Literature DB >> 28009345

The role of membrane-inner retina adherence in predicting simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery.

P Tranos1, L Wickham2, N Dervenis1, A Vakalis1, S Asteriades1, P Stavrakas3.   

Abstract

PurposeTo correlate the frequency and extent of simultaneous inadvertent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal with characteristics of ERM adherence demonstrated on pre-operative spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT).Patients and methodsThis is a prospective, observational, case series of patients undergoing pars plana vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM. Inner retina-ERM adhesion was categorized as focal, broad or complete in five anatomic locations at macular area based on preoperative SD-OCT findings. The extent of spontaneous ILM peeling was quantified on a scale 0-100% in each of the aforementioned anatomic locations by the operating surgeons who were masked to the OCT characteristics. All operations were recorded with a high definition recording system and the area of simultaneous ILM peel was quantified by a second masked observer. The final extent of spontaneous ILM peel was calculated as the average of the two scores.ResultsThirty consecutive subjects who underwent surgery for idiopathic ERM were included in the study. Evidence of simultaneous ILM peeling was identified in 80.3% of individuals. With regards to the type of ERM-macula adhesion, inadvertent ILM peel was observed in 70% of the patients who pre-operatively showed complete adhesion, in 43% with broad adhesion and in only 21% with focal adhesion (P<0.001). The extent of the spontaneous ILM peel during removal of ERM was also significantly dependent on the type of ERM-inner retina adhesion. Total simultaneous ILM peel was observed in 59% of locations with complete ERM-macula adhesion but only in 22% and 7% of locations with broad and focal adhesion respectively (P<0.001).ConclusionsSimultaneous ILM peel is a frequent occurrence during ERM surgery, especially when there is complete or broad ERM adherence to the macula. The type of ERM-inner retina adhesion represents a valid predictor of the extent of simultaneous ILM peel during removal of ERM. Thorough evaluation of preoperative OCT may be a useful tool in determining a safer, more simplistic strategy in ERM surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28009345      PMCID: PMC5396004          DOI: 10.1038/eye.2016.285

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eye (Lond)        ISSN: 0950-222X            Impact factor:   3.775


  36 in total

Review 1.  Techniques, rationale, and outcomes of internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Arghavan Almony; Eric Nudleman; Gaurav K Shah; Kevin J Blinder; Dean B Eliott; Robert A Mittra; Asheesh Tewari
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 4.256

2.  Microperimetric determination of retinal sensitivity in areas of dissociated optic nerve fiber layer following internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Hiroki Imai; Kouichi Ohta
Journal:  Jpn J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-11-05       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  Surgery for epimacular membrane: impact of retinal internal limiting membrane removal on functional outcome.

Authors:  Etienne H Bovey; Sylvie Uffer; Farid Achache
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 4.256

4.  Epiretinal membrane surgery with or without internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Alvin Kh Kwok; Timothy Yy Lai; Kenneth Sc Yuen
Journal:  Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 4.207

5.  Secondary paracentral retinal holes following internal limiting membrane removal.

Authors:  P Steven; H Laqua; D Wong; H Hoerauf
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.638

6.  Macular pucker: to peel or not to peel the internal limiting membrane? A microperimetric response.

Authors:  Guido Ripandelli; Fabio Scarinci; Paolo Piaggi; Gianluca Guidi; Marco Pileri; Gaetano Cupo; Maria S Sartini; Vincenzo Parisi; Sara Baldanzellu; Cristiano Giusti; Marco Nardi; Mario Stirpe; Stefano Lazzeri
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 4.256

7.  Visual acuity outcomes following surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane: an analysis of data from 2001 to 2011.

Authors:  S R Dawson; M Shunmugam; T H Williamson
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 3.775

8.  Photoreceptor change and visual outcome after idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal with or without additional internal limiting membrane peeling.

Authors:  Seong Joon Ahn; Jeeyun Ahn; Se Joon Woo; Kyu Hyung Park
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 4.256

9.  Dissociated optic nerve fiber layer appearance after internal limiting membrane peeling for idiopathic macular holes.

Authors:  Yasuki Ito; Hiroko Terasaki; Akiko Takahashi; Tomomi Yamakoshi; Mineo Kondo; Makoto Nakamura
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 12.079

10.  Double peeling during vitrectomy for macular pucker: the Charles L. Schepens Lecture.

Authors:  Stanley Chang; Emily M Gregory-Roberts; Sungpyo Park; Ketan Laud; Scott D Smith; Quan V Hoang
Journal:  JAMA Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 7.389

View more
  2 in total

1.  Long-term outcome of highly myopic foveoschisis treated by vitrectomy with or without gas tamponade.

Authors:  Li-Na Yun; Yi-Qiao Xing
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

2.  Ocular manifestations in Gorlin-Goltz syndrome.

Authors:  Antonietta Moramarco; Ehud Himmelblau; Emanuele Miraglia; Fabiana Mallone; Vincenzo Roberti; Federica Franzone; Chiara Iacovino; Sandra Giustini; Alessandro Lambiase
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 4.123

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.