| Literature DB >> 28017541 |
Onur Guneser1, Asli Demirkol2, Yonca Karagul Yuceer2, Sine Ozmen Togay3, Muge Isleten Hosoglu2, Murat Elibol4.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to investigate the production of flavor compounds from olive mill waste by microbial fermentation of Rhizopus oryzae and Candida tropicalis. Olive mill waste fermentations were performed in shake and bioreactor cultures. Production of flavor compounds from olive mill waste was followed by Gas Chromatography-Mass spectrometry, Gas chromatography- olfactometry and Spectrum Sensory Analysis®. As a result, 1.73-log and 3.23-log cfu/mL increases were observed in the microbial populations of R. oryzae and C. tropicalis during shake cultures, respectively. C. tropicalis can produce a higher concentration of d-limonene from olive mill waste than R. oryzae in shake cultures. The concentration of d-limonene was determined as 185.56 and 249.54μg/kg in the fermented olive mill waste by R. oryzae and C. tropicalis in shake cultures respectively. In contrast, R. oryzae can produce a higher concentration of d-limonene (87.73μg/kg) d-limonene than C. tropicalis (11.95μg/kg) in bioreactor cultures. Based on sensory analysis, unripe olive, wet towel, sweet aromatic, fermented aromas were determined at high intensity in olive mill waste fermented with R. oryzae meanwhile olive mill waste fermented with C. tropicalis had only a high intensity of unripe olive and oily aroma.Entities:
Keywords: Agro-waste; Bioflavor; Biotechnology; Microbial fermentation; Olive mill waste
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28017541 PMCID: PMC5470337 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2016.08.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Growth of R. oryzae and C. torpicalis in OMW during shake cultures.
| Fermentation time (h) | Microbial count ± S.E. (log cfu/mL OMW solution) | |
|---|---|---|
| Shake cultures | ||
| 0 | 0.92 ± 0.08 | 6.15 ± 0.14 |
| 24 | 6.76 ± 0.65 | 7.97 ± 1.13 |
| 48 | 7.65 ± 0.01 | 7.61 ± 0.01 |
| 72 | 6.68 ± 0.01 | 9.21 ± 2.25 |
| 120 | 6.83 ± 0.04 | 9.38 ± 0.01 |
| 168 | 6.69 ± 0.01 | 9.05 ± 0.14 |
| 288 | 6.84 ± 0.03 | 9.28 ± 0.01 |
| Maximum growth (log cfu/mL) | 1.73 | 3.23 |
Microbial analysis could not conducted for this fermentation time. S.E.: standard error, cfu: colony forming unit.
Aroma-active compounds of unfermented and fermented OMW with R. oryzae and C. tropicalis (n = 2).
| RI | Volatile compound | Aroma quality | Identification methods | Aroma intensity | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | Control | ||||||
| 598 | Diacetyl | Butter | RI,O | 1.25 ± 0.25 | 0.60 ± 0.10 | 4.75 ± 0.75 | 4.50 ± 1.50 |
| 734 | |||||||
| 802 | Hexanal | Green grass | RI,MS,O | 3.0 ± 1.0 | ND | 2.0 ± 0.10 | ND |
| 856 | Unknown 1 | Dirty, acid | RI,O | 5.50 ± 0.50 | 5.25 ± 1.25 | 0.75 ± 0.75 | ND |
| 862 | Isovaleric acid | Sour, fruity | RI,O | 5.50 ± 0.50 | 4.75 ± 0.25 | 1.75 ± 0.25 | 1.50 ± 1.50 |
| 869 | Sytrene | Acid, dirty | RI,MS,O | ND | ND | 2.75 ± 0.25 | ND |
| 898 | Methional | Boiled potato | RI,O | 4.50 ± 0.50 | ND | 4.50 ± 1.50 | 3.75 ± 0.25 |
| 928 | 2-Acetyl-1-pyroline | Popcorn | RI,O | ND | 0.50 ± 0.50 | ND | ND |
| 975 | Unknown 2 | Metallic | RI,O | 5.75 ± 0.25 | 3.0 ± 0.10 | 4.50 ± 1.50 | 3.75 ± 0.25 |
| 999 | Hexyl acetate | Cologne | RI,O | 4.50 ± 0.50 | 0.75 ± 0.25 | 1.50 ± 0.50 | 0.75 ± 0.75 |
| 1040 | |||||||
| 1050 | Benzeneacetaldehyde | Rose, flower | RI,MS,O | 2.50 ± 0.50 | 2.0 ± 2.0 | ND | ND |
| 1058 | Unknown 3 | Vegetable oil | RI,O | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 2.0 ± 0.10 | ND | ND |
| 1077 | Wet towel | RI,MS,O | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 1.50 ± 0.50 | 3.0 ± 1.0 | 2.25 ± 0.25 | |
| 1095 | Guaiacol | Burn sugar | RI,MS,O | ND | ND | 3.50 ± 1.50 | ND |
| 1120 | Unknown 4 | Sour | RI,O | 3.0 ± 0.10 | 0.50 ± 0.50 | ND | ND |
| 1138 | ( | Hay | RI,MS,O | 5.0 ± 0.10 | 2.0 ± 1.0 | 2.50 ± 0.50 | ND |
| 1144 | |||||||
| 1157 | ( | Cucumber | RI,MS,O | 2.0 ± 2.0 | 1.0 ± 0.10 | 2.50 ± 0.50 | ND |
| 1158 | ( | Hay | RI,O | 3.50 ± 0.50 | ND | 2.75 ± 0.75 | 1.0 ± 1.0 |
| 1186 | Naphthalene | Dirty | RI,MS,O | ND | ND | 0.75 ± 0.75 | 1.0 ± 1.0 |
| 1191 | Carveol | Minty | RI,MS,O | 0.50 ± 0.50 | ND | ND | ND |
| 1216 | 2,4-Nonadienal | Burnt oil | RI,MS,O | 5.75 ± 0.25 | 1.50 ± 0.50 | 3.25 ± 0.75 | 2.0 ± 2.0 |
| 1268 | Geraniol | Sweet, flower | RI,O | 0.50 ± 0.50 | 1.0 ± 1.0 | 2.0 ± 0.10 | 1.0 ± 1.0 |
| 1322 | ( | Burnt oil | RI,MS,O | ND | ND | 4.50 ± 0.50 | 1.0 ± 0.50 |
| 1372 | α-Cubebene | Sweet | RI,MS,O | 3.0 ± 1.0 | ND | ND | ND |
Intensity of aroma compounds marked bold increased in fermented OMW.
RI: Retention indices based on HP-5 column.
Aroma intensity in 5 days (∼135 h) fermented and unfermented OMW. SE, standard error; ND, not detected; MS, mass spectrometry; O, odor.
Changes in concentration of flavor compounds in OMW during shake cultures of R. oryzae and C. topicalis.
| Volatile compound | RI | Aroma quality | Mean (μg/kg OMW) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 72 h | 288 h | |||
| 2-Pentanone | 682 | Sweet | 12.29 ± 8.72 | 14.16 ± 10.04 | 24.28 ± 3.30 |
| Methoxyphenyloxime | 926 | – | 61.74 ± 29.17 | 64.95 ± 29.73 | 92.26 ± 3.32 |
| 1032 | Lemon, citrus | 40.13 ± 1.05B | 185.56 ± 17.47A | 17.22 ± 1.60B | |
| 2-Phenylethanol | 1118 | Rose | 1.35 ± 0.96B | 13.91 ± 6.57A | 11.71 ± 8.30A |
A,B Means followed by different superscript letter represent significant differences in the same flavor compound through the fermentation time.
Retention index based on HP 5MS column.
Mean relative abundance = (concentration of internal standard × peak area of compound)/(peak area of the internal standard).
72 h incubation without R. oryzae or C. tropicalis, Nd: not detected, SE: standard error.
Fig. 1Changes in concentration of flavor compounds in OMW during bioreactor cultures of R. oryzae (A) and C. tropicalis (B). A–EMeans followed by different superscript letter on bar represents significant differences in the same flavor compound through the fermentation time.
The productivity of flavor compounds produced by R. oryzae and C. tropicalis in bireactor cultures.
| Volatile compounds | Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Pentanone | 0.26 ± 0.01 | Nc |
| Methoxyphenyloxime | 0.45 ± 0.01 | Nc |
| 0.47 ± 0.01 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | |
| 2-Phenylethanol | 0.06 ± 0.01 | Nc |
| Methyl butanoate | Nc | 0.1 ± 0.01 |
Productivity was calculated based on the maximum concentration of each volatile compounds through the bioreactor culture. Nc, not calculated.
Fig. 2Sensory properties of OMW fermented by R. oryzae (A) and C. tropicalis (B).