Hiroyuki Oya1, Matthew A Howard2, Vincent A Magnotta3, Anton Kruger4, Timothy D Griffiths5, Louis Lemieux6, David W Carmichael7, Christopher I Petkov5, Hiroto Kawasaki2, Christopher K Kovach2, Matthew J Sutterer2, Ralph Adolphs8. 1. Department of Neurosurgery, Human Brain Research Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA. Electronic address: hiroyuki-oya@uiowa.edu. 2. Department of Neurosurgery, Human Brain Research Laboratory, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA. 3. Department of Radiology, University of Iowa College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA 52241, USA. 4. Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Iowa College of Engineering, USA. 5. Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK. 6. UCL Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK. 7. UCL Institute of Child Health, University College London, London, UK. 8. Division of Biology and Biological Engineering, California Institute of Technology, USA.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Understanding brain function requires knowledge of how one brain region causally influences another. This information is difficult to obtain directly in the human brain, and is instead typically inferred from resting-state fMRI. NEW METHOD: Here, we demonstrate the safety and scientific promise of a novel and complementary approach: concurrent electrical stimulation and fMRI (es-fMRI) at 3T in awake neurosurgical patients with implanted depth electrodes. RESULTS: We document the results of safety testing, actual experimental setup, and stimulation parameters, that safely and reliably evoke activation in distal structures through stimulation of amygdala, cingulate, or prefrontal cortex. We compare connectivity inferred from the evoked patterns of activation with that estimated from standard resting-state fMRI in the same patients: while connectivity patterns obtained with each approach are correlated, each method produces unique results. Response patterns were stable over the course of 11min of es-fMRI runs. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: es-fMRI in awake humans yields unique information about effective connectivity, complementing resting-state fMRI. Although our stimulations were below the level of inducing any apparent behavioral or perceptual effects, a next step would be to use es-fMRI to modulate task performances. This would reveal the acute network-level changes induced by the stimulation that mediate the behavioral and cognitive effects seen with brain stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: es-fMRI provides a novel and safe approach for mapping effective connectivity in the human brain in a clinical setting, and will inform treatments for psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders that use deep brain stimulation.
BACKGROUND: Understanding brain function requires knowledge of how one brain region causally influences another. This information is difficult to obtain directly in the human brain, and is instead typically inferred from resting-state fMRI. NEW METHOD: Here, we demonstrate the safety and scientific promise of a novel and complementary approach: concurrent electrical stimulation and fMRI (es-fMRI) at 3T in awake neurosurgical patients with implanted depth electrodes. RESULTS: We document the results of safety testing, actual experimental setup, and stimulation parameters, that safely and reliably evoke activation in distal structures through stimulation of amygdala, cingulate, or prefrontal cortex. We compare connectivity inferred from the evoked patterns of activation with that estimated from standard resting-state fMRI in the same patients: while connectivity patterns obtained with each approach are correlated, each method produces unique results. Response patterns were stable over the course of 11min of es-fMRI runs. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHOD: es-fMRI in awake humans yields unique information about effective connectivity, complementing resting-state fMRI. Although our stimulations were below the level of inducing any apparent behavioral or perceptual effects, a next step would be to use es-fMRI to modulate task performances. This would reveal the acute network-level changes induced by the stimulation that mediate the behavioral and cognitive effects seen with brain stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: es-fMRI provides a novel and safe approach for mapping effective connectivity in the human brain in a clinical setting, and will inform treatments for psychiatric and neurodegenerative disorders that use deep brain stimulation.
Authors: Andreas S Tolias; Fahad Sultan; Mark Augath; Axel Oeltermann; Edward J Tehovnik; Peter H Schiller; Nikos K Logothetis Journal: Neuron Date: 2005-12-22 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: Bharat B Biswal; Maarten Mennes; Xi-Nian Zuo; Suril Gohel; Clare Kelly; Steve M Smith; Christian F Beckmann; Jonathan S Adelstein; Randy L Buckner; Stan Colcombe; Anne-Marie Dogonowski; Monique Ernst; Damien Fair; Michelle Hampson; Matthew J Hoptman; James S Hyde; Vesa J Kiviniemi; Rolf Kötter; Shi-Jiang Li; Ching-Po Lin; Mark J Lowe; Clare Mackay; David J Madden; Kristoffer H Madsen; Daniel S Margulies; Helen S Mayberg; Katie McMahon; Christopher S Monk; Stewart H Mostofsky; Bonnie J Nagel; James J Pekar; Scott J Peltier; Steven E Petersen; Valentin Riedl; Serge A R B Rombouts; Bart Rypma; Bradley L Schlaggar; Sein Schmidt; Rachael D Seidler; Greg J Siegle; Christian Sorg; Gao-Jun Teng; Juha Veijola; Arno Villringer; Martin Walter; Lihong Wang; Xu-Chu Weng; Susan Whitfield-Gabrieli; Peter Williamson; Christian Windischberger; Yu-Feng Zang; Hong-Ying Zhang; F Xavier Castellanos; Michael P Milham Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2010-02-22 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: M Desai; I Kahn; U Knoblich; J Bernstein; H Atallah; A Yang; N Kopell; R L Buckner; A M Graybiel; C I Moore; E S Boyden Journal: J Neurophysiol Date: 2010-12-15 Impact factor: 2.714
Authors: Stephen E Jones; Myron Zhang; Rafi Avitsian; Pallab Bhattacharyya; Juan Bulacio; Fernando Cendes; Rei Enatsu; Mark Lowe; Imad Najm; Dileep Nair; Michael Phillips; Jorge Gonzalez-Martinez Journal: Brain Connect Date: 2014-05
Authors: Emily A Ferenczi; Kelly A Zalocusky; Conor Liston; Logan Grosenick; Melissa R Warden; Debha Amatya; Kiefer Katovich; Hershel Mehta; Brian Patenaude; Charu Ramakrishnan; Paul Kalanithi; Amit Etkin; Brian Knutson; Gary H Glover; Karl Deisseroth Journal: Science Date: 2016-01-01 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Ethan A Solomon; Michael R Sperling; Ashwini D Sharan; Paul A Wanda; Deborah F Levy; Anastasia Lyalenko; Isaac Pedisich; Daniel S Rizzuto; Michael J Kahana Journal: Brain Stimul Date: 2021-08-21 Impact factor: 9.184
Authors: Ryan Kelley; Oliver Flouty; Eric B Emmons; Youngcho Kim; Johnathan Kingyon; Jan R Wessel; Hiroyuki Oya; Jeremy D Greenlee; Nandakumar S Narayanan Journal: Brain Date: 2018-01-01 Impact factor: 13.501
Authors: Augix Guohua Xu; Meizhen Qian; Feiyan Tian; Bin Xu; Robert M Friedman; Jianbao Wang; Xuemei Song; Yi Sun; Mykyta M Chernov; Jonathan M Cayce; E Duco Jansen; Anita Mahadevan-Jansen; Xiaotong Zhang; Gang Chen; Anna Wang Roe Journal: Sci Adv Date: 2019-04-24 Impact factor: 14.957
Authors: Francesca Rocchi; Hiroyuki Oya; Fabien Balezeau; Alexander J Billig; Zsuzsanna Kocsis; Rick L Jenison; Kirill V Nourski; Christopher K Kovach; Mitchell Steinschneider; Yukiko Kikuchi; Ariane E Rhone; Brian J Dlouhy; Hiroto Kawasaki; Ralph Adolphs; Jeremy D W Greenlee; Timothy D Griffiths; Matthew A Howard; Christopher I Petkov Journal: Neuron Date: 2021-01-21 Impact factor: 17.173
Authors: E A Solomon; J E Kragel; R Gross; B Lega; M R Sperling; G Worrell; S A Sheth; K A Zaghloul; B C Jobst; J M Stein; S Das; R Gorniak; C S Inman; S Seger; D S Rizzuto; M J Kahana Journal: Nat Commun Date: 2018-10-25 Impact factor: 14.919
Authors: W H Thompson; R Nair; H Oya; O Esteban; J M Shine; C I Petkov; R A Poldrack; M Howard; R Adolphs Journal: Sci Data Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 6.444