Literature DB >> 28011181

Patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate prostheses for secondary reconstruction of large calvarial defects: A retrospective feasibility study of a new intraoperative moulding device for cranioplasty.

Manuel Moser1, Raphael Schmid2, Ralf Schindel2, Gerhard Hildebrandt2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review a new template-based technique for intraoperative patient-specific cranioplasty manufacturing (PSCM) with polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) to cover large calvarial defects.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: A polypropylene foil thermoformed on a three-dimensional reprint of the calvarial defect was used as an intraoperative moulding device for PMMA between August 2012 and December 2015. Surgical and radiological data were retrospectively reviewed, and a patient questionnaire was used to assess functional and cosmetic outcome (numeric rating scale, Odom's criteria).
RESULTS: Seventeen patients (mean age 42.2 ± 14.5 years) received PSCM. Operating time averaged 130 ± 34 min, and the approximate blood loss was 293 ± 185 ml. Volumetric analysis revealed a lower implant volume compared to index bone (mean 66.5 vs. 72 cm3, p = 0.513), the mean difference in thickness being the lowest in the posterior parietal and pterional (0.4-0.7 mm) and the highest in the anterior-superior frontal area (1.8 mm). Cosmetic satisfaction averaged 9 ± 1.5, with 70.6% of patients judging the overall result as excellent or good and 29.4% as satisfactory. Mean follow-up was 19.5 ± 13.3 months, with an overall complication rate of 17.6%, including 11.8% surgical site infections (SSIs) and one implant removal.
CONCLUSIONS: Intraoperative PSCM using PMMA moulded on a thermoformed polypropylene foil leads to satisfactory outcomes. It is a safe technique with complication rates comparable but not superior to those of other alloplastic techniques, but the device has considerable production costs.
Copyright © 2016 European Association for Cranio-Maxillo-Facial Surgery. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CAD/CAM; CranioTool™; Cranioplasty; PMMA; Patient-specific

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28011181     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcms.2016.11.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Craniomaxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1010-5182            Impact factor:   2.078


  3 in total

1.  Cranioplasty Using a Mixture of Biologic and Nonbiologic Agents.

Authors:  Demetri Arnaoutakis; Arash Bahrami; Jason E Cohn; Jesse E Smith
Journal:  JAMA Facial Plast Surg       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 4.611

2.  Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards.

Authors:  Jin-Hun Jeon; Seong-Sig Hwang; Ji-Hwan Kim; Woong-Chul Kim
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2018-10-22       Impact factor: 1.904

3.  Accuracy Assessment of Molded, Patient-Specific Polymethylmethacrylate Craniofacial Implants Compared to Their 3D Printed Originals.

Authors:  Dave Chamo; Bilal Msallem; Neha Sharma; Soheila Aghlmandi; Christoph Kunz; Florian M Thieringer
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-03-19       Impact factor: 4.241

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.