Literature DB >> 28003507

Low Nicotine Content Descriptors Reduce Perceived Health Risks and Positive Cigarette Ratings in Participants Using Very Low Nicotine Content Cigarettes.

Rachel L Denlinger-Apte1, Danielle L Joel2, Andrew A Strasser3, Eric C Donny2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Understanding how smokers perceive reduced nicotine content cigarettes will be important if the FDA and global regulatory agencies implement reduced nicotine product standards for cigarettes. Prior research has shown that some smokers incorrectly believe "light" cigarettes are less harmful than regular cigarettes. Similar misunderstandings of health risk could also apply to reduced nicotine cigarettes. To date, most studies of reduced nicotine cigarettes have blinded subjects to the nicotine content. Therefore, little is known about how smokers experience reduced nicotine content cigarettes when they are aware of the reduced content, and how use may be impacted.
METHODS: The present study was a within-subjects experiment with 68 adult daily smokers who smoked two identical very low nicotine content Quest 3 (0.05 mg nicotine yield) cigarettes. Subjects were told that one cigarette contained "average" nicotine content, and the other contained "very low" nicotine content. After smoking each cigarette, subjects completed subjective measures about their smoking experience.
RESULTS: Subjects rated the "very low" nicotine cigarette as less harmful to their health overall compared to the "average" nicotine cigarette; this effect held true for specific smoking-related diseases. Additionally, they rated the "very low" nicotine cigarette as having less desirable subjective effects than the "average" nicotine cigarette and predicted having greater interest in quitting smoking in the future if only the "very low" nicotine cigarette was available.
CONCLUSIONS: Explicit knowledge of very low nicotine content changes smokers' perceptions of very low nicotine content cigarettes, resulting in reduced predicted harm, subjective ratings and predicted future use. IMPLICATIONS: Before a reduced nicotine product standard for cigarettes can be implemented, it is important to understand how product information impacts how smokers think about and experience very low nicotine content cigarettes. Prior research has shown that smokers incorrectly believed light cigarettes were less harmful products. As such, smokers may also misunderstand the health risks associated with smoking very low nicotine content cigarettes. This study highlights the importance of smokers' perceptions of nicotine content in cigarettes on the perceived health risks and the subjective effects of smoking very low nicotine content cigarettes.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28003507      PMCID: PMC5896530          DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntw320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  31 in total

1.  Expectancy and pharmacology influence the subjective effects of nicotine in a balanced-placebo design.

Authors:  William L Kelemen; Farnaz Kaighobadi
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.157

Review 2.  Nicotine reduction revisited: science and future directions.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Kenneth A Perkins; Mark G Lesage; David L Ashley; Jack E Henningfield; Neal L Benowitz; Cathy L Backinger; Mitch Zeller
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 7.552

3.  Educating smokers about their cigarettes and nicotine medications.

Authors:  Maansi Bansal-Travers; K Michael Cummings; Andrew Hyland; Anthony Brown; Paula Celestino
Journal:  Health Educ Res       Date:  2010-01-11

4.  The role of nicotine content information in smokers' subjective responses to nicotine and placebo inhalers.

Authors:  Christine Darredeau; Sean P Barrett
Journal:  Hum Psychopharmacol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.672

5.  Effects of nicotine dose, instructional set, and outcome expectancies on the subjective effects of smoking in the presence of a stressor.

Authors:  Laura M Juliano; Thomas H Brandon
Journal:  J Abnorm Psychol       Date:  2002-02

6.  The AMA proposal to mandate nicotine reduction in cigarettes: a simulation of the population health impacts.

Authors:  Tammy O Tengs; Sajjad Ahmad; Jennifer M Savage; Rebecca Moore; Eric Gage
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Smoking behavior and exposure to tobacco toxicants during 6 months of smoking progressively reduced nicotine content cigarettes.

Authors:  Neal L Benowitz; Katherine M Dains; Sharon M Hall; Susan Stewart; Margaret Wilson; Delia Dempsey; Peyton Jacob
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Perceived Health Risks of Snus and Medicinal Nicotine Products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; R I Vogel; Herb H Severson; Joni A Jensen; Richard J O'Connor
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.244

9.  The influence of instructions and nicotine dose on the subjective and reinforcing effects of smoking.

Authors:  Kenneth A Perkins; Lynette Jacobs; Melinda Ciccocioppo; Cynthia Conklin; Michael Sayette; Anthony Caggiula
Journal:  Exp Clin Psychopharmacol       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.157

10.  Greater reductions in nicotine exposure while smoking very low nicotine content cigarettes predict smoking cessation.

Authors:  Sarah S Dermody; Eric C Donny; Louise A Hertsgaard; Dorothy K Hatsukami
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2014-09-05       Impact factor: 7.552

View more
  22 in total

1.  Prevalence and correlates of nicotine and nicotine product perceptions in U.S. young adults, 2016.

Authors:  Andrea C Villanti; Shelly Naud; Julia C West; Jennifer L Pearson; Olivia A Wackowski; Raymond S Niaura; Elizabeth Hair; Jessica M Rath
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2019-06-10       Impact factor: 3.913

2.  Nicotine and addiction beliefs and perceptions among the US-born and foreign-born populations.

Authors:  Anh B Nguyen; Xiaoquan Zhao; Leah Hoffman; Aura Lee Morse; Janine Delahanty
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Perceived nicotine content of reduced nicotine content cigarettes is a correlate of perceived health risks.

Authors:  Lauren R Pacek; F Joseph McClernon; Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Melissa Mercincavage; Andrew A Strasser; Sarah S Dermody; Ryan Vandrey; Tracy T Smith; Natalie Nardone; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Rachel V Kozink; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2017-07-22       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Public misperception that very low nicotine cigarettes are less carcinogenic.

Authors:  M Justin Byron; Michelle Jeong; David B Abrams; Noel T Brewer
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 7.552

5.  Effects of immediate versus gradual nicotine reduction in cigarettes on biomarkers of biological effects.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Xianghua Luo; Alisa K Heskin; Mei Kuen Tang; Steven G Carmella; Joni Jensen; Jason D Robinson; Ryan Vandrey; David J Drobes; Andrew A Strasser; Mustafa al'Absi; Scott Leischow; Paul M Cinciripini; Joseph Koopmeiners; Joshua Ikuemonisan; Neal L Benowitz; Eric C Donny; Stephen S Hecht
Journal:  Addiction       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 6.526

6.  Responses to reduced nicotine cigarette marketing features: a systematic review.

Authors:  Andrea C Johnson; Melissa Mercincavage; Valentina Souprountchouk; Sasha Rogelberg; Anupreet K Sidhu; Cristine D Delnevo; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-10-07       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Correlates of support for a nicotine-reduction policy in smokers with 6-week exposure to very low nicotine cigarettes.

Authors:  Rachel L Denlinger-Apte; Jennifer W Tidey; Joseph S Koopmeiners; Dorothy K Hatsukami; Tracy T Smith; Lauren R Pacek; F Joseph McClernon; Eric C Donny
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 7.552

8.  Lung function decline in former smokers and low-intensity current smokers: a secondary data analysis of the NHLBI Pooled Cohorts Study.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Oelsner; Pallavi P Balte; Surya P Bhatt; Patricia A Cassano; David Couper; Aaron R Folsom; Neal D Freedman; David R Jacobs; Ravi Kalhan; Amanda R Mathew; Richard A Kronmal; Laura R Loehr; Stephanie J London; Anne B Newman; George T O'Connor; Joseph E Schwartz; Lewis J Smith; Wendy B White; Sachin Yende
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2019-10-09       Impact factor: 102.642

9.  Effects of advertising features on smokers' and non-smokers' perceptions of a reduced nicotine cigarette modified risk tobacco product.

Authors:  Melissa Mercincavage; Lauren R Pacek; James Thrasher; Joseph N Cappella; Cristine Delnevo; Eric C Donny; Andrew A Strasser
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2021-04-15       Impact factor: 6.953

10.  Regulatory Approaches and Implementation of Minimally Addictive Combusted Products.

Authors:  Dorothy K Hatsukami; Dongqun Xu; Geoffrey Ferris Wayne
Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 5.825

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.