Ju Dong Yang1, Joseph J Larson2, Kymberly D Watt1, Alina M Allen1, Russell H Wiesner1, Gregory J Gores1, Lewis R Roberts1, Julie A Heimbach3, Michael D Leise4. 1. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. 2. Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. 3. Division of Transplant Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. 4. Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota. Electronic address: Leise.Michael@mayo.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management strategies for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have changed, along with liver allocation policies based on model for end-stage liver disease score. We investigated etiologic-specific trends in liver transplantation in the United States during different time periods. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study, using the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry data, to identify all adult patients registered for liver transplantation in the United States from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2015. For subjects listed with multiple diagnoses, HCC was considered the primary listing diagnosis. To determine whether availability of direct-acting antiviral agents, which began in 2011, affected pretransplant (death or drop-out) and post-transplant outcomes for patients with HCV infection, we compared data from the time periods of 2004 to 2010 and 2011 to 2014. We used competing-risk analysis to compare differences in end points between these periods. Differences between periods in pretransplantation and post-transplantation outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Maier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Associations between year of listing and pre-liver transplant outcome, and year of liver transplant and survival after transplant, were examined using the log-rank test. Proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the reliability of the time period effect with potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 109,018 registrants, 18.5% were registered for liver transplantation because of HCC. In 2015, HCC was the leading diagnosis among registrants (23.9% of registrations) and recipients (27.2% of recipients). Between 2004 and 2015, the ratio of registrants with vs without HCC increased 5.6-fold for patients with HCV infection, 1.9-fold for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, 2.7-fold for patients with alcohol abuse, and 10.2-fold for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. After adjusting for covariates, we associated the period of 2011 to 2014 with a decreased probability that HCC registrants would undergo liver transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P < .0001). The period of 2011 to 2014 also was associated with a decreased probability of drop-out owing to deterioration or death from HCV-induced (HR, 0.90; P = .0003), HBV-induced (HR, 0.71; P = .002), or alcohol-induced (HR, 0.90; P = .01) liver disease, and an increased probability of delisting as a result of clinical improvement in patients with HCV infection (HR, 3.4; P < .0001), HBV infection (HR, 2.3; P = .004), or alcohol abuse (HR, 2.2; P < .0001). The period of 2011 to 2014 was associated with a decreased risk of graft loss or death, with the largest effect seen in HCV-infected recipients (HR, 0.76; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: HCC was the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States in 2015. Despite this, the probability of liver transplantation decreased the most in registrants with HCC. Pretransplantation and post-transplantation outcomes have improved, particularly in patients with HCV infection.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: Management strategies for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) have changed, along with liver allocation policies based on model for end-stage liver disease score. We investigated etiologic-specific trends in liver transplantation in the United States during different time periods. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study, using the United Network for Organ Sharing/Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network registry data, to identify all adult patients registered for liver transplantation in the United States from January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2015. For subjects listed with multiple diagnoses, HCC was considered the primary listing diagnosis. To determine whether availability of direct-acting antiviral agents, which began in 2011, affected pretransplant (death or drop-out) and post-transplant outcomes for patients with HCV infection, we compared data from the time periods of 2004 to 2010 and 2011 to 2014. We used competing-risk analysis to compare differences in end points between these periods. Differences between periods in pretransplantation and post-transplantation outcomes were estimated using Kaplan-Maier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Associations between year of listing and pre-liver transplant outcome, and year of liver transplant and survival after transplant, were examined using the log-rank test. Proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate the reliability of the time period effect with potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 109,018 registrants, 18.5% were registered for liver transplantation because of HCC. In 2015, HCC was the leading diagnosis among registrants (23.9% of registrations) and recipients (27.2% of recipients). Between 2004 and 2015, the ratio of registrants with vs without HCC increased 5.6-fold for patients with HCV infection, 1.9-fold for patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, 2.7-fold for patients with alcohol abuse, and 10.2-fold for patients with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. After adjusting for covariates, we associated the period of 2011 to 2014 with a decreased probability that HCC registrants would undergo liver transplantation (hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P < .0001). The period of 2011 to 2014 also was associated with a decreased probability of drop-out owing to deterioration or death from HCV-induced (HR, 0.90; P = .0003), HBV-induced (HR, 0.71; P = .002), or alcohol-induced (HR, 0.90; P = .01) liver disease, and an increased probability of delisting as a result of clinical improvement in patients with HCV infection (HR, 3.4; P < .0001), HBV infection (HR, 2.3; P = .004), or alcohol abuse (HR, 2.2; P < .0001). The period of 2011 to 2014 was associated with a decreased risk of graft loss or death, with the largest effect seen in HCV-infected recipients (HR, 0.76; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS:HCC was the leading indication for liver transplantation in the United States in 2015. Despite this, the probability of liver transplantation decreased the most in registrants with HCC. Pretransplantation and post-transplantation outcomes have improved, particularly in patients with HCV infection.
Authors: Ju Dong Yang; Bashar A Aqel; Surakit Pungpapong; Gregory J Gores; Lewis R Roberts; Michael D Leise Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2016-07-05 Impact factor: 25.083
Authors: Jeong Won Jang; Jong Young Choi; Young Seok Kim; Hyun Young Woo; Sung Kyu Choi; Chang Hyeong Lee; Tae Yeob Kim; Joo Hyun Sohn; Won Young Tak; Kwang-Hyub Han Journal: Hepatology Date: 2015-03-18 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Robert J Wong; Maria Aguilar; Ramsey Cheung; Ryan B Perumpail; Stephen A Harrison; Zobair M Younossi; Aijaz Ahmed Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-11-25 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Adriaan J van der Meer; Bart J Veldt; Jordan J Feld; Heiner Wedemeyer; Jean-François Dufour; Frank Lammert; Andres Duarte-Rojo; E Jenny Heathcote; Michael P Manns; Lorenz Kuske; Stefan Zeuzem; W Peter Hofmann; Robert J de Knegt; Bettina E Hansen; Harry L A Janssen Journal: JAMA Date: 2012-12-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Joel P Wedd; Eric Nordstrom; Trevor Nydam; Janette Durham; Michael Zimmerman; Thor Johnson; W Thomas Purcell; Scott W Biggins Journal: Liver Transpl Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 5.799
Authors: Graham R Foster; William L Irving; Michelle C M Cheung; Alex J Walker; Benjamin E Hudson; Suman Verma; John McLauchlan; David J Mutimer; Ashley Brown; William T H Gelson; Douglas C MacDonald; Kosh Agarwal Journal: J Hepatol Date: 2016-01-30 Impact factor: 30.083
Authors: Michael C Wallace; Matthew Knuiman; Yi Huang; George Garas; Leon A Adams; Gerry MacQuillan; David B Preen; Gary P Jeffrey Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2018-05-28 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Ju Dong Yang; Fowsiyo Ahmed; Kristin C Mara; Benyam D Addissie; Alina M Allen; Gregory J Gores; Lewis R Roberts Journal: Hepatology Date: 2019-10-21 Impact factor: 17.425
Authors: Fasiha Kanwal; Jennifer R Kramer; Srikar Mapakshi; Yamini Natarajan; Maneerat Chayanupatkul; Peter A Richardson; Liang Li; Roxanne Desiderio; Aaron P Thrift; Steven M Asch; Jinna Chu; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2018-08-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Marc Puigvehí; Dana Hashim; Philipp K Haber; Amreen Dinani; Thomas D Schiano; Amon Asgharpour; Tatyana Kushner; Gaurav Kakked; Parissa Tabrizian; Myron Schwartz; Ahmet Gurakar; Douglas Dieterich; Paolo Boffetta; Scott L Friedman; Josep M Llovet; Behnam Saberi Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2019-10-11 Impact factor: 8.086