Literature DB >> 28009791

Deriving a GPS Monitoring Time Recommendation for Physical Activity Studies of Adults.

Katelyn M Holliday1, Annie Green Howard, Michael Emch, Daniel A Rodríguez, Wayne D Rosamond, Kelly R Evenson.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Determining locations of physical activity (PA) is important for surveillance and intervention development, yet recommendations for using location recording tools like global positioning system (GPS) units are lacking. Specifically, no recommendation exists for the number of days study participants should wear a GPS to reliably estimate PA time spent in locations.
METHODS: This study used data from participants (N = 224, age = 18-85 yr) in five states who concurrently wore an ActiGraph GT1M accelerometer and a Qstarz BT-Q1000X GPS for three consecutive weeks to construct monitoring day recommendations through variance partitioning methods. PA bouts ≥10 min were constructed from accelerometer counts, and the location of GPS points was determined using a hand-coding protocol.
RESULTS: Monitoring day recommendations varied by the type of location (e.g., participant homes vs parks) and the intensity of PA bouts considered (low and medium cut point moderate to vigorous PA [MVPA] bouts or high cut point vigorous PA [VPA] bouts). In general, minutes of all PA intensities spent in a given location could be measured with ≥80% reliability using 1-3 d of GPS monitoring for fitness facilities, schools, and footpaths. MVPA bout minutes in parks and roads required longer monitoring periods of 5-12 d. PA in homes and commercial areas required >19 d of monitoring.
CONCLUSIONS: Twelve days of monitoring was found to reliably estimate minutes in both low and medium threshold MVPA as well as VPA bouts for many important built environment locations that can be targeted to increase PA at the population level. Minutes of PA in the home environment and commercial locations may be best assessed through other means given the lengthy estimated monitoring time required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28009791      PMCID: PMC5392135          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001190

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  25 in total

1.  Using objective physical activity measures with youth: how many days of monitoring are needed?

Authors:  S G Trost; R R Pate; P S Freedson; J F Sallis; W C Taylor
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Variability of some objective measures of physical activity.

Authors:  R J Gretebeck; H J Montoye
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 3.  Calibration of accelerometer output for adults.

Authors:  Charles E Matthew
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.411

Review 4.  ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood.

Authors:  Dinesh John; Patty Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Physical activity in U.S.: adults compliance with the Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans.

Authors:  Jared M Tucker; Gregory J Welk; Nicholas K Beyler
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 5.043

6.  Sources of variance in daily physical activity levels as measured by an accelerometer.

Authors:  Charles E Matthews; Barbara E Ainsworth; Raymond W Thompson; David R Bassett
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 5.411

7.  Assessing the contribution of parks to physical activity using global positioning system and accelerometry.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Fang Wen; Amy Hillier; Deborah A Cohen
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer.

Authors:  Richard P Troiano; David Berrigan; Kevin W Dodd; Louise C Mâsse; Timothy Tilert; Margaret McDowell
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Use of neighbourhood parks: does socio-economic status matter? A four-city study.

Authors:  D A Cohen; S Lapham; K R Evenson; S Williamson; D Golinelli; P Ward; A Hillier; T L McKenzie
Journal:  Public Health       Date:  2013-03-17       Impact factor: 2.427

10.  Calibrating physical activity intensity for hip-worn accelerometry in women age 60 to 91 years: The Women's Health Initiative OPACH Calibration Study.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Fang Wen; Amy H Herring; Chongzhi Di; Michael J LaMonte; Lesley Fels Tinker; I-Min Lee; Eileen Rillamas-Sun; Andrea Z LaCroix; David M Buchner
Journal:  Prev Med Rep       Date:  2015
View more
  7 in total

1.  Park use and physical activity among adolescent girls at two time points.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Gi-Hyoug Cho; Daniel A Rodríguez; Deborah A Cohen
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2018-04-30       Impact factor: 3.337

2.  United States' neighborhood park use and physical activity over two years: The National Study of Neighborhood Parks.

Authors:  Kelly R Evenson; Stephanie Williamson; Bing Han; Thomas L McKenzie; Deborah A Cohen
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2019-03-19       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Accelerometer and GPS Data to Analyze Built Environments and Physical Activity.

Authors:  Kosuke Tamura; Jeffrey S Wilson; Keith Goldfeld; Robin C Puett; David B Klenosky; William A Harper; Philip J Troped
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 2.500

4.  Where Are Adults Active? An Examination of Physical Activity Locations Using GPS in Five US Cities.

Authors:  Katelyn M Holliday; Annie Green Howard; Michael Emch; Daniel A Rodríguez; Wayne D Rosamond; Kelly R Evenson
Journal:  J Urban Health       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 3.671

5.  GPS-based built environment measures associated with adult physical activity.

Authors:  Kwadwo A Boakye; Ofer Amram; John M Schuna; Glen E Duncan; Perry Hystad
Journal:  Health Place       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 4.931

6.  The number of repeated observations needed to estimate the habitual physical activity of an individual to a given level of precision.

Authors:  Patrick Bergman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Physical Activity in Older Mexican Americans Living in Two Cities on the U.S.-Mexico Border.

Authors:  Gerardo Vasquez; Jennifer Salinas; Jennifer Molokwu; Gurjeet Shokar; Silvia Flores-Luevano; Adam Alomari; Navkiran K Shokar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.