Literature DB >> 25158943

Macular pucker: to peel or not to peel the internal limiting membrane? A microperimetric response.

Guido Ripandelli1, Fabio Scarinci, Paolo Piaggi, Gianluca Guidi, Marco Pileri, Gaetano Cupo, Maria S Sartini, Vincenzo Parisi, Sara Baldanzellu, Cristiano Giusti, Marco Nardi, Mario Stirpe, Stefano Lazzeri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To compare functional and anatomical outcomes after idiopathic macular pucker removal between eyes that underwent internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling and eyes that did not.
METHODS: In this multicentric, randomized clinical trial, 60 eyes of 60 patients affected with idiopathic macular pucker were enrolled. Thirty eyes underwent 23-gauge pars plana vitrectomy associated with ILM peeling ("ILM peeling group"), whereas 30 eyes did not undergo ILM peeling ("ILM not peeling group"). Retinal sensitivity, frequency of microscotomas, and all the other microperimetric parameters were tested by MP1 microperimetry. Best-corrected visual acuity was investigated with the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart. Anatomical outcomes were analyzed with spectral domain optical coherence tomography.
RESULTS: After a 12-month follow-up, the mean retinal sensitivity in the 4° central area showed a greater and faster recovery in the ILM not peeling group than in the ILM peeling group (P = 0.041). The number of absolute microscotomas (0 dB) within the 12° central retinal area was significantly higher in the ILM peeling group than in the ILM not peeling group (P = 0.044).
CONCLUSION: The ILM not peeling group seems to show better outcomes than the ILM peeling group as measured by mean retinal sensitivity and number of microscotomas after a 12-month follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25158943     DOI: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000000330

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Retina        ISSN: 0275-004X            Impact factor:   4.256


  31 in total

1.  Non-inverted pedicle internal limiting membrane transposition for large macular holes.

Authors:  Zizhong Hu; Xiaojian Ye; Xuehua Lv; Kang Liang; Weiwei Zhang; Xi Chen; Erbing Cao; Xunyi Gu; Qinghuai Liu; Ping Xie
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 3.775

2.  Macular peeling-induced retinal damage: clinical and histopathological evaluation after using different dyes.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gennaro Ilardi; Mariantonia Ferrara; Gilda Cennamo; Barbara Parolini; Cesare Mariotti; Stefania Staibano; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-06-08       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  The role of membrane-inner retina adherence in predicting simultaneous internal limiting membrane peeling during idiopathic epiretinal membrane surgery.

Authors:  P Tranos; L Wickham; N Dervenis; A Vakalis; S Asteriades; P Stavrakas
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2016-12-23       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Functional and structural outcomes of ILM peeling in uncomplicated macula-off RRD using microperimetry & en-face OCT.

Authors:  Mohamed Gaber Ahmed Mohamed Eissa; Mohamad Amr Salah Eddin Abdelhakim; Tamer Ahmed Macky; Mohamed Mahmoud Khafagy; Hassan Aly Mortada
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Association of retinal vessel density with retinal sensitivity in surgery for idiopathic epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Urara Osada; Hiroshi Kunikata; Masayuki Yasuda; Kazuki Hashimoto; Koji M Nishiguchi; Toru Nakazawa
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-06-03       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Deep and superficial OCT angiography changes after macular peeling: idiopathic vs diabetic epiretinal membranes.

Authors:  Mario R Romano; Gilda Cennamo; Stefano Schiemer; Claudia Rossi; Federica Sparnelli; Giovanni Cennamo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-11-30       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Diplopia in Parkinson's disease: visual illusion or oculomotor impairment?

Authors:  Femke Visser; Annemarie M M Vlaar; Carlijn D J M Borm; Valentin Apostolov; Y X Lee; Irene C Notting; Henry C Weinstein; Henk W Berendse
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2019-06-18       Impact factor: 4.849

8.  Evaluation of postoperative visual function based on the preoperative inner layer structure in the epiretinal membrane.

Authors:  Hiroko Terashima; Fumiki Okamoto; Hiruma Hasebe; Naoki Matsuoka; Eriko Ueda; Hiromitsu Yoshida; Tetsuya Togano; Takeo Fukuchi
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-07       Impact factor: 3.117

9.  LONG-TERM RETROSPECTIVE ANALYSIS OF VISUAL ACUITY AND OPTICAL COHERENCE TOPOGRAPHIC CHANGES AFTER SINGLE VERSUS DOUBLE PEELING DURING VITRECTOMY FOR MACULAR EPIRETINAL MEMBRANES.

Authors:  Jesse J Jung; Quan V Hoang; Megan L Ridley-Lane; Dov B Sebrow; Elona Dhrami-Gavazi; Stanley Chang
Journal:  Retina       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.256

10.  Evaluation of intraoperative slow-release dexamethasone implant combined with idiopathic epiretinal membrane removal.

Authors:  Alfonso Savastano; Alice Bitossi; Fabrizio Giansanti; Lorenzo Vannozzi; Tomaso Caporossi; Francesco Barca; Gianni Virgili; Gloria Gambini; Umberto De Vico; Patrizio Bernardinelli; Maria Cristina Savastano; Stanislao Rizzo
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-09-06       Impact factor: 3.117

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.