Literature DB >> 28003620

Synthetic MR Imaging in the Diagnosis of Bacterial Meningitis.

Christina Andica1, Akifumi Hagiwara, Misaki Nakazawa, Kanako K Kumamaru, Masaaki Hori, Mitsuru Ikeno, Toshiaki Shimizu, Shigeki Aoki.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28003620      PMCID: PMC5600066          DOI: 10.2463/mrms.ci.2016-0082

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci        ISSN: 1347-3182            Impact factor:   2.471


× No keyword cloud information.
In infancy, the clinical presentation of meningitis is usually nonspecific and cerebrospinal fluid analysis is less useful.[1] Contrast-enhanced (CE) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging technique for detecting meningitis and CE T1 weighted imaging (T1WI) is the preferred sequence at many institutions.[2] However, CE fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) reportedly has a higher sensitivity than CE T1WI.[2] Synthetic MRI is a method based on quantification of the T1 and T2 relaxation times, the proton density (PD), and the amplitude of the local radio frequency B1 field by a single scan.[3] With this technique, tailored contrast-weighted images can be acquired with a significant reduction in examination time. A seven-week-old female infant was hospitalized with a diagnosis of probable bacterial meningitis. Lumbar puncture was performed unsuccessfully. Blood examination showed elevated CRP and blood culture was positive for group B streptococcus. A 3T MR system (Discovery MR750w, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) with a twelve-channel head coil was used for all imaging. Synthetic images were created using SyMRI StandAlone software (SyntheticMR AB, Linköping, Sweden). The patient underwent conventional and quantitative imaging before and after intravenous administration of contrast agent (Gadoteridol 0.1 mmol/kg of body weight). CE conventional T1 weighted inversion recovery (T1IR), FLAIR, and quantitative MRI were performed 3, 8 and 16 minutes after contrast agent administration, respectively. In our institution, quantitative MRI was performed routinely in pediatric patients because of its usefulness.[4] Parameters of synthetic non-CE and CE T1IR (TR 2020 ms, TE 17 ms, TI 840 ms) and FLAIR (TR 9000 ms, TE 122 ms, TI 2320 ms) were adjusted retrospectively to be the same as conventional T1IR (TR 2023.4 ms, TE 17.4 ms, TI 832 ms), and FLAIR (TR 9000 ms, TE 121.74 ms, TI 2472.6 ms). Non-CE conventional (Fig. 1A and B) and synthetic (Fig. 2A and B) MRI showed bilateral subdural effusion. Conventional CE T1IR (Fig. 1C) did not show enhancement but CE FLAIR (Fig. 1D) showed a subtle enhancement in the subdural effusion area that represents a contrast agent leakage into the effusion secondary to meningitis. Formation of the vascularized outer membrane of subdural effusion and extravasation of plasma from the blood vessels causes higher gadolinium (Gd) concentration in the effusion.[5] Synthetic CE T1IR (Fig. 2C) also showed a subtle enhancement, but more obvious than conventional CE T1IR MR Image. More apparent enhancement on the synthetic MRI might have been caused by higher concentrations of Gd that leakage into the effusion due to longer duration time after contrast material administration. However, synthetic CE FLAIR (Fig. 2D) showed enhancement more clearly. Moreover, synthetic double IR (DIR) images also can be acquired with any combination of TI. In this case, synthetic CE DIR (TR 15000 ms. TE 100 ms, TI 260 ms, TI2 3100 ms) (Fig. 2E) showed enhancement even more clearly by nulling the CSF and minimizing the signal of fat.[3]
Fig 1.

Conventional MRI. (A) T1IR and (B) FLAIR show subdural effusion (arrowheads). CE (C) T1IR does not show enhancement but (D) FLAIR shows a subtle enhancement in the subdural effusion area (arrows). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; FLAIR, fluid attenuated inversion recovery; T1IR, T1 weighted inversion recovery.

Fig 2.

Synthetic MRI. (A) T1IR and (B) FLAIR show subdural effusion (arrowheads). CE (C) T1IR shows subtle enhancements (arrows). CE (D) FLAIR and (E) DIR show a clear enhancement in the subdural effusion area (arrows). MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; T1IR, T1 weighted inversion recovery; DIR, double IR; CE, Contrast-enhanced.

Bacterial meningitis is a potentially life threatening neurological emergency requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment.[2] CE FLAIR has a high sensitivity to meningeal pathology even with low concentrations of gadolinium,[2] but is not performed routinely. In synthetic MRI, CE FLAIR images can be easily made after the image acquisition. This case showed that synthetic CE FLAIR appears superior to conventional CE T1-IR and FLAIR in the diagnosis of meningitis.
  4 in total

1.  Delayed magnetic resonance imaging with GdD-DTPA differentiates subdural hygroma and subdural effusion.

Authors:  K Mori; M Maeda
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  2000-04

2.  Contrast-enhanced FLAIR in the early diagnosis of infectious meningitis.

Authors:  Alesssandra Splendiani; Edoardo Puglielli; Rosanna De Amicis; Stefano Necozione; Carlo Masciocchi; Massimo Gallucci
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2005-07-21       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Dural Enhancement in a Patient with Sturge-Weber Syndrome Revealed by Double Inversion Recovery Contrast Using Synthetic MRI.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Misaki Nakazawa; Christina Andica; Kouhei Tsuruta; Nao Takano; Masaaki Hori; Hiroharu Suzuki; Hidenori Sugano; Hajime Arai; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2015-11-06       Impact factor: 2.471

4.  The Advantage of Synthetic MRI for the Visualization of Early White Matter Change in an Infant with Sturge-Weber Syndrome.

Authors:  Christina Andica; Akifumi Hagiwara; Misaki Nakazawa; Kouhei Tsuruta; Nao Takano; Masaaki Hori; Hiroharu Suzuki; Hidenori Sugano; Hajime Arai; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.471

  4 in total
  11 in total

1.  Synthetic MRI showed increased myelin partial volume in the white matter of a patient with Sturge-Weber syndrome.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Christina Andica; Masaaki Hori; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2017-08-26       Impact factor: 2.804

2.  Synthetic MRI of the knee: new perspectives in musculoskeletal imaging and possible applications for the assessment of bone marrow disorders.

Authors:  Lydia Chougar; Akifumi Hagiwara; Christina Andica; Masaaki Hori; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Quantitative Synthetic MRI in Children: Normative Intracranial Tissue Segmentation Values during Development.

Authors:  A McAllister; J Leach; H West; B Jones; B Zhang; S Serai
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  Validity of SyMRI for Assessment of the Neonatal Brain.

Authors:  Victor Schmidbauer; Gudrun Geisl; Mariana Cardoso Diogo; Suren Jengojan; Vsevolod Perepelov; Michael Weber; Katharina Goeral; Florian Lindenlaub; Katrin Klebermass-Schrehof; Angelika Berger; Daniela Prayer; Gregor Kasprian
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  The effect of scan parameters on T1, T2 relaxation times measured with multi-dynamic multi-echo sequence: a phantom study.

Authors:  Zuofeng Zheng; Jiafei Yang; Dongpo Zhang; Jun Ma; Hongxia Yin; Yawen Liu; Zhenchang Wang
Journal:  Phys Eng Sci Med       Date:  2022-05-13

Review 6.  SyMRI of the Brain: Rapid Quantification of Relaxation Rates and Proton Density, With Synthetic MRI, Automatic Brain Segmentation, and Myelin Measurement.

Authors:  Akifumi Hagiwara; Marcel Warntjes; Masaaki Hori; Christina Andica; Misaki Nakazawa; Kanako Kunishima Kumamaru; Osamu Abe; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 6.016

7.  Gray Matter Alterations in Early and Late Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis Evaluated with Synthetic Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging.

Authors:  Christina Andica; Akifumi Hagiwara; Koji Kamagata; Kazumasa Yokoyama; Keigo Shimoji; Asami Saito; Yuki Takenaka; Misaki Nakazawa; Masaaki Hori; Julien Cohen-Adad; Mariko Yoshida Takemura; Nobutaka Hattori; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Signal Intensity within Cerebral Venous Sinuses on Synthetic MRI.

Authors:  Lydia Chougar; Akifumi Hagiwara; Nao Takano; Christina Andica; Julien Cohen-Adad; Marcel Warntjes; Tomoko Maekawa; Masaaki Hori; Saori Koshino; Misaki Nakazawa; Osamu Abe; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci       Date:  2019-04-05       Impact factor: 2.471

9.  3D quantitative synthetic MRI-derived cortical thickness and subcortical brain volumes: Scan-rescan repeatability and comparison with conventional T1 -weighted images.

Authors:  Shohei Fujita; Akifumi Hagiwara; Masaaki Hori; Marcel Warntjes; Koji Kamagata; Issei Fukunaga; Masami Goto; Haruyama Takuya; Kohei Takasu; Christina Andica; Tomoko Maekawa; Mariko Yoshida Takemura; Ryusuke Irie; Akihiko Wada; Michimasa Suzuki; Shigeki Aoki
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-04-10       Impact factor: 4.813

10.  Quantitative Analysis of Synthetic Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Alzheimer's Disease.

Authors:  Baohui Lou; Yuwei Jiang; Chunmei Li; Pu-Yeh Wu; Shuhua Li; Bin Qin; Haibo Chen; Rui Wang; Bing Wu; Min Chen
Journal:  Front Aging Neurosci       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 5.750

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.