Literature DB >> 28006025

iTRAQ-Based Quantitative Proteomics Identifies Potential Regulatory Proteins Involved in Chicken Eggshell Brownness.

Guangqi Li1, Congjiao Sun1, Guiqin Wu2, Fengying Shi2, Aiqiao Liu2, Ning Yang1.   

Abstract

Brown eggs are popular in many countries and consumers regard eggshell brownness as an important indicator of egg quality. However, the potential regulatory proteins and detailed molecular mechanisms regulating eggshell brownness have yet to be clearly defined. In the present study, we performed quantitative proteomics analysis with iTRAQ technology in the shell gland epithelium of hens laying dark and light brown eggs to investigate the candidate proteins and molecular mechanisms underlying variation in chicken eggshell brownness. The results indicated 147 differentially expressed proteins between these two groups, among which 65 and 82 proteins were significantly up-regulated in the light and dark groups, respectively. Functional analysis indicated that in the light group, the down-regulated iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein (Iba57) would decrease the synthesis of protoporphyrin IX; furthermore, the up-regulated protein solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; adenine nucleotide translocator), member 5 (SLC25A5) and down-regulated translocator protein (TSPO) would lead to increased amounts of protoporphyrin IX transported into the mitochondria matrix to form heme with iron, which is supplied by ovotransferrin protein (TF). In other words, chickens from the light group produce less protoporphyrin IX, which is mainly used for heme synthesis. Therefore, the exported protoporphyrin IX available for eggshell deposition and brownness is reduced in the light group. The current study provides valuable information to elucidate variation of chicken eggshell brownness, and demonstrates the feasibility and sensitivity of iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics analysis in providing useful insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying brown eggshell pigmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28006025      PMCID: PMC5179088          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168750

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


Introduction

Brown eggs dominate commercial markets in many countries, such as China, Britain, France, Italy and Portugal. Eggshell color has low genetic correlation with external and internal egg quality traits [1]. However, consumers still regard eggshell color as an important indicator of egg quality. Market tests suggest that consumers positively perceive brown eggs as being more nutritious and flavorful, and that hens laying brown eggs are thought to be organically fed [2]. Consumers who prefer brown eggs also pay attention to the intensity of eggshell brownness, and exhibit a preference for uniformity in eggshell brownness [3]. Protoporphyrin IX, an iron-free form of heme, is one of the commonest natural sources of porphyrin and the dominant pigment in brown eggshell [4, 5]. Porphyrin and its derivatives, originally called the coloring of life, play an important role in life living organisms [6]. Porphyrin contains four pyrrole rings (tetrapyrrole)connected by methane groups and there are fifteen kinds of possible isomers formed by the side chains on the porphyrin rings through different combinations [3, 7]. The structure of tetrapyrrole is highly conjugated which produces absorption bands in the visible region. Thus, eggs with protoporphyrin IX deposited onto the shell exterior will appear brown. Protoporphyrin IX destined for the avian eggshell is synthesized in the shell gland [8-11] and accumulates in the epithelial cells progressively after ovulation. It is secreted into the uterine fluid in the final stage of eggshell formation; therefore, protoporphyrin IX is mainly found in the cuticle of the eggshell [12]. Low levels of protoporphyrin IX are observed in the epithelial cells of the shell gland when the egg is in the isthmus [13] and amounts of protoporphyrin IX are maximal 3–4 hours before oviposition [14, 15]. There are three kinds of secretory cells in the chicken shell gland, including ciliated and non-ciliated columnar cells in the shell gland epithelium and tubular gland cells in the mucosa. These cells secret proteinaceous and acid mucopolysaccharide material during eggshell mineralization and are active in the formation of the shell cuticle [16]. Protoporphyrin IX is accumulated and secreted only by the ciliated apical cells in the shell gland epithelium throughout the ovulation cycle [13, 15, 17]. Studies since the 1920’s have consistently shown that the color in brown eggshells was controlled by several genes [18, 19]. However, very few additional studies have been conducted to investigate the responsible genes which regulate the intensity of eggshell brownness; moreover, the genetic mechanisms remain to be clearly defined. Proteomic analysis is a major platform for discovering functional genes which regulate biological function at the protein level. Herein, we set out to analyze the shell gland epithelium proteome from hens laying dark and light brown eggs using isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantitation (iTRAQ), a powerful technology to identify and measure the expression levels of relevant sets of proteins [20], in order to gain insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the variation of eggshell brownness.

Materials and Methods

Chickens and sample collection

Two hundred and eighty-one pure-line hens laying brown eggs were used for the study. All the experimental chickens were raised in individual cages and fed with a commercial layer diet. The entire procedure was strictly performed according to the protocol approved by the Animal Welfare Committee of China Agricultural University (Permit number XK622). At 28 wk of age, eggs were collected on 3 successive days to measure the eggshell color (ESC), eggshell weight (ESW), eggshell strength (ESS), eggshell thickness (EST) and egg shape index (ESI). Each eggshell trait phenotype value was represented by the average value of the three eggs. The eggshell color was measured on the L*a*b* color space system using a reflectometer (Konica Minolta, Tokyo, Japan). Eggshell weight was measured using an electronic scale with an accuracy of 0.1 g (Mettler Toledo, Zurich, Switzerland). Eggshell strength was measured vertically with the eggshell force gauge (Model-II, Robotmation, Tokyo, Japan). Eggshell thickness was measured with digital micrometer (Mitutoyo, Japan). Egg shape index is the ratio of egg length and egg width measured by an Egg Shape Index Gauge (FHK, Tokyo, Japan, 1 mm). A total of 15 hens laying dark brown eggs and 15 hens laying light brown eggs were selected according to eggshell color and other eggshell qualities. Eggs from the two groups differed significantly in eggshell color, but not in eggshell weight, eggshell strength, eggshell thickness or egg shape index. The oviposition time of these 30 selected chickens (28–29 wks of age) was recorded at hourly intervals from 06:00 am to 14:00 pm each day. Four chickens laying dark brown eggs (D) and four chickens laying light brown eggs (L), with fairly uniform oviposition time, were slaughtered 6 h after oviposition; the entire shell gland epithelium was collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen immediately to be used for iTRAQ analysis (Fig 1) and Western blotting study.
Fig 1

Proteomic workflow for shell gland from chickens laying dark and light brown eggs.

Protein extraction and digestion

Protein was extracted from each shell gland using a Total Protein Extraction Kit (CWBIO, Beijing, China) according to the manufacturers’ instructions and kept at −80°C for iTRAQ and Western blotting assays. The proteins concentration and quality were determined with a Protein Assay Kit (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA, USA) and confirmed by SDS-PAGE on a 12% gel (Geneview, USA). Disulfide bonds were reduced in supernatant proteins by treating protein (100μg) with 10 mM DTT, followed by alkylation with 55 mM iodoacetamide [21]. Tryptic digestion was performed with Trypsin Gold (Promega, Madison, WI, USA) at a ratio 30: 1(protein to trypsin) at 37°C for 16 hours.

iTRAQ labeling and SCX fractionation

After tryptic digestion, peptides were dried by vacuum centrifugation and then reconstituted in 0.5M TEAB and processed according to the manufacture’s protocol with 8-plexiTRAQ reagent (Applied biosystems, Foster City, CA) [22, 23]. Briefly, one unit of iTRAQ reagent was thawed and reconstituted in 24 μL isopropanol. The peptides were labeled with the isobaric tags and incubated at room temperature for 2h. The labeled peptide mixtures were then pooled and dried by vacuum centrifugation. The SCX chromatography of the iTRAQ labeled peptide mixtures was performed with a LC-20AB HPLC Pump system (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) after reconstitution and elution with a 4.6×250 mm Ultremex SCX column containing 5μm particles (Phenomenex) at 214 nm. The collected fractions were desalted with a Strata XC18 column (Phenomenex) and vacuum-dried for further analysis.

LC-ESI-MS/MS analysis

The collected fractions were resuspended in a mixed solution (5% ACN, 0.1%FA) and centrifuged at 20,000 xg for 10 minutes. A sample of the supernatant (5μl) was loaded with an autosampler onto a LC-20AD nanoHPLC (Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan) with a 2 cm C18 trap column; peptides were separated on a 10 cm analytical C18 column (inner diameter 75 μm) that was packed in-house. Data acquisition was performed with a TripleTOF 5600 System (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) [21] fitted with a Nanospray III source (AB SCIEX, Concord, ON) and a pulled quartz tip as the emitter (New Objectives, Woburn, MA).

Proteome data analysis

Raw data files were converted into MGF files using Proteome Discoverer 1.2 (PD 1.2, Thermo) and the MS/MS spectra were analyzed using the Mascot search engine (Matrix Science, London, UK, version 2.3.02) [24] to query the Ensembl (gallus_gallus4) database(ftp://ftp.ensembl.org/pub/release-76/fasta/gallus_gallus/pep/) containing 55387 sequences. The peptide masses and fragment ion tolerances were permitted to within ± 0.05Da and ± 0.1Da, respectively, with allowance for one missed cleavage in the trypsin digests. Other search parameter settings were as follows: Gln—> pyro-Glu (N-term Q), Oxidation (M), Deamidation (NQ) as the potential variable modifications, and Carbamidomethyl (C), iTRAQ8plex (N-term), iTRAQ8plex (K) as fixed modifications. To reduce the probability of false peptide identification, only peptides at the 95% confidence interval by a Mascot probability analysis greater than “identity” were counted as identified. Each confident protein identification was based on at least one unique peptide. Proteins containing at least two unique peptides were quantified and the proteins with a 1.2-fold change between dark group and light group and a P-value of statistical evaluation less than 0.05 were determined as differentially expressed proteins. The annotation analysis of differentially expressed proteins was conducted by the Blast2GO software, compared with the genome background, to obtain all significantly enriched GO terms.

Validation of differentially expressed proteins by Western blot

Western blot analysis was used for detection of ovotransferrin abundance in the two groups. Briefly, protein samples (10 ug) from the same shell gland tissues used in the proteomic analysis were prepared in SDS sample buffer and then separated on 10% SDS-PAGE gel, followed by electrophoretic transfer onto polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) membrane (Millipore Inc. MA, USA). The membranes were blocked in TBST with 5% nonfatmilk for 2 h at room temperature and then incubated for 24 h with primary antibodies, rabbit anti-ovotransferrin polyclonal antibody (0.5 μg/ml, EasySee, Beijing, China) and anti-GAPDH antibody (1:10000, EasySee, Beijing, China). The membranes were washed three times with TBST and subsequently incubated with goat anti-rabbit IgG (H+L), HRP Conjugate(1:5000, EasySee, Beijing, China) for 1 h at room temperature. Finally, the signals were detected using Clarity-Enhanced Chemiluminescence (ECL) reagent (Thermo Scientific) and analyzed with Quantity One software. To compare band intensity, the mean intensity from an identical area around each band was found and subtracted from a “blank” area on the same blot. Data shown is the band intensity normalized to the GAPDH controls in each lane.

Results

Comparison of eggshell quality between the two groups

A total of 765 eggs from 281 hens were collected on three consecutive days, and eggshell color, egg shape index, eggshell strength, eggshell thickness and eggshell weight were measured. The L* value was used to represent the intensity of eggshell brownness, as verified by the high correlation coefficient between the L*value and protoporphyrin IX quantity in the eggshell [11]. Lower L* values are associated with darker eggshells, and vice-versa. The Shapiro-Wilk normality test showed that the eggshell color (L* value) of the 281 hens followed a normal distribution (W = 0.9938, p-value = 0.3077). Chickens were selected according to L* values from two tails of the selected eggs; the selected chickens consistently laid eggs with uniform eggshell brownness throughout this laying period. Although the two groups of chickens used for proteomic analysis laid eggs differing significantly in eggshell color, they did not differ in other egg parameters (egg shape index, eggshell strength, eggshell thickness and eggshell weight) (Table 1). This sample selection method was applied in order to eliminate potential interference caused by differences in the other eggshell traits.
Table 1

Comparison of eggshell quality between the two groups.

Eggshell qualityDark group (N = 4)Light group (N = 4)Population (N = 281)
Eggshell color (L*)55.47±0.65C69.82±0.43A62.83±3.43B
Eggshell color (a*)20.94±0.48A13.42±0.48C17.20±1.87B
Eggshell color (b*)30.27±1.08A24.22±2.40B29.12±1.90A
Eggshell weight (g)5.54±0.345.46±0.385.75±0.51
Eggshell strength(kg/cm2)3.623±0.70113.629±1.0293.752±0.75
Eggshell thickness (mm)0.316±0.0150.311±0.0090.313±0.023
Egg shape index1.28±0.051.28±0.021.27±0.07

A/B/Cmeans with different superscripts within each row differ significantly (P<0.01).

N = Number of hens.

A/B/Cmeans with different superscripts within each row differ significantly (P<0.01). N = Number of hens.

Identification of differentially expressed proteins

The objective of the present study was to identify proteomic differences in the shell gland epithelium of chickens laying light and dark brown eggs in order to provide insight into the mechanisms regulating the intensity of eggshell brownness. Four different biological replicates from each group were analyzed in order to estimate the relative abundance of proteins using iTRAQ-labeling technology. The iTRAQ data showed that a total of 64155, 68823, 61687and 60035 MS/MS spectra in the four biological replicate sets (set1, set2, set3 and set4) could be matched to known spectra by the Mascot software (version 2.3.02); of these, 54400, 57965, 51924 and 50697 unique spectra were matched to 28714, 30229, 27897 and 26246 peptides, respectively. After data filtering, 25342, 26584, 24554 and 23126 unique peptides remained, which permitted identification of 5176, 5244, 5070 and 5010 proteins in the four sets (Table 2). Among the identified proteins, 3453 were common to all four biological replicates (Fig 2A). Most proteins were identified by fewer than ten peptides (Fig 2B) and the masses of identified protein were distributed from 10 to 100 kDa with good average coverage (Fig 2C and 2D). The abundance of proteins identified by at least two unique peptides was measured, and a total of 3344, 3432, 3255 and 3097 proteins were reliably quantified in the four biological replicates, among which, 2250 proteins were common to all four biological replicates (Fig 2E and S1 Table). Of the 2250 common proteins, 147proteins with a fold change > 1.2 and a p value < 0.05, in at least two replicates and simultaneously present in the other two replicates, conformed to this variation trend and were determined to be differentially expressed proteins. These included 65 significantly up-regulated proteins and 82 significantly down-regulated proteins (S2 Table).
Table 2

Descriptive statistics for proteomic identification in the four sets.

SetTotal SpectraSpectraUnique SpectraPeptideUnique PeptideIdentified ProteinQuantified ProteinUp ProteinsDown Proteins
Set138432764155544002871425342517633444441
Set238931368823579653022926584524434324953
Set341161361687519242789724554507032555853
Set437444060035506972624623126501030974054

Up Proteins = Number of significantly up-regulated proteins, fold change > 1.2, P<0.05. Down Proteins = Number of significantly down-regulated proteins, fold change < 0.84, P<0.05.

Fig 2

Results of the proteome analysis.

A: Venn diagrams showed the overlap of identified proteins in the four biological replicates, which were expressed as set 1, set 2, set 3 and set 4. B: The peptide number distribution of identified proteins. C: The distribution of identified proteins mass. D: Pie charts showing the distribution of protein coverage. E: Venn diagrams showed the overlap of quantified proteins in the four biological replicates, which were expressed as set 1, set 2, set 3, and set 4.

Up Proteins = Number of significantly up-regulated proteins, fold change > 1.2, P<0.05. Down Proteins = Number of significantly down-regulated proteins, fold change < 0.84, P<0.05.

Results of the proteome analysis.

A: Venn diagrams showed the overlap of identified proteins in the four biological replicates, which were expressed as set 1, set 2, set 3 and set 4. B: The peptide number distribution of identified proteins. C: The distribution of identified proteins mass. D: Pie charts showing the distribution of protein coverage. E: Venn diagrams showed the overlap of quantified proteins in the four biological replicates, which were expressed as set 1, set 2, set 3, and set 4.

Classification and pathway analysis of differentially expressed proteins in S2 Table

To identify proteins and signaling pathways that are vital to regulate function in the synthesis, transport, accumulation and deposition of protoporphyrin IX, functional analysis of the differentially expressed proteins in S2 Table was carried out using Blast2GO software (version 3.2). Proteins were categorized according to their cellular component (CC), molecular function (MF) and biological process (BP) (Fig 3). The cellular component annotation revealed that the significantly changed proteins were involved in cell part(GO:0044464), organelle (GO:0043226), membrane (GO:0016020) and extracellular region (GO:0005576). Molecular functions of the annotated proteins were mainly associated with three GO terms. The term of binding (GO: 0005488) contains several sub-terms including protein binding (GO: 0005515), ion binding (GO: 0043167), cofactor binding (GO: 0048037), organic cyclic compound binding (GO: 009715), heterocyclic compound binding (GO: 1901363). The term of catalytic activity (GO: 0003824) encompasses biologically catalyzed reactions involving substrates and enzymes, which occurs at physiological temperatures. Transporter activity (GO: 0005215) involves small-molecule carriers or transporters, which enables the intracellular movement or intercellular transport of macromolecules, small molecules and ions. The biological process annotation revealed that the significantly changed proteins were involved in four classes of GO terms. The cellular process (GO: 0009987) is signal conversion in which a signal is conveyed to trigger changes at the cellular level. The metabolic process (GO: 0008152) are chemical reactions and pathways including small molecules transformation, DNA repair and replication, and protein synthesis and degradation. The term of biological regulation (GO: 0065007) describes modulation of a measurable attribute in regulation of biological process, biological quality and molecular function. Localization (GO: 0051179) is the location, establishment and maintenance of substance or cellular components, such as macromolecule localization, nitric oxide storage and localization of cell.
Fig 3

(A–C) Charts showing the functional categorization of genes with significant protein expression differences between dark group and light group.

The proteins were categorized based on GO annotation, and the number of each category is displayed based on (A) biological process, (B) molecular function and (C) cellular components.

(A–C) Charts showing the functional categorization of genes with significant protein expression differences between dark group and light group.

The proteins were categorized based on GO annotation, and the number of each category is displayed based on (A) biological process, (B) molecular function and (C) cellular components. Pathway analysis of the differentially expressed proteins in S2 Table using Blast2GO software (version 3.2) revealed enrichment of most proteins was involved in four pathways (Table 3). The purine metabolism pathway (map00230) involves purine synthesis and breakdown, which is carried out in many organisms. In the thiamine metabolism pathway (map00730), glycine is the basic substrate, which is also the key substrate in the first step of protoporphyrin IX synthesis. Oxidative phosphorylation (map00190) is an energy-releasing chemical reaction in which nutrients are oxidized by enzymes and energy is released by transferring electrons to oxygen. In our study, four differentially expressed proteins which are involved in this pathway were all up-regulated in the light group. The citrate cycle (TCA cycle, map00020), also called the tricarboxylic acid cycle, involves in a series of enzyme-catalyzed chemical reactions which occurs in the mitochondrial matrix.
Table 3

Main pathways of differentially expressed proteins in S2 Table.

Pathway# ProteinsProtein IDGene SymbolFold Change (L/D)Map ID
Purine metabolism11ENSGALP00000002236RAP1A1.39map00230
ENSGALP00000033584CRHOA1.24
ENSGALP00000024757RBF1.26
ENSGALP00000002695ATP5A11.85
ENSGALP00000000062Novel0.74
ENSGALP00000013046ARL31.3
ENSGALP00000038795ATP5A1W1.78
ENSGALP00000010899ATP5C11.4
ENSGALP00000002205ATP5F11.23
ENSGALP00000008546GUK11.45
ENSGALP00000008095ADK1.32
Thiamine metabolism11ENSGALP00000015909RAB33B0.76map00730
ENSGALP00000001352CGN0.78
ENSGALP00000002236RAP1A1.39
ENSGALP00000033584CRHOA1.24
ENSGALP00000024757RBF1.26
ENSGALP00000002695ATP5A11.85
ENSGALP00000000062Novel0.74
ENSGALP00000013046ARL31.3
ENSGALP00000010899ATP5C11.4
ENSGALP00000002205ATP5F11.23
ENSGALP00000023849ATP6V1A0.79
Oxidative phosphorylation4ENSGALP00000042172COX7A2L1.32map00190
ENSGALP00000014321NDUFA51.33
ENSGALP00000034622ND51.66
ENSGALP00000000693Novel1.28
Citrate cycle (TCA cycle)3ENSGALP00000028857OGDH1.6map00020
ENSGALP00000000693Novel1.28
ENSGALP00000015626PCK20.76

# Proteins = Number of proteins involved in the pathway.

# Proteins = Number of proteins involved in the pathway.

Verification of ovotransferrin expression by Western blot

To confirm the results of the differentially expressed proteins identified by iTRAQ analysis (S2 Table), Western blotting was performed to detect the levels of ovotransferrin in the two groups. GAPDH was monitored as an internal control. The Western blot results showed that the levels of ovotransferrin in the shell gland epithelium of the light group were higher (Fig 4), which is in agreement with the results of iTRAQ analysis.
Fig 4

Analysis of ovotransferrin abundance in the two groups detected by Western blot.

Proteins id are indicated above the figures. The protein names are listed on the left of the figure and the positions of molecular weight (kDa) are indicated to the right of the figure. Values are means ± SD;* p< 0.05 (n = 4).

Analysis of ovotransferrin abundance in the two groups detected by Western blot.

Proteins id are indicated above the figures. The protein names are listed on the left of the figure and the positions of molecular weight (kDa) are indicated to the right of the figure. Values are means ± SD;* p< 0.05 (n = 4).

Discussion

Proteomics is a valuable approach which has been useful for detecting and quantifying chicken proteins associated with disease resistance traits and eggshell mechanical properties [25-27]. Isobaric tags for relative and absolute quantification (iTRAQ) analysis can greatly increase the identification sensitivity and quantitative accuracy of proteomic analyses through a multiplexed quantitative strategy; it is a powerful tool for quantitative proteomic analysis that has been widely applied in several studies [28-30]. In the current study, we have used the iTRAQ technology for the first time to identify the differentially expressed proteins in the shell gland epithelium of chickens that lay eggs with distinct levels of brownness. The intensity of eggshell brownness is dependent on the concentration of protoporphyrin IX in the eggshell [11], which will be affected by the total amount of protoporphyrin IX and the size of eggshell. Given the same amount of protoporphyrin IX, larger eggs will have lighter brownness than smaller eggs. To avoid this interference, we identified two groups of hens that laid eggs with different levels of eggshell brownness, but with similar egg shape index, eggshell thickness and eggshell weight. This approach ensured that the difference in brownness between two groups was caused by the total amount of protoporphyrin IX, rather than the size of eggshell. The results showed that 2250 proteins were reliably identified in the chicken shell gland epithelium, and 147 proteins were differentially expressed between the two groups. The biosynthesis, transport, accumulation and deposition of protoporphyrin IX in the shell gland are coordinated with eggshell mineralization. At 6 h post-oviposition the next egg reaches the shell gland to undergo mineralization during nearly 19 hours; meanwhile, the protoporphyrin IX granules can be observed in the epithelium of the shell gland, suggesting that the proteins associated with protoporphyrin IX synthesis and transport are active at this time. Our previous studies indicated that the intensity of eggshell brownness was determined by the content of protoporphyrin IX deposited onto the eggshell, and that the protoporphyrin IX content in the eggshell depends on the accumulation of protoporphyrin IX in the shell gland epithelium [11]. Therefore, the differentially expressed proteins (S2 Table) that are involved in protoporphyrin IX synthesis and transport warrant further investigation. The biosynthesis pathway for protoporphyrin IX has been fully elucidated. Protoporphyrin IX is formed in the mitochondrion and the involved enzymes are mainly located in the mitochondrial inner or outer membrane, suggesting that the differentially expressed proteins located in the mitochondrial inner or outer membrane, based on their cellular component, might be active during the synthesis and transport of protoporphyrin IX. The functional and pathway analysis gave an overall view of the differentially expressed proteins (S2 Table). In addition, we searched databases and related literature for detailed functional descriptions of these differentially expressed proteins. Finally, we identified eight putative protein candidates (Table 4). These include four proteins that could function in protoporphyrin IX synthesis and transport: iron-sulfur cluster assembly protein (Iba57), ovotransferrin (TF), the 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO) and the adenine nucleotide transporter (SLC25A5). An additional four proteins are involved in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway and could play vital roles in the production and accumulation of protoporphyrin IX in the shell gland epithelium: cytochrome c oxidase subunit (COX7A2L), NADH dehydrogenase (NDUFA5), NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5 (ND5) and succinate dehydrogenase.
Table 4

Putative proteins influencing chicken eggshell brownness.

Protein IDProtein DescriptionGene SymbolFold Change (L/D)Function Description
ENSGALP00000010405OvotransferrinTF1.509iron-transfer and protective activities
ENSGALP00000008534Chromosome 1 open reading frame 69Iba570.605Catalyze the maturation of mitochondria [4Fe-4S] proteins
ENSGALP00000022870Translocator proteinTSPO0.711Export protoporphyrin IX out of mitochondria
ENSGALP00000014105Solute carrier family 25 (mitochondrial carrier; adenine nucleotide translocator), member 5SLC25A51.250Import protoporphyrin IX into mitochondria matrix
ENSGALP00000042172Cytochrome c oxidase subunit VIIa polypeptide 2 likeCOX7A2L1.32Catalyzes the electron transfer from reduced cytochrome c to oxygen
ENSGALP00000014321NADH dehydrogenase (ubiquinone) 1 alpha subcomplex, 5NDUFA51.33Transfers electrons from NADH to ubiquinone
ENSGALP00000034622NADH-ubiquinone oxidoreductase chain 5ND51.66Transfer of electrons from NADH to the respiratory chain
ENSGALP00000000693Succinate dehydrogenaseNovel1.28Catalyzes the oxidation of succinate to fumarate with the reduction of ubiquinone to ubiquinol
Iba57 is a novel member of the mitochondrial ISC assembly system, which belongs to the COG0354 protein family and occurs in all organisms. Iba57 is located in mitochondrial matrix and plays specific roles in the maturation of mitochondria [4Fe-4S] proteins [31-33]. The [4Fe-4S] clusters are essential cofactors for the activation of numerous key mitochondrial enzymes including aconitase and lipoic acid synthase [32, 34, 35]. The latter enzyme generates lipoate, a cofactor for the function of pyruvate dehydrogenase (PDH) enzymes to convert pyruvate into acetyl-CoA, which enters the citric acid cycle to form citrate. Aconitase converts citrate to isocitrate [36], which leads to synthesis of succinyl-CoA [37], a substrate in the first and rate-limiting step of heme synthesis. In situ hybridization analysis using zebrafish embryos at 24 hour post-fertilization shows that Iba57 is specifically expressed in the intermediate cell mass which is functionally equivalent to the hematopoietic tissues; knockdown of Iba57 results in reduction of heme production, and thus causes severe anemia in zebrafish [38]. It is hypothesized that Iba57 provides [4Fe-4S] protein for lipoic acid synthase and aconitase, which affects the production of succinyl-CoA and regulates heme synthesis. The down-regulated Iba57protein in the light group would reduce [4Fe-4S] protein production, which in turn leads to reduced production of succinyl-CoA, and results in a decreased rate of heme formation. Protoporphyrin IX is the immediate precursor to heme. Hence, we propose that a decline in the rate of heme synthesis would diminish the production of protoporphyrin IX. Ovotransferrin (TF) protein belongs to the iron-binding protein family and is endowed with both iron-transfer and protective activities [39]. Contrary to the mammalian genome, the avian genome contains only one transferrin gene which is expressed both in liver and oviduct [40]. The chicken ovotransferrin gene, first identified in 1944, has a size of 10.5 kb and is organized in 17 exons and 16 introns [41]. The encoded ovotransferrin protein is a 77.90 kDa glycoprotein, with the capability to reversibly bind Fe3+; it is involved in iron transport and homeostasis [42]. The pathway for heme synthesis is fully understood now. In the last step, ferrochelatase inserts an iron into protoporphyrin IX to produce heme [43, 44]; the rate of iron uptake from transferrin limits the rate of heme synthesis [45]. Therefore, low iron levels will result in the accumulation of protoporphyrin IX in the cell [46]. In the shell gland of the light group, the iron levels may be greater due to higher levels of ovotransferrin protein, which will promote the consumption of protoporphyrin IX to form heme. Therefore, there will be less protoporphyrin IX left to be used for eggshell pigmentation. The 18 kDa translocator protein (TSPO), previous known as the peripheral-type benzodiazepine receptor or recognition site (PBR), was first identified in 1977 by its capability to bind benzodiazepines [47]. TSPO protein is a transmembrane protein localized primarily in the mitochondrial outer membrane and is widely and conservatively expressed in fungi, bacteria, plants and animals [48], participating in cell respiration, steroidogenesis, cell apoptosis and the transport of benzodiazepines and tetrapyrrole [49-52]. TPSO had been previously demonstrated to have high affinity with porphyrin, especially protoporphyrin IX, in bacteria, vertebrates and mammals [53, 54], and involved in heme synthesis by transporting protoporphyrin IX [52]. In cultured cells exposed to protoporphyrin IX, TSPO prevented intracellular accumulation of protoporphyrin IX [55]; leading to speculation that the role of TSPO in protoporphyrin IX transportis export. Therefore, TSPO density and distribution in cells could be a predictor of the capacity for protoporphyrin IX production [56]. In our study, the TSPO protein was down-regulated in the light group, which would decrease the rate of protoporphyrin IX export from the mitochondria; therefore, less protoporphyrin IX could be accumulated in the epithelial cell of shell gland for eggshell pigmentation. TSPO forms a ternary complex with the 32 kDa voltage-dependent anion channel (VDAC) and the 30 kDa adenine nucleotide transporter (SLC25A5) which are located in both the outer and inner mitochondrial membranes, functioning as the transport machinery for various substrates and endogenous ligands including porphyrins [57, 58]. Our results showed that the SLC25A5 protein was up-regulated in the light group compared with the dark group. The SLC25A5 protein is an inner membrane transporter that facilitates the exchange of ATP and ADP and also contributes to heme biosynthesis by serving as an alternative protoporphyrin IX transport pathway to import it into the mitochondrial matrix for heme synthesis [59, 60]. SLC25A5 gene knockout mice showed a pale phenotype and postnatal growth was severely retarded with macrocytic anemia because of maturation arrest of the erythrocyte precursor [61]. Therefore, the up-regulated SLC25A5 protein expression in the light group would cause more protoporphyrin IX to be imported into mitochondrial matrix for heme synthesis. The overall result of differential TSPO and SLC25A5 protein expression patterns between the two eggshell groups would be a reduction in available protoporphyrin IX in the lighter eggshell pigmentation group. Oxidative phosphorylation is a metabolic pathway that produces ATP by transporting electrons to acceptors such as oxygen. Oxygen is necessary in the enzymic biosynthesis of protoporphyrin IX and the rate of protoporphyrin IX formation is enhanced by an increase in oxygen concentration near the normal range (20%, v/v) [62]. In mammals, protoporphyrinogen oxidase is the key enzyme which catalyzes the oxidation of protoporphyrinogen IX to protoporphyrin IX; however, protoporphyrinogen oxidase in birds has not yet been identified. In fact, the reaction of protoporphyrinogen IX oxidization to protoporphyrin IX is facile; in the absence of protoporphyrinogen oxidase, protoporphyrinogen IX can be auto-oxidized to protoporphyrin IX in the presence of oxygen. Sparks (2011) speculated that, in avian species, colourless protoporphyrinogen IX is synthesized in the tubular gland cells and then transported to epithelial cells of the shell gland to be auto-oxidized to protoporphyrin IX [3]. Therefore, the oxygen concentration in the shell gland cells is important for regulating the formation of protoporphyrin IX. In the present study, the four differentially expressed proteins involved in the oxidative phosphorylation pathway (Table 2) were up-regulated in the light group, indicating that the oxidative phosphorylation maybe more active in the shell gland of chickens from the light group. Therefore, the consumption of oxygen is greater in the shell gland of chickens from the light group which may decrease the rate of protoporphyrin IX formation. The protein profiling data revealed that proteins involved in the synthesis and transport of protoporphyrin IX might influence the intensity of eggshell brownness and result in different shades of eggshell brownness. It is proposed that the variation in eggshell brownness is due to the combined interactions of these proteins (Fig 5). In the shell gland of chickens from the light group, the down-regulated Iba57 protein might reduce [4Fe-4S] protein production, and then lead to the diminished production of succinyl-CoA, resulting in a decreased rate of protoporphyrin IX formation. In addition, oxidative phosphorylation was more active in the shell gland of chickens from the light shell group which would consume more oxygen and this might also decrease the rate of protoporphyrin IX formation. Moreover, up-regulated SLC25A5and down-regulated TSPO would import more protoporphyrin IX into the mitochondrial matrix where heme is synthesized. And the up-regulated ovotransferrin protein in the shell gland of chickens from the light group would transported more iron into the mitochondria, which would promote the formation of heme from protoporphyrin IX and result in the decrease of protoporphyrin IX accumulation in the shell gland epithelium cells.
Fig 5

Putative interaction of candidate proteins regulating the content of protoporphyrin IX used for eggshell pigmentation.

ALAS1: Delta-aminolevulinate synthase 1, ALA: Delta-aminolevulinic acid, ALAD: Delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, URO3S: Uroporphyrinogen III Synthase, UROD: Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase, CPOX: Coproporphyrinogen III oxidase, FECH: Ferrochelatase.

Putative interaction of candidate proteins regulating the content of protoporphyrin IX used for eggshell pigmentation.

ALAS1: Delta-aminolevulinate synthase 1, ALA: Delta-aminolevulinic acid, ALAD: Delta-aminolevulinic acid dehydratase, URO3S: Uroporphyrinogen III Synthase, UROD: Uroporphyrinogen decarboxylase, CPOX: Coproporphyrinogen III oxidase, FECH: Ferrochelatase.

Conclusions

In summary, chickens from the light eggshell group produce less protoporphyrin IX, most of which was used for heme synthesis; therefore, the protoporphyrin IX content deposited onto the eggshell would be reduced. Proteomics is an effective tool to identify candidate proteins that regulate complex biological processes. The proteins implicated in eggshell protoporphyrin IX formation can serve as a foundation to better understand and further investigate the molecular mechanisms of eggshell pigmentation brownness.

Protein quantification in the shell gland epithelium of hens laying light and dark eggs.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.

Significantly altered proteins in the shell gland epithelium of hens laying light and dark eggs.

(XLSX) Click here for additional data file.
  53 in total

1.  High densities of benzodiazepine receptors in human cortical areas.

Authors:  C Braestrup; R Albrechtsen; R F Squires
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1977-10-20       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Phospho-iTRAQ: assessing isobaric labels for the large-scale study of phosphopeptide stoichiometry.

Authors:  Pieter Glibert; Paulien Meert; Katleen Van Steendam; Filip Van Nieuwerburgh; Dieter De Coninck; Lennart Martens; Maarten Dhaenens; Dieter Deforce
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2015-01-02       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 3.  Structural and functional evolution of the translocator protein (18 kDa).

Authors:  J Fan; P Lindemann; M G J Feuilloley; V Papadopoulos
Journal:  Curr Mol Med       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.222

4.  The fine structure of the secretory cells of the uterus (shell gland) of the chicken.

Authors:  P C Breen; P P De Bruyn
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 1.804

5.  The Arabidopsis multistress regulator TSPO is a heme binding membrane protein and a potential scavenger of porphyrins via an autophagy-dependent degradation mechanism.

Authors:  Celine Vanhee; Grzegorz Zapotoczny; Danièle Masquelier; Michel Ghislain; Henri Batoko
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2011-02-11       Impact factor: 11.277

6.  iTRAQ-based quantitative proteomics of developing and ripening muscadine grape berry.

Authors:  Devaiah Kambiranda; Ramesh Katam; Sheikh M Basha; Shalom Siebert
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2013-12-06       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 7.  The mitochondrial transporter family (SLC25): physiological and pathological implications.

Authors:  Ferdinando Palmieri
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  2003-11-04       Impact factor: 3.657

8.  Discovery of genes essential for heme biosynthesis through large-scale gene expression analysis.

Authors:  Roland Nilsson; Iman J Schultz; Eric L Pierce; Kathleen A Soltis; Amornrat Naranuntarat; Diane M Ward; Joshua M Baughman; Prasad N Paradkar; Paul D Kingsley; Valeria C Culotta; Jerry Kaplan; James Palis; Barry H Paw; Vamsi K Mootha
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 27.287

9.  Mitochondrial Iba57p is required for Fe/S cluster formation on aconitase and activation of radical SAM enzymes.

Authors:  Cristy Gelling; Ian W Dawes; Nadine Richhardt; Roland Lill; Ulrich Mühlenhoff
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2007-12-17       Impact factor: 4.272

10.  Comparative Analysis of Label-Free and 8-Plex iTRAQ Approach for Quantitative Tissue Proteomic Analysis.

Authors:  Agnieszka Latosinska; Konstantinos Vougas; Manousos Makridakis; Julie Klein; William Mullen; Mahmoud Abbas; Konstantinos Stravodimos; Ioannis Katafigiotis; Axel S Merseburger; Jerome Zoidakis; Harald Mischak; Antonia Vlahou; Vera Jankowski
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  Mitochondrial transcription factor A induces the declined mitochondrial biogenesis correlative with depigmentation of brown eggshell in aged laying hens.

Authors:  Ming-Yuan Lu; Wei-Wei Wang; Guang-Hai Qi; Li Xu; Jing Wang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  Chinese Herbal Medicines Attenuate Acute Pancreatitis: Pharmacological Activities and Mechanisms.

Authors:  Hong Xiang; Qingkai Zhang; Bing Qi; Xufeng Tao; Shilin Xia; Huiyi Song; Jialin Qu; Dong Shang
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 5.810

Review 3.  Recent advances in avian egg science: A review.

Authors:  Philippe B Wilson
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Concentration of egg white antimicrobial and immunomodulatory proteins is related to eggshell pigmentation across traditional chicken breeds.

Authors:  Veronika Gvoždíková Javůrková; Monika Pokorná; Ivan Mikšík; Eva Tůmová
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.