Literature DB >> 28018108

Heparin bridge therapy and post-polypectomy bleeding.

Toshiyuki Kubo1, Kentaro Yamashita1, Kei Onodera1, Tomoya Iida1, Yoshiaki Arimura1, Masanori Nojima1, Hiroshi Nakase1.   

Abstract

AIM: To identify risk factors for post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB), focusing on antithrombotic agents.
METHODS: This was a case-control study based on medical records at a single center. PPB was defined as bleeding that occurred 6 h to 10 d after colonoscopic polypectomy and required endoscopic hemostasis. As risk factors for PPB, patient-related factors including anticoagulants, antiplatelets and heparin bridge therapy as well as polyp- and procedure-related factors were evaluated. All colonoscopic hot polypectomies, endoscopic mucosal resections and endoscopic submucosal dissections performed between January 2011 and December 2014 were reviewed.
RESULTS: PPB occurred in 29 (3.7%) of 788 polypectomies performed during the study period. Antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents were prescribed for 210 (26.6%) patients and were ceased before polypectomy except for aspirin and cilostazol in 19 cases. Bridging therapy using intravenous unfractionated heparin was adopted for 73 patients. The univariate analysis revealed that anticoagulants, heparin bridge, and anticoagulants plus heparin bridge were significantly associated with PPB (P < 0.0001) whereas antiplatelets and antiplatelets plus heparin were not. None of the other factors including age, gender, location, size, shape, number of resected polyps, prophylactic clipping and resection method were correlated with PPB. The multivariate analysis demonstrated that anticoagulants and anticoagulants plus heparin bridge therapy were significant risk factors for PPB (P < 0.0001). Of the 29 PPB cases, 4 required transfusions and none required surgery. A thromboembolic event occurred in a patient who took anticoagulant.
CONCLUSION: Patients taking anticoagulants have an increased risk of PPB, even if the anticoagulants are interrupted before polypectomy. Heparin-bridge therapy might be responsible for the increased PPB in patients taking anticoagulants.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anticoagulants; Antiplatelets; Colonic polypectomy; Endoscopic surgery; Heparin bridge therapy; Post-polypectomy bleeding

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28018108      PMCID: PMC5143747          DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v22.i45.10009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 1007-9327            Impact factor:   5.742


Core tip: Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is the most common complication of colon polypectomy. In this study, we demonstrated that patients taking anticoagulants have an increased risk of PPB, even if the anticoagulants are interrupted before polypectomy. Heparin-bridge therapy might be responsible for the increased PPB in patients who take anticoagulants.

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer and ranks fourth as a cause of death worldwide[1]. Endoscopic polypectomy is a safe and useful procedure to prevent CRC, reducing the CRC morbidity by 70%-80%[2,3]. Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is the most common complication of endoscopic polypectomy with reported incidences ranging from 0.65% to 8.6%[4-6]. Risk factors for PPB include larger polyp size, right colon, pedunculated type and anticoagulants[6-9], although these are still controversial. Major guidelines recommend cessation of anticoagulants before polypectomy and heparin bridge therapy for high thrombotic risk cases[10-12]. Nevertheless, a study demonstrated that the incidence of PPB was higher in patients taking anticoagulants, even if they were interrupted[13]. Recently, another study suggested that heparin bridge therapy might be associated with a higher PPB rate in patients taking anticoagulants[14]. Studies, including a meta-analysis, suggest that bridging therapy might be associated with high bleeding risk after invasive procedures including polypectomy in patients taking anticoagulants[15,16]. A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that bleeding risk was higher in patients taking bridging therapy than in those without bridging and that thromboembolic risk was similar in both groups[17]. The aim of this study was to elucidate the risk factors for PPB including antithrombotic agents and heparin bridge therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a case-control study based on medical records at Sapporo Medical University Hospital. All colonoscopic polypectomies, endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) performed between January 2011 and December 2014 were included. Patient-, polyp- and procedure- related factors were obtained from the database. The patient-related factors included age, gender, comorbidity, antithrombotic agents (antiplatelet and anticoagulant). The polyp-related factors included location (right colon: cecum, ascending colon, and transverse colon; left colon: descending colon, sigmoid colon, and rectum), size, shape and number of resected polyp. The procedure-related factors were prophylactic clipping and resection method (polypectomy, EMR or ESD). PPB was defined as bleeding that occurred 6 h to 10 d after colonoscopic polypectomy and required endoscopic hemostasis. For such cases, a second-look colonoscopy was performed to identify the origin of the bleeding and endoscopic hemostasis was performed immediately. The management of antithrombotic agents was based on the Japanese Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines published in 2005[18]. All anticoagulants and antiplatelets were ceased before polypectomy except in high thrombotic risk cases. Aspirin and thienopyridines (ticlopidine and clopidogrel) were stopped 5-7 d before polypectomy and other antiplatelets such as cilostazol, dipyridamole or beraprost were ceased 24 to 48 h before the procedure. The anticoagulants used during the study period were warfarin, dabigatran and rivaroxaban. Warfarin was ceased 4-5 d before polypectomy and dabigatran and rivaroxaban were stopped 24 to 48 h prior to the procedure. All antiplatelets and anticoagulants were resumed 24 to 48 h from polypectomy. For high thrombotic risk patients, intravenous unfractionated heparin (UFH) was administered after ceasing anticoagulants or antiplatelets. UFH was started 2-3 d before polypectomy at 10000 to 15000 U/d, which was adjusted by monitoring APTT. The UFH was stopped 4-6 h prior to polypectomy and resumed 2-6 h after the procedure. The instrument used for polypectomy and EMR was a SnareMaster (Olympus medical, Tokyo, Japan) and normal saline was injected for EMR. The instruments used for ESD were a Hook knife (Olympus medical, Tokyo, Japan) or Flush Knife BT (Fujifilm, Tokyo, Japan). Glyceol® (Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.) and hyaluronic acid was used for submucosal injection in ESD. An electrosurgical unit (VIO 300D; ERBE, Tubingen, Germany) was set according to the manufacturer’s instructions and a mixed current was used for resection. As cold polypectomy was not adopted during the study period, all the procedures including polypectomy, EMR and ESD were performed using electrocautery (hot). PPB was treated endoscopically using soft coagulation, hemoclipping, or epinephrine injection. Student’s t-test was used for continuous variables and chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test was used for categorical variables. First, a univariate analysis was performed for all possible risk factors. The significant variables were taken as potential risk factors and were included in the multivariate logistic regression model. All P values were two-sided and the results were considered significant when P values were < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 788 patients underwent polypectomy during the study period. Antithrombotic agents were prescribed to 210 (26.6%) patients; anticoagulants to 83 (10.5%), antiplatelets to 154 (19.5%), both to 28 (3.6%), dual antiplatelet agents to 59 (7.5%) and triple antiplatelet agents to 8 (1.0%) patients. Bridging therapy using intravenous UFH was adopted for 73 patients (9.3%) (Table 1). All anticoagulants and antiplatelets were ceased before polypectomy except for aspirin or cilostazol in 19 cases. PPB occurred in 29 (3.7%) of 788 polypectomies performed. Four PPB patients required transfusion and none required surgery. None of the following were correlated with PPB: age, gender, polyp location, polyp size, polyp shape (flat vs sessile vs pedunculated), number of polyps resected, prophylactic clipping, resection method (polypectomy or EMR vs ESD), antiplatelets and antiplatelet plus heparin bridge therapy (Table 2). Anticoagulants, heparin bridge therapy, and anticoagulants plus heparin bridge therapy (meaning that anticoagulants were substituted by heparin before polypectomy) were significantly associated with PPB (Table 2).
Table 1

Prescription of antithrombotic agents

Anticoagulantsn
Warfarin68
Dabigatran12
Rivaroxaban3
Antiplatelets
Aspirin93
Clopidogrel35
Cilostazol31
Ticlopidine12
Others28
Anticoagulants + antiplatelets28
Dual antiplatelets59
Triple antiplatelets8
Heparin bridge73
Table 2

Characteristics of the study cohort and polyps n (%)

No bleedingBleedingP value
No. of patients759 (96.3)29 (3.7)
Age (yr, mean)64 ± 14.362 ± 16.00.50
GenderMale458 (98.1)9 (1.9)0.35
Female301 (93.8)20 (6.2)
Polyp locationRight239 (95.6)11 (4.4)0.93
Left336 (95.5)16 (4.5)
Polyp size≥ 10 mm338 (96.8)11 (3.2)0.43
< 10 mm361 (95.8)16 (4.2)
Polyp shapeFlat266 (96.7)9 (3.3)0.73
Sessile416 (96.5)15 (3.5)
Pedunculated118 (95.2)6 (4.8)
No. of polyps resected1343 (96.6)12 (3.4)0.69
≥ 2416 (96.1)17 (3.9)
Prophylactic clippingYes566 (95.8)25 (4.2)0.16
No193 (98.0)4 (2.0)
Resection methodPolypectomy or EMR703 (96.6)25 (3.4)0.20
ESD56 (93.3)4 (6.7)
AntiplateletsYes146 (94.8)8 (5.2)0.27
No613 (96.7)21 (3.3)
AnticoagulantsYes72 (86.7)11 (13.3)< 0.001
No687 (97.4)18 (2.6)
Heparin bridgeYes63 (86.3)10 (13.7)< 0.001
No696 (97.3)19 (2.7)
Antiplatelets + heparin bridgeYes32 (91.4)3 (8.6)0.11
No727 (96.5)26 (3.5)
Anticoagulants + heparin bridgeYes47 (82.5)10 (17.5)< 0.001
No712 (97.4)19 (2.6)

PPB: Post-polypectomy bleeding.

Prescription of antithrombotic agents Characteristics of the study cohort and polyps n (%) PPB: Post-polypectomy bleeding. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that anticoagulants and anticoagulants plus heparin bridge therapy were independent risk factors for PPB whereas heparin bridge therapy alone was not (Table 3). The odds ratios of anticoagulants and anticoagulants plus heparin were 4.2 (95%CI: 1.126-15.87, P = 0.033) and 9.8 (95%CI: 3.771-25.443, P < 0.001), respectively.
Table 3

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for Post-polypectomy bleeding

VariableOdds ratio95%CIP value
Anticoagulants4.2271.126-15.8720.033
Heparin bridge therapy2.1720.556-8.4820.265
Anticoagulants+ heparin bridge9.7963.771-25.443< 0.001

PPB: Post-polypectomy bleeding.

Multivariate analysis of risk factors for Post-polypectomy bleeding PPB: Post-polypectomy bleeding. Eleven PPB cases that took anticoagulants are summarized in Table 4. Seven patients had atrial fibrillation, seven had valvular heart disease and one had cerebrovascular disease. Warfarin, dabigatran and antiplatelets were prescribed to 9, 2 and 3 patients, respectively. Anticoagulants and antiplatelets were ceased before polypectomy in all cases and heparin bridge therapy was carried out for 10 of 11 patients. Bleeding occurred 1 to 6 d after polypectomy. All PPB were successfully treated by endoscopy but re-bleeding occurred in 3 cases. Seven patients resumed anticoagulants before PPB but the PT-INR at PPB were within therapeutic range. Eight patients were still on heparin at PPB and APTT at PPB were elevated in 2 patients. A thromboembolic event occurred in a patient after ceasing anticoagulant treatment.
Table 4

Summary of 11 post-polypectomy bleeding cases taking anticoagulants

Anticoagu-lantsAntiplateletsHeparinOnset ofPT-INRAnticoagulantsAPTTHeparin
bridgePPB (POD)at PPBat PPBat PPBat PPB
1WarfarinClopidogrelYes51.62Yes93.1Yes
2Warfarin-Yes21.31Yes42.8Yes
3Warfarin-Yes61.26Yes32.2No
4WarfarinAspirinYes2, 51.20Yes29.4Yes
5Warfarin-Yes51.25Yes73.1Yes
6Dabigatran-No22.03---
7Warfarin-Yes1, 21.31No45.2Yes
8Dabigatran-Yes61.40-50.1No
9Warfarin-Yes1, 61.23No33.5Yes
10WarfarinAspirinYes21.32Yes40.4Yes
(Continued)
11Warfarin-Yes11.21Yes29.5Yes

PPB: Post-polypectomy bleeding; POD: Post-operative day.

Summary of 11 post-polypectomy bleeding cases taking anticoagulants PPB: Post-polypectomy bleeding; POD: Post-operative day.

DISCUSSION

Our study demonstrated that anticoagulants and anticoagulants plus heparin bridge therapy might be independent risk factors for PPB despite periprocedural interruption. Several studies demonstrated a close correlation between PPB and anticoagulants[5,13,14,19-21]. Sawhney et al[5] demonstrated that resuming anticoagulants following polypectomy was strongly associated with severe delayed PPB. Witt et al[13] also suggested the incidence of PPB was higher in patients receiving anticoagulation therapy, even though warfarin was interrupted for the procedure. It has been recently suggested that heparin bridge therapy might be associated with PPB after ceasing antithrombotic agents[15]. Inoue et al[14] demonstrated that the incidence of PPB was significantly higher in a heparin bridge group than in a non-heparin bridge group (20.0% vs 1.4%, respectively). Ishigami et al[22] also demonstrated that heparin-bridging therapy is associated with a high risk of PPB regardless of polyp size. A meta-analysis[15] and large-scale studies[16,17] also suggest that heparin bridge therapy might increase bleeding after invasive procedures including polypectomy in patients taking anticoagulants. Notably, a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial demonstrated that the incidence of major bleeding was higher in a bridging group than in a no-bridging group whereas the incidence of arterial thromboembolism was similar in both groups (the BRIDGE trial)[17]. Our study also demonstrated that anticoagulants and anticoagulants plus heparin-bridge therapy were independent risk factors for PPB. Anticoagulants were interrupted in all cases and PT-INR at PPB was below the therapeutic range in most cases. Of 11 PPB cases using anticoagulants, 10 underwent heparin bridge therapy and 8 were on heparin at the time of PPB. Heparin bridge therapy might be responsible for PPB in patients taking anticoagulants, though APTT at PPB was elevated in only 2 cases. Heparin might have a synergic effect with anticoagulants, which is not measurable using APTT or PT-INR. Interestingly, antiplatelets plus heparin was not associated with PPB in our study. Previous studies demonstrated that aspirin is not a risk factor for PPB in conventional polypectomy[19,20,23-25]. Yousfi et al[23] demonstrated that there was no statistically relevant difference in prior aspirin use before polypectomy in a bleeding group and matched controls. Manocha et al[25] demonstrated PPB rates of patients on aspirin and NSAIDs vs those not on aspirin or NSAIDs (3.2% vs 3.0%). In contrast, polypectomy on clopidogrel is likely to have increased risk for PPB[8]. It might be prudent to postpone polypectomy for high thrombotic risk patients taking clopidogrel. These results might reflect the mechanism of hemostatsis: anticoagulants work on the secondary hemostatsis process such as manufacturing of fibrin, while antiplatelet agents work on the primary hemostatsis such as the cohesion of platelets. As the secondary hemostasis is stronger than the primary, anticoagulants including heparin might cause PPB more frequently than antiplatelets[21]. The present study had several limitations. First, this study was a retrospective study conducted at a single institution. The second limitation was the small sample size. As PPB is a rare complication with incidences ranging from 0.65% to 8.6%[4-6], the small sample size of our study might have led to the ambiguous conclusion. Despite these limitations, we believe that the results of this study may have important implications for clinical practice. A further study on a larger scale will be needed. In conclusion, patients taking anticoagulants have an increased risk of PPB, even if anticoagulants are interrupted before polypectomy. Heparin-bridge therapy might be responsible for the increased PPB in patients taking anticoagulants. A prospective study to compare bridging with no bridging at polypectomy is warranted.

COMMENTS

Background

Post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event of colonoscopic polypectomy. Past studies demonstrated risk factors for PPB but it is still controversial whether antithrombotic agents are associated with PPB. Major guidelines recommend ceasing anticoagulants before polypectomy and substituting by heparin (heparin-bridge) in high thrombotic risk cases.

Research frontiers

Recent studies suggest that heparin-bridge might increase bleeding after invasive procedure including polypectomy.

Innovations and breakthroughs

This study demonstrated that PPB increased in patients taking anticoagulants, despite they were ceased before polypectomy according to the guidelines. From the study results, the authors speculated that heparin-bridge might be responsible for PPB in patients taking anticoagulants.

Applications

When ceasing anticoagulants before polypectomy, no bridging might be better than heparin-bridge to reduce PPB. Prospective study is necessary to compare incidence of PPB as well as thrombotic events between 2 groups with and without heparin-bridge.

Terminology

In this study, PPB was defined as bleeding that occurred 6 h to 10 d after polypectomy and required endoscopic hemostasis.

Peer-review

The authors showed that the PPB was associated with heparin bridging therapy. Patients who took antiplatelets during heparin bridging therapy showed the high incidence of PPB. This study is new evidence about PPB.
  24 in total

1.  The Global Burden of Cancer 2013.

Authors:  Christina Fitzmaurice; Daniel Dicker; Amanda Pain; Hannah Hamavid; Maziar Moradi-Lakeh; Michael F MacIntyre; Christine Allen; Gillian Hansen; Rachel Woodbrook; Charles Wolfe; Randah R Hamadeh; Ami Moore; Andrea Werdecker; Bradford D Gessner; Braden Te Ao; Brian McMahon; Chante Karimkhani; Chuanhua Yu; Graham S Cooke; David C Schwebel; David O Carpenter; David M Pereira; Denis Nash; Dhruv S Kazi; Diego De Leo; Dietrich Plass; Kingsley N Ukwaja; George D Thurston; Kim Yun Jin; Edgar P Simard; Edward Mills; Eun-Kee Park; Ferrán Catalá-López; Gabrielle deVeber; Carolyn Gotay; Gulfaraz Khan; H Dean Hosgood; Itamar S Santos; Janet L Leasher; Jasvinder Singh; James Leigh; Jost B Jonas; Jost Jonas; Juan Sanabria; Justin Beardsley; Kathryn H Jacobsen; Ken Takahashi; Richard C Franklin; Luca Ronfani; Marcella Montico; Luigi Naldi; Marcello Tonelli; Johanna Geleijnse; Max Petzold; Mark G Shrime; Mustafa Younis; Naohiro Yonemoto; Nicholas Breitborde; Paul Yip; Farshad Pourmalek; Paulo A Lotufo; Alireza Esteghamati; Graeme J Hankey; Raghib Ali; Raimundas Lunevicius; Reza Malekzadeh; Robert Dellavalle; Robert Weintraub; Robyn Lucas; Roderick Hay; David Rojas-Rueda; Ronny Westerman; Sadaf G Sepanlou; Sandra Nolte; Scott Patten; Scott Weichenthal; Semaw Ferede Abera; Seyed-Mohammad Fereshtehnejad; Ivy Shiue; Tim Driscoll; Tommi Vasankari; Ubai Alsharif; Vafa Rahimi-Movaghar; Vasiliy V Vlassov; W S Marcenes; Wubegzier Mekonnen; Yohannes Adama Melaku; Yuichiro Yano; Al Artaman; Ismael Campos; Jennifer MacLachlan; Ulrich Mueller; Daniel Kim; Matias Trillini; Babak Eshrati; Hywel C Williams; Kenji Shibuya; Rakhi Dandona; Kinnari Murthy; Benjamin Cowie; Azmeraw T Amare; Carl Abelardo Antonio; Carlos Castañeda-Orjuela; Coen H van Gool; Francesco Violante; In-Hwan Oh; Kedede Deribe; Kjetil Soreide; Luke Knibbs; Maia Kereselidze; Mark Green; Rosario Cardenas; Nobhojit Roy; Taavi Tillmann; Taavi Tillman; Yongmei Li; Hans Krueger; Lorenzo Monasta; Subhojit Dey; Sara Sheikhbahaei; Nima Hafezi-Nejad; G Anil Kumar; Chandrashekhar T Sreeramareddy; Lalit Dandona; Haidong Wang; Stein Emil Vollset; Ali Mokdad; Joshua A Salomon; Rafael Lozano; Theo Vos; Mohammad Forouzanfar; Alan Lopez; Christopher Murray; Mohsen Naghavi
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 31.777

2.  Risk factors for adverse events related to polypectomy in the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme.

Authors:  Matthew D Rutter; Claire Nickerson; Colin J Rees; Julietta Patnick; Roger G Blanks
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 10.093

3.  Giant laterally spreading tumors of the papilla: endoscopic features, resection technique, and outcome (with videos).

Authors:  Andrew D Hopper; Michael J Bourke; Stephen J Williams; Michael P Swan
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-03-11       Impact factor: 9.427

4.  Perioperative Bridging Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  James D Douketis; Alex C Spyropoulos; Scott Kaatz; Richard C Becker; Joseph A Caprini; Andrew S Dunn; David A Garcia; Alan Jacobson; Amir K Jaffer; David F Kong; Sam Schulman; Alexander G G Turpie; Vic Hasselblad; Thomas L Ortel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Guidelines for gastroenterological endoscopy in patients undergoing antithrombotic treatment.

Authors:  Kazuma Fujimoto; Mitsuhiro Fujishiro; Mototsugu Kato; Kazuhide Higuchi; Ryuichi Iwakiri; Choitsu Sakamoto; Shinichiro Uchiyama; Atsunori Kashiwagi; Hisao Ogawa; Kazunari Murakami; Tetsuya Mine; Junji Yoshino; Yoshikazu Kinoshita; Masao Ichinose; Toshiyuki Matsui
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-11-12       Impact factor: 7.559

6.  Postpolypectomy lower gastrointestinal bleeding: potential role of aspirin.

Authors:  Mahmoud Yousfi; Christopher J Gostout; Todd H Baron; Jose L Hernandez; Ray Keate; David E Fleischer; Darius Sorbi
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 10.864

Review 7.  Periprocedural heparin bridging in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: systematic review and meta-analysis of bleeding and thromboembolic rates.

Authors:  Deborah Siegal; Jovana Yudin; Scott Kaatz; James D Douketis; Wendy Lim; Alex C Spyropoulos
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 29.690

Review 8.  Hemorrhage following colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  L Rosen; D S Bub; J F Reed; S A Nastasee
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 4.585

9.  Clinical features of post-polypectomy bleeding associated with heparin bridge therapy.

Authors:  Takuya Inoue; Tsutomu Nishida; Akira Maekawa; Yoshiki Tsujii; Tomofumi Akasaka; Motohiko Kato; Yoshito Hayashi; Shunsuke Yamamoto; Jumpei Kondo; Takuya Yamada; Shinichiro Shinzaki; Hideki Iijima; Masahiko Tsujii; Tetsuo Takehara
Journal:  Dig Endosc       Date:  2013-06-04       Impact factor: 7.559

10.  Risk factors for severe delayed postpolypectomy bleeding.

Authors:  M S Sawhney; N Salfiti; D B Nelson; F A Lederle; J H Bond
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 10.093

View more
  6 in total

1.  Risk of delayed bleeding after hot snare polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection in the colorectum with continuation of anticoagulants.

Authors:  Takamasa Kobayashi; Manabu Takeuchi; Yuki Hojo; Yui Ishii; Youhei Koseki; Yoko Kobayashi; Motoi Azumi; Yuji Kobayashi; Junji Kohisa; Seiichi Yoshikawa; Shuji Terai
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2021-08

Review 2.  Antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and colonoscopic polypectomy.

Authors:  Neena S Abraham
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2019-10-01       Impact factor: 9.427

3.  Prediction and Prevention of Postpolypectomy Bleeding: Necessity of a Different Approach for Patients Using Antithrombotic Agents.

Authors:  Duk Hwan Kim
Journal:  Clin Endosc       Date:  2017-05-31

4.  A prospective multicenter observational study evaluating the risk of periendoscopic events in patients using anticoagulants: the Osaka GIANT Study.

Authors:  Takuya Inoue; Hideki Iijima; Takuya Yamada; Yuji Okuyama; Kanae Takahashi; Tsutomu Nishida; Ryu Ishihara; Tomofumi Akasaka; Ichizo Kobayashi; Toshio Kuroshima; Yuichi Yasunaga; Katsumi Yamamoto; Masanori Nakahara; Yoshinori Doi; Sachiko Nakajima; Akira Mukai; Eiji Masuda; Shunsuke Yoshii; Yoshito Hayashi; Hitoshi Minamiguchi; Yasushi Sakata; Kouji Yamamoto; Masahiko Tsujii; Tetsuo Takehara
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2019-01-17

5.  Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection with submucosal injection of epinephrine versus hypertonic saline in patients taking antithrombotic agents: propensity-score-matching analysis.

Authors:  Daisuke Yamaguchi; Hisako Yoshida; Kei Ikeda; Yuki Takeuchi; Shota Yamashita; Amane Jubashi; Takahiro Yukimoto; Eri Takeshita; Wataru Yoshioka; Hiroko Fukuda; Naoyuki Tominaga; Nanae Tsuruoka; Tomohito Morisaki; Keisuke Ario; Seiji Tsunada; Kazuma Fujimoto
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-11-19       Impact factor: 3.067

6.  The effect of prophylactic hemoclip placement and risk factors of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in polyps sized 6 to 20 millimeters: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Chun-Wei Chen; Chia-Jung Kuo; Cheng-Tang Chiu; Ming-Yao Su; Chun-Jung Lin; Puo-Hsien Le; Siew-Na Lim; Chau-Ting Yeh; Malcolm R Alison; Wey-Ran Lin
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-09-22       Impact factor: 3.067

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.