PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to understand conflicts in the ICU setting as experienced by clinicians and administrators and explore methods currently used to resolve such conflicts when there may be discordance between clinicians and families, caregivers or administration. METHODS: Qualitative case study methodology using semi-structured interviews was used. The sample included community and academic health science centres in 16 hospitals from across the province of Ontario, Canada. A total of 42 participants including hospital administrators and ICU clinicians were interviewed. Participants were sampled purposively to ensure representation. RESULTS: The most common source of conflict in the ICU is a result of disagreement about the goals of treatment. Such conflicts arise between the ICU and referring teams (inter-team), among members of the ICU team (intra-team), and between the ICU team and patients' family/substitute decision-maker (SDM). Inter- and intra-team conflicts often contribute to conflicts between the ICU team and families. Various themes were identified as contributing factors that may influence conflict resolution practices as well as the various consequences and challenges of conflict situations. Limitations of current conflict resolution policies were revealed as well as suggested strategies to improve practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability in dealing with conflicts in the ICU. Greater attention is needed at a systems level to support a culture aimed at prevention and resolution of conflicts to avoid increased sources of anxiety, stress and burnout.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to understand conflicts in the ICU setting as experienced by clinicians and administrators and explore methods currently used to resolve such conflicts when there may be discordance between clinicians and families, caregivers or administration. METHODS: Qualitative case study methodology using semi-structured interviews was used. The sample included community and academic health science centres in 16 hospitals from across the province of Ontario, Canada. A total of 42 participants including hospital administrators and ICU clinicians were interviewed. Participants were sampled purposively to ensure representation. RESULTS: The most common source of conflict in the ICU is a result of disagreement about the goals of treatment. Such conflicts arise between the ICU and referring teams (inter-team), among members of the ICU team (intra-team), and between the ICU team and patients' family/substitute decision-maker (SDM). Inter- and intra-team conflicts often contribute to conflicts between the ICU team and families. Various themes were identified as contributing factors that may influence conflict resolution practices as well as the various consequences and challenges of conflict situations. Limitations of current conflict resolution policies were revealed as well as suggested strategies to improve practice. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability in dealing with conflicts in the ICU. Greater attention is needed at a systems level to support a culture aimed at prevention and resolution of conflicts to avoid increased sources of anxiety, stress and burnout.
Authors: Edouard Ferrand; François Lemaire; Bernard Regnier; Khaldoun Kuteifan; Michel Badet; Pierre Asfar; Samir Jaber; Jean-Luc Chagnon; Anne Renault; René Robert; Frédéric Pochard; Christian Herve; Christian Brun-Buisson; Philippe Duvaldestin Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2003-01-24 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Daren K Heyland; Peter Dodek; Graeme Rocker; Dianne Groll; Amiram Gafni; Deb Pichora; Sam Shortt; Joan Tranmer; Neil Lazar; Jim Kutsogiannis; Miu Lam Journal: CMAJ Date: 2006-02-28 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Jeffrey P Burns; Michelle M Mello; David M Studdert; Ann Louise Puopolo; Robert D Truog; Troyen A Brennan Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Kay Choong See; Ming Yan Zhao; Emiko Nakataki; Kaweesak Chittawatanarat; Wen-Feng Fang; Mohammad Omar Faruq; Bambang Wahjuprajitno; Yaseen M Arabi; Wai Tat Wong; Jigeeshu V Divatia; Jose Emmanuel Palo; Babu Raja Shrestha; Khalid M K Nafees; Nguyen Gia Binh; Hussain Nasser Al Rahma; Khamsay Detleuxay; Venetia Ong; Jason Phua Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-11-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Terrah J Paul Olson; Karen J Brasel; Andrew J Redmann; G Caleb Alexander; Margaret L Schwarze Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2013-01 Impact factor: 14.766
Authors: Dorothy R Carter; Kristin L Cullen-Lester; Justin M Jones; Alexandra Gerbasi; Donna Chrobot-Mason; Eun Young Nae Journal: Leadersh Q Date: 2020-01-14