Literature DB >> 28012034

Surgical treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: early results of en bloc portal vein resection.

Víctor Molina1, Jaime Sampson2, Joana Ferrer2, Alba Díaz3, Juan Ramon Ayuso4, Santiago Sánchez-Cabús2, Josep Fuster2, Juan Carlos García-Valdecasas2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to analyse the safety, feasibility and survival outcomes of our treatment of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) since the introduction of more aggressive approaches (en bloc, vascular and extended liver resections) in 2007. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From July 2007 to December 2014, 32 consecutive patients with PHC underwent surgery with curative intent. Surgery with resection and reconstruction of the portal vein bifurcation and right hepatic artery was performed if necessary for a complete removal of the tumour. Perioperative data and postoperative histological findings, tumour recurrence rates and survival rates were recorded. Seventeen (53%) of the patients presented with stage IIIb or IV according to the UICC classification system.
RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate in our series was 45%, and this percentage increased to 65% when patients with advanced stage cancer (stage IIIb or higher) were excluded. We performed 3 arterials and 23 portal vein reconstruction. Twelve patients underwent extended hemihepatectomy. We achieved cancer-free margins in 19 patients (60%). Tumour stage and nodal involvement were the most important prognostic factors. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates of this cohort were 72% (23) and 15.6% (5), respectively; these results were similar to data published by other groups.
CONCLUSIONS: An aggressive approach involving en bloc or extended liver resection combined with vascular reconstruction provides acceptable morbidity and mortality and increases the 5-year survival rate of PHC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hemihepatectomy; Hilar cholangiocarcinoma; Liver fuction; Surgery; Vascular resection

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28012034     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-016-1542-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   3.445


  32 in total

1.  Staging, resectability, and outcome in 225 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  W R Jarnagin; Y Fong; R P DeMatteo; M Gonen; E C Burke; J Bodniewicz BS; M Youssef BA; D Klimstra; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 12.969

2.  The "50-50 criteria" on postoperative day 5: an accurate predictor of liver failure and death after hepatectomy.

Authors:  Silvio Balzan; Jacques Belghiti; Olivier Farges; Satoshi Ogata; Alain Sauvanet; Didier Delefosse; François Durand
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  New staging system and a registry for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Michelle L Deoliveira; Richard D Schulick; Yuji Nimura; Charles Rosen; Gregory Gores; Peter Neuhaus; Pierre-Alain Clavien
Journal:  Hepatology       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 17.425

4.  Oncological superiority of hilar en bloc resection for the treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Peter Neuhaus; Armin Thelen; Sven Jonas; Gero Puhl; Timm Denecke; Wilfried Veltzke-Schlieker; Daniel Seehofer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Extent of liver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor): how much is enough?

Authors:  Thomas M van Gulik; Anthony T Ruys; Oliver R C Busch; Erik A J Rauws; Dirk J Gouma
Journal:  Dig Surg       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.588

6.  Cholangiocarcinoma. A spectrum of intrahepatic, perihilar, and distal tumors.

Authors:  A Nakeeb; H A Pitt; T A Sohn; J Coleman; R A Abrams; S Piantadosi; R H Hruban; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo; J L Cameron
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Cholangiocarcinoma: thirty-one-year experience with 564 patients at a single institution.

Authors:  Michelle L DeOliveira; Steven C Cunningham; John L Cameron; Farin Kamangar; Jordan M Winter; Keith D Lillemoe; Michael A Choti; Charles J Yeo; Richard D Schulick
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Liver resection for Bismuth type I and Type II hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Jin Hong Lim; Gi Hong Choi; Sung Hoon Choi; Kyung Sik Kim; Jin Sub Choi; Woo Jung Lee
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 9.  Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma: patterns of spread, the importance of hepatic resection for curative operation, and a presurgical clinical staging system.

Authors:  E C Burke; W R Jarnagin; S N Hochwald; P W Pisters; Y Fong; L H Blumgart
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Relevance of the ISGLS definition of posthepatectomy liver failure in early prediction of poor outcome after liver resection: study on 680 hepatectomies.

Authors:  Cécile Skrzypczyk; Stéphanie Truant; Alain Duhamel; Carole Langlois; Emmanuel Boleslawski; Dine Koriche; Mohamed Hebbar; François Fourrier; Philippe Mathurin; François René Pruvot
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 12.969

View more
  8 in total

1.  Postoperative Pancreatic Fistula in Surgery for Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Watanabe; Tomoki Ebata; Yukihiro Yokoyama; Tsuyoshi Igami; Takashi Mizuno; Junpei Yamaguchi; Shunsuke Onoe; Masato Nagino
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Elevated red blood cell distribution width predicts poor prognosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bei Li; Zhen You; Xian-Ze Xiong; Yong Zhou; Si-Jia Wu; Rong-Xing Zhou; Jiong Lu; Nan-Sheng Cheng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-11-25

3.  Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio Predicts Resectability and Early Recurrence of Bismuth-Corlette Type IV Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Dingzhong Peng; Jiong Lu; Haijie Hu; Bei Li; Xiwen Ye; Nansheng Cheng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  A simple scoring system to predict early recurrence of Bismuth-Corlette type IV perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ding-Zhong Peng; Jiong Lu; Bei Li; Hai-Jie Hu; Xi-Wen Ye; Xian-Ze Xiong; Nan-Sheng Cheng
Journal:  Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf)       Date:  2019-04-21

5.  Controlling Nutritional Status (CONUT) Score as a New Indicator of Prognosis in Patients With Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma Is Superior to NLR and PNI: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Ankang Wang; Zhenxing He; Peng Cong; Yueyu Qu; Tao Hu; Yu Cai; Bo Sun; Hao Chen; Wenguang Fu; Yong Peng
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.244

6.  A new mild hyperthermia device to treat vascular involvement in cancer surgery.

Authors:  Matthew J Ware; Lam P Nguyen; Justin J Law; Martyna Krzykawska-Serda; Kimberly M Taylor; Hop S Tran Cao; Andrew O Anderson; Merlyn Pulikkathara; Jared M Newton; Jason C Ho; Rosa Hwang; Kimal Rajapakshe; Cristian Coarfa; Shixia Huang; Dean Edwards; Steven A Curley; Stuart J Corr
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Practical review for diagnosis and clinical management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Daniele Dondossola; Michele Ghidini; Francesco Grossi; Giorgio Rossi; Diego Foschi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2020-07-07       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Elevated platelet distribution width predicts poor prognosis in hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Authors:  Bei Li; Jiong Lu; Ding-Zhong Peng; Xin-Yi Zhang; Zhen You
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.