Literature DB >> 28004470

Carbonic anhydrase 2 is a novel invasion-associated factor in urinary bladder cancers.

Hirokazu Tachibana1,2, Min Gi1, Minoru Kato1,2, Shotaro Yamano1, Masaki Fujioka1, Anna Kakehashi1, Yukiyoshi Hirayama1,2, Yuki Koyama1,2, Satoshi Tamada2, Tatsuya Nakatani2, Hideki Wanibuchi1.   

Abstract

Rat bladder cancer is nearly always papillary non-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC). To establish an animal model mimicking invasive UC that arises from papillary non-invasive UC in the bladder, male human c-Ha-ras proto-oncogene transgenic rats (Hras128) were treated with 0.05% N-butyl-N-(hydroxybutyl)nitrosameine (BBN) in their drinking water and/or 0.1% phenylethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) in their diet as follows: BBN (8 weeks)→PEITC (8 weeks); PEITC (8 weeks)→BBN (8 weeks); BBN alone (16 weeks); PEITC alone (16 weeks); and no treatment. At the end of week 16, the highest incidence of invasive UC was observed in the BBNPEITC group. Therefore, we used Hras128 rats treated with BBN followed by PEITC as a model of invasive bladder cancer to identify invasion-associated proteins. Proteome analysis was performed to compare the protein profiles of invasive and non-invasive UC in Hras128 rats. We identified 49 proteins that were either overexpressed or underexpressed in invasive UC but not in non-invasive UC. Immunohistochemical analysis of carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2), an overexpressed protein, showed that the relative number of CA2-positive UC was significantly higher for invasive UC compared to non-invasive UC in rats. Moreover, the incidence of CA2-positive cancers was also significantly higher for human muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) compared to non-MIBC (NMIBC) and was positively associated with the progression of NMIBC. Our findings indicate that CA2 is an invasion-associated factor and suggest that it could serve as a potential therapeutic molecular target for bladder cancers.
© 2016 The Authors. Cancer Science published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Cancer Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Carbonic anhydrase 2; Hras128 rats; N-butyl-N-(hydroxybutyl)nitrosameine; invasion-associated factor; invasive urinary bladder cancer

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28004470      PMCID: PMC5378286          DOI: 10.1111/cas.13143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Sci        ISSN: 1347-9032            Impact factor:   6.716


Urinary bladder cancer is the 9th most frequent cancer worldwide and the 13th most common cause of cancer death.1 Approximately 90% of bladder cancers are urothelial carcinomas (UC), and 25% of these tumors are diagnosed as muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (MIBC).2, 3 MIBC is fatal with a 5‐year survival rate of approximately 50% due to lethal metastasis.4 The other 75% of UC are diagnosed as non‐MIBC (NMIBC). NMIBC include pTis (generally referred to carcinoma in situ [CIS]), pTa and pT1. CIS and pTa tumors are non‐invasive and localized in the epithelium of the urinary bladder, whereas pT1 tumors invade subepithelial connective tissue (lamina propria).5 NMIBC frequently recur following treatment, and 15% of them progress to fatal MIBC.6 It has been suggested that MIBC can arise de novo 7, 8, 9, 10 or progress from NMIBC.6, 7, 8 Muscle‐invasive bladder cancer has been extensively studied and recent studies have revealed that MIBC can be grouped into basal and luminal subtypes based on the gene expression profile, with the basal MIBC being associated with poor outcomes because they tend to have more invasive and metastatic characteristics.11 In addition, mutation of p53 is frequently observed in CIS, and aberrant RB is also considered a key molecule in the progression of CIS to MIBC.7 However, the exact mechanisms by which pTa and pT1 tumors progress to MIBC remains unclear. Histopathologically, tumor grade is a good prognostic indicator of progression for UC.12, 13, 14 However, predicting progression of pTa and pT1 tumors remains a challenge as bladder tumors with the same pathologic grade have a heterogeneous clinical outcome. Therefore, identification of invasion‐associated factors during the process of acquiring invasive capability by pTa and pT1 tumors may provide new therapeutic strategies, improving the outcomes of UC patients. Chemically‐induced rat urinary bladder cancer is nearly always non‐invasive UC that closely resembles the pathologic characteristics of its human counterpart, non‐invasive pTa tumors.15, 16, 17, 18 In the present study, we aim to establish a novel medium‐term chemically‐induced invasion model mimicking the invasive UC that arise from non‐invasive UC and to use this model to identify invasion‐associated factors. The BBN‐induced rat bladder cancer model is a widely used orthotropic model of human UC with short‐term treatment of BBN being capable of inducing high incidences of non‐invasive UC,18, 19 and Hras128 rats exhibit high susceptibility to N‐butyl‐N‐(4‐hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (BBN)‐induced bladder carcinogenesis;20, 21 however, unlike other rat models, Hras128 rats treated with BBN also develop invasive UC.20, 21 In addition, it was reported that preneoplastic lesions induced by the rat urinary bladder carcinogen phenylethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) were prone to dysplasia in rats.22, 23 In an attempt to efficiently induce invasive UC, we treated separate groups of Hras128 rats with BBN followed by PEITC (BBNPEITC), PEITC followed by BBN (PEITCBBN), BBN alone, or PEITC alone. The results of the present study demonstrated that BBNPEITC treatment is an effective regimen to induce invasive UC in the Hras128 rat. Proteomic comparison of invasive and non‐invasive UC induced by BBNPEITC treatment and analysis of human UC revealed that carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) is an invasion‐associated factor and suggest that it could serve as a potential therapeutic target for UC.

Materials and Methods

Chemicals

N‐butyl‐N‐(hydroxybutyl)nitrosamine (BBN) (purity >98%) was obtained from Wako Pure Chemical Industries, Osaka, Japan. Phenylethyl isothiocyanate (PEITC) (purity = 99%) was obtained from Sigma‐Aldrich (Tokyo, Japan). Corn oil was obtained from Nakarai Chemicals (Kyoto, Japan).

Animals

Fifty‐two male human c‐Ha‐ras proto‐oncogene transgenic (Hras128) rats at 5 weeks of age were obtained from CLEA Japan (Tokyo, Japan). The Laboratory Animal Center of Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine is accredited by the Center for the Accreditation of Laboratory Animal Care and Use (CALAC), Japan Health Sciences Foundation (JHSF). Animals were housed in polycarbonate cages (3 rats/cage) in experimental animal rooms with a targeted temperature of 22 ± 3°C, relative humidity of 55 ± 5%, and a 12‐h light/dark cycle. All animals were acclimated to the animal room environment for 7 days before being used for experiments.

Animal study protocol

All animal studies were approved by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine and conducted in accordance with the Guidelines for Proper Conduct of Animal Experiments (Science Council of Japan, 2006). For the present study, 0.05% BBN was dissolved in tap water. To prepare a 0.1% PEITC diet, PEITC was dissolved in 1% corn oil (10 g/kg diet), and the solution was mixed with basal diet (Oriental MF [Oriental Yeast, Tokyo, Japan]). Diet and tap water were available ad libitum throughout the study. Male Hras128 rats were divided into five groups and treated as follows: BBNPEITC group (13 rats), 8 weeks treatment with BBN followed by 8 weeks treatment with PEITC after 3 days of BBN cessation; PEITCBBN group (13 rats), 8 weeks treatment with PEITC followed by 8 weeks treatment with BBN after 3 days of PEITC cessation; BBN alone group (9 rats), 16 weeks treatment with BBN; PEITC alone group (9 rats), 16 weeks treatment with PEITC; and control group (8 rats), no treatment. At the end of week 16, rats were killed by administration of an overdose (50 mg/kg of body weight, i.p.) of pentobarbital sodium (Somnopentyl, Kyoritsu Seiyaku, Tokyo, Japan.) Urinary bladders were inflated by intraluminal injection of 4% phosphate‐buffered paraformaldehyde (PFA) solution, and then fixed in the same PFA solution at 4°C for 4 h. PFA‐fixed urinary bladders were cut into eight strips and routinely processed for embedding in paraffin.

Patients

Immunohistochemical analysis was performed on samples from 235 patients with urothelial carcinomas who were treated for bladder cancer by radical cystectomy or first transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) at Osaka City University Hospital between 2000 and 2009. There were 189 men and 46 women, and the median age was 67 years (range, 33–90 years). Pathologic staging and grading was performed according to 2004 WHO/1998 ISUP classification.5 The Institutional Review Board at Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine approved the use of the specimens and clinical data in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and guidelines of Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine.

Protein extraction and QSTAR Elite LC/MS/MS analysis

Six non‐invasive UC from 5 rats and 6 invasive UC from 6 rats in the PEITCBBN group, and 4 normal bladder urothelium from 4 rats in the control group were processed for proteomic analysis. The six invasive UC included 4 non‐muscle invasive and 2 muscle invasive UC. Ten serial UC sections and twenty serial normal urinary bladder sections (10‐μm thickness) were cut from paraffin‐embedded urinary bladder specimens. The first and the last sections in each bladder sample were stained with H&E to identify the area for needle microdissection. After deparaffinization, normal bladder urothelium and non‐invasive and invasive UC were collected using serile toothpicks under a light microscope and transferred immediately to Eppendorf Tubes containing Liquid Tissue buffer in the Liquid Tissue MS Protein Prep Kit (Expression Pathology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA). An image of representative normal urothelial tissue separated from the urinary bladder of a control rat is shown in Figure S1. Protein extraction was performed using Liquid Tissue MS protein Prep Kit according to the manufacturer's instructions. Protein concentrations were determined using the BCA Protein Assay kit (Pierce, IL, USA). Forty‐eight μg of protein from normal urothelium (12 μg each rat) and 48 μg of protein from 6 non‐invasive and 6 invasive UC (8 μg each UC) were used for proteome analysis as described previously.24, 25 Briefly, protein reduction, alkylation, digestion and subsequent peptide labeling were performed using the AB Sciex iTRAQ Reagent Multi‐Plex Kit (AB Sciex, Foster City, CA, USA), according to the manufacturer's instructions. Peptides were fractionated by six concentrations of KCl solutions using the ICAT cation exchange cartridge (AB Sciex). Desalting and concentrating, peptides of each fraction were quantified using a DiNa‐AI nano LC System (KYA Technologies, Tokyo, Japan) coupled to the QSTAR Elite MS/MS through a NanoSpray ion source (AB Sciex, Concord, ON, Canada). Protein Pilot 2.0 software (AB Sciex) with the Paragon Algorithm was used for the identification and relative quantification of proteins. Protein quantitative ratio statistics were calculated as the median of all peptide ratios. Proteins showing a fold‐change of at least 1.2 at a P‐value < 0.05 were considered differentially expressed. The LC‐MS/MS and ProteinPilot results were further analyzed by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Ingenuity Systems, Mountain View, CA, USA) to investigate protein functions and cellular location.

Immunohistochemical analysis

Serial sections (4‐μm thickness) cut from paraffin‐embedded urinary bladder specimens of the BBN alone group, BBNPEITC group, and human UC specimens were examined for expression of CA2 by immunohistochemical staining using the avidin–biotin–peroxidase complex (ABC) method. Antigen retrieval was performed for rat sections by microwaving at 98°C for 20 min in 0.01 M citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% H2O2 in distilled water for 5 min. After blocking non‐specific binding with goat serum at 37°C for 30 min, rat sections were incubated with rabbit monoclonal anti‐CA2 antibody (ab124687, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) diluted 1:1000 and human sections were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti‐CA2 antibody (ab191343, Abcam, Cambridge, MA, USA) diluted 1:1000 overnight at 4°C. Immunoreactivity was detected using a VECSTAIN Elite ABC Kit (PK‐6101, Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA, USA) and 3,3′‐diaminobenzidine hydrochloride (Sigma Chemical, St Louis, MO, USA). Omission of the primary antibody served as the negative control and was included with each staining procedure. Overexpression of CA2 in rat and human UC were defined as positive when cytoplasmic staining was evident in >10% of the cells. In addition, semiquantitative estimation of CA2 staining in rat UC with multiple values for extent and intensity for a score of 0 to 9 was performed as previously described.26 The extent of staining was scored on a semiquantitative scale of 0 to 3, using the following criteria: 0, no detectable staining; 1, ≤10% scattered cells; 2, >10% but ≤50% stained cells; 3, homogeneous staining in >50% of cells. The intensity of staining was scored using the following criteria: 0, no detectable staining; 1, weakly stained cytoplasm; 2, moderately stained cytoplasm; 3, strongly stained cytoplasm. Final scores were derived from multiplication of extent by intensity.

Statistical analysis

All mean values are reported as mean ± SD. Statistical analyses were performed using the GraphPad Prism 6 program (GraphPad Software, CA, USA). Fisher's exact test was used to evaluate the differences in incidence of UC and CA2‐positive cancers in the animal study and incidence of CA2 expression pattern among clinical and pathological parameters in the human study. The nonparametric Mann–Whitney U‐test was used for the evaluation of CA2 staining scores in rat UC. Differences in mean values of multiplicity of bladder cancers in the animal study were evaluated by Student's t‐test when variance was homogeneous and Welch's t‐test when variance was heterogeneous. Progression‐free survival was defined as the time between the date of surgery and the last date of follow up or date of progression in pT status. The curves were done using the Kaplan–Meier method with the log‐rank test to assess the hazard ratio. P‐values < 0.05 were considered significant.

Results

Induction of invasive urothelial carcinoma in Hras128 rats

Macroscopically, tumors were observed in BBNPEITC and BBN alone groups but not in the PEITCBBN or PEITC alone groups (Fig. 1). The incidence and multiplicity of UC in the urinary bladder are summarized in Table 1. Non‐invasive UC were observed in the all animals in the BBNPEITC and BBN alone groups. The incidence of invasive UC showed a tendency to increase in the BBNPEITC group compared to the BBN alone group. The multiplicity of invasive UC as well as non‐invasive UC was significantly higher in the BBNPEITC group compared to the BBN alone group. The incidence and multiplicity of muscle invasive UC was also increased in the BBNPEITC group (69.2%; 0.5 ± 0.8/rat) compared to the BBN alone group (11.1%; 0.1 ± 0.3/rat), albeit without statistical difference. In contrast, no UC were observed in the PEITCBBN, PEITC alone or control groups, although papillary or nodular hyperplasia was observed in the PEITCBBN and PEITC alone groups. These results show that BBNPEITC treatment is the most effective regimen to induce invasive UC in Hras128 rats, and we used this model of invasive bladder cancer to identify invasion‐associated proteins.
Figure 1

Macroscopic view of urinary bladders of Hras 128 rats at week 16. Tumors were observed in the BBN→PEITC (a) and BBN alone (b) groups, but not in the PEITC→BBN (c) or PEITC alone (d) groups.

Table 1

Incidence and multiplicity of urothelial carcinoma in the urinary bladders of Hras128 rats

Number of ratsIncidence (%)Multiplicity (number of UC/rat)
Non‐invasive UCInvasive UCNon‐invasive UCInvasive UC
BBN→PEITC1313 (100)9 (69.2)16.0 ± 5.9* 1.5 ± 1.3**
PEITC→BBN130000
PEITC alone90000
BBN alone99 (100)4 (44.4)7.3 ± 4.20.4 ± 0.5
Control80000

*P < 0.01, **P < 0.05 versus the BBN alone group, respectively. UC, urothelial carcinoma.

Macroscopic view of urinary bladders of Hras 128 rats at week 16. Tumors were observed in the BBNPEITC (a) and BBN alone (b) groups, but not in the PEITCBBN (c) or PEITC alone (d) groups. Incidence and multiplicity of urothelial carcinoma in the urinary bladders of Hras128 rats *P < 0.01, **P < 0.05 versus the BBN alone group, respectively. UC, urothelial carcinoma.

Identification of differentially expressed proteins by proteomic comparison analysis of invasive and non‐invasive urothelial carcinoma induced by BBN→PEITC treatment

Proteomic analysis was conducted for 6 invasive UC and 6 non‐invasive UC in the rats treated with BBNPEITC and 4 normal urothelium in the non‐treatment group by QSTA Elite LC‐MS‐MS. As shown in Figure 2a, there were 232 and 217 proteins differentially expressed in the invasive and non‐invasive UC compared to the normal urothelium, respectively. A total of 183 of these proteins, 100 overexpressed and 83 underexpressed, were differentially expressed in both the invasive and non‐invasive UC (Tables S1 and S2). A total of 49 proteins, 24 overexpressed and 25 underexpressed proteins, were differentially expressed in the invasive but not non‐invasive UC (Tables S3 and S4). There were 34 proteins, 23 overexpressed and 11 underexpressed proteins, differentially expressed in the non‐invasive but not invasive UC (Tables S5 and S6).
Figure 2

(a) The number of differentially expressed proteins in invasive and non‐invasive UC compared to normal urothelium. There were 232 and 217 proteins differentially expressed in the invasive and non‐invasive UC compared to the normal urothelium, respectively. 183 of these proteins were differentially expressed in both the invasive and non‐invasive UC. There were 49 proteins differentially expressed in the invasive but not non‐invasive UC and 34 proteins differentially expressed in the non‐invasive but not invasive UC. ↑, overexpression; ↓, underexpression. (b) Cancer‐related proteins categorized by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of proteins differentially expressed in the invasive but not non‐invasive UC.

(a) The number of differentially expressed proteins in invasive and non‐invasive UC compared to normal urothelium. There were 232 and 217 proteins differentially expressed in the invasive and non‐invasive UC compared to the normal urothelium, respectively. 183 of these proteins were differentially expressed in both the invasive and non‐invasive UC. There were 49 proteins differentially expressed in the invasive but not non‐invasive UC and 34 proteins differentially expressed in the non‐invasive but not invasive UC. ↑, overexpression; ↓, underexpression. (b) Cancer‐related proteins categorized by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis of proteins differentially expressed in the invasive but not non‐invasive UC.

Selection of carbonic anhydrase 2 as a candidate invasive factor

Of the 49 proteins differentially expressed in the invasive but not the non‐invasive UC, 18 are coded by genes categorized as cancer related‐genes by Ingenuity Pathway Analysis (Fig. 2b). Of these 18 proteins, we selected CA2 as a candidate invasive factor for further studies: CAshave been implicated in cancer invasiveness;27, 28 CA2 was the only overexpressed CA in the present study and its aberrant expression has not been reported in UC; CA2 was the 4th most highly overexpressed protein; and CA inhibitors are commercially available that can be used for future studies. We did not select the top 3 overexpressed proteins (S100A9, ALDH3A1 and NDUFV2) for further examination because: (i) S100A9 has already been reported to be an invasion‐associated factor in UC;29, 30, 31 and (ii) we tried several ALDH3A1 and NDUFV2 antibodies, but they were not satisfactory for immunohistochemistry of either rat or human UC specimens.

Expression of CA2 in rat urothelial carcinoma

Normal epithelial cells in the control rats did not show immunoreactivity for CA2 (Fig. 3a). CA2 staining was localized to the cytoplasm of UC (Fig. 3b,c), and some papillary and nodular hyperplasias, but was not present in morphologically normal urothelial cells of the BBNPEITC‐treated rats. The incidence of CA2‐positive UC and CA2 expression scores in UC induced by BBNPEITC treatment are summarized in Figure 3d. The incidence of CA2‐positive UC was significantly higher for invasive UC (78.9%) compared to non‐invasive UC (28.9%). The expression score of CA2 was also significantly higher for invasive UC (5.2 ± 2.7) compared to non‐invasive UC (2.4 ± 1.7). In UC induced by BBN alone, the incidence of CA2‐positive UC was also significantly higher for invasive UC (75%) compared to non‐invasive UC (31.9%). While the multiplicity of invasive UC as well as non‐invasive UC was significantly higher in the BBNPEITC group compared to the BBN alone group, the incidence of CA2‐positive invasive and non‐invasive UC was comparable between these two groups. These results suggest that CA2 is an invasion‐associated factor for rat UC. These results also show that BBNPEITC treatment is the most effective regimen to induce invasive UC in Hras128 rats, but PEITC had no effect on the expression of CA2 and may promote BBN‐induced invasive UC in a CA‐2 independent manner.
Figure 3

Expression of carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) in the urinary bladder of Hras 128 rats. Normal epithelial cells in the control rats were negative for CA2 (a). CA2 staining was localized to the cytoplasm of urothelial carcinoma (UC) induced by BBN→PEITC treatment ((b) HE staining; (c) CA2 staining). Summary of the expression of CA2 in rat UC induced by BBN→PEITC treatment (d).

Expression of carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) in the urinary bladder of Hras 128 rats. Normal epithelial cells in the control rats were negative for CA2 (a). CA2 staining was localized to the cytoplasm of urothelial carcinoma (UC) induced by BBNPEITC treatment ((b) HE staining; (c) CA2 staining). Summary of the expression of CA2 in rat UC induced by BBNPEITC treatment (d).

Expression of carbonic anhydrase 2 in human urothelial carcinomas and its correlation with histopathological parameters and progression

Carbonic anhydrase 2 expression and clinical and pathological characteristics of the 235 bladder cancer patients used in the present study are summarized in Table 2. Normal urothelium was negative for CA2 (Fig. 4a). CA2 staining was localized to the cytoplasm of UC (Fig. 4b,c). The incidence of CA2‐positive UC was 0, 15.2, 13.2 and 54.8% in pTis, pTa, pT1 and ≥pT2 UC, respectively. The similar incidence of CA2‐positive UC between pTa and pT1 UC suggested the possibility that CA2‐positive pTa may have the potential to invade the lamina propria. The findings that the incidence of CA2‐positive UC was significantly higher in MIBC (≥pT2) compared to pTis, pT1 and pTa UC, and was also significantly higher in MIBC compared to NMIBC (pTis + pTa + pT1), suggest that CA2 may play an important role in muscle invasion. Furthermore, the incidence of CA2‐positive UC was significantly higher in high grade UC (32.1%) when compared to low grade UC (7.7%). Finally, analysis of 95 NMIBC patients after TURBT showed that CA2‐positive UC showed more rapid disease progression (Fig. 4d) than CA2‐negative UC (P < 0.0001, hazard ratio: 10): progression defined as an increase in the stage of pTa to ≥pT1 or pT1 to ≥pT2. These results suggest that the expression of CA2 is associated with the grade of malignancy, invasiveness and progression in human UC. No significant association was found with recurrence‐free survival or overall survival due to the small number of deaths in the present analysis (data not shown).
Table 2

Pathological characteristics and CA2 expression in human UC

CharacteristicNumber of patientsIncidence of CA2‐positive UC
Patients (mean age ± SD)235 (67 ± 10)50/235 (21.2%)
Gender
Male (Mean age ± SD)189 (67 ± 10)40/189 (21.2%)
Female (Mean age ± SD)46 (67 ± 13)10/46 (21.7%)
Pathological T stage
pTis80/8 (0)
pTa13220/132 (15.2%)
pT1537/53 (13.2%)
≧pT24223/42 (54.8%) ,
NMIBC (pTis+pTa+pT1)19327/193 (14.0%)
MIBC(≧pT2)4223/42 (54.8%)§
Tumor grade
Low grade1048/104 (7.7%)
High grade13142/131 (32.1%)

†P < 0.01 versus pTis; ‡P < 0.0001 versus pTa and pT1; §P < 0.0001 versus NMIBC; ¶P < 0.0001 versus low grade. CA2, carbonic anhydrase 2; UC, urothelial carcinoma.

Figure 4

Expression of carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) in the human urothelial carcinoma (UC). Normal epithelial cells were negative for CA2 (a). CA2 staining was localized to the cytoplasm of UC ((b) HE staining; (c) CA2 staining). Analysis of the cumulative incidence of stage progression of 95 non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) showed that CA2‐positive UC had a more rapid disease progression than CA2‐negative UC: progression being defined as an increase in stage of pTa to ≥pT1 or pT1 to ≥pT2, (P < 0.0001, HR = 10) (d).

Pathological characteristics and CA2 expression in human UC †P < 0.01 versus pTis; ‡P < 0.0001 versus pTa and pT1; §P < 0.0001 versus NMIBC; ¶P < 0.0001 versus low grade. CA2, carbonic anhydrase 2; UC, urothelial carcinoma. Expression of carbonic anhydrase 2 (CA2) in the human urothelial carcinoma (UC). Normal epithelial cells were negative for CA2 (a). CA2 staining was localized to the cytoplasm of UC ((b) HE staining; (c) CA2 staining). Analysis of the cumulative incidence of stage progression of 95 non‐muscle‐invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients after transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT) showed that CA2‐positive UC had a more rapid disease progression than CA2‐negative UC: progression being defined as an increase in stage of pTa to ≥pT1 or pT1 to ≥pT2, (P < 0.0001, HR = 10) (d).

Discussion

In the present study, we established a new 16‐week rat invasive bladder cancer model using Hras128 rats treated with BBN followed by PEITC. Chemically‐induced rat urinary bladder cancer in the existing models is nearly always non‐invasive UC that closely resembles the pathologic characteristics of its human counterpart, non‐invasive pTa tumors.15, 16, 17, 18, 32, 33 The advantages of our model are that it mimics invasive UC that arises from non‐invasive UC and the short period of time required for inducing invasive UC. Our model is useful in understanding mechanisms by which non‐invasive UC progresses to invasive UC; using this model, we identified 49 proteins differentially expressed in invasive rat UC by comparing invasive and non‐invasive UC. In the present study, we demonstrated that CA2 was overexpressed in invasive UC in rats, and using this result, we found that the incidence of CA2‐positive UC was also significantly higher in human MIBC compared to NMIBC, and expression of CA2 is positively associated with the progression of NMIBC. These findings suggest that CA2 is an invasion‐associated factor of UC. The extracellular pH of tumor tissues is often acidic, and an acidic microenvironment is closely associated with migration and invasion of tumor cells, leading to more aggressive behavior.28, 34, 35 CA enzymes catalyze the chemical equilibration among CO2, HCO3 − and H+, and play an important role in maintaining pH homeostasis.27 Hypoxic conditions induce the expression of CA, which lowers the extracellular pH and increases invasion, progression and metastasis of cancer cells.28 Overexpression of CA2 has been reported in astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and medulloblastomas.36 However, little is known about the exact roles of CA2 in these cancers. Our finding that CA2 expression is increased in invasive UC supports a hypothesis that CA2 plays a role in making the surrounding environment acidic and promoting UC invasiveness. This hypothesis supports the proposal stated above that CA2 is an invasion‐associated factor of UC and suggests that CA2 may provide new therapeutic strategies to improve the outcomes of UC patients. The rat model of invasive UC described in this report will also be useful for evaluating potential chemopreventive and therapeutic agents in the treatment of invasive UC. A study to investigate the effects of CA2 inhibitors using this model is currently underway. In a separate ongoing study using a mouse model of BBN‐induced invasive UC, a non‐specific CA inhibitor significantly inhibited the development of invasive UC, while it did not have a significant effect on the development of non‐invasive UC, which supports the proposals put forth in this report: CA2 is an invasion‐associated factor of UC that may provide new therapeutic strategies to improve the outcomes of UC patients, and the model of invasive UC described in this report will be useful in evaluating potential chemopreventive and therapeutic drugs. Hras128 rats carry three copies of the human c‐Ha‐ras proto‐oncogene and exhibit high susceptibility to BBN‐induced bladder carcinogenesis.20, 21 Taken together with the fact that activating mutations in Hras are an early event in the development of a subset of human UC,37, 38, 39, 40 this suggests that mutation of the Hras transgene is a primary factor in the development of invasive UC in the animal model described in this study. However, it has been demonstrated that enhanced UC development is not primarily due to mutations occurring in the transgene in Hras128 rats.21 Another factor in the susceptibility of Hras128 to UC could be relatively high expression of the human Hras transgene. A recent study using mice with an active HRAS gene showed that RTK/RAS pathway activation alone in urothelial cells causes hyperplasia, and RAS pathway activation and P53 pathway inactivation together confer invasive properties to noninvasive urothelial tumor cells.41 However, the exact mechanisms that contribute to development of invasive UC in Hras128 rats require further investigation. Comparative proteome analysis of invasive and non‐invasive UC provide insight into the development and progression of UC in this model. Proteins other than CA2 differentially expressed in the invasive rat UC (Tables S3 and S4) may also be involved in development of invasive UC. Exploring the role of these proteins in UC invasion and analysis of their interactions and relationships with CA2 in the animal model described here will facilitate understanding not only of the role of CA2 but also provide insight into the mechanism of UC invasion. It also should be noted that CA2 was the only CA that was increased in the invasive rat UC compared to the non‐invasive UC and normal urothelium. Considering that expression of CA9 has been associated with the invasion and progression of human UC and that CA9 and CA12 are overexpressed in human colon cancer, glioblastoma and breast cancer,42 further study is necessary to determine the relationship of CA2 to CA9 and CA12 in human UC. BBN followed by PEITC treatment was the most effective regimen to induce invasive UC in the Hras128 rat in the present 16‐week study. Under the conditions of this study, BBN (at the dose of 0.05% in the drinking water) showed much higher initiation activity of bladder carcinogenesis compared to PEITC (at the dose of 0.1% in the diet), as evidenced by the result that a high incidence of UC was noted in the 16‐week BBN treatment group but not in the 16‐week PEITC treatment group. Therefore, a possible reason that no UC were induced in the PEITCBBN group is the lower bladder cancer initiation activity of PEITC compared to BBN and the shorter duration of the BBN treatment after PEITC treatment (8 weeks) compared to BBN treatment alone (16 weeks). In conclusion, the findings of the present study indicate that CA2 is an invasion‐associated factor and suggests that it could serve as a potential therapeutic target for bladder cancers. Hras128 rats treated with BBN followed by PEITC is a useful model of invasive bladder cancer that can be used for identifying invasion‐associated proteins, and it is also applicable for evaluation of potential chemopreventive and therapeutic agents for the treatment of invasive UC.

Disclosure Statement

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare. Fig. S1. An image of representative normal urothelial tissue (↑) separated from urinary bladder of a control Hras128 rat (HE staining). Click here for additional data file. Table S1. Proteins overexpressed in both non‐invasive and invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) compared to normal urothelium in Hras128 rats. Click here for additional data file. Table S2. Proteins underexpressed in both Non‐invasive and invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) compared to normal urothelium in Hras128 rats. Click here for additional data file. Table S3. Proteins overexpressed in the invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) but not in the non‐invasive UC compared to the normal urothelium in Hras128 rats. Click here for additional data file. Table S4. Proteins underexpressed in the invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) but not in the non‐invasive UC compared to the normal urothelium in Hras128 rats. Click here for additional data file. Table S5. Proteins overexpressed in the noninvasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) but not in the invasive UC compared to the normal urothelium in Hras128 rats. Click here for additional data file. Table S6. Proteins underexpressed in the noninvasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) but not in the invasive UC compared to the normal urothelium in Hras128 rats. Click here for additional data file.
  42 in total

Review 1.  Urothelial tumorigenesis: a tale of divergent pathways.

Authors:  Xue-Ru Wu
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 60.716

2.  Noninvasive detection of breast cancer lymph node metastasis using carbonic anhydrases IX and XII targeted imaging probes.

Authors:  Narges K Tafreshi; Marilyn M Bui; Kellsey Bishop; Mark C Lloyd; Steven A Enkemann; Alexis S Lopez; Dominique Abrahams; Bradford W Carter; Josef Vagner; Stephen R Grobmyer; Stephen R Gobmyer; Robert J Gillies; David L Morse
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2011-10-20       Impact factor: 12.531

3.  Celecoxib inhibits N-butyl-N-(4-hydroxybutyl)-nitrosamine-induced urinary bladder cancers in male B6D2F1 mice and female Fischer-344 rats.

Authors:  C J Grubbs; R A Lubet; A T Koki; K M Leahy; J L Masferrer; V E Steele; G J Kelloff; D L Hill; K Seibert
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2000-10-15       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Multivariate analysis of the prognostic factors of primary superficial bladder cancer.

Authors:  F Millán-Rodríguez; G Chéchile-Toniolo; J Salvador-Bayarri; J Palou; J Vicente-Rodríguez
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 7.450

5.  Chemoprevention by indomethacin of tumor promotion in a rat urinary bladder carcinogenesis model.

Authors:  M A Shibata; R Hasegawa; T Shirai; Y Takesada; S Fukushima
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1993-12-02       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  T24 human bladder carcinoma cells with activated Ha-ras protooncogene: nontumorigenic cells susceptible to malignant transformation with carcinogen.

Authors:  D R Senger; C A Perruzzi; I U Ali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Preferential and novel activation of H-ras in human bladder carcinomas.

Authors:  K V Visvanathan; R D Pocock; I C Summerhayes
Journal:  Oncogene Res       Date:  1988

8.  Targeted proteomics of isolated glomeruli from the kidneys of diabetic rats: sorbin and SH3 domain containing 2 is a novel protein associated with diabetic nephropathy.

Authors:  Shinya Nakatani; Anna Kakehashi; Eiji Ishimura; Shotaro Yamano; Katsuhito Mori; Min Wei; Masaaki Inaba; Hideki Wanibuchi
Journal:  Exp Diabetes Res       Date:  2011-10-05

9.  The present and future burden of urinary bladder cancer in the world.

Authors:  Martine Ploeg; Katja K H Aben; Lambertus A Kiemeney
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Carbonic anhydrase 2 is a novel invasion-associated factor in urinary bladder cancers.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tachibana; Min Gi; Minoru Kato; Shotaro Yamano; Masaki Fujioka; Anna Kakehashi; Yukiyoshi Hirayama; Yuki Koyama; Satoshi Tamada; Tatsuya Nakatani; Hideki Wanibuchi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.716

View more
  7 in total

1.  Carbonic anhydrase 2 is a novel invasion-associated factor in urinary bladder cancers.

Authors:  Hirokazu Tachibana; Min Gi; Minoru Kato; Shotaro Yamano; Masaki Fujioka; Anna Kakehashi; Yukiyoshi Hirayama; Yuki Koyama; Satoshi Tamada; Tatsuya Nakatani; Hideki Wanibuchi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 6.716

2.  Steroid sulfatase promotes invasion through epithelial-mesenchymal transition and predicts the progression of bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yasuomi Shimizu; Satoshi Tamada; Minoru Kato; Yuji Takeyama; Masaki Fujioka; Anna Kakehashi; Tatsuya Nakatani; Hideki Wanibuchi; Min Gi
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 2.447

3.  A chronic toxicity study of diphenylarsinic acid in the drinking water of C57BL/6J mice for 52 weeks.

Authors:  Takashi Yamaguchi; Min Gi; Masaki Fujioka; Yoshiyuki Tago; Anna Kakehashi; Hideki Wanibuchi
Journal:  J Toxicol Pathol       Date:  2019-03-21       Impact factor: 1.628

4.  Identification of novel biomarkers affecting the metastasis of colorectal cancer through bioinformatics analysis and validation through qRT-PCR.

Authors:  Wenping Lian; Huifang Jin; Jingjing Cao; Xinyu Zhang; Tao Zhu; Shuai Zhao; Sujun Wu; Kailu Zou; Xinyun Zhang; Mingliang Zhang; Xiaoyong Zheng; Mengle Peng
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2020-03-30       Impact factor: 5.722

5.  SSTR5‑AS1 functions as a ceRNA to regulate CA2 by sponging miR‑15b‑5p for the development and prognosis of HBV‑related hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jing Xu; Jing Zhang; Fenglian Shan; Jie Wen; Yue Wang
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2019-10-11       Impact factor: 2.952

Review 6.  Molecular Mechanisms of the Anti-Cancer Effects of Isothiocyanates from Cruciferous Vegetables in Bladder Cancer.

Authors:  Tomhiro Mastuo; Yasuyoshi Miyata; Tsutomu Yuno; Yuta Mukae; Asato Otsubo; Kensuke Mitsunari; Kojiro Ohba; Hideki Sakai
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-01-29       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  The carbonic anhydrase inhibitor acetazolamide inhibits urinary bladder cancers via suppression of β-catenin signaling.

Authors:  Taisuke Matsue; Min Gi; Masayuki Shiota; Hirokazu Tachibana; Shugo Suzuki; Masaki Fujioka; Anna Kakehashi; Tomoki Yamamoto; Minoru Kato; Junji Uchida; Hideki Wanibuchi
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 6.518

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.