Suzanne Hagen1, Cathryn Glazener2, Doreen McClurg3, Christine Macarthur4, Andrew Elders3, Peter Herbison5, Don Wilson6, Philip Toozs-Hobson7, Christine Hemming8, Jean Hay-Smith9, Marissa Collins10, Sylvia Dickson11, Janet Logan3. 1. Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. Electronic address: s.hagen@gcu.ac.uk. 2. Health Services Research Unit, Health Sciences Building, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 3. Nursing, Midwifery and Allied Health Professions Research Unit, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. 4. Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK. 5. Preventive and Social Medicine, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand. 6. Department of Women's and Children's Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, Dunedin, New Zealand. 7. Department of Urogynaecology, Birmingham Women's Hospital, Birmingham, UK. 8. Aberdeen Royal Infirmary, Foresterhill, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK. 9. Rehabilitation Teaching and Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand. 10. Yunus Centre for Social Business and Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK. 11. School of Health and Life Sciences, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND:Pelvic floor muscle training can reduce prolapse severity and symptoms in women seeking treatment. We aimed to assess whether this intervention could also be effective in secondary prevention of prolapse and the need for future treatment. METHODS: We did this multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial at three centres in New Zealand and the UK. Women from a longitudinal study of pelvic floor function after childbirth were potentially eligible for inclusion. Women of any age who had stage 1-3 prolapse, but had not sought treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1), via remote computer allocation, to receive either one-to-one pelvic floor muscle training (five physiotherapy appointments over 16 weeks, and annual review) plus Pilates-based pelvic floor muscle training classes and a DVD for home use (intervention group), or a prolapse lifestyle advice leaflet (control group). Randomisation was minimised by centre, parity (three or less vs more than three deliveries), prolapse stage (above the hymen vs at or beyond the hymen), and delivery method (any vaginal vs all caesarean sections). Women and intervention physiotherapists could not be masked to group allocation, but allocation was masked from data entry researchers and from the trial statistician until after database lock. The primary outcome was self-reported prolapse symptoms (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score [POP-SS]) at 2 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01171846. FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2008, and Feb 24, 2010, in New Zealand, and Oct 27, 2010, and Sept 5, 2011, in the UK, we randomly assigned 414 women to the intervention group (n=207) or the control group (n=207). One participant in each group was excluded after randomisation, leaving 412 women for analysis. At baseline, 399 (97%) women had prolapse above or at the level of the hymen. The mean POP-SS score at 2 years was 3·2 (SD 3·4) in the intervention group versus 4·2 (SD 4·4) in the control group (adjusted mean difference -1·01, 95% CI -1·70 to -0·33; p=0·004). The mean symptom score stayed similar across time points in the control group, but decreased in the intervention group. Three adverse events were reported, all of which were in the intervention group (one women had a fall, one woman had a pain in her tail bone, and one woman had chest pain and shortness of breath). INTERPRETATION: Our study shows that pelvic floor muscle training leads to a small, but probably important, reduction in prolapse symptoms. This finding will be important for women and caregivers considering preventive strategies. FUNDING: Wellbeing of Women charity, the New Zealand Continence Association, and the Dean's Bequest Fund of Dunedin School of Medicine.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: Pelvic floor muscle training can reduce prolapse severity and symptoms in women seeking treatment. We aimed to assess whether this intervention could also be effective in secondary prevention of prolapse and the need for future treatment. METHODS: We did this multicentre, parallel-group, randomised controlled trial at three centres in New Zealand and the UK. Women from a longitudinal study of pelvic floor function after childbirth were potentially eligible for inclusion. Women of any age who had stage 1-3 prolapse, but had not sought treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1), via remote computer allocation, to receive either one-to-one pelvic floor muscle training (five physiotherapy appointments over 16 weeks, and annual review) plus Pilates-based pelvic floor muscle training classes and a DVD for home use (intervention group), or a prolapse lifestyle advice leaflet (control group). Randomisation was minimised by centre, parity (three or less vs more than three deliveries), prolapse stage (above the hymen vs at or beyond the hymen), and delivery method (any vaginal vs all caesarean sections). Women and intervention physiotherapists could not be masked to group allocation, but allocation was masked from data entry researchers and from the trial statistician until after database lock. The primary outcome was self-reported prolapse symptoms (Pelvic Organ Prolapse Symptom Score [POP-SS]) at 2 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01171846. FINDINGS: Between Dec 21, 2008, and Feb 24, 2010, in New Zealand, and Oct 27, 2010, and Sept 5, 2011, in the UK, we randomly assigned 414 women to the intervention group (n=207) or the control group (n=207). One participant in each group was excluded after randomisation, leaving 412 women for analysis. At baseline, 399 (97%) women had prolapse above or at the level of the hymen. The mean POP-SS score at 2 years was 3·2 (SD 3·4) in the intervention group versus 4·2 (SD 4·4) in the control group (adjusted mean difference -1·01, 95% CI -1·70 to -0·33; p=0·004). The mean symptom score stayed similar across time points in the control group, but decreased in the intervention group. Three adverse events were reported, all of which were in the intervention group (one women had a fall, one woman had a pain in her tail bone, and one woman had chest pain and shortness of breath). INTERPRETATION: Our study shows that pelvic floor muscle training leads to a small, but probably important, reduction in prolapse symptoms. This finding will be important for women and caregivers considering preventive strategies. FUNDING: Wellbeing of Women charity, the New Zealand Continence Association, and the Dean's Bequest Fund of Dunedin School of Medicine.
Authors: Marta Bailón Queiruga; Aina Delgado-Morell; Marta Peró Garcia; Sandra Coll Girona; Ignasi Gich Saladich; Oriol Porta Roda Journal: Int Urogynecol J Date: 2021-05-15 Impact factor: 2.894
Authors: Whitney Moss; Janet M Shaw; Meng Yang; Xiaoming Sheng; Robert Hitchcock; Stefan Niederauer; Diane Packer; Ingrid E Nygaard Journal: Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg Date: 2020-06 Impact factor: 1.913
Authors: Andrzej Pomian; Wojciech Majkusiak; Wojciech Lisik; Paweł Tomasik; Edyta Horosz; Aneta Zwierzchowska; Jacek Kociszewski; Ewa Barcz Journal: Obes Surg Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 4.129
Authors: Beatriz Navarro-Brazález; Fernando Vergara-Pérez; Virginia Prieto-Gómez; Beatriz Sánchez-Sánchez; María José Yuste-Sánchez; María Torres-Lacomba Journal: J Pers Med Date: 2021-12-14