| Literature DB >> 28004176 |
Florian Blachutzik1, Niklas Boeder2, Jens Wiebe3, Alessio Mattesini4, Oliver Dörr2, Astrid Most2, Timm Bauer2, Monique Tröbs5, Jens Röther5, Christian Schlundt5, Stephan Achenbach5, Christian Hamm2, Holger Nef2.
Abstract
Overlapping implantation of bioresorbable vascular scaffolds is frequently necessary, but its influence on vessel and scaffold structure has not been thoroughly analyzed previously. The aim of this study was to analyze the acute effects of overlapping implantation on BRS as determined by optical coherence tomography (OCT). A total of 38 patients with de novo coronary artery stenoses who underwent OCT in the context of implantation of novolimus-eluting BRS (DESolve, Elixir Medical Corporation, Sunnyvale, California, USA) were investigated. In 15 patients, overlapping implantation of two BRS was performed, while 23 patients with implantation of one single BRS served as the control group. OCT data were retrospectively analyzed regarding acute scaffold implantation results. There were no significant differences between the overlap and control group in terms of residual in-scaffold area stenosis, scaffold area, mean or minimal lumen area, eccentricity index, incomplete scaffold apposition area or malapposition. While strut fracture was slightly more frequent in BRS with overlap its incidence was low overall. In patients with overlapping BRS, overlap segments did not display smaller lumen areas than segments without overlap (mean lumen area overlap: 8.16 ± 2.97 mm2 vs. no overlap: 7.70 ± 2.55 mm2; p = 0.71; minimal lumen area overlap: 6.83 ± 2.71 mm2 vs. no overlap: 6.17 ± 2.58 mm2; p = 0.37). Acute mechanical performance of novolimus-eluting BRS is not impaired by overlapping implantation. It can be assumed that vessel expansion compensates for the double scaffold layer in the overlap area resulting in a similar lumen area in overlap areas and in those with a single strut layer.Entities:
Keywords: Bioresorbable Scaffold; Optical coherence tomography; Percutaneous coronary intervention
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28004176 DOI: 10.1007/s00380-016-0932-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heart Vessels ISSN: 0910-8327 Impact factor: 2.037