Literature DB >> 28005401

Improved Algorithm for Automated Glucose Clamps.

Mareike Kuhlenkötter1, Tim Heise1, Carsten Benesch1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In glucose clamp experiments, blood glucose concentrations (BGs) are kept as close as possible to a predefined target level using variable glucose infusion rates (GIRs). In automated clamps, GIRs are calculated by algorithms implemented in the device (e.g., the Biostator). Low BG- and GIR-variability is needed for high clamp quality. We therefore tried to reduce oscillations in both BG and GIR with an improved algorithm implemented in ClampArt, a modern clamp device. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: The Biostator algorithm was first improved by numerical simulations of glucose clamps (in silico). With the results of the simulations, we started in vitro experiments using the ClampArt device and a container with water and glucose as "test subject." After a small pilot in vivo study, a larger clinical study was performed to compare the original with the optimized algorithm.
RESULTS: With the improved algorithm, in silico, in vitro, and in vivo experiments showed reduced oscillations in both BG and GIR. In the clinical study, the coefficient of variation (CV) of BG values was lowered from 6.0% (4.6%-7.8%) [median (interquartile range)] to 4.2% (3.6%-5.0%), P < 0.0001 and the CV of GIR from 60.7% (49.6%-82.0%) to 43.5% (32.8%-57.2%), P < 0.0001. Other clamp quality parameters did not change substantially, median deviation from target slightly increased from 0.6% (0.2%-1.0%) to 1.1% (0.7%-1.5%), P = 0.0005, whereas utility did not change [97.0% (93.4%-100.0%) vs. 97.0% (94.0%-98.8%), P = 0.57].
CONCLUSIONS: With the improved algorithm, all experiments confirmed a reduction in BG- and GIR-oscillations without a major impact on other glucose clamp parameters. The optimized algorithm has been implemented in ClampArt for all future glucose clamp studies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clamp quality; ClampArt; Control deviation; Glucose clamp; Pharmacodynamics; Type 1 diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28005401     DOI: 10.1089/dia.2016.0355

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Technol Ther        ISSN: 1520-9156            Impact factor:   6.118


  5 in total

1.  Day-to-Day and Within-Day Variability in Glucose-Lowering Effect Between Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine (100 U/mL and 300 U/mL): A Comparison Across Studies.

Authors:  Tim Heise; Kadriye Kaplan; Hanne L Haahr
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-09-26

2.  Precision and accuracy of hyperglycemic clamps in a multicenter study.

Authors:  Kieren J Mather; Ashley H Tjaden; Adam Hoehn; Kristen J Nadeau; Thomas A Buchanan; Steven E Kahn; Silva A Arslanian; Sonia Caprio; Karen M Atkinson; Melanie Cree-Green; Kristina M Utzschneider; Sharon L Edelstein
Journal:  Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 4.310

3.  How to Achieve Sufficient Endogenous Insulin Suppression in Euglycemic Clamps Assessing the Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Long-Acting Insulin Preparations Employing Healthy Volunteers.

Authors:  Hui Liu; Ting Li; Hongling Yu; Jiaqi Li; Huiwen Tan; Yerong Yu
Journal:  Front Pharmacol       Date:  2022-07-22       Impact factor: 5.988

4.  Urban Cultural Industry Management System and Public Economic Based on Improved Algorithm.

Authors:  Mengzhi Xiong
Journal:  Comput Intell Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04

5.  New Clamp-PID Algorithm for Automated Glucose Clamps Improves Clamp Quality.

Authors:  Carsten Benesch; Mareike Kuhlenkötter; Leszek Nosek; Tim Heise
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2021-02-10
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.