Literature DB >> 28009558

Dynamic X-ray diffraction sampling for protein crystal positioning.

Nicole M Scarborough1, G M Dilshan P Godaliyadda2, Dong Hye Ye2, David J Kissick3, Shijie Zhang1, Justin A Newman1, Michael J Sheedlo1, Azhad U Chowdhury1, Robert F Fischetti3, Chittaranjan Das1, Gregery T Buzzard4, Charles A Bouman2, Garth J Simpson1.   

Abstract

A sparse supervised learning approach for dynamic sampling (SLADS) is described for dose reduction in diffraction-based protein crystal positioning. Crystal centering is typically a prerequisite for macromolecular diffraction at synchrotron facilities, with X-ray diffraction mapping growing in popularity as a mechanism for localization. In X-ray raster scanning, diffraction is used to identify the crystal positions based on the detection of Bragg-like peaks in the scattering patterns; however, this additional X-ray exposure may result in detectable damage to the crystal prior to data collection. Dynamic sampling, in which preceding measurements inform the next most information-rich location to probe for image reconstruction, significantly reduced the X-ray dose experienced by protein crystals during positioning by diffraction raster scanning. The SLADS algorithm implemented herein is designed for single-pixel measurements and can select a new location to measure. In each step of SLADS, the algorithm selects the pixel, which, when measured, maximizes the expected reduction in distortion given previous measurements. Ground-truth diffraction data were obtained for a 5 µm-diameter beam and SLADS reconstructed the image sampling 31% of the total volume and only 9% of the interior of the crystal greatly reducing the X-ray dosage on the crystal. Using in situ two-photon-excited fluorescence microscopy measurements as a surrogate for diffraction imaging with a 1 µm-diameter beam, the SLADS algorithm enabled image reconstruction from a 7% sampling of the total volume and 12% sampling of the interior of the crystal. When implemented into the beamline at Argonne National Laboratory, without ground-truth images, an acceptable reconstruction was obtained with 3% of the image sampled and approximately 5% of the crystal. The incorporation of SLADS into X-ray diffraction acquisitions has the potential to significantly minimize the impact of X-ray exposure on the crystal by limiting the dose and area exposed for image reconstruction and crystal positioning using data collection hardware present in most macromolecular crystallography end-stations.

Keywords:  X-ray diffraction; dynamic sampling; nonlinear optical microscopy; second-harmonic generation; supervised learning approach; two-photon-excited fluorescence

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28009558      PMCID: PMC5182024          DOI: 10.1107/S160057751601612X

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat        ISSN: 0909-0495            Impact factor:   2.616


  31 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for macromolecular synchrotron crystallography.

Authors:  W Minor; D Tomchick; Z Otwinowski
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2000-05-15       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  Structural changes in a cryo-cooled protein crystal owing to radiation damage.

Authors:  W P Burmeister
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2000-03

3.  The PILATUS 1M detector.

Authors:  Ch Broennimann; E F Eikenberry; B Henrich; R Horisberger; G Huelsen; E Pohl; B Schmitt; C Schulze-Briese; M Suzuki; T Tomizaki; H Toyokawa; A Wagner
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 2.616

4.  Two-photon excited UV fluorescence for protein crystal detection.

Authors:  Jeremy T Madden; Emma L DeWalt; Garth J Simpson
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2011-09-08

5.  Novel chromophores and buried charges control color in mFruits.

Authors:  Xiaokun Shu; Nathan C Shaner; Corinne A Yarbrough; Roger Y Tsien; S James Remington
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-08-15       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Guiding synchrotron X-ray diffraction by multimodal video-rate protein crystal imaging.

Authors:  Justin A Newman; Shijie Zhang; Shane Z Sullivan; Ximeng Y Dow; Michael Becker; Michael J Sheedlo; Sergey Stepanov; Mark S Carlsen; R Michael Everly; Chittaranjan Das; Robert F Fischetti; Garth J Simpson
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 2.616

7.  Radiation damage in protein crystals is reduced with a micron-sized X-ray beam.

Authors:  Ruslan Sanishvili; Derek W Yoder; Sudhir Babu Pothineni; Gerd Rosenbaum; Shenglan Xu; Stefan Vogt; Sergey Stepanov; Oleg A Makarov; Stephen Corcoran; Richard Benn; Venugopalan Nagarajan; Janet L Smith; Robert F Fischetti
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-28       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Imaging of protein crystals with two-photon microscopy.

Authors:  Pius Padayatti; Grazyna Palczewska; Wenyu Sun; Krzysztof Palczewski; David Salom
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2012-02-16       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Radiation damage in macromolecular crystallography: what is it and why should we care?

Authors:  Elspeth F Garman
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr       Date:  2010-03-24

Review 10.  Serial femtosecond crystallography: the first five years.

Authors:  Ilme Schlichting
Journal:  IUCrJ       Date:  2015-02-03       Impact factor: 4.769

View more
  2 in total

1.  Dynamic Sparse Sampling for Confocal Raman Microscopy.

Authors:  Shijie Zhang; Zhengtian Song; G M Dilshan P Godaliyadda; Dong Hye Ye; Azhad U Chowdhury; Atanu Sengupta; Gregery T Buzzard; Charles A Bouman; Garth J Simpson
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 6.986

2.  HTD2: a single-crystal X-ray diffractometer for combined high-pressure/low-temperature experiments at laboratory scale.

Authors:  Andreas Fischer; Jan Langmann; Marcel Vöst; Georg Eickerling; Wolfgang Scherer
Journal:  J Appl Crystallogr       Date:  2022-09-28       Impact factor: 4.868

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.