Literature DB >> 28003407

Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors control baseline activity and Hebbian stimulus timing-dependent plasticity in fusiform cells of the dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Roxana A Stefanescu1, Susan E Shore2,3,4.   

Abstract

Cholinergic modulation contributes to adaptive sensory processing by controlling spontaneous and stimulus-evoked neural activity and long-term synaptic plasticity. In the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN), in vitro activation of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) alters the spontaneous activity of DCN neurons and interacts with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) and endocannabinoid receptors to modulate the plasticity of parallel fiber synapses onto fusiform cells by converting Hebbian long-term potentiation to anti-Hebbian long-term depression. Because noise exposure and tinnitus are known to increase spontaneous activity in fusiform cells as well as alter stimulus timing-dependent plasticity (StTDP), it is important to understand the contribution of mAChRs to in vivo spontaneous activity and plasticity in fusiform cells. In the present study, we blocked mAChRs actions by infusing atropine, a mAChR antagonist, into the DCN fusiform cell layer in normal hearing guinea pigs. Atropine delivery leads to decreased spontaneous firing rates and increased synchronization of fusiform cell spiking activity. Consistent with StTDP alterations observed in tinnitus animals, atropine infusion induced a dominant pattern of inversion of StTDP mean population learning rule from a Hebbian to an anti-Hebbian profile. Units preserving their initial Hebbian learning rules shifted toward more excitatory changes in StTDP, whereas units with initial suppressive learning rules transitioned toward a Hebbian profile. Together, these results implicate muscarinic cholinergic modulation as a factor in controlling in vivo fusiform cell baseline activity and plasticity, suggesting a central role in the maladaptive plasticity associated with tinnitus pathology.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This study is the first to use a novel method of atropine infusion directly into the fusiform cell layer of the dorsal cochlear nucleus coupled with simultaneous recordings of neural activity to clarify the contribution of muscarinic acetylcholine receptors (mAChRs) to in vivo fusiform cell baseline activity and auditory-somatosensory plasticity. We have determined that blocking the mAChRs increases the synchronization of spiking activity across the fusiform cell population and induces a dominant pattern of inversion in their stimulus timing-dependent plasticity. These modifications are consistent with similar changes established in previous tinnitus studies, suggesting that mAChRs might have a critical contribution in mediating the maladaptive alterations associated with tinnitus pathology. Blocking mAChRs also resulted in decreased fusiform cell spontaneous firing rates, which is in contrast with their tinnitus hyperactivity, suggesting that changes in the interactions between the cholinergic and GABAergic systems might also be an underlying factor in tinnitus pathology.
Copyright © 2017 the American Physiological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dorsal cochlear nucleus; mAChR; synaptic plasticity

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28003407      PMCID: PMC5349328          DOI: 10.1152/jn.00270.2016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  78 in total

1.  Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats.

Authors:  E D Young; W E Brownell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Stimulus-timing-dependent modifications of rate-level functions in animals with and without tinnitus.

Authors:  Roxana A Stefanescu; Seth D Koehler; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  The responses of single neurones in the cochlear nucleus of the cat as a function of their location and the anaesthetic state.

Authors:  E F Evans; P G Nelson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1973-06-29       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Identification of response properties of ascending axons from dorsal cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  E D Young
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1980-10-27       Impact factor: 3.252

5.  Cholinergic induction of theta-frequency oscillations in hippocampal inhibitory interneurons and pacing of pyramidal cell firing.

Authors:  C A Chapman; J C Lacaille
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-10-01       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 6.  Cholinergic cells of the pontomesencephalic tegmentum: connections with auditory structures from cochlear nucleus to cortex.

Authors:  Brett R Schofield; Susan D Motts; Jeffrey G Mellott
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 7.  Top-down modulation of prepulse inhibition of the startle reflex in humans and rats.

Authors:  Liang Li; Yi Du; Nanxin Li; Xihong Wu; Yanhong Wu
Journal:  Neurosci Biobehav Rev       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 8.989

8.  NMDA Receptors Mediate Stimulus-Timing-Dependent Plasticity and Neural Synchrony in the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus.

Authors:  Roxana A Stefanescu; Susan E Shore
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  An acetylcholine-activated microcircuit drives temporal dynamics of cortical activity.

Authors:  Naiyan Chen; Hiroki Sugihara; Mriganka Sur
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 10.  Pedunculopontine arousal system physiology - Deep brain stimulation (DBS).

Authors:  Edgar Garcia-Rill; Brennon Luster; Stasia D'Onofrio; Susan Mahaffey; Veronica Bisagno; Francisco J Urbano
Journal:  Sleep Sci       Date:  2015-09-25
View more
  8 in total

1.  Amino acid and acetylcholine chemistry in mountain beaver cochlear nucleus and comparisons to pocket gopher, other rodents, and cat.

Authors:  Donald A Godfrey; Nikki L Mikesell; Timothy G Godfrey; James A Kaltenbach
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 3.208

2.  Auditory-somatosensory bimodal stimulation desynchronizes brain circuitry to reduce tinnitus in guinea pigs and humans.

Authors:  Kendra L Marks; David T Martel; Calvin Wu; Gregory J Basura; Larry E Roberts; Kara C Schvartz-Leyzac; Susan E Shore
Journal:  Sci Transl Med       Date:  2018-01-03       Impact factor: 17.956

Review 3.  Neural plasticity and its initiating conditions in tinnitus.

Authors:  L E Roberts
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.284

4.  Quantitative distribution of choline acetyltransferase activity in rat trapezoid body.

Authors:  Lauren A Linker; Lissette Carlson; Donald A Godfrey; Judy A Parli; C David Ross
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-08-25       Impact factor: 3.208

Review 5.  Mechanisms of Noise-Induced Tinnitus: Insights from Cellular Studies.

Authors:  Susan E Shore; Calvin Wu
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Olivocochlear projections contribute to superior intensity coding in cochlear nucleus small cells.

Authors:  Adam Hockley; Calvin Wu; Susan E Shore
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2021-12-06       Impact factor: 6.228

Review 7.  Cannabinoids, Inner Ear, Hearing, and Tinnitus: A Neuroimmunological Perspective.

Authors:  Paola Perin; Alex Mabou Tagne; Paolo Enrico; Franca Marino; Marco Cosentino; Roberto Pizzala; Cinzia Boselli
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2020-11-23       Impact factor: 4.003

8.  Multiple Sources of Cholinergic Input to the Superior Olivary Complex.

Authors:  Nichole L Beebe; Chao Zhang; R Michael Burger; Brett R Schofield
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 3.492

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.