Michael J Nabozny1, Jacqueline M Kruser, Nicole M Steffens, Kristen E Pecanac, Karen J Brasel, Eva H Chittenden, Zara Cooper, Martin F McKneally, Margaret L Schwarze. 1. *Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI †Department of Medicine, Northwestern University. Chicago, IL ‡School of Nursing, University of Wisconsin. Madison, WI §Department of Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR ¶Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital. Boston, MA ||Center for Surgery and Public Health, Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital. Boston, MA **Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ††Joint Centre for Bioethics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada ‡‡Department of Medical History and Bioethics, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To characterize how patients buy-in to treatments beyond the operating room and what limits they would place on additional life-supporting treatments. BACKGROUND: During a high-risk operation, surgeons generally assume that patients buy-in to life-supporting interventions that might be necessary postoperatively. How patients understand this agreement and their willingness to participate in additional treatment is unknown. METHODS: We purposively sampled surgeons in Toronto, Ontario, Boston, Massachusetts, and Madison, Wisconsin, who are good communicators and routinely perform high-risk operations. We audio-recorded their conversations with patients considering high-risk surgery. For patients who were then scheduled for surgery, we performed open-ended preoperative and postoperative interviews. We used directed qualitative content analysis to analyze the interviews and surgeon visits, specifically evaluating the content about the use of postoperative life support. RESULTS: We recorded 43 patients' conversations with surgeons, 34 preoperative, and 27 postoperative interviews. Patients expressed trust in their surgeon to make decisions about additional treatments if a serious complication occurred, yet expressed a preference for significant treatment limitations that were not discussed with their surgeon preoperatively. Patients valued the existence or creation of an advance directive preoperatively, but they did not discuss this directive with their surgeon. Instead they assumed it would be effective if needed and that family members knew their wishes. CONCLUSIONS: Patients implicitly trust their surgeons to treat postoperative complications as they arise. Although patients may buy-in to some additional postoperative interventions, they hold a broad range of preferences for treatment limitations that were not discussed with the surgeon preoperatively.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize how patients buy-in to treatments beyond the operating room and what limits they would place on additional life-supporting treatments. BACKGROUND: During a high-risk operation, surgeons generally assume that patients buy-in to life-supporting interventions that might be necessary postoperatively. How patients understand this agreement and their willingness to participate in additional treatment is unknown. METHODS: We purposively sampled surgeons in Toronto, Ontario, Boston, Massachusetts, and Madison, Wisconsin, who are good communicators and routinely perform high-risk operations. We audio-recorded their conversations with patients considering high-risk surgery. For patients who were then scheduled for surgery, we performed open-ended preoperative and postoperative interviews. We used directed qualitative content analysis to analyze the interviews and surgeon visits, specifically evaluating the content about the use of postoperative life support. RESULTS: We recorded 43 patients' conversations with surgeons, 34 preoperative, and 27 postoperative interviews. Patients expressed trust in their surgeon to make decisions about additional treatments if a serious complication occurred, yet expressed a preference for significant treatment limitations that were not discussed with their surgeon preoperatively. Patients valued the existence or creation of an advance directive preoperatively, but they did not discuss this directive with their surgeon. Instead they assumed it would be effective if needed and that family members knew their wishes. CONCLUSIONS:Patients implicitly trust their surgeons to treat postoperative complications as they arise. Although patients may buy-in to some additional postoperative interventions, they hold a broad range of preferences for treatment limitations that were not discussed with the surgeon preoperatively.
Authors: Nicole M Steffens; Jennifer L Tucholka; Michael J Nabozny; Andrea E Schmick; Karen J Brasel; Margaret L Schwarze Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2016-10-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Claire Sokas; Irene M Yeh; Kathleen Coogan; Rachelle Bernacki; Susan Mitchell; Angela Bader; Keren Ladin; Jennifer A Palmer; James A Tulsky; Zara Cooper Journal: J Pain Symptom Manage Date: 2020-10-07 Impact factor: 3.612
Authors: Lauren J Taylor; Paul J Rathouz; Ana Berlin; Karen J Brasel; Anne C Mosenthal; Emily Finlayson; Zara Cooper; Nicole M Steffens; Nora Jacobson; Anne Buffington; Jennifer L Tucholka; Qianqian Zhao; Margaret L Schwarze Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2017-05-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: P Normahani; V Sounderajah; W Harrop-Griffiths; A Chukwuemeka; N S Peters; N J Standfield; M Collins; U Jaffer Journal: BJS Open Date: 2020-05-31
Authors: Lindsay K Haines; Allyson C Cook; Justin S Hatchimonji; Vanessa P Ho; Elle L Kalbfell; Kathleen M O'Connell; Jacinta C Robenstine; Mathias Schlögl; Christine C Toevs; Christopher A Jones; Robert S Krouse; Niels D Martin Journal: J Palliat Med Date: 2021-07 Impact factor: 2.947
Authors: Sara Shaw; Gemma Hughes; Tim Stephens; Rupert Pearse; John Prowle; Richard Edmund Ashcroft; Ester Avagliano; James Day; Mark Edsell; Jennifer Edwards; Leslie Everest Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-05-05 Impact factor: 2.692