Literature DB >> 28012116

Serum Chromogranin A as a Complementary Marker for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer-Specific Survival.

Christian Niedworok1, Stephan Tschirdewahn1, Henning Reis2, Nils Lehmann3, Miklós Szücs4, Péter Nyirády4, Imre Romics4, Herbert Rübben1, Tibor Szarvas5,6.   

Abstract

Better prognostication of clinically localized prostate cancer (PCA) is urgently needed. Former studies using different study end-points provided controversial results regarding the prognostic value of serum chromogranin A (CGA) in clinically localized PCA. However, serum CGA was not tested for correlation with the most significant study end-point of long-term disease-specific survival (DSS). CGA and matrix metalloproteinase-7 (MMP7) levels were measured by the BRAHMS KRYPTOR in two independent patient groups with 127 serum and 110 plasma samples. CGA and MMP7 concentrations were correlated with clinicopathological and survival data. In addition, we tested the combinations of CGA with PSA and with a currently identified prognostic factor, MMP7, for their prognostic value. CGA concentrations were significantly elevated in advanced compared to clinically localized cases both in serum and plasma samples (45 vs. 23 ng/ml, p < 0.001 and; 41 vs. 22 ng/ml; p = 0.002 respectively). In accordance, high CGA levels were correlated with poor DSS. In clinically localized cases, CGA levels alone were not prognostic, but its dichotomized combinations with PSA or MMP7 were independently associated with DSS (HR: 4.88, 95% CI: 1.35-17.71, p = 0.016, HR: 7.46, 1.65-33.63, p = 0.009, respectively). Elevated serum CGA levels in progressed PCA and its prognostic value suggest a potential for CGA in disease monitoring. Our results revealed no independent prognostic value for CGA as a single serum marker in clinically localized cases. However, when combining with PSA or MMP7, CGA may improve both marker's performance in distinguishing between clinically significant and indolent PCAs.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CGA; Chromogranin A; KRYPTOR; Prognosis; Prostate cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28012116     DOI: 10.1007/s12253-016-0171-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pathol Oncol Res        ISSN: 1219-4956            Impact factor:   3.201


  16 in total

1.  Analytical evaluation of a second generation assay for chromogranin A; a dual-site study.

Authors:  Johannes G Krabbe; Phillip J Monaghan; Joanne Russell; Yolanda B de Rijke
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 3.694

Review 2.  Rare earth cryptates and homogeneous fluoroimmunoassays with human sera.

Authors:  G Mathis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 8.327

3.  Validation of the diagnostic and prognostic relevance of serum MMP-7 levels in renal cell cancer by using a novel automated fluorescent immunoassay method.

Authors:  Christian Niedworok; Frank vom Dorp; Stephan Tschirdewahn; Herbert Rübben; Henning Reis; Miklos Szucs; Tibor Szarvas
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2016-01-02       Impact factor: 2.370

4.  Secretion of chromogranin A by peptide-producing endocrine neoplasms.

Authors:  D T O'Connor; L J Deftos
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Independent prognostic role of circulating chromogranin A in prostate cancer patients with hormone-refractory disease.

Authors:  A Berruti; A Mosca; M Tucci; C Terrone; M Torta; R Tarabuzzi; L Russo; C Cracco; E Bollito; R M Scarpa; A Angeli; L Dogliotti
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.678

6.  Serum levels of chromogranin A are not predictive of high-grade, poorly differentiated prostate cancer: results from an Italian biopsy cohort.

Authors:  Cosimo De Nunzio; Simone Albisinni; Fabrizio Presicce; Riccardo Lombardo; Fabiana Cancrini; Andrea Tubaro
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2012-11-13       Impact factor: 3.498

7.  Chromogranin A and biochemical progression-free survival in prostate adenocarcinomas submitted to radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Sciarra Alessandro; Gentile Vincenzo; Autran Gomez Ana Maria; Salciccia Stefano; Gentilucci Alessandro; Monti Salvatore; Toscano Vincenzo; Di Silverio Franco
Journal:  Endocr Relat Cancer       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.678

8.  Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up.

Authors:  Fritz H Schröder; Jonas Hugosson; Monique J Roobol; Teuvo L J Tammela; Marco Zappa; Vera Nelen; Maciej Kwiatkowski; Marcos Lujan; Liisa Määttänen; Hans Lilja; Louis J Denis; Franz Recker; Alvaro Paez; Chris H Bangma; Sigrid Carlsson; Donella Puliti; Arnauld Villers; Xavier Rebillard; Matti Hakama; Ulf-Hakan Stenman; Paula Kujala; Kimmo Taari; Gunnar Aus; Andreas Huber; Theo H van der Kwast; Ron H N van Schaik; Harry J de Koning; Sue M Moss; Anssi Auvinen
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Clinical understaging in patients with prostate adenocarcinoma submitted to radical prostatectomy: predictive value of serum chromogranin A.

Authors:  Alessandro Sciarra; Giuseppe Voria; Salvatore Monti; Luigi Mazzone; Gianna Mariotti; Mariangela Pozza; Giuseppe D'Eramo; Franco Di Silverio
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2004-03-01       Impact factor: 4.104

10.  Chromogranin A: is it a useful marker of neuroendocrine tumors?

Authors:  Davide Campana; Francesca Nori; Lidya Piscitelli; Antonio Maria Morselli-Labate; Raffaele Pezzilli; Roberto Corinaldesi; Paola Tomassetti
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-05-20       Impact factor: 44.544

View more
  2 in total

1.  High-soluble CGA levels are associated with poor survival in bladder cancer.

Authors:  T Szarvas; B Jardin-Watelet; N Bourgoin; M J Hoffmann; P Nyirády; C Oláh; T Széll; A Csizmarik; B Hadaschik; H Reis
Journal:  Endocr Connect       Date:  2019-05-01       Impact factor: 3.335

2.  miR‑508‑3p suppresses the development of ovarian carcinoma by targeting CCNA2 and MMP7.

Authors:  Fei Guo; Kai Zhang; Meiyue Li; Lei Cui; Guoyan Liu; Ye Yan; Wenyan Tian; Fei Teng; Yanfang Zhang; Chao Gao; Jinping Gao; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2020-04-27       Impact factor: 5.650

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.