Literature DB >> 27343202

Projected outcomes of 6-month delay in exception points versus an equivalent Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score for hepatocellular carcinoma liver transplant candidates.

Sarah K Alver1, Douglas J Lorenz1, Michael R Marvin2, Guy N Brock3.   

Abstract

The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) recently implemented a 6-month delay before granting exception points to liver transplantation candidates with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to address disparity in transplantation access between HCC and non-HCC patients. An HCC-specific scoring scheme, the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease equivalent (MELDEQ ), has also been developed. We compared projected dropout and transplant probabilities and posttransplant survival for HCC and non-HCC patients under the 6-month delay and the MELDEQ using UNOS data from October 1, 2009, to June 30, 2014, and multistate modeling. Overall (combined HCC and non-HCC) wait-list dropout was similar under both schemes and slightly improved (though not statistically significant) compared to actual data. Projected HCC wait-list dropout was similar between the MELDEQ and 6-month delay at 6 months but thereafter started to differ, with the 6-month delay eventually favoring HCC patients (3-year dropout 10.0% [9.0%-11.0%] for HCC versus 14.1% [13.6%-14.6%]) for non-HCC) and the MELDEQ favoring non-HCC patients (3-year dropout 16.0% [13.2%-18.8%] for HCC versus 12.3% [11.9%-12.7%] for non-HCC). Projected transplant probabilities for HCC patients were substantially lower under the MELDEQ compared to the 6-month delay (26.6% versus 83.8% by 3 years, respectively). Projected HCC posttransplant survival under the 6-month delay was similar to actual, but slightly worse under the MELDEQ (2-year survival 82.9% [81.7%-84.2%] versus actual of 85.5% [84.3%-86.7%]). In conclusion, although the 6-month delay improves equity in transplant and dropout between HCC and non-HCC candidates, disparity between the 2 groups may still exist after 6 months of wait-list time. Projections under the MELDEQ , however, appear to disadvantage HCC patients. Therefore, modification to the exception point progression or refinement of an HCC prioritization score may be warranted. Liver Transplantation 22 1343-1355 2016 AASLD.
© 2016 by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27343202     DOI: 10.1002/lt.24503

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  9 in total

1.  Comparison of two equivalent model for end-stage liver disease scores for hepatocellular carcinoma patients using data from the United Network for Organ Sharing liver transplant waiting list registry.

Authors:  Sarah K Alver; Douglas J Lorenz; Kenneth Washburn; Michael R Marvin; Guy N Brock
Journal:  Transpl Int       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 3.782

2.  Trends in the Mortality of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the United States.

Authors:  Eliza W Beal; Dmitry Tumin; Ali Kabir; Dimitrios Moris; Xu-Feng Zhang; Jeffery Chakedis; Kenneth Washburn; Sylvester Black; Carl M Schmidt; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Liver transplantation and waitlist mortality for HCC and non-HCC candidates following the 2015 HCC exception policy change.

Authors:  Tanveen Ishaque; Allan B Massie; Mary G Bowring; Christine E Haugen; Jessica M Ruck; Samantha E Halpern; Madeleine M Waldram; Macey L Henderson; Jacqueline M Garonzik Wang; Andrew M Cameron; Benjamin Philosophe; Shane Ottmann; Anne F Rositch; Dorry L Segev
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 8.086

4.  Hepatocellular Carcinoma Is the Most Common Indication for Liver Transplantation and Placement on the Waitlist in the United States.

Authors:  Ju Dong Yang; Joseph J Larson; Kymberly D Watt; Alina M Allen; Russell H Wiesner; Gregory J Gores; Lewis R Roberts; Julie A Heimbach; Michael D Leise
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 11.382

5.  Predictors of low risk for dropout from the liver transplant waiting list for hepatocellular carcinoma in long wait time regions: Implications for organ allocation.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Jennifer L Dodge; Ryutaro Hirose; John P Roberts; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 8.086

6.  A novel waitlist dropout score for hepatocellular carcinoma - identifying a threshold that predicts worse post-transplant survival.

Authors:  Neil Mehta; Jennifer L Dodge; John P Roberts; Francis Y Yao
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 25.083

7.  Predicting survival after liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma using the LiTES-HCC score.

Authors:  David Goldberg; Alejandro Mantero; Craig Newcomb; Cindy Delgado; Kimberly A Forde; David E Kaplan; Binu John; Nadine Nuchovich; Barbara Dominguez; Ezekiel Emanuel; Peter P Reese
Journal:  J Hepatol       Date:  2021-01-13       Impact factor: 30.083

8.  Multistate model of the patient flow process in the pediatric emergency department.

Authors:  Anqi Liu; David M Kline; Guy N Brock; Bema K Bonsu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-07-10       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Early Impact of MMaT-3 Policy on Liver Transplant Waitlist Outcomes for Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Authors:  Anjiya Shaikh; Karthik Goli; Nicole E Rich; Jihane N Benhammou; Saira Khaderi; Ruben Hernaez; Vatche G Agopian; John M Vierling; Donghee Kim; Aijaz Ahmed; John A Goss; Abbas Rana; Fasiha Kanwal; George Cholankeril
Journal:  Transplant Direct       Date:  2022-04-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.