| Literature DB >> 28003620 |
Christina Andica1, Akifumi Hagiwara, Misaki Nakazawa, Kanako K Kumamaru, Masaaki Hori, Mitsuru Ikeno, Toshiaki Shimizu, Shigeki Aoki.
Abstract
Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2016 PMID: 28003620 PMCID: PMC5600066 DOI: 10.2463/mrms.ci.2016-0082
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Magn Reson Med Sci ISSN: 1347-3182 Impact factor: 2.471
Fig 1.Conventional MRI. (A) T1IR and (B) FLAIR show subdural effusion (arrowheads). CE (C) T1IR does not show enhancement but (D) FLAIR shows a subtle enhancement in the subdural effusion area (arrows). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery; T1IR, T1 weighted inversion recovery.
Fig 2.Synthetic MRI. (A) T1IR and (B) FLAIR show subdural effusion (arrowheads). CE (C) T1IR shows subtle enhancements (arrows). CE (D) FLAIR and (E) DIR show a clear enhancement in the subdural effusion area (arrows). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; T1IR, T1 weighted inversion recovery; DIR, double IR; CE, Contrast-enhanced.