Literature DB >> 28017468

All-Suture Anchors: Biomechanical Analysis of Pullout Strength, Displacement, and Failure Mode.

F Alan Barber1, Morley A Herbert2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the biomechanical and design characteristics of all-suture anchors.
METHODS: All-suture anchors were tested in fresh porcine cortical bone and biphasic polyurethane foam blocks by cyclic loading (10-100 N for 200 cycles), followed by destructive testing parallel to the insertion axis at 12.5 mm/s. Endpoints included ultimate failure load, displacement at 100 and 200 cycles, stiffness, and failure mode. Anchors tested included JuggerKnot (1.4, 1.5, and 2.8), Iconix (1, 2, and 3), Y-knot (1.3, 1.8, and 2.8), Q-Fix (1.8 and 2.8), and Draw Tight (1.8 and 3.2).
RESULTS: The mean ultimate failure strength of the triple-loaded anchors (564 ± 42 N) was significantly greater than the mean ultimate failure strength of the double-loaded anchors (465 ± 33 N) (P = .017), and the double-loaded anchors were stronger than the single-loaded anchors (256 ± 35 N) (P < .0001). No difference was found between the results in porcine bone and biphasic polyurethane foam. None of these anchors demonstrated 5 mm or 10 mm of displacement during cyclic loading. The Y-Knot demonstrated greater displacement than the JuggerKnot and Q-Fix (P = .025) but not the Iconix and Draw Tight (P > .05). The most common failure mode varied and was suture breaking for the Q-Fix (97%), JuggerKnot (81%), and Iconix anchors (58%), anchor pullout with the Draw Tight (76%), whereas the Y-Knot was 50% suture breaking and 50% anchor pullout.
CONCLUSIONS: The ultimate failure load of an all-suture anchor is correlated directly with its number of sutures. With cyclic loading, the Y-Knot demonstrated greater displacement than the JuggerKnot and Q-Fix but not the Iconix and Draw Tight. JuggerKnot (81%) and Q-Fix (97%) anchors failed by suture breaking, whereas the Draw Tight anchor failed by anchor pullout (76%). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: All-suture anchors vary in strength and performance, and these factors may influence clinical success. Biphasic polyurethane foam is a validated model for suture anchor testing.
Copyright © 2016 Arthroscopy Association of North America. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28017468     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2016.09.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  13 in total

Review 1.  [Diagnostics and treatment concepts for anteroinferior shoulder instability : Current trends].

Authors:  F Martetschläger; M Tauber; P Habermeyer
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Arthroscopic remplissage with all-suture anchors causes cystic lesions in the humerus: a volumetric CT study of 55 anchors.

Authors:  Miguel Angel Ruiz Ibán; Rosa Vega Rodriguez; Raquel Ruiz Díaz; Roque Pérez Expósito; Irene Zarcos Paredes; Jorge Diaz Heredia
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Biomaterials Used for Suture Anchors in Orthopedic Surgery.

Authors:  Chul-Hyun Cho; Ki-Cheor Bae; Du-Han Kim
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2021-08-17

4.  Biomechanical testing of trans-humeral all-suture anchors for rotator cuff repair.

Authors:  Mikel Aramberri-Gutiérrez; Amaia Martínez-Menduiña; Simon Boyle; Maria Valencia
Journal:  Shoulder Elbow       Date:  2018-08-04

5.  Comparison between all-suture and biocomposite anchors in the arthroscopic treatment of traumatic anterior shoulder instability: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ioannis Pantekidis; Michael-Alexander Malahias; Stefania Kokkineli; Emmanouil Brilakis; Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2021-03-27

6.  The Effect of Torque Differences for All-Suture Anchor Fixation Strength: A Biomechanical Analysis.

Authors:  Lucca Lacheta; Jon Miles; Brenton Douglass; Peter Millett
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Biomechanical analysis of the interval slide procedure: a fresh porcine cadaver study.

Authors:  Felix Porschke; Marc Schnetzke; Christoph Luecke; Christel Weiss; Stefan Studier-Fischer; Paul Alfred Gruetzner; Thorsten Guehring
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 2.928

8.  Conventional rotator cuff versus all-suture anchors-A biomechanical study focusing on the insertion angle in an unlimited cyclic model.

Authors:  Dimitris Ntalos; Kay Sellenschloh; Gerd Huber; Daniel Briem; Klaus Püschel; Michael M Morlock; Karl-Heinz Frosch; Florian Fensky; Till Orla Klatte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  A non-inferiority comparison of Delta Medical's PEEK Suture Anchor and Smith & Nephew's PEEK Suture Anchor in arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: a multicenter prospective single-blind randomized controlled clinical trial.

Authors:  Peng Gao; Hongtao Wang; Yongsheng Xu; Yanlin Li; Guofeng Cai; Yufeng Wu; Ziqi Huang; Qiang Li; Jing Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-12

Review 10.  The Clinical and Biomechanical Performance of All-Suture Anchors: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Selim Ergün; Umut Akgün; F Alan Barber; Mustafa Karahan
Journal:  Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil       Date:  2020-05-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.