Literature DB >> 22912386

Periprocedural heparin bridging in patients receiving vitamin K antagonists: systematic review and meta-analysis of bleeding and thromboembolic rates.

Deborah Siegal1, Jovana Yudin, Scott Kaatz, James D Douketis, Wendy Lim, Alex C Spyropoulos.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Periprocedural bridging with unfractionated heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin aims to reduce the risk of thromboembolic events in patients receiving long-term vitamin K antagonists. Optimal periprocedural anticoagulation has not been established. METHODS AND
RESULTS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (2001-2010) were searched for English-language studies including patients receiving heparin bridging during interruption of vitamin K antagonists for elective procedures. Data were independently collected by 2 investigators (κ=0.90). The final review included 34 studies with 1 randomized trial. Thromboembolic events occurred in 73 of 7118 bridged patients (pooled incidence, 0.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0.0-3.4) and 32 of 5160 nonbridged patients (pooled incidence, 0.6%; 95% CI, 0.0-1.2). There was no difference in the risk of thromboembolic events in 8 studies comparing bridged and nonbridged groups (odds ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.42-1.54). Bridging was associated with an increased risk of overall bleeding in 13 studies (odds ratio, 5.40; 95% CI, 3.00-9.74) and major bleeding in 5 studies (odds ratio, 3.60; 95% CI, 1.52-8.50) comparing bridged and nonbridged patients. There was no difference in thromboembolic events (odds ratio, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.04-2.09) but an increased risk of overall bleeding (odds ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 1.27-4.08) with full versus prophylactic/intermediate-dose low-molecular-weight heparin bridging. Low-thromboembolic-risk and/or non-vitamin K antagonist patient groups were used for comparison. Study quality was poor with heterogeneity for some analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Vitamin K antagonist-treated patients receiving periprocedural heparin bridging appear to be at increased risk of overall and major bleeding and at similar risk of thromboembolic events compared to nonbridged patients. Randomized trials are needed to define the role of periprocedural heparin bridging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22912386     DOI: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.105221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  90 in total

1.  "Tiers of delay": warfarin, hip fractures, and target-driven care.

Authors:  W G P Eardley; K E Macleod; H Freeman; A Tate
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2014-09

2.  Bridging anticoagulation for interruption of warfarin in a patient with atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Eric Tseng; Mark A Crowther; Christopher M Hillis
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2015-12-22       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  PURLs: Should you bypass anticoagulant "bridging" before and after surgery?

Authors:  Jennie B Jarrett; Ted Schaffer; Kate Rowland
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Influence of periprocedural anticoagulation strategies on complication rate and hospital stay in patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Melanie Gunawardene; S Willems; B Schäffer; J Moser; R Ö Akbulak; M Jularic; C Eickholt; J Nührich; C Meyer; P Kuklik; S Sehner; V Czerner; B A Hoffmann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 5.460

5.  The equipoise of perioperative anticoagulation management: a Canadian cross-sectional survey.

Authors:  Leslie Skeith; Alejandro Lazo-Langner; Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  J Thromb Thrombolysis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.300

6.  [Platelet inhibitors and anticoagulants: managing blood thinners in dermatosurgery].

Authors:  C Löser; U Zeymer; A Nast
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.751

7.  A bridge too far? Findings of bridging anticoagulation use and outcomes in the Outcomes Registry for Better Informed Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation (ORBIT-AF).

Authors:  Amir Y Shaikh; David D McManus
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Outcomes of temporary interruption of rivaroxaban compared with warfarin in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: results from the rivaroxaban once daily, oral, direct factor Xa inhibition compared with vitamin K antagonism for prevention of stroke and embolism trial in atrial fibrillation (ROCKET AF).

Authors:  Matthew W Sherwood; James D Douketis; Manesh R Patel; Jonathan P Piccini; Anne S Hellkamp; Yuliya Lokhnygina; Alex C Spyropoulos; Graeme J Hankey; Daniel E Singer; Christopher C Nessel; Kenneth W Mahaffey; Keith A A Fox; Robert M Califf; Richard C Becker
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  American Society of Hematology 2018 guidelines for management of venous thromboembolism: optimal management of anticoagulation therapy.

Authors:  Daniel M Witt; Robby Nieuwlaat; Nathan P Clark; Jack Ansell; Anne Holbrook; Jane Skov; Nadine Shehab; Juliet Mock; Tarra Myers; Francesco Dentali; Mark A Crowther; Arnav Agarwal; Meha Bhatt; Rasha Khatib; John J Riva; Yuan Zhang; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2018-11-27

Review 10.  A Bridge to Nowhere? Benefits and Risks for Periprocedural Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation.

Authors:  Arun Krishnamoorthy; Thomas Ortel
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 2.931

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.