| Literature DB >> 28003836 |
Saeed Ghanbarzadeh1, Aram Khalili2, Abolghasem Jouyban3, Shahram Emami4, Yousef Javadzadeh2, Mohammad Solhi5, Hamed Hamishehkar3.
Abstract
Low solubility and dissolution rate are the primary challenges in the drug development which substantially impact the oral absorption and bioavailability of drugs. Due to the poor water solubility, Albendazole (ABZ) is poorly absorbed from the gastrointestinal tract and shows low oral bioavailability (5%) which is a major disadvantage for the systemic use of ABZ. To improve the solubility and dissolution rate of ABZ, different classes of hydrophilic excipients such as sugars (lactose, sucrose, and glucose), polyols (mannitol and sorbitol), ionic surfactant (sodium lauryl sulfate) and non-ionic surfactant (Cremophor A25) were co-spray dried with ABZ. The crystallinity changes in the processed drug were characterized by differential scanning calorimetry and X-Ray diffraction methods were used to interpret the enhanced solubility and dissolution rate of the drug. Results showed that the solubility and dissolution rate of ABZ were increased 1.8-2.6 folds and 3-25 folds, respectively. Unexpectedly, SLS decreased the solubility index of drug powder even lower than the unprocessed drug which was attributed to drug-SLS ionic interaction as depicted from Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. It was concluded that by applying the facile, one-step, industrially scalable technique and the use of small amounts of excipient (only 4% of the formulation), a great improvement (21 folds) in dissolution rate of ABZ was achieved. This finding may be used in the pharmaceutical industries for the formulation of therapeutically efficient dosage forms of class II and IV drugs classified in biopharmaceutical classification system.Entities:
Keywords: Albendazole; Dissolution rate; Solubility; Spray drying; Surfactants
Year: 2016 PMID: 28003836 PMCID: PMC5168879 DOI: 10.4103/1735-5362.194868
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Res Pharm Sci ISSN: 1735-5362
Investigated parameters of unprocessed ABZ and different solid dispersion formulations. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Fig. 1Dissolution profiles of albendazole (ABZ) and spray-dried (SD) formulations. Data presented as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3).
Fig. 2Scanning electron microscopic images of (a) unprocessed albendazole, (b) spray-dried albendazole, and (c) cospray dried albendazole with Cremophor A25.
Fig. 3X-ray diffraction patterns of albendazole (ABZ) and spray-dried albendazole (ABZ-SD), albendazole, physical mixture (PM) and co-spray dried formulations with lactose, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), and Cremophor A25.
Fig. 4Differential scanning calorimetry thermograms of albendazole (ABZ) and spray-dried albendazole (ABZ-SD), albendazole, physical mixture (PM) and co-spray dried formulations with lactose, sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), and Cremophor A25.
Investigated parameters of unprocessed albendazole and different solid dispersion formulation. Data presented as mean ± standard rd deviation (n = 3).
Fig. 5The fourier transform infrared spectroscopy of albendazole (ABZ), sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), physical mixture (PM) and spray-dried (SD) formulation.