Ben R Saleem1, Roelof J Beukinga2,3, Ronald Boellaard2, Andor W J M Glaudemans2, Michel M P J Reijnen4, Clark J Zeebregts5, Riemer H J A Slart2,3. 1. Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands. r.b.saleem@gmail.com. 2. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands. 3. Department of Biomedical Photonic Imaging (BMPI), University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands. 4. Department of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands. 5. Department of Surgery, Division of Vascular Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30 001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI. METHODS: Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different 18F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8. RESULTS: The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Textural analysis to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.
BACKGROUND: The clinical problem in suspected aortoiliac graft infection (AGI) is to obtain proof of infection. Although 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography scanning (PET) has been suggested to play a pivotal role, an evidence-based interpretation is lacking. The objective of this retrospective study was to examine the feasibility and utility of 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity characterized by textural features to diagnose AGI. METHODS: Thirty patients with a history of aortic graft reconstruction who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT scanning were included. Sixteen patients were suspected to have an AGI (group I). AGI was considered proven only in the case of a positive bacterial culture. Positive cultures were found in 10 of the 16 patients (group Ia), and in the other six patients, cultures remained negative (group Ib). A control group was formed of 14 patients undergoing 18F-FDG PET for other reasons (group II). PET images were assessed using conventional maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax), tissue-to-background ratio (TBR), and visual grading scale (VGS). Additionally, 64 different 18F-FDG PET based textural features were applied to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity. To select candidate predictors, univariable logistic regression analysis was performed (α = 0.16). The accuracy was satisfactory in case of an AUC > 0.8. RESULTS: The feature selection process yielded the textural features named variance (AUC = 0.88), high grey level zone emphasis (AUC = 0.87), small zone low grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.80), and small zone high grey level emphasis (AUC = 0.81) most optimal for distinguishing between groups I and II. SUVmax, TBR, and VGS were also able to distinguish between these groups with AUCs of 0.87, 0.78, and 0.90, respectively. The textural feature named short run high grey level emphasis was able to distinguish group Ia from Ib (AUC = 0.83), while for the same task the TBR and VGS were not found to be predictive. SUVmax was found predictive in distinguishing these groups, but showed an unsatisfactory accuracy (AUC = 0.75). CONCLUSION: Textural analysis to characterize 18F-FDG uptake heterogeneity is feasible and shows promising results in diagnosing AGI, but requires additional external validation and refinement before it can be implemented in the clinical decision-making process.
Entities:
Keywords:
18F-FDG PET; Aortic prosthetic graft infection; Textural features
Authors: P Berger; I Vaartjes; A Scholtens; F L Moll; G J De Borst; B De Keizer; M L Bots; J D Blankensteijn Journal: Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg Date: 2015-07-09 Impact factor: 7.069
Authors: Ben R Saleem; Robbert Meerwaldt; Ignace F J Tielliu; Eric L G Verhoeven; Jan J A M van den Dungen; Clark J Zeebregts Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2010-01-15 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Ben R Saleem; Robert A Pol; Riemer H J A Slart; Michel M P J Reijnen; Clark J Zeebregts Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-08-19 Impact factor: 3.411
Authors: Chiara Lauri; Alberto Signore; Andor W J M Glaudemans; Giorgio Treglia; Olivier Gheysens; Riemer H J A Slart; Roberto Iezzi; Niek H J Prakken; Eike Sebastian Debus; Susanne Honig; Anne Lejay; Nabil Chakfé Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2022-04-04 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: Allan Felipe Fattori Alves; José Ricardo de Arruda Miranda; Fabiano Reis; Sergio Augusto Santana de Souza; Luciana Luchesi Rodrigues Alves; Laisson de Moura Feitoza; José Thiago de Souza de Castro; Diana Rodrigues de Pina Journal: J Venom Anim Toxins Incl Trop Dis Date: 2020-09-04