Literature DB >> 2801483

Diagnostic accuracy and estimation of the severity of valvular regurgitation from the signal void on cine magnetic resonance images.

S Wagner1, W Auffermann, P Buser, T H Lim, B Kircher, P Pflugfelder, C B Higgins.   

Abstract

Anomalous blood flow caused by valvular regurgitation can be visualized as a narrowly defined area of signal loss in contrast to the high intensity of the blood pool on repetitive gradient refocused magnetic resonance (MRI) (cine MRI) views. In order to assess the accuracy of identification and measurements of the signal void in the evaluation of mitral (MR) and aortic regurgitation (AR), the cine MRI studies of 62 patients with regurgitation and of 20 normal volunteers were retrospectively analyzed in a blinded study of three independent reviewers. Accuracy for detection of MR was greater than 0.96 and for AR was greater than 0.91 for all three reviewers. The total volume of the signal void associated with regurgitation was measured on cine MRI images of 58 patients by two independent observers. The patients were divided into three groups of severity based upon assessment of severity of regurgitation by two-dimensional echocardiography and/or angiography. The total volume of signal loss was 9.0 ml (+/- 0.94 SEE; n = 18) for mild MR, 30.7 ml (+/- 5.3 SEE; n = 11) for moderate MR, and 83.4 ml (+/- 17.4 SEE; n = 5) for severe MR. In patients with AR, the calculated signal void was 27.3 ml (+/- 3.2 SEE; n = 24) in mild, 49.7 ml (+/- 2.9 SEE; n = 7) in moderate, and 75.8 ml (+/- 5.7; n = 6) in severe cases. The differences in the volume of the signal void were significant among the three groups of severity (p less than 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2801483     DOI: 10.1016/0002-8703(89)90590-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  11 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic resonance imaging in valvular heart disease.

Authors:  M Schmidt; J Crnac; B Dederichs; P Theissen; H Schicha; U Sechtem
Journal:  Int J Card Imaging       Date:  1997-06

2.  Routine cine-CMR for prosthesis-associated mitral regurgitation: a multicenter comparison to echocardiography.

Authors:  Lauren A Simprini; Anika Afroz; Mitchell A Cooper; Igor Klem; Christoph Jensen; Raymond J Kim; Monvadi B Srichai; John F Heitner; Michael Sood; Elizabeth Chandy; Dipan J Shah; Juan Lopez-Mattei; Robert W Biederman; John D Grizzard; Anthon Fuisz; Kambiz Ghafourian; Afshin Farzaneh-Far; Jonathan Weinsaft
Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis       Date:  2014-09

3.  Quantification of tricuspid regurgitation using two-dimensional velocity encoding cine: optimal plane and reproducibility.

Authors:  Hoyong Jun; Eun-Ah Park; Young Eun Bahn; Whal Lee; Hyung-Kwan Kim; Jin Wook Chung
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 4.  Valvular heart disease: what does cardiovascular MRI add?

Authors:  Pier Giorgio Masci; Steven Dymarkowski; Jan Bogaert
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 5.  Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Valvular Heart Disease: Diagnosis, Assessment, and Management.

Authors:  Roshin C Mathew; Adrián I Löffler; Michael Salerno
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 2.931

Review 6.  Magnetic resonance imaging of acquired cardiac disease.

Authors:  C L Carrol; C B Higgins; G R Caputo
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  1996

7.  Mitral regurgitation recovery and atrial reverse remodeling following pulmonary vein isolation procedure in patients with atrial fibrillation: a clinical observation proof-of-concept cardiac MRI study.

Authors:  Sahadev T Reddy; William Belden; Mark Doyle; Diane V Thompson; Ronald Williams; June Yamrozik; Moneal Shah; Robert W W Biederman
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  2013-03-21       Impact factor: 1.900

Review 8.  Heart valve disease: investigation by cardiovascular magnetic resonance.

Authors:  Saul G Myerson
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 9.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: clinical implications in the evaluation of connective tissue diseases.

Authors:  Sophie Mavrogeni; George Markousis-Mavrogenis; Loukia Koutsogeorgopoulou; Genovefa Kolovou
Journal:  J Inflamm Res       Date:  2017-05-11

Review 10.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance physics for clinicians: Part II.

Authors:  John D Biglands; Aleksandra Radjenovic; John P Ridgway
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2012-09-20       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.