AIM: To test the utility of targeted sequencing as a method of clinical molecular testing in patients diagnosed with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD). METHODS: After genetic counseling, peripheral blood was drawn from 188 probands and 36 carriers of IRD. Single gene testing was performed on each patient in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certified laboratory. DNA was isolated, and all exons in the gene of interest were analyzed along with 20 base pairs of flanking intronic sequence. Genetic testing was most often performed on ABCA4, CTRP5, ELOV4, BEST1, CRB1, and PRPH2. Pathogenicity of novel sequence changes was predicted by PolyPhen2 and sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT). RESULTS: Of the 225 genetic tests performed, 150 were for recessive IRD, and 75 were for dominant IRD. A positive molecular diagnosis was made in 70 (59%) of probands with recessive IRD and 19 (26%) probands with dominant IRD. Analysis confirmed 12 (34%) of individuals as carriers of familial mutations associated with IRD. Thirty-two novel variants were identified; among these, 17 sequence changes in four genes were predicted to be possibly or probably damaging including: ABCA4 (14), BEST1 (2), PRPH2 (1), and TIMP3 (1). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted analysis of clinically suspected genes in 225 subjects resulted in a positive molecular diagnosis in 26% of patients with dominant IRD and 59% of patients with recessive IRD. Novel damaging mutations were identified in four genes. Single gene screening is not an ideal method for diagnostic testing given the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity among IRD cases. High-throughput sequencing of all genes associated with retinal degeneration may be more efficient for molecular diagnosis.
AIM: To test the utility of targeted sequencing as a method of clinical molecular testing in patients diagnosed with inherited retinal degeneration (IRD). METHODS: After genetic counseling, peripheral blood was drawn from 188 probands and 36 carriers of IRD. Single gene testing was performed on each patient in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) certified laboratory. DNA was isolated, and all exons in the gene of interest were analyzed along with 20 base pairs of flanking intronic sequence. Genetic testing was most often performed on ABCA4, CTRP5, ELOV4, BEST1, CRB1, and PRPH2. Pathogenicity of novel sequence changes was predicted by PolyPhen2 and sorting intolerant from tolerant (SIFT). RESULTS: Of the 225 genetic tests performed, 150 were for recessive IRD, and 75 were for dominant IRD. A positive molecular diagnosis was made in 70 (59%) of probands with recessive IRD and 19 (26%) probands with dominant IRD. Analysis confirmed 12 (34%) of individuals as carriers of familial mutations associated with IRD. Thirty-two novel variants were identified; among these, 17 sequence changes in four genes were predicted to be possibly or probably damaging including: ABCA4 (14), BEST1 (2), PRPH2 (1), and TIMP3 (1). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted analysis of clinically suspected genes in 225 subjects resulted in a positive molecular diagnosis in 26% of patients with dominant IRD and 59% of patients with recessive IRD. Novel damaging mutations were identified in four genes. Single gene screening is not an ideal method for diagnostic testing given the phenotypic and genetic heterogeneity among IRD cases. High-throughput sequencing of all genes associated with retinal degeneration may be more efficient for molecular diagnosis.
Authors: Adrian T Fung; Suzanne Yzer; Naomi Goldberg; Hao Wang; Michael Nissen; Alfonso Giovannini; Joanna E Merriam; Elena N Bukanova; Carolyn Cai; Lawrence A Yannuzzi; Stephen H Tsang; Rando Allikmets Journal: Retina Date: 2015-04 Impact factor: 4.256
Authors: Katy Downs; David N Zacks; Rafael Caruso; Athanasios J Karoukis; Kari Branham; Beverly M Yashar; Mark H Haimann; Karmen Trzupek; Meira Meltzer; Delphine Blain; Julia E Richards; Richard G Weleber; John R Heckenlively; Paul A Sieving; Radha Ayyagari Journal: Arch Ophthalmol Date: 2007-02
Authors: Kaoru Fujinami; Jana Zernant; Ravinder K Chana; Genevieve A Wright; Kazushige Tsunoda; Yoko Ozawa; Kazuo Tsubota; Anthony G Robson; Graham E Holder; Rando Allikmets; Michel Michaelides; Anthony T Moore Journal: Ophthalmology Date: 2014-10-12 Impact factor: 12.079
Authors: Manon H C A Peeters; Mubeen Khan; Anoek A M B Rooijakkers; Timo Mulders; Lonneke Haer-Wigman; Camiel J F Boon; Caroline C W Klaver; L Ingeborgh van den Born; Carel B Hoyng; Frans P M Cremers; Anneke I den Hollander; Claire-Marie Dhaenens; Rob W J Collin Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 2021-09-20 Impact factor: 4.700