13). A more recent publication confirms these results, indicating that a pH of 6.0 prolongs neutrophil survival and increases phagocytosis of bacteria; however, phagolysosomal killing is decreased (14). Neutrophils cultivated in alkaline conditions show decreased survival compared to neutral or acidic environments (15). Importantly, the effects of pH on immune and cellular functions are very broad and affect a multitude of cellular signaling molecules (16). Assay conditions may therefore strongly affect the specific results but may not necessarily depict the in vivo situation. Trevani and colleagues also highlighted the role of CO2 and bicarbonate to neutrophil function, since intracellular acidification in response to extracellular hydrochloric acid challenge was less pronounced in bicarbonate free medium (13, 16). The importance of the choice of the acidifying agent is highlighted by findings showing that hydrochloric acid induces an inflammatory response in stimulated RAW 264.7 cells, whereas acidification with lactate leads to an anti-inflammatory phenotype (17). However, the buffering agent is not solely responsible for the diverse effects reported through the years as indicated by inconsistent results even among studies using one and the same buffering system (13, 14, 16, 18). We have observed a decrease of intracellular pH in conditions with a high ratio of CO2 to bicarbonate and an increase of intracellular pH in alkaline conditions. The change of pH in both directions was accompanied by an increase in intracellular calcium; however, elevated levels of the ion were only observed in response to alkalinization. An increase of cytosolic pH in neutrophils has been reported for a variety of stimuli, including PMA, ionomycin, and platelet-activating factor (19–21). We hypothesize that intracellular alkalinization by a high extracellular pH renders neutrophils more responsive to NET-inducing agents. Intracellular alkalinization likely triggers the same signals that follow stimulus-induced alkalinization. The concomitant increase in calcium is in line with this hypothesis, since calcium is required for several enzymes involved in NET formation. The intracellular pH of neutrophils is thought to be mainly regulated by Na+/H+ and Cl−/HCO3− antiporters. Recently a Na+/HCO3− cotransporter has been identified (22, 23). Efflux of chloride is commonly accompanying activation of neutrophils (24). Substitution of chloride with glucuronate leads to an outward flux of chloride (25). A high extracellular concentration of bicarbonate is likely recapitulating a similar effect. Interestingly, the broadly acting anion channel inhibitor DIDS was able to inhibit bicarbonate-induced NET release in a time and dose-dependent manner. The altered behavior of neutrophils at different pH is of special interest in the setting of cystic fibrosis (CF). The airway mucus and intestinal and pancreatic fluid in patients with CFTR mutations are strongly altered in the pH. Additionally, alterations in neutrophil intracellular pH homeostasis have been implicated in CF (26). It is tempting to speculate that these pH changes influence NET formation observed in patients with CF (27). Our results give an interesting perspective on the role of the pH in inflammatory processes. We have observed that NET formation is substantially decreased in an acidic environment. In inflamed areas, pH values of as low as 5.5 have been reported (16). Although the observations presented here are limited to in vitro experiments, we will discuss possible implications for the in vivo situation (Figure 10).
Figure 10

Hypothetical model of how the pH modulates neutrophil function . Bacterial infection or tissue damage results in the recruitment of neutrophils. With ongoing inflammation, the pH acidifies (red to green gradient), rendering neutrophils unable to perform neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. However, other antibacterial mechanism like phagocytosis or degranulation is not affected by the pH. NET formation is observed in the well-vascularized border region of the inflammation, where a neutral pH environment is found. The NETs shield off the infected area and prevent the spreading of microbes and danger-associated molecular patterns.

Hypothetical model of how the pH modulates neutrophil function . Bacterial infection or tissue damage results in the recruitment of neutrophils. With ongoing inflammation, the pH acidifies (red to green gradient), rendering neutrophils unable to perform neutrophil extracellular trap (NET) formation. However, other antibacterial mechanism like phagocytosis or degranulation is not affected by the pH. NET formation is observed in the well-vascularized border region of the inflammation, where a neutral pH environment is found. The NETs shield off the infected area and prevent the spreading of microbes and danger-associated molecular patterns. In areas of hypoxia, such as an inflammatory focus or ischemic tissue, anaerobic glycolysis will lead to an increased formation of lactic acid and to tissue acidification. The border of the inflammatory areas is characterized by a steep increase in oxygen saturation as well as a gradient from acidic to neutral pH (Figure 10). We hypothesize that neutrophils detect the border of the inflamed area in part by this pH gradient. NET formation at elevated pH values might then primarily function as a barrier to wall-off infected or inflamed areas and to prevent invasion of the organism with pathogens or to prevent spreading of danger-associated molecular patterns from necroinflammatory areas (28). The pH might also serve as an indicator for neutrophils to sense the progress of inflammation. In the acidic center of the inflammatory focus, pathogens might still be traced and phagocytosed whereas in the periphery, the strategy is to shield the non-inflamed tissue (Figure 10). Restitution of serum pH in the setting of reperfusion may then promote NET formation and contribute to reperfusion injury. The tumor microenvironment can technically be considered a necroinflammatory area, with hypoxic, necrotic cores, and areas of hypervasculation due to aberrant neoangiogenesis. In a similar manner, also the tumor environment is characterized by steep intratumoral and peritumoral pH gradients. Besides the presence of tumor-associated neutrophils, tumor-bearing mice exert a prethrombotic phenotype. Recent studies have causally implicated to increased NET formation as a hypercoaguable state (29–31). Moreover, NETs reportedly promote metastasis. The existence and the role of NETs in the microenvironment surrounding the tumor are far less examined. Following our hypothesis, we would expect neutrophils to undergo NET formation in contact to necrotic tumor tissue spatially influenced by the local pH. It will be the focus of future studies to determine the biological role of NETs adjacent to tumors, as these NETs could temporarily prevent expansion of the tumor or be hijacked by the malignancy to promote its spread. Such complexity is in line with recent reports about neutrophils being involved in both the initiation and resolution of inflammation (32–34). Apart from these thoughts on the role of the pH on neutrophil function in vivo, our results have far-reaching technical implications for the multitude of studies which currently examine the effect of chemical interference with NET formation. Experimentators need to be aware of the ménage-à-trois of bicarbonate, CO2, and pH. Even mild changes in the ratio of CO2 to bicarbonate and the pH may severely impact the outcome of an experiment. An inhibitory effect of a compound in vitro might solely be due to pH alterations of the media. In a standard lab incubator, simply opening the door to enter a well plate profoundly changes the incubator atmosphere for up to 15 min. Therefore, using a gas-control module in a microplate reader will significantly improve the quantification of DNA externalization. pH effects are especially pronounced for ionomycin, which shows increasing binding affinity to Ca2+ with increasing medium pH (35). Ionomycin induces a calcium and PADI4-dependent subroutine of NET release and is therefore in the center of therapeutic research (36–39). Small variations of the extracellular pH may easily mask the effects of drugs targeting the potential of neutrophils to externalize chromatin. Likewise, the strong inter- and intra-individual variations in the formation of NETs could at least in part be related to unstable experimental settings (40). Altogether, our findings highlight the necessity of optimized pH control in NET assays. A close attention to pH-related issues will increase the validity of experiments and allow higher reproducibility and detection of more subtle changes.

Author Contributions

CM, AM, and ML planned and performed most of the experiments, conducted data analysis, and wrote the manuscript. SP, SG, JH, DK, and MB performed experiments and conducted data analyses. LM, CB, and GS provided scientific input and wrote the manuscript. PT and RF performed microscopy and scientific input. ML and MH supervised the project, planned and conducted experiments, analyzed data, and wrote the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Conflict of Interest Statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  40 in total

1.  Apoptotic neutrophils and T cells sequester chemokines during immune response resolution through modulation of CCR5 expression.

Authors:  Amiram Ariel; Gabrielle Fredman; Yee-Ping Sun; Alpdogan Kantarci; Thomas E Van Dyke; Andrew D Luster; Charles N Serhan
Journal:  Nat Immunol       Date:  2006-10-01       Impact factor: 25.606

Review 2.  How neutrophil extracellular traps orchestrate the local immune response in gout.

Authors:  Christian Maueröder; Deborah Kienhöfer; Jonas Hahn; Christine Schauer; Bernhard Manger; Georg Schett; Martin Herrmann; Markus H Hoffmann
Journal:  J Mol Med (Berl)       Date:  2015-05-24       Impact factor: 4.599

3.  Intracellular pH changes during neutrophil activation: Na+/H+ antiport.

Authors:  S J Weisman; A Punzo; C Ford; R I Sha'afi
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 4.962

4.  Ambient pCO2 modulates intracellular pH, intracellular oxidant generation, and interleukin-8 secretion in human neutrophils.

Authors:  R J Coakley; C Taggart; C Greene; N G McElvaney; S J O'Neill
Journal:  J Leukoc Biol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 4.962

5.  Peptidylarginine deiminase inhibition is immunomodulatory and vasculoprotective in murine lupus.

Authors:  Jason S Knight; Wenpu Zhao; Wei Luo; Venkataraman Subramanian; Alexander A O'Dell; Srilakshmi Yalavarthi; Jeffrey B Hodgin; Daniel T Eitzman; Paul R Thompson; Mariana J Kaplan
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2013-06-03       Impact factor: 14.808

6.  Lactic and hydrochloric acids induce different patterns of inflammatory response in LPS-stimulated RAW 264.7 cells.

Authors:  John A Kellum; Mingchen Song; Jinyou Li
Journal:  Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.619

7.  Novel cell death program leads to neutrophil extracellular traps.

Authors:  Tobias A Fuchs; Ulrike Abed; Christian Goosmann; Robert Hurwitz; Ilka Schulze; Volker Wahn; Yvette Weinrauch; Volker Brinkmann; Arturo Zychlinsky
Journal:  J Cell Biol       Date:  2007-01-08       Impact factor: 10.539

8.  Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Form a Barrier between Necrotic and Viable Areas in Acute Abdominal Inflammation.

Authors:  Rostyslav Bilyy; Volodymyr Fedorov; Volodymyr Vovk; Moritz Leppkes; Tetiana Dumych; Valentyna Chopyak; Georg Schett; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-10-10       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Neutrophils Discriminate between Lipopolysaccharides of Different Bacterial Sources and Selectively Release Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.

Authors:  Elmar Pieterse; Nils Rother; Cansu Yanginlar; Luuk B Hilbrands; Johan van der Vlag
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 7.561

Review 10.  Role of neutrophil apoptosis in the resolution of inflammation.

Authors:  Driss El Kebir; János G Filep
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2010-09-01
View more
  33 in total

Review 1.  To NET or not to NET:current opinions and state of the science regarding the formation of neutrophil extracellular traps.

Authors:  Sebastian Boeltz; Poorya Amini; Hans-Joachim Anders; Felipe Andrade; Rostyslav Bilyy; Simon Chatfield; Iwona Cichon; Danielle M Clancy; Jyaysi Desai; Tetiana Dumych; Nishant Dwivedi; Rachael Ann Gordon; Jonas Hahn; Andrés Hidalgo; Markus H Hoffmann; Mariana J Kaplan; Jason S Knight; Elzbieta Kolaczkowska; Paul Kubes; Moritz Leppkes; Angelo A Manfredi; Seamus J Martin; Christian Maueröder; Norma Maugeri; Ioannis Mitroulis; Luis E Munoz; Daigo Nakazawa; Indira Neeli; Victor Nizet; Elmar Pieterse; Marko Z Radic; Christiane Reinwald; Konstantinos Ritis; Patrizia Rovere-Querini; Michal Santocki; Christine Schauer; Georg Schett; Mark Jay Shlomchik; Hans-Uwe Simon; Panagiotis Skendros; Darko Stojkov; Peter Vandenabeele; Tom Vanden Berghe; Johan van der Vlag; Ljubomir Vitkov; Maren von Köckritz-Blickwede; Shida Yousefi; Alexander Zarbock; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Cell Death Differ       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 15.828

Review 2.  Towards a pro-resolving concept in systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  Sebastian Boeltz; Melanie Hagen; Jasmin Knopf; Aparna Mahajan; Maximilian Schick; Yi Zhao; Cornelia Erfurt-Berge; Jürgen Rech; Luis E Muñoz; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 3.  Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Exacerbate Ischemic Brain Damage.

Authors:  Congqin Li; Ying Xing; Yuqian Zhang; Yan Hua; Jian Hu; Yulong Bai
Journal:  Mol Neurobiol       Date:  2021-11-08       Impact factor: 5.590

4.  Metabolic requirements of Besnoitia besnoiti tachyzoite-triggered NETosis.

Authors:  Ershun Zhou; Iván Conejeros; Ulrich Gärtner; Sybille Mazurek; Carlos Hermosilla; Anja Taubert
Journal:  Parasitol Res       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 2.289

5.  Interleukin 8 Elicits Rapid Physiological Changes in Neutrophils That Are Altered by Inflammatory Conditions.

Authors:  Stefan Bernhard; Stefan Hug; Alexander Elias Paul Stratmann; Maike Erber; Laura Vidoni; Christiane Leonie Knapp; Bertram Dietrich Thomaß; Michael Fauler; Bo Nilsson; Kristina Nilsson Ekdahl; Karl Föhr; Christian Karl Braun; Lisa Wohlgemuth; Markus Huber-Lang; David Alexander Christian Messerer
Journal:  J Innate Immun       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 7.349

6.  Azithromycin and Chloramphenicol Diminish Neutrophil Extracellular Traps (NETs) Release.

Authors:  Weronika Bystrzycka; Aneta Manda-Handzlik; Sandra Sieczkowska; Aneta Moskalik; Urszula Demkow; Olga Ciepiela
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 5.923

7.  Perspective on Protein Arginine Deiminase Activity-Bicarbonate Is a pH-Independent Regulator of Citrullination.

Authors:  Yebin Zhou; Nanette Mittereder; Gary P Sims
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-01-18       Impact factor: 7.561

8.  Neutrophil Extracellular Traps Open the Pandora's Box in Severe Malaria.

Authors:  Sebastian Boeltz; Luis E Muñoz; Tobias A Fuchs; Martin Herrmann
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 7.561

9.  Extracellular Acidification Inhibits the ROS-Dependent Formation of Neutrophil Extracellular Traps.

Authors:  Martina Behnen; Sonja Möller; Antonia Brozek; Matthias Klinger; Tamás Laskay
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2017-02-28       Impact factor: 7.561

10.  Guidelines for the use of flow cytometry and cell sorting in immunological studies (second edition).

Authors:  Andrea Cossarizza; Hyun-Dong Chang; Andreas Radbruch; Andreas Acs; Dieter Adam; Sabine Adam-Klages; William W Agace; Nima Aghaeepour; Mübeccel Akdis; Matthieu Allez; Larissa Nogueira Almeida; Giorgia Alvisi; Graham Anderson; Immanuel Andrä; Francesco Annunziato; Achille Anselmo; Petra Bacher; Cosima T Baldari; Sudipto Bari; Vincenzo Barnaba; Joana Barros-Martins; Luca Battistini; Wolfgang Bauer; Sabine Baumgart; Nicole Baumgarth; Dirk Baumjohann; Bianka Baying; Mary Bebawy; Burkhard Becher; Wolfgang Beisker; Vladimir Benes; Rudi Beyaert; Alfonso Blanco; Dominic A Boardman; Christian Bogdan; Jessica G Borger; Giovanna Borsellino; Philip E Boulais; Jolene A Bradford; Dirk Brenner; Ryan R Brinkman; Anna E S Brooks; Dirk H Busch; Martin Büscher; Timothy P Bushnell; Federica Calzetti; Garth Cameron; Ilenia Cammarata; Xuetao Cao; Susanna L Cardell; Stefano Casola; Marco A Cassatella; Andrea Cavani; Antonio Celada; Lucienne Chatenoud; Pratip K Chattopadhyay; Sue Chow; Eleni Christakou; Luka Čičin-Šain; Mario Clerici; Federico S Colombo; Laura Cook; Anne Cooke; Andrea M Cooper; Alexandra J Corbett; Antonio Cosma; Lorenzo Cosmi; Pierre G Coulie; Ana Cumano; Ljiljana Cvetkovic; Van Duc Dang; Chantip Dang-Heine; Martin S Davey; Derek Davies; Sara De Biasi; Genny Del Zotto; Gelo Victoriano Dela Cruz; Michael Delacher; Silvia Della Bella; Paolo Dellabona; Günnur Deniz; Mark Dessing; James P Di Santo; Andreas Diefenbach; Francesco Dieli; Andreas Dolf; Thomas Dörner; Regine J Dress; Diana Dudziak; Michael Dustin; Charles-Antoine Dutertre; Friederike Ebner; Sidonia B G Eckle; Matthias Edinger; Pascale Eede; Götz R A Ehrhardt; Marcus Eich; Pablo Engel; Britta Engelhardt; Anna Erdei; Charlotte Esser; Bart Everts; Maximilien Evrard; Christine S Falk; Todd A Fehniger; Mar Felipo-Benavent; Helen Ferry; Markus Feuerer; Andrew Filby; Kata Filkor; Simon Fillatreau; Marie Follo; Irmgard Förster; John Foster; Gemma A Foulds; Britta Frehse; Paul S Frenette; Stefan Frischbutter; Wolfgang Fritzsche; David W Galbraith; Anastasia Gangaev; Natalio Garbi; Brice Gaudilliere; Ricardo T Gazzinelli; Jens Geginat; Wilhelm Gerner; Nicholas A Gherardin; Kamran Ghoreschi; Lara Gibellini; Florent Ginhoux; Keisuke Goda; Dale I Godfrey; Christoph Goettlinger; Jose M González-Navajas; Carl S Goodyear; Andrea Gori; Jane L Grogan; Daryl Grummitt; Andreas Grützkau; Claudia Haftmann; Jonas Hahn; Hamida Hammad; Günter Hämmerling; Leo Hansmann; Goran Hansson; Christopher M Harpur; Susanne Hartmann; Andrea Hauser; Anja E Hauser; David L Haviland; David Hedley; Daniela C Hernández; Guadalupe Herrera; Martin Herrmann; Christoph Hess; Thomas Höfer; Petra Hoffmann; Kristin Hogquist; Tristan Holland; Thomas Höllt; Rikard Holmdahl; Pleun Hombrink; Jessica P Houston; Bimba F Hoyer; Bo Huang; Fang-Ping Huang; Johanna E Huber; Jochen Huehn; Michael Hundemer; Christopher A Hunter; William Y K Hwang; Anna Iannone; Florian Ingelfinger; Sabine M Ivison; Hans-Martin Jäck; Peter K Jani; Beatriz Jávega; Stipan Jonjic; Toralf Kaiser; Tomas Kalina; Thomas Kamradt; Stefan H E Kaufmann; Baerbel Keller; Steven L C Ketelaars; Ahad Khalilnezhad; Srijit Khan; Jan Kisielow; Paul Klenerman; Jasmin Knopf; Hui-Fern Koay; Katja Kobow; Jay K Kolls; Wan Ting Kong; Manfred Kopf; Thomas Korn; Katharina Kriegsmann; Hendy Kristyanto; Thomas Kroneis; Andreas Krueger; Jenny Kühne; Christian Kukat; Désirée Kunkel; Heike Kunze-Schumacher; Tomohiro Kurosaki; Christian Kurts; Pia Kvistborg; Immanuel Kwok; Jonathan Landry; Olivier Lantz; Paola Lanuti; Francesca LaRosa; Agnès Lehuen; Salomé LeibundGut-Landmann; Michael D Leipold; Leslie Y T Leung; Megan K Levings; Andreia C Lino; Francesco Liotta; Virginia Litwin; Yanling Liu; Hans-Gustaf Ljunggren; Michael Lohoff; Giovanna Lombardi; Lilly Lopez; Miguel López-Botet; Amy E Lovett-Racke; Erik Lubberts; Herve Luche; Burkhard Ludewig; Enrico Lugli; Sebastian Lunemann; Holden T Maecker; Laura Maggi; Orla Maguire; Florian Mair; Kerstin H Mair; Alberto Mantovani; Rudolf A Manz; Aaron J Marshall; Alicia Martínez-Romero; Glòria Martrus; Ivana Marventano; Wlodzimierz Maslinski; Giuseppe Matarese; Anna Vittoria Mattioli; Christian Maueröder; Alessio Mazzoni; James McCluskey; Mairi McGrath; Helen M McGuire; Iain B McInnes; Henrik E Mei; Fritz Melchers; Susanne Melzer; Dirk Mielenz; Stephen D Miller; Kingston H G Mills; Hans Minderman; Jenny Mjösberg; Jonni Moore; Barry Moran; Lorenzo Moretta; Tim R Mosmann; Susann Müller; Gabriele Multhoff; Luis Enrique Muñoz; Christian Münz; Toshinori Nakayama; Milena Nasi; Katrin Neumann; Lai Guan Ng; Antonia Niedobitek; Sussan Nourshargh; Gabriel Núñez; José-Enrique O'Connor; Aaron Ochel; Anna Oja; Diana Ordonez; Alberto Orfao; Eva Orlowski-Oliver; Wenjun Ouyang; Annette Oxenius; Raghavendra Palankar; Isabel Panse; Kovit Pattanapanyasat; Malte Paulsen; Dinko Pavlinic; Livius Penter; Pärt Peterson; Christian Peth; Jordi Petriz; Federica Piancone; Winfried F Pickl; Silvia Piconese; Marcello Pinti; A Graham Pockley; Malgorzata Justyna Podolska; Zhiyong Poon; Katharina Pracht; Immo Prinz; Carlo E M Pucillo; Sally A Quataert; Linda Quatrini; Kylie M Quinn; Helena Radbruch; Tim R D J Radstake; Susann Rahmig; Hans-Peter Rahn; Bartek Rajwa; Gevitha Ravichandran; Yotam Raz; Jonathan A Rebhahn; Diether Recktenwald; Dorothea Reimer; Caetano Reis e Sousa; Ester B M Remmerswaal; Lisa Richter; Laura G Rico; Andy Riddell; Aja M Rieger; J Paul Robinson; Chiara Romagnani; Anna Rubartelli; Jürgen Ruland; Armin Saalmüller; Yvan Saeys; Takashi Saito; Shimon Sakaguchi; Francisco Sala-de-Oyanguren; Yvonne Samstag; Sharon Sanderson; Inga Sandrock; Angela Santoni; Ramon Bellmàs Sanz; Marina Saresella; Catherine Sautes-Fridman; Birgit Sawitzki; Linda Schadt; Alexander Scheffold; Hans U Scherer; Matthias Schiemann; Frank A Schildberg; Esther Schimisky; Andreas Schlitzer; Josephine Schlosser; Stephan Schmid; Steffen Schmitt; Kilian Schober; Daniel Schraivogel; Wolfgang Schuh; Thomas Schüler; Reiner Schulte; Axel Ronald Schulz; Sebastian R Schulz; Cristiano Scottá; Daniel Scott-Algara; David P Sester; T Vincent Shankey; Bruno Silva-Santos; Anna Katharina Simon; Katarzyna M Sitnik; Silvano Sozzani; Daniel E Speiser; Josef Spidlen; Anders Stahlberg; Alan M Stall; Natalie Stanley; Regina Stark; Christina Stehle; Tobit Steinmetz; Hannes Stockinger; Yousuke Takahama; Kiyoshi Takeda; Leonard Tan; Attila Tárnok; Gisa Tiegs; Gergely Toldi; Julia Tornack; Elisabetta Traggiai; Mohamed Trebak; Timothy I M Tree; Joe Trotter; John Trowsdale; Maria Tsoumakidou; Henning Ulrich; Sophia Urbanczyk; Willem van de Veen; Maries van den Broek; Edwin van der Pol; Sofie Van Gassen; Gert Van Isterdael; René A W van Lier; Marc Veldhoen; Salvador Vento-Asturias; Paulo Vieira; David Voehringer; Hans-Dieter Volk; Anouk von Borstel; Konrad von Volkmann; Ari Waisman; Rachael V Walker; Paul K Wallace; Sa A Wang; Xin M Wang; Michael D Ward; Kirsten A Ward-Hartstonge; Klaus Warnatz; Gary Warnes; Sarah Warth; Claudia Waskow; James V Watson; Carsten Watzl; Leonie Wegener; Thomas Weisenburger; Annika Wiedemann; Jürgen Wienands; Anneke Wilharm; Robert John Wilkinson; Gerald Willimsky; James B Wing; Rieke Winkelmann; Thomas H Winkler; Oliver F Wirz; Alicia Wong; Peter Wurst; Jennie H M Yang; Juhao Yang; Maria Yazdanbakhsh; Liping Yu; Alice Yue; Hanlin Zhang; Yi Zhao; Susanne Maria Ziegler; Christina Zielinski; Jakob Zimmermann; Arturo Zychlinsky
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 6.688

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.