Literature DB >> 28017399

Safety and immunogenicity of a recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine in healthy adults in Sierra Leone: a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

Feng-Cai Zhu1, Alie H Wurie2, Li-Hua Hou3, Qi Liang1, Yu-Hua Li4, James B W Russell2, Shi-Po Wu3, Jing-Xin Li1, Yue-Mei Hu1, Qiang Guo3, Wen-Bo Xu5, Abdul R Wurie2, Wen-Juan Wang1, Zhe Zhang3, Wen-Jiao Yin5, Manal Ghazzawi2, Xu Zhang6, Lei Duan6, Jun-Zhi Wang7, Wei Chen8.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based vaccine expressing the glycoprotein of Ebola Zaire Makona variant showed good safety and immunogenicity in a phase 1 trial of healthy Chinese adults. We aimed to assess the safety and immunogenicity of this vaccine in healthy adults in Sierra Leone and to determine the optimal dose.
METHODS: We did a single-centre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 clinical trial at Sierra Leone-China Friendship Hospital, Freetown, Sierra Leone. We recruited healthy adults aged 18-50 years who were HIV negative, had no history of Ebola virus infection, and had no previous immunisation with other Ebola vaccine candidates. Participants were sequentially enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1:1), by computer-generated block randomisation (block size of eight), to receive the high-dose vaccine (1·6 × 1011 viral particles), low-dose vaccine (8·0 × 1010 viral particles), or placebo (containing only vaccine excipients, with no viral particles). Participants, investigators, and study staff (except two study pharmacists) were masked from treatment allocation. The primary safety outcome was occurrence of solicited adverse reactions within 7 days of vaccination, analysed by intention to treat. The primary immunogenicity outcome was glycoprotein-specific antibody responses at days 14, 28, and 168 after vaccination, analysed in all vaccinated participants who had blood samples drawn for antibody tests. The trial is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry, number PACTR201509001259869, and is completed.
FINDINGS: During Oct 10-28, 2015, 500 participants were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive the high-dose vaccine (n=250), low-dose vaccine (n=125), or placebo (n=125). 132 (53%) participants in the high-dose group, 60 (48%) in the low-dose group, and 54 (43%) in the placebo group reported at least one solicited adverse reaction within 7 days of vaccination. Most adverse reactions were mild and self-limiting. Solicited injection-site adverse reactions were significantly more frequent in vaccine recipients (65 [26%] in high-dose group and 31 [25%] in low-dose group) than in those receiving placebo (17 [14%]; p=0·0169). Glycoprotein-specific antibody responses were detected from day 14 onwards (geometric mean titre 1251·0 [95% CI 976·6-1602·5] in low-dose group and 1728·4 [1459·4-2047·0] in high-dose group) and peaked at day 28 (1471·8 [1151·0-1881·8] and 2043·1 [1762·4-2368·4]), but declined quickly in the following months (223·3 [148·2-336·4] and 254·2 [185·0-349·5] at day 168). Geometric mean titres in the placebo group remained around 6·0-6·8 throughout the study period. Three serious adverse events (malaria, gastroenteritis, and one fatal asthma episode) were reported in the high-dose vaccine group, but none was deemed related to the vaccine.
INTERPRETATION: The recombinant adenovirus type-5 vector-based Ebola vaccine was safe and highly immunogenic in healthy Sierra Leonean adults, and 8·0 × 1010 viral particles was the optimal dose. FUNDING: Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology and the National Health and Family Planning Commission, Beijing Institute of Biotechnology, and Tianjin CanSino Biotechnology.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28017399     DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32617-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lancet        ISSN: 0140-6736            Impact factor:   79.321


  60 in total

Review 1.  Vaccines against Ebola virus and Marburg virus: recent advances and promising candidates.

Authors:  John J Suschak; Connie S Schmaljohn
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2019-10-07       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Perceptions and acceptability of an experimental Ebola vaccine among health care workers, frontline staff, and the general public during the 2014-2015 Ebola outbreak in Sierra Leone.

Authors:  Mohamed F Jalloh; Mohammad B Jalloh; Alison Albert; Brent Wolff; Amy Callis; Aparna Ramakrishnan; Emily Cramer; Paul Sengeh; Samuel Abu Pratt; Lansana Conteh; Rana Hajjeh; Rebecca Bunnell; John T Redd; Anna Mia Ekström; Helena Nordenstedt
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-02-10       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 3.  Vaccine vectors: the bright side of cytomegalovirus.

Authors:  Andrea C Méndez; Cristina Rodríguez-Rojas; Margarita Del Val
Journal:  Med Microbiol Immunol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Longitudinal quantification of adenovirus neutralizing responses in Zambian mother-infant pairs: Impact of HIV-1 infection and its treatment.

Authors:  Sara R Privatt; Brianna L Bullard; Eric A Weaver; Charles Wood; John T West
Journal:  Vaccine       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 3.641

Review 5.  Post-exposure treatments for Ebola and Marburg virus infections.

Authors:  Robert W Cross; Chad E Mire; Heinz Feldmann; Thomas W Geisbert
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 84.694

6.  Development of an antibody cocktail for treatment of Sudan virus infection.

Authors:  Andrew S Herbert; Jeffery W Froude; Ramon A Ortiz; Ana I Kuehne; Danielle E Dorosky; Russell R Bakken; Samantha E Zak; Nicole M Josleyn; Konstantin Musiychuk; R Mark Jones; Brian Green; Stephen J Streatfield; Anna Z Wec; Natasha Bohorova; Ognian Bohorov; Do H Kim; Michael H Pauly; Jesus Velasco; Kevin J Whaley; Spencer W Stonier; Zachary A Bornholdt; Kartik Chandran; Larry Zeitlin; Darryl Sampey; Vidadi Yusibov; John M Dye
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-03       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  Immune barriers of Ebola virus infection.

Authors:  Anita K McElroy; Elke Mühlberger; César Muñoz-Fontela
Journal:  Curr Opin Virol       Date:  2018-02-16       Impact factor: 7.090

8.  Willingness to pay for an Ebola vaccine during the 2014-2016 ebola outbreak in West Africa: Results from a U.S. National sample.

Authors:  Julia E Painter; Michael E von Fricken; Suyane Viana de O Mesquita; Ralph J DiClemente
Journal:  Hum Vaccin Immunother       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Immunodominance of Adenovirus-Derived CD8+ T Cell Epitopes Interferes with the Induction of Transgene-Specific Immunity in Adenovirus-Based Immunization.

Authors:  Dominik Schöne; Camilla Patrizia Hrycak; Sonja Windmann; Dennis Lapuente; Ulf Dittmer; Matthias Tenbusch; Wibke Bayer
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2017-09-27       Impact factor: 5.103

10.  Prevention of Ebola virus disease through vaccination: where we are in 2018.

Authors:  Yves Lévy; Clifford Lane; Peter Piot; Abdul Habib Beavogui; Mark Kieh; Bailah Leigh; Seydou Doumbia; Eric D'Ortenzio; Claire Lévy-Marchal; Jerome Pierson; Deborah Watson-Jones; Vinh-Kim Nguyen; Heidi Larson; Julia Lysander; Christine Lacabaratz; Rodolphe Thiebaut; Augustin Augier; David Ishola; Stephen Kennedy; Geneviève Chêne; Brian Greenwood; James Neaton; Yazdan Yazdanpanah
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2018-08-10       Impact factor: 79.321

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.